Integration of Problem-Based Learning Model with Guided Inquiry Worksheet to Enhance Scientific Process Skills and Critical Thinking Abilities

Authors

Khairil Anbiya , Muhibbudin , Ibnu Khaldun , Yusrizal

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.4724

Published:

2023-10-25

Issue:

Vol. 9 No. 10 (2023): October

Keywords:

Critical thinking abilities, Guided inquiry, Scientific process skills

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Anbiya, K., Muhibbudin, Khaldun, I. ., & Yusrizal. (2023). Integration of Problem-Based Learning Model with Guided Inquiry Worksheet to Enhance Scientific Process Skills and Critical Thinking Abilities. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(10), 8328–8334. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.4724

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

The low ability of students to comprehend and connect information, as well as the problems they face, contributes to a low level of scientific literacy. The application of the integration of problem-based learning models with guided inquiry worksheets in this study aims to examine the improvement of students' scientific process skills (SPS) and critical thinking abilities (CTA). A non-equivalent control group design with pretest-posttest was used as the research design. The sample consisted of students from Class X MIA-1 and X MIA-2, selected through purposive sampling technique. Data obtained from the observation sheets on SPS and test questions were analyzed using the SPSS application with the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) test. The results showed a probability sig. of 0.907 > 0.05 for SPS and a probability sig. of 0.598 < 0.05 for CTA. The research findings concluded that the application of the integration of problem-based learning models with guided inquiry worksheets can significantly enhance students' scientific process skills and critical thinking abilities.

References

Barnard, M., Whitt, E., & McDonald, S. (2021). Learning Objectives and Their Effects on Learning and Assessment Preparation: Insights from an Undergraduate Psychology Course. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(5), 673–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1822281

Berland, L. K., & Reiser, B. J. (2008). Making Sense of Argumentation and Explanation. Science Education, 93(1), 26–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20286

Brooks, S., Dobbins, K., Scott, J. J. A., Rawlinson, M., & Norman, R. I. (2014). Learning about Learning Outcomes: The Student Perspective. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(6), 721–733. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2014.901964

Collins, D. P., Rasco, D., & Benassi, V. A. (2018). Test-Enhanced Learning: Does Deeper Processing on Quizzes Benefit Exam Performance? Teaching of Psychology, 3, 235–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628318779262

Culpepper, S. A., & Aguinis, H. (2011). Using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) with Fallible Covariates. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 166–178. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023355

Curtis, E., Brownlee, J. L., & Spooner-Lane, R. (2020). Teaching Perspectives of Philosophical Inquiry: Changes to Secondary Teachers’ Understanding of Student Learning and Pedagogical Practices. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100711

Deal, T. E., & Peterson, K. D. (2016). Shaping School Culture. Hoboken: Wiley.

Dewi, R. A. K., & Rukmini, P. (2019). The Effect of Thematic Learning by Using a Scientific Approach to Increase the Multiple Intelligence of Students. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 7(1), 40–46. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v7i1.24326.

Elisabet, E., Relmasira, S. C., & Hardini, A. T. A. (2019). Meningkatkan Motivasi dan Hasil Belajar IPA dengan Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Project Based Learning (PjBL). Journal of Education Action Research, 3(3), 285. https://doi.org/10.23887/jear.v3i3.19451.

Fortus, D., & Touitou, I. (2021). Changes to Students’ Motivation to Learn Science. Discip Interdscip Sci Educ Res, 3(1), 2-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-020-00029-0

Fortus, D., & Vedder-Weiss, D. (2014). Measuring Students Continuing Motivation for Science Learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(4), 497–522. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21136

Ghani, I. B. A., Ibrahim, N. H., Yahaya, N. A., & Surif, J. (2017). Enhancing Student’s HOTS in Laboratory Educational Activity by Using Concept Map as an Alternative Assessment Tool. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(4), 849-874. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00120G

Handayani, B. T., Arifuddin, M., & Misbah, M. (2017). Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains Melalui Model Guided Discovery Learning. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 1(3), 143-154. https://doi.org/10.20527/jipf.v1i3.1016

Janssen, E. M., Meulendijks, W., Mainhard, T., Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L., Heijltjes, A. E. G., Peppen, L. M., & Gog, T. (2019). Identifying Characteristics Associated with Higher Education Teachers’ Cognitive Reflection Test Performance and Their Attitudes towards Teaching Critical Thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 84(1), 139-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.05.008

Khaldun, I., Hanum, L., & Utami, S. D. (2019). Pengembangan Soal Kimia Higher Order Thinking Skills Berbasis Komputer dengan Wondershare Quiz Creator Materi Hidrolisis Garam dan Larutan Penyangga. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 7(2), 132-142. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v7i2.14702

Martens, S. E., Spruijt, A., Wolfhagen, I. H. A. P., Whittingham, J. R. D., & Dolmans, D. H. J. M. (2019). A Students’ Take on Student–Staff Partnerships: Experiences and Preferences. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(6), 910–919. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1546374

Merdekawati, K. (2017). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Unjuk Kerja Praktikum Kimia Fisika. Paedagogia: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 20(1), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.20961/paedagogia.v20i1.16592

Mutrovina, N., & Syarief, S. H. (2015). Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa Melalui Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing pada Materi Reaksi Reduksi-Oksidasi di Kelas X SMA Negeri 12 Surabaya. UNESA Journal of Chemical Education, 4(3), 446-471. https://doi.org/10.26740/ujced.v4n3.p%25p

OECD. (2019a). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework PISA. Paris: OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2019b). PISA 2018 Result Combined Executive Summaries: Volume I, II & III. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Puspita, A. R., Paidi, P., & Nurcahyo, H. (2017). Analisis Keterampilan Proses Sains LKPD Sel di SMA Negeri Kota Bekasi. Jurnal Prodi Pendidikan Biologi, 6(3), 164-170. https://doi.org/10.21831/edubio.v6i3.7972

Putra, M. I. S., Widodo, W., & Jatmiko, B. (2016). The Development of Guided Inquiry Science Learning Materials to Improve Science Literacy Skill of Prospective Mi Teachers. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(10), 83-93. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i1.5794

Riyadi, B., Ertikanto, C., & Suyatna, A. (2018). The Analysis and Design of Guided Inquiry E-Worksheet Based to Develop High Order Thinking Skills. International Journal of Research–Granthaalayah, 6(7), 223-233. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v6.i7.2018.1302

Rohwer, Y., & Rice, C. (2015). How Are Models and Explanations Related? Erkenntnis, 81(5), 1127-1148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-015-9788-0

Samani, S., & Iskandar, I. (1999). Buku Pedoman Perwatan Prefentif. Jakarta: Dikdasmen.

Sarah, F., Khaldun, I., & Gani, A. (2021). The Development Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) as Questions in Chemistry Study (Solubility and Solubility Product Constant). Jurnal Pendidikan Sains (JPS), 9(1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.26714/jps.9.1.2021.51-60

Siska, B. M., Kurnia, K., & Sunarya, Y. (2013). Peningkatan Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa SMA Melalui Pembelajaran Praktikum Berbasis Inkuiri pada Materi Laju Reaksi. Jurnal Riset dan Praktik Pendidikan Kimia, 1(1), 69-75. Retrieved from http://journal.fpmipa.upi.edu/index.php/jr ppk/article/view/216

Sya’idah, F. A. N., Wijayati, N., Nuswowati, M., & Haryani, S. (2020). Pengaruh Model Blended Learning Berbantuan E-Lkpd Materi Hidrolisis Garam terhadap Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik. Chemistry in Education, 9(1), 1–8. Retrieved from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/chemined/article/view/39581

Vedder-Weiss, D., & Fortus, D. (2018). Teachers’ Mastery Goals: Using a Self-Report Survey to Study the Relations between Teaching Practices and Students’ Motivation for Science Learning. Research in Science Education, 48(1), 181–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9565-3

Yakar, Z., & Baykara, H. (2014). Inquiry-Based Laboratory Practices in a Science Teacher Training Program. Eurasia Journal of Mathemaics, Science & Technology Education, 10(2), 173-183. Retrieved from http://www.misericordia.edu/uploaded/documents/library/Books/APAStyle.pdf?1436800286903

Author Biographies

Khairil Anbiya, Universitas Syiah Kuala

Muhibbudin, Universitas Syiah Kuala

Ibnu Khaldun, Universitas Syiah Kuala

Yusrizal, Universitas Syiah Kuala

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Khairil Anbiya, Muhibbudin, Ibnu Khaldun, Yusrizal

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).