Stem Education in Science Learning: Systematic Literature Review

Authors

Rudi Pranata , Syahril , Ruth Rize Paas Megahati S.

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9i8.4655

Published:

2023-08-25

Issue:

Vol. 9 No. 8 (2023): August

Keywords:

Education, STEM education, strategies

Review

Downloads

How to Cite

Pranata, R. ., Syahril, & Megahati S., R. R. P. (2023). Stem Education in Science Learning: Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(8), 424–431. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i8.4655
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

As one of the efforts to produce Sumber Human Resources (HR) who have century competence 21st, a learning design is needed which integrates skills or 21st century skills. By including students are involved in remembering, understanding, apply, analyze, evaluate as well create both in scientific theory and at the time their daily life. A review is conducted on the state-of-the-art methods using the preferred reporting items for reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline. We review literature from several publications and analyze STEM approach is a very appropriate approach to use in 21st century learning. After applying STEM approach, students are expected to be able mastering scientific and technological literacy. In learning there is a process of interaction between educators and students and learning resources in a learning environment to achieve learning goals. Learning is done using learning strategies in facilitating the teaching and learning process. So that the process can be carried out properly and conveyed correctly, STEM learning is carried out which can integrate knowledge, skills and values of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics to be able to solve a problem related to learning in the context of everyday life.

 

References

Abdulrahaman, M. D., Faruk, N., Oloyede, A. A., Surajudeen-Bakinde, N. T., Olawoyin, L. A., Mejabi, O. V., Imam-Fulani, Y. O., Fahm, A. O., & Azeez, A. L. (2020). Multimedia tools in the teaching and learning processes: A systematic review. Heliyon, 6(11), e05312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05312

Ahmad, K., Nurkhin, A., Muhsin, M., & Pramusinto, H. (2020). Problem-Based Learning Strategy: Its Impact on Students’ Critical and Creative Thinking Skills. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(3), 1141–1150. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.3.1141

Ali, E. Y., Munir, M., Permana, J., & Kurniady, D. A. (2020). Academic Service Quality in Education Management in Higher Education. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Research of Educational Administration and Management (ICREAM 2019), 455-461. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200130.221

Amirtham S, N., & Kumar, A. (2023). The underrepresentation of women in STEM disciplines in India: A secondary analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2179901

Bećirović, S., Dubravac, V., & Brdarević-Čeljo, A. (2022). Cooperative Learning as a Pathway to Strengthening Motivation and Improving Achievement in an EFL Classroom. SAGE Open, 12(1), 215824402210780. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221078016

Bertrand, M. G., & Namukasa, I. K. (2020). STEAM education: Student learning and transferable skills. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 13(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-01-2020-0003

Biwer, F., Egbrink, M. G. A. O., Aalten, P., & De Bruin, A. B. H. (2020). Fostering effective learning strategies in higher education—A mixed-methods study. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 9(2), 186–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.03.004

Case, A. S. (2022). The Role of Teachable Ownership of Learning Components in College Adjustment. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 59(2), 180–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/19496591.2020.1825459

Chang, Y.-H., Yan, Y.-C., & Lu, Y.-T. (2022). Effects of Combining Different Collaborative Learning Strategies with Problem-Based Learning in a Flipped Classroom on Program Language Learning. Sustainability, 14(9), 5282. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095282

Conradty, C., Sotiriou, S. A., & Bogner, F. X. (2020). How Creativity in STEAM Modules Intervenes with Self-Efficacy and Motivation. Education Sciences, 10(3), 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10030070

Dare, E. A., Keratithamkul, K., Hiwatig, B. M., & Li, F. (2021). Beyond Content: The Role of STEM Disciplines, Real-World Problems, 21st Century Skills, and STEM Careers within Science Teachers’ Conceptions of Integrated STEM Education. Education Sciences, 11(11), 737. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110737

Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Baabdullah, A. M., Ribeiro-Navarrete, S., Giannakis, M., Al-Debei, M. M., Dennehy, D., Metri, B., Buhalis, D., Cheung, C. M. K., Conboy, K., Doyle, R., Dubey, R., Dutot, V., Felix, R., Goyal, D. P., Gustafsson, A., Hinsch, C., Jebabli, I., … Wamba, S. F. (2022). Metaverse beyond the hype: Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 66, 102542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102542

Dziuban, C., Graham, C. R., Moskal, P. D., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. (2018). Blended learning: The new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0087-5

Erlia, W. (2021). Roles of the teacher for increasing learning quality of students. ETUDE: Journal of Educational Research, 1(3), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.56724/etude.v1i3.35

Fatima, H. G., Akbar, H., Khan, B. S., Amin, H., & Anjum, M. A. (2022). Cooperative Learning As An Innovative Method In Teaching Science At Elementary Level. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 879-889. Retrieved from https://journalppw.com/index.php/jpsp/article/view/14795

Fauqi, I. F. (2022). Teacher Strategies in Online Learning due to Pandemic: A Literature Review. SUJANA (Education and Learning Review), 1(1), 13-27. Retrieved from https://journal.jfpublisher.com/index.php/sujana/article/view/182

Felder, R. M. (2021). STEM education: A tale of two paradigms. Journal of Food Science Education, 20(1), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4329.12219

Fernández-Río, J. (2016). Student-teacher-content-context: Indissoluble Ingredients in the Teaching-learning Process. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 87(1), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2016.1110476

Finnie, R., & Childs, S. (2018). Who Goes into STEM Disciplines? Evidence from the Youth in Transition Survey. Canadian Public Policy, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3138/cpp.2017-077

Firnando Sabetra, Ambiyar, & Ishak Aziz. (2021). The Component of Lesson Plan on Classroom Management. International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS), 1(3). https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v1i3.72

Glogger-Frey, I., Ampatziadis, Y., Ohst, A., & Renkl, A. (2018). Future teachers’ knowledge about learning strategies: Misconcepts and knowledge-in-pieces. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 28, 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.02.001

González-Pérez, L. I., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2022). Components of Education 4.0 in 21st Century Skills Frameworks: Systematic Review. Sustainability, 14(3), 1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031493

Hailikari, T., Virtanen, V., Vesalainen, M., & Postareff, L. (2022). Student perspectives on how different elements of constructive alignment support active learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 23(3), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787421989160

Harris, R., & Clayton, B. (2019). The current emphasis on learning outcomes. International Journal of Training Research, 17(2), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/14480220.2019.1644777

Herlina, E. (2022). Implementation Of Cooperative Learning Methods In Improving Reading Comprehension. SIGEH ELT: Journal of Literature and Linguistics, 2(2), 117-124. https://doi.org/10.36269/sigeh.v2i2.1143

Hsiao, P.-W., & Su, C.-H. (2021). A Study on the Impact of STEAM Education for Sustainable Development Courses and Its Effects on Student Motivation and Learning. Sustainability, 13(7), 3772. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073772

Huang, S. C. (2018). Language learning strategies in context. The Language Learning Journal, 46(5), 647–659. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2016.1186723

Jayanti, G. S., & Rozimela, Y. (2022). Using Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) Strategy to Improve Students’ Writing Skill. In 67th TEFLIN International Virtual Conference & the 9th ICOELT 2021 (TEFLIN ICOELT 2021), 110-114. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220201.020

Johnston, A. C., Akarsu, M., Moore, T. J., & Guzey, S. S. (2019). Engineering as the integrator: A case study of one middle school science teacher’s talk. Journal of Engineering Education, 108(3), 418–440. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20286

Kajonmanee, T., Chaipidech, P., Srisawasdi, N., & Chaipah, K. (2020). A personalised mobile learning system for promoting STEM discipline teachers’ TPACK development. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 14(2), 215. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2020.106186

Keiler, L. S. (2018). Teachers’ roles and identities in student-centered classrooms. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0131-6

Kintu, M. J., Zhu, C., & Kagambe, E. (2017). Blended learning effectiveness: The relationship between student characteristics, design features and outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0043-4

Kocabas, S., Ozfidan, B., & Burlbaw, L. M. (2019). American STEM Education in Its Global, National, and Linguistic Contexts. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/108618

Kulakoglu, B., & Kondakci, Y. (2023). STEM Education as a Concept Borrowing Issue: Perspectives of School Administrators in Turkey. ECNU Review of Education, 6(1), 84–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311221107390

Kumar, V., & Sharma, D. (2021). E-Learning Theories, Components, and Cloud Computing-Based Learning Platforms: International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 16(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJWLTT.20210501.oa1

Lin, M.-H., Chen, H.-C., & Liu, K.-S. (2017). A Study of the Effects of Digital Learning on Learning Motivation and Learning Outcome. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3553–3564. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00744a

Loeng, S. (2020). Self-Directed Learning: A Core Concept in Adult Education. Education Research International, 2020, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3816132

Luna, M., & Selmer, S. (2021). Examining the Responding Component of Teacher Noticing: A Case of One Teacher’s Pedagogical Responses to Students’ Thinking in Classroom Artifacts. Journal of Teacher Education, 72(5), 579–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871211015980

Martin, N. M. (2019). Processing Different Kinds of Expository Text: An Investigation of Students’ Strategy Use in Postsecondary Education. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 49(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2018.1472944

Masih, N. K., & Ariana, I. M. (2018). Industries’ Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes. In International Conference on Social Sciences (ICSS 2018), 226(1), 530-533. https://doi.org/10.2991/icss-18.2018.109

May, B. K., Wendt, J. L., & Barthlow, M. J. (2022). A comparison of students’ interest in STEM across science standard types. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 6(1), 100287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100287

Miftahul Jannah, Z. A. Imam Supardi, & Prabowo. (2020). Guided Inquiry Model with the REACT Strategy Learning Materials to Improve the Students’ Learning Achievement. IJORER: International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 1(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v1i2.45

Miranda, J., Navarrete, C., Noguez, J., Molina-Espinosa, J.-M., Ramírez-Montoya, M.-S., Navarro-Tuch, S. A., Bustamante-Bello, M.-R., Rosas-Fernández, J.-B., & Molina, A. (2021). The core components of education 4.0 in higher education: Three case studies in engineering education. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 93, 107278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107278

Mpofu, V. (2020). A Theoretical Framework for Implementing STEM Education. In Theorizing STEM Education in the 21st Century, IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88304

Mudiono, A. (2018). Developing Innovative and Interactive Learning in Elementary School. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Early Childhood and Primary Education (ECPE 2018), 7-11. https://doi.org/10.2991/ecpe-18.2018.2

Naukkarinen, J. K., & Bairoh, S. (2020). STEM: A help or a hinderance in attracting more girls to engineering? Journal of Engineering Education, 109(2), 177–193. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20320

Nguyen, K. A., Borrego, M., Finelli, C. J., DeMonbrun, M., Crockett, C., Tharayil, S., Shekhar, P., Waters, C., & Rosenberg, R. (2021). Instructor strategies to aid implementation of active learning: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00270-7

Nugraha, S. T., Suwandi, S., Nurkamto, J., & Saddhono, K. (2018). The Importance of Needs Assessment for the Implementation of E-Learning in a Language Program. KnE Social Sciences, 3(9), 254. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i9.2686

Ovbiagbonhia, A. R., Kollöffel, B., & Brok, P. D. (2019). Educating for innovation: Students’ perceptions of the learning environment and of their own innovation competence. Learning Environments Research, 22(3), 387–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09280-3

Park, W., Wu, J.-Y., & Erduran, S. (2020). The Nature of STEM Disciplines in the Science Education Standards Documents from the USA, Korea and Taiwan: Focusing on Disciplinary Aims, Values and Practices. Science & Education, 29(4), 899–927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00139-1

Rafida, T., & Idayani, E. (2021). The Influence of Guided Inquiry Learning Strategies and Learning Motivation on the Outcomes of Islamic Education Learning in SMP Negeri 2 Bireuen. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(2), 1945–1952. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i2.1881

Rea, S. D., Wang, L., Muenks, K., & Yan, V. X. (2022). Students Can (Mostly) Recognize Effective Learning, So Why Do They Not Do It? Journal of Intelligence, 10(4), 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10040127

Romero-Tena, R., Barragán-Sánchez, R., Llorente-Cejudo, C., & Palacios-Rodríguez, A. (2020). The Challenge of Initial Training for Early Childhood Teachers. A Cross Sectional Study of Their Digital Competences. Sustainability, 12(11), 4782. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114782

Silva, A. B. D., Bispo, A. C. K. D. A., Rodriguez, D. G., & Vasquez, F. I. F. (2018). Problem-based learning: A proposal for structuring PBL and its implications for learning among students in an undergraduate management degree program. Revista de Gestão, 25(2), 160–177. https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-03-2018-030

Sorohiti, M., & Aini, E. N. (2021). Grammar Teaching Materials: What Makes Them Interesting?: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Sustainable Innovation 2020–Social, Humanity, and Education (ICoSIHESS 2020), 270-277. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210120.135

Stehle, S. M., & Peters-Burton, E. E. (2019). Developing student 21st Century skills in selected exemplary inclusive STEM high schools. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0192-1

Suárez, Ã., Specht, M., Prinsen, F., Kalz, M., & Ternier, S. (2018). A review of the types of mobile activities in mobile inquiry-based learning. Computers & Education, 118, 38–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.004

Sutarto, S., Sari, D. P., & Fathurrochman, I. (2020). Teacher strategies in online learning to increase students’ interest in learning during COVID-19 pandemic. Jurnal Konseling Dan Pendidikan, 8(3), 129. https://doi.org/10.29210/147800

Swiecki, Z., Khosravi, H., Chen, G., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Lodge, J. M., Milligan, S., Selwyn, N., & Gašević, D. (2022). Assessment in the age of artificial intelligence. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100075

Syamsu Nahar, S., Candra Wijaya. (2022). The Influence of Learning Strategies For Concept Maps And Thinking Styles On The Learning Outcomes Of Islamic Religious Education And Ethics. International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM), 3(3), 216–235. https://doi.org/10.47006/ijierm.v3i3.123

Tan, A.-L., Teo, T. W., Choy, B. H., & Ong, Y. S. (2019). The S-T-E-M Quartet. Innovation and Education, 1(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42862-019-0005-x

Thomas, N., Bowen, N. E. J. A., Reynolds, B. L., Osment, C., Pun, J. K. H., & Mikolajewska, A. (2021). A Systematic Review of the Core Components of Language Learning Strategy Research in Taiwan. English Teaching & Learning, 45(3), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-021-00095-1

Tong, D. H., Uyen, B. P., & Ngan, L. K. (2022). The effectiveness of blended learning on students’ academic achievement, self-study skills and learning attitudes: A quasi-experiment study in teaching the conventions for coordinates in the plane. Heliyon, 8(12), e12657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12657

Wei, X., Saab, N., & Admiraal, W. (2023). Do learners share the same perceived learning outcomes in MOOCs? Identifying the role of motivation, perceived learning support, learning engagement, and self-regulated learning strategies. The Internet and Higher Education, 56, 100880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100880

Wilson, H. E., Song, H., Johnson, J., Presley, L., & Olson, K. (2021). Effects of transdisciplinary STEAM lessons on student critical and creative thinking. The Journal of Educational Research, 114(5), 445–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2021.1975090

Author Biographies

Rudi Pranata, Universitas Negeri Padang

 

 

Syahril, Universitas Negeri Padang

 

 

Ruth Rize Paas Megahati S., Politeknik Kesehatan Kesuma Bangsa, Bandar Lampung

 

 

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Rudi Pranata, Syahril, Ruth Rize Paas Megahati S.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).