Multiple Scaffolding STEAM Project-Based Learning Model In Science Learning

Authors

Ni Luh Ida Mareta Yanti , Wayan Redhana , Wayan Suastra

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9i8.4470

Published:

2023-08-25

Issue:

Vol. 9 No. 8 (2023): August

Keywords:

Achievement Motivation, Critical Thinking Skills, Multiple Scaffolding, PjBL-STEAM, Project based learning

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Yanti, N. L. I. M. ., Redhana, W. ., & Suastra, W. . (2023). Multiple Scaffolding STEAM Project-Based Learning Model In Science Learning. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(8), 6493–6502. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i8.4470
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Downloads

Metrics

PDF views
211
Aug 25 '23Aug 28 '23Aug 31 '23Sep 01 '23Sep 04 '23Sep 07 '23Sep 10 '23Sep 13 '23Sep 16 '23Sep 19 '23Sep 22 '236.0
|

Abstract

Higher order thinking skills (HOTs) are skills needed to face the 21st century. This research aims to (1) analyze simultaneously the differences in learning outcomes, critical thinking skills, and achievement motivation of students who learn using the PjBL-STEAM model assisted by multiple scaffolding and the PjBL model in science learning, (2) analyze the differences in learning outcomes of students who learning using the PjBL-STEAM model assisted by multiple scaffolding and the PjBL model in science learning, (3) analyzing differences in critical thinking skills of students who learn using the PjBL-STEAM model assisted by multiple scaffolding and the PjBL model in science learning, (4) analyzing differences in achievement motivation students who learn to use the PjBL-STEAM model assisted by multiple scaffolding and the PjBL model in science learning. This research is a quantitative research with nonequivalent pretest-posttest control group design. The sampling technique used was cluster random sampling with the sample size consisting of 159 students in classes VII A, VII B, VII D, and VII F at SMP Negeri 5 Denpasar. The research instruments used were learning achievement tests, critical thinking skills tests and achievement motivation questionnaires. Data analysis used Multivariate Analysis of Covariance (MANCOVA). Hypothesis testing is carried out using a significance level of 5%, hypothesis testing is carried out after assumption testing (normality test, variance homogeneity test, variance covariance homogeneity test, linearity test, multicollinearity test, regression line slope homogeneity test). Based on the data analysis, the research results show that (1) there are simultaneous differences in learning outcomes, critical thinking skills, and achievement motivation of students who learn using the PjBL-STEAM model assisted by multiple scaffolding and the PjBL model in science learning, (2) there are differences in the learning outcomes of students who learn using the PjBL-STEAM model assisted by multiple scaffolding and the PjBL model in science learning, (3) there are differences in the critical thinking skills of students who learn using the PjBL-STEAM model assisted by multiple scaffolding and the PjBL model in science learning, (4) differences in the achievement motivation of students who learn using the PjBL-STEAM model assisted by multiple scaffolding and the PjBL model in science learning

References

Adnyani, I. G. A. A. W., Pujani, N. M., & Juniartina, P. P. (2018). Pengaruh Model Learning Cycle 7E Terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Sains Indonesia (JPPSI), 1(2), 56. https://doi.org/10.23887/jppsi.v1i2.17172

Agusti, N. M., & Aslam, A. (2022). Efektivitas media pembelajaran aplikasi wordwall terhadap hasil belajar IPA siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(4), 5794–5800. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3053

Amalia, D., Rachmah, D. N., & Mayangsari, M. D. (2018). The Difference In Achievement Motivation Between Islamic Boarding School Students And Public School Students In Martapura. Jurnal Kognisia, 1(2), 38–46.

Amalia, N. F., & Pujiastuti, E. (2016). Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Rasa Ingin Tahu melalui Model PBL. Seminar Nasional Matematika X Universitas Negeri Semarang 2016, 523–531.

Arvyati, Maonde, F., & Noho, N. (2016). Pengaruh Motivasi Berprestasi Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika Siswa SMA Negeri dan SMA Swasta Di Kota Kendari The Effect Of Achievement Motivation To Students’mathematics Achievement Of SMA Public And Sma Private In Kendari. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 26–42.

Astuti, I. D., Toto, T., & Yulisma, L. (2019). Model project based learning (PjBL) terintegrasi stem untuk meningkatkan penguasaan konsep dan aktivitas belajar siswa. Quagga: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Biologi, 11(2), 93. https://doi.org/10.25134/quagga.v11i2.1915

Azizah, I. N., & Widjajanti, D. B. (2019). Keefektifan pembelajaran berbasis proyek ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis, dan kepercayaan diri siswa. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 233–243. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v6i2.15927

Bektas, O. K. & O. (2017). The Effect of Project Based Learning on Seventh Grade Students ’. 10(1), 37–54.

Cahyani, G. P., & Sulastri, S. (2021). Pengaruh Project Based Learning dengan Pendekatan STEAM Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis pada Pembelajaran Online di SMK Negeri 12 Malang. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi (JPAK), 9(3), 372–379. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpak.v9n3.p372-379

Ciriello, R. F., Beck, R., & Thatcher, J. B. (2018). The paradoxical effects of blockchain technology on social networking practices. International Conference on Information Systems 2018, ICIS 2018, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3920002

Dywan, A. A., & Airlanda, G. S. (2020). Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Project Based Learning Berbasis STEM dan Tidak Berbasis STEM terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. Jurnal Basicedu, 4(2), 344–354. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v4i2.353

Fitriyah, A., & Ramadani, S. D. (2021). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Steam Berbasis Pjbl ( Project-Based Learning ) Terhadap Keterampilan. Journal Of Chemistry And Education (JCAE), X(1), 209–226.

Gulo, A. (2022). Penerapan model discovery learning terhadap hasil belajar peserta didik pada materi ekosistem. Educativo: Jurnal Pendidikan, 1(1), 307–313. https://doi.org/10.56248/educativo.v1i1.54

Haerani, R., & Rahman, T. (2022). Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMA melalui Pembelajaran Proyek Mini Riset pada Kegiatan Pengelolaan Limbah Rumah Tangga ( Improving Critical Thinking Skills of High School Students through Learning Mini Research Projects on Household Wast. Assimilation: Indonesian Journal of Biology Education, 5(2), 106–112. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/asimilasi/article/view/49724

Hermayani, A. Z., Dwiastuti, S., & Marjono, M. (2015). Peningkatan Motivasi Belajar Dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Pada Materi Ekosistem Melalui Penerapan Model Inkuiri Terbimbing. BIOEDUKASI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi), 6(2), 79–85. https://doi.org/10.24127/bioedukasi.v6i2.335

Insyasiska, D., Zubaidah, S., & Susilo, H. (2015). Pengaruh Project Based Learning Terhadap Motivasi Belajar , Kreativitas , Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis , dan Kemampuan Kognitif Siswa pada Pemebelajaran Biologi. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 7(1), 9–21.

Kanza, N. R. F., Lesmono, A. D., & Widodo, H. M. (2020). Analisis keaktifan belajar siswa menggunakan model project based learning dengan pendekatan stem pada pembelajaran fisika materi elastisitas di kelas XI MIPA 5 SMA Negeri 2 Jember. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 9(2), 71. https://doi.org/10.19184/jpf.v9i1.17955

Khairani Astri, E., Siburian, J., & Hariyadi, B. (2022). Pengaruh Model Project Based Learning terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dan Berkomunikasi Peserta Didik. Biodik, 8(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.22437/bio.v8i1.16061

Khoiriyah, N., Abdurrahman, A., & Wahyudi, I. (2018). Implementasi pendekatan pembelajaran STEM untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa SMA pada materi gelombang bunyi. Jurnal Riset Dan Kajian Pendidikan Fisika, 5(2), 53. https://doi.org/10.12928/jrkpf.v5i2.9977

Kraujalienė, L. (2019). Comparative Analysis of Multicriteria Decision-Making Methods Evaluating the Efficiency of Technology Transfer. Business, Management and Education, 17(0), 72–93. https://doi.org/10.3846/bme.2019.11014

Mamahit, J. A., Aloysius, D. C., & Suwono, H. (2020). Efektivitas Model Project-Based Learning Terintegrasi STEM (PjBL-STEM) terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Kelas X. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 5(9), 1284. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i9.14034

Mardhiyatirrahmah, L., Muchlas, & Marhayati. (2020). Dampak Positif dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penerapan Pendekatan STEM pada Pembelajaran Matematika di Sekolah. JPM: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(Agustus), 78–88.

Marudut, M. R. H., Bachtiar, I. G., Kadir, & Iasha, V. (2020). Peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kritis dalam pembelajaran IPA. JURNAL BASICEDU: Research & LearninginElementary Education, 4(3), 577–585.

McClelland, D. C. (1987). Biological Aspects of Human Motivation. Motivation, Intention, and Volition, 1986, 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70967-8_2

Nasrulloh, M. F., & Umardiyah, F. (2020). Efektivitas Strategi Pembelajaran Think-Talk-Write (TTW) Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Komunikasi Matematis. Jurnal Penelitian Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 69–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.26486/jm.v5i1.1322W:http://ejurnal.mercubuana-yogya.ac.id/index.php/mercumatika

Ngabekti, S., Prasetyo, A. P. B., Hardianti, R. D., & Teampanpong, J. (2019). The development of stem mobile learning package ecosystem. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(1), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i1.16905

Niky Amanah, L. (2017). Pengaruh Adversity Quotient (Aq) Dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika. Perspektif Ilmu Pendidikan, 28(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.21009/pip.281.7

Novaliyosi, N. dalam H. &. (2019). Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). The Language of Science Education, 108–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-497-0_97

Nurazizah, S., Sinaga, P., & Jauhari, A. (2017). Profil Kemampuan Kognitif dan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMA pada Materi Usaha dan Energi. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 3(2), 197–202. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.03211

Nurfadilah, S., & Siswanto, J. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif pada Konsep Polimer dengan Pendekatan STEAM Bermuatan ESD Siswa SMA Negeri 1 Bantarbolang. Media Penelitian Pendidikan : Jurnal Penelitian Dalam Bidang Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 14(1), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.26877/mpp.v14i1.5543

Nurmayani. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis IPA SD. Jurnal Ilmiah KONTEKSTUAL, 1(02), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.46772/kontekstual.v1i02.162

Prasetyo, J., Rijanto, T., & Trimulyani, D. (2021). Studi Literatur : Meta Analisis Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek dalam Meningkatkan Kreativitas. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Elektro, 10(01), 89–98.

Priantari, I., Prafitasari, A. N., Kusumawardhani, D. R., & Susanti, S. (2020). Improving Students Critical Thinking through STEAM-PjBL Learning Pembelajaran STEAM-PjBL untuk Peningkatan Berpikir Kritis. Bioeducation Journal, 4(2), 94–102. https://doi.org/10.24036/bioedu.v4i2.283

Rachmawati, I., Feranie, S., Sinaga, P., & Saepuzaman, D. (2018). Penerapan Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif Ilmiah Dan Berpikir Kritis Ilmiah Siswa Sma Pada Materi Kesetimbangan Benda Tegar. WaPFi (Wahana Pendidikan Fisika), 3(2), 25. https://doi.org/10.17509/wapfi.v3i2.13725

Rahayu, N., & Alyani, F. (2020). Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Ditinjau Dari Adversity Quotient. Prima: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 121. https://doi.org/10.31000/prima.v4i2.2668

Ramli, R., Yohandri, Y., Sari, Y. S., & Selisne, M. (2020). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik Fisika Berbasis Pendekatan Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics untuk Meningkatkan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik. Jurnal Eksakta Pendidikan (Jep), 4(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.24036/jep/vol4-iss1/405

Santoso, S. H., & Mosik, M. (2019). Unnes Physics Education Journal Kefektifan LKS Berbasis STEM ( Science , Technology , Engineering and Mathematic ) untuk. Unnes Physics Education Journal, 8(3), 248–253. https://doi.org/10.15294/upej.v8i3.35622

Sellars, M., Fakirmohammad, R., Bui, L., Fishetti, J., Niyozov, S., Reynolds, R., Thapliyal, N., Liu-Smith, Y. L., & Ali, N. (2018). Conversations on critical thinking: Can critical thinking find its way forward as the skill set and mindset of the century? Education Sciences, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8040205

Stansell, A., Tyler-Wood, T., & Stansell, C. (2016). Inventing the invented for stem understanding. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in the Digital Age, CELDA 2016, 378–380.

Sumarni, W., Wijayati, N., & Supanti, S. (2019). Kemampuan Kognitif Dan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek Berpendekatan Stem. J-PEK (Jurnal Pembelajaran Kimia), 4(1), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.17977/um026v4i12019p018

Susilowati, Sajidan, & Ramli, M. (2017). Analisis keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa madrasah aliyah negeri di Kabupaten Magetan. Prosiding SNPS (Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains), 21(2000), 223–231.

Tsai, H. Y., Chung, C. C., & Lou, S. J. (2018). Construction and development of iSTEM learning model. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/78019

Yuliati, Y., & Saputra, D. S. (2020). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Stem (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) Berbasis Moodle Terhadap Kemampuan Literasi Sains Mahasiswa Calon Guru Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Elementaria Edukasia, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.31949/jee.v3i2.2504

Yuyu, Y. (2017). Literasi Sains Dalam Pembelajaran IPA. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 3(2), 21–28.

Author Biographies

Ni Luh Ida Mareta Yanti, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Wayan Redhana, Ganesha University of Education

Wayan Suastra, Ganesha University of Education

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Ni Luh Ida Mareta Yanti, Wayan Redhana, Wayan Suastra

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).