Overcoming Challenges in STEM Education: A Literature Review That Leads to Effective Pedagogy in STEM Learning

Authors

Suhirman , Saiful Prayogi

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9i8.4715

Published:

2023-08-25

Issue:

Vol. 9 No. 8 (2023): August

Keywords:

Challenges, Literature Review, Effective Pedagogy, STEM Education and Learning

Review

Downloads

How to Cite

Suhirman, S., & Prayogi, S. . (2023). Overcoming Challenges in STEM Education: A Literature Review That Leads to Effective Pedagogy in STEM Learning . Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(8), 432–443. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i8.4715
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Downloads

Metrics

PDF views
1,198
Aug 25 '23Aug 28 '23Aug 31 '23Sep 01 '23Sep 04 '23Sep 07 '23Sep 10 '23Sep 13 '23Sep 16 '23Sep 19 '23Sep 22 '2329
|

Abstract

The current study aims to analyze trends in studies related to challenges of STEM-based learning, analyzing the challenges of STEM education, describing solution approaches to overcome challenges in STEM education, and describing effective STEM pedagogy. To achieve the goals of this study, a literature review related to STEM education and learning was conducted, specifically by performing a bibliometric analysis. The bibliometric analysis is related to a coherent literature review with the theme of "Challenges of STEM-based Learning," analyzed from SCOPUS databases. The results of the study show that to date the existing study trends have addressed a number of challenges related to STEM education, especially those related to STEM pedagogy. The current study proposes a number of approaches to address challenges in STEM education, the focus is on how effective STEM education can be implemented in learning routines. Finally, it was concluded that some effective pedagogical aspects in STEM education and learning include: creating an innovative learning environment that encourages inquiry, experimentation, and critical thinking; utilizing various authentic learning methods and relevant learning resources; facilitating a collaborative learning environment; creating an inclusive learning environment; and reflecting and improving teaching practices.

References

Aeschlimann, B., Herzog, W., & Makarova, E. (2016). How to foster students’ motivation in mathematics and science classes and promote students’ STEM career choice. A study in Swiss high schools. International Journal of Educational Research, 79, 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.06.004

Aikenhead, G. S. (2008). Objectivity: The opiate of the academic? Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3(3), 581–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-008-9126-9

Al Salami, M. K., Makela, C. J., & de Miranda, M. A. (2017). Assessing changes in teachers’ attitudes toward interdisciplinary STEM teaching. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27(1), 63–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9341-0

Annisa, N., Asrizal, & Festiyed. (2022). Effects of STEM-based learning materials on knowledge and literacy of students in science and physics learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2309(1), 012063. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2309/1/012063

Archer, L., Godec, S., Patel, U., Dawson, E., & Calabrese Barton, A. (2022). ‘It really has made me think’: Exploring how informal STEM learning practitioners developed critical reflective practice for social justice using the Equity Compass tool. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2022.2159504

Asghar, A., Ellington, R., Rice, E., Johnson, F., & Prime, G. M. (2012). Supporting STEM Education in Secondary Science Contexts. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1349

Bagiati, A., & Evangelou, D. (2015). Engineering curriculum in the preschool classroom: The teacher’s experience. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 23(1), 112–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2014.991099

Bell, D. (2016). The reality of STEM education, design and technology teachers’ perceptions: A phenomenographic study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9300-9

Biazus, M. de O., & Mahtari, S. (2022). The Impact of Project-Based Learning (PjBL) Model on Secondary Students’ Creative Thinking Skills. International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education, 1(1), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.36312/ijece.v1i1.752

Bilad, M. R., Anwar, K., & Hayati, S. (2022). Nurturing Prospective STEM Teachers’ Critical Thinking Skill through Virtual Simulation-Assisted Remote Inquiry in Fourier Transform Courses. International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education, 1(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.36312/ijece.v1i1.728

Bilad, M. R., Doyan, A., & Susilawati, S. (2022). Analyzing STEM Students’ Critical Thinking Performance: Literacy Study on the Polymer Film Fabrication Process Irradiated with Gamma Rays. International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education, 1(2), 49-60. https://doi.org/10.36312/ijece.v1i2.782

Börner, K., Scrivner, O., Gallant, M., Ma, S., Liu, X., Chewning, K., Wu, L., & Evans, J. A. (2018). Skill discrepancies between research, education, and jobs reveal the critical need to supply soft skills for the data economy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(50), 12630–12637. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804247115

Clark, R., & Andrews, J. (2010). Researching primary engineering education: UK perspectives, an exploratory study. European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(5), 585–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2010.497551

Clements, D. H., Vinh, M., Lim, C.-I., & Sarama, J. (2021). STEM for Inclusive Excellence and Equity. Early Education and Development, 32(1), 148–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2020.1755776

Coufal, P. (2022). Project-Based STEM Learning Using Educational Robotics as the Development of Student Problem-Solving Competence. Mathematics, 10(23), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10234618

Dare, E. A., Ellis, J. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2014). Driven by Beliefs: Understanding Challenges Physical Science Teachers Face When Integrating Engineering and Physics. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 4(2). https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1098

Domenici, V. (2022). STEAM Project-Based Learning Activities at the Science Museum as an Effective Training for Future Chemistry Teachers. Education Sciences, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12010030

Dong, Y., Wang, J., Yang, Y., & Kurup, P. M. (2020). Understanding intrinsic challenges to STEM instructional practices for Chinese teachers based on their beliefs and knowledge base. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00245-0

Edelen, D., & Bush, S. B. (2021). Moving Toward Inclusiveness in STEM With Culturally Responsive Teaching. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 57(3), 115–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2021.1935178

Ekayanti, B. H., Prayogi, S., & Gummah, S. (2022). Efforts to Drill the Critical Thinking Skills on Momentum and Impulse Phenomena Using Discovery Learning Model. International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education, 1(2), 84-94. https://doi.org/10.36312/ijece.v1i2.1250

EL-Deghaidy, H., Mansour, N., Alzaghibi, M., & Alhammad, K. (2017). Context of STEM Integration in Schools: Views from In-service Science Teachers. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01235a

ElSayary, A. (2021). Using a Reflective Practice Model to Teach STEM Education in a Blended Learning Environment. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(2). Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1289486

English, L. D. (2023). Ways of thinking in STEM-based problem solving. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01474-7

Fitriani, H., Samsuri, T., Rachmadiarti, F., Raharjo, R., & Mantlana, C. D. (2022). Development of Evaluative-Process Learning Tools Integrated with Conceptual-Problem-Based Learning Models: Study of Its Validity and Effectiveness to Train Critical Thinking. International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education, 1(1), 27-37. https://doi.org/10.36312/ijece.v1i1.736

Flynn, E. P. (2011). From design to prototype—Manufacturing STEM integration in the classroom and laboratory. 2011 Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC), 3B-1-3B. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISECon.2011.6229630

Goodpaster, K. P. S., Adedokun, O. A., & Weaver, G. C. (2012). Teachers’ Perceptions of Rural STEM Teaching: Implications for Rural Teacher Retention. Rural Educator, 33(3), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.35608/ruraled.v33i3.408

Herro, D., & Quigley, C. (2017). Exploring teachers’ perceptions of STEAM teaching through professional development: Implications for teacher educators. Professional Development in Education, 43(3), 416–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2016.1205507

Hidayat, R., & Evendi, E. (2022). The Intervention of Mathematical Problem-Solving Model on the Systems of Linear Equation Material: Analysing its Impact on Increasing Students’ Creative Thinking. International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education, 1(2), 61-68. https://doi.org/10.36312/ijece.v1i2.1069

Holmlund, T. D., Lesseig, K., & Slavit, D. (2018). Making sense of “STEM education†in K-12 contexts. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0127-2

Holstein, K. A., & Keene, K. A. (2013). The Complexities and Challenges Associated with the Implementation of a STEM Curriculum. Teacher Education and Practice, 26(4), 616–636. Retrieved from https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A514683235/AONE?u=anon~7a802fc1&sid=googleScholar&xid=893a9f26

Hsu, M.-C., Purzer, S., & Cardella, M. (2011). Elementary Teachers’ Views about Teaching Design, Engineering, and Technology. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 1(2). https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314639

Kayan-Fadlelmula, F., Sellami, A., Abdelkader, N., & Umer, S. (2022). A systematic review of STEM education research in the GCC countries: Trends, gaps and barriers. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00319-7

Kilty, T. J., & Burrows, A. C. (2022). Integrated STEM and Partnerships: What to Do for More Effective Teams in Informal Settings. Education Sciences, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12010058

Lange, C., Costley, J., & Fanguy, M. (2021). Collaborative group work and the different types of cognitive load. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(4), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1788970

Le, L. T. B., Tran, T. T., & Tran, N. H. (2021). Challenges to STEM education in Vietnamese high school contexts. Heliyon, 7(12), e08649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08649

Lee, M.-H., Chai, C. S., & Hong, H.-Y. (2019). STEM Education in Asia Pacific: Challenges and Development. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0424-z

Lesseig, K., Nelson, T. H., Slavit, D., & Seidel, R. A. (2016). Supporting Middle School Teachers’ Implementation of STEM Design Challenges. School Science and Mathematics, 116(4), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12172

Leung, A. (2020). Boundary crossing pedagogy in STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00212-9

Li, Y., Schoenfeld, A. H., diSessa, A. A., Graesser, A. C., Benson, L. C., English, L. D., & Duschl, R. A. (2019). Design and Design Thinking in STEM Education. Journal for STEM Education Research, 2(2), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-019-00020-z

Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2

Millerâ€Idriss, C., & Hanauer, E. (2011). Transnational higher education: Offshore campuses in the Middle East. Comparative Education, 47(2), 181–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2011.553935

Nadelson, L. S., & Seifert, A. (2013). Perceptions, Engagement, and Practices of Teachers Seeking Professional Development in Place-Based Integrated STEM. Teacher Education and Practice, 26(2), 242–266. Retrieved from https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A514683033/AONE?u=anon~68f79d3b&sid=googleScholar&xid=dc0c073c

Oyewo, O. A., Ramaila, S., & Mavuru, L. (2022). Harnessing Project-Based Learning to Enhance STEM Students’ Critical Thinking Skills Using Water Treatment Activity. Education Sciences, 12(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110780

Park, H., Byun, S., Sim, J., Han, H.-S., & Baek, Y. S. (2016). Teachers’ Perceptions and Practices of STEAM Education in South Korea. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(7). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1531a

Park, M.-H., Dimitrov, D. M., Patterson, L. G., & Park, D.-Y. (2017). Early childhood teachers’ beliefs about readiness for teaching science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 15(3), 275–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X15614040

Pizziconi, V., Haag, S., Ganesh, T., Cozort, L., Krause, S., Tasooji, A., Ramakrishna, B. L., Meldrum, D., Lunt, B., Valdez, A., & Yarbrough, V. (2010). The P3E2 project: The introduction, implementation and evaluation of engineering design integrated across the middle school curriculum. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. Scopus.

Prayogi, S., Yuanita, L., & Wasis. (2018). Critical Inquiry Based Learning: A Model of Learning to Promote Critical Thinking Among Prospective Teachers of Physic. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(1). Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1344529

Ryoo, J., & Winkelmann, K. (Eds.). (2021). Innovative Learning Environments in STEM Higher Education: Opportunities, Challenges, and Looking Forward. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58948-6

Ryu, M., Mentzer, N., & Knobloch, N. (2019). Preservice teachers’ experiences of STEM integration: Challenges and implications for integrated STEM teacher preparation. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(3), 493–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9440-9

Sahin, A., & Top, N. (2015). Teachers’ Reflections on STEM Students on the Stage (SOS)TM Model. In A Practice-based Model of STEM Teaching, 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-019-2_15

Sarwi, S., Baihaqi, M. A., & Ellianawati, E. (2021). Implementation of Project Based Learning Based on STEM Approach to Improve Students’ Problems Solving Abilities. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1918(5), 052049. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/5/052049

Shernoff, D. J., Sinha, S., Bressler, D. M., & Ginsburg, L. (2017). Assessing teacher education and professional development needs for the implementation of integrated approaches to STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0068-1

Smith, K., Maynard, N., Berry, A., Stephenson, T., Spiteri, T., Corrigan, D., Mansfield, J., Ellerton, P., & Smith, T. (2022). Principles of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) in STEM Education: Using Expert Wisdom and Research to Frame Educational Practice. Education Sciences, 12(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100728

Tuong, H. A., Nam, P. S., Hau, N. H., Tien, V. T. B., Lavicza, Z., & Hougton, T. (2023). Utilizing STEM-based practices to enhance mathematics teaching in Vietnam: Developing students’ real-world problem solving and 21st century skills. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1790

Van Haneghan, J. P., Pruet, S. A., Neal-Waltman, R., & Harlan, J. M. (2015). Teacher Beliefs about Motivating and Teaching Students to Carry out Engineering Design Challenges: Some Initial Data. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 5(2). https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1097

van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 577–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010

Verawati, N. N. S. P., Ernita, N., & Prayogi, S. (2022). Enhancing the Reasoning Performance of STEM Students in Modern Physics Courses Using Virtual Simulation in the LMS Platform. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 17(13). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i13.31459

Vossen, T. E., Land-Zandstra, A. M., Russo, P., Schut, A., Van Vulpen, I. B., Watts, A. L., Booij, C., & Tupan-Wenno, M. (2023). Effects of a STEM-oriented lesson series aimed at inclusive and diverse education on primary school children’s perceptions of and sense of belonging in space science. International Journal of Science Education, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2172693

Wang, H.-H., Moore, T. J., Roehrig, G. H., & Park, M. S. (2011). STEM Integration: Teacher Perceptions and Practice. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 1(2). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/160807/

Wang, J., Guo, D., & Jou, M. (2015). A study on the effects of model-based inquiry pedagogy on students’ inquiry skills in a virtual physics lab. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 658–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.043

Weinberg, A. E., Balgopal, M. M., & Sample McMeeking, L. B. (2021). Professional Growth and Identity Development of STEM Teacher Educators in a Community of Practice. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(S1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10148-9

Wirzal, M. D. H., Halim, N. S. A., Md Nordin, N. A. H., & Bustam, M. A. (2022). Metacognition in Science Learning: Bibliometric Analysis of Last Two Decades. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: E-Saintika, 6(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.36312/esaintika.v6i1.665

Zakiyah, R. N., Ibrohim, & Suwono, H. (2021). The influence of science, technology, engineering, mathematic (STEM) based biology learning through inquiry learning models towards students’ critical thinking skills and mastery of biological concepts. In AIP Conference Proceedings, 2330(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043361

Author Biographies

Suhirman, Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram

Saiful Prayogi, Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Suhirman, Saiful Prayogi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).