Development of Argumentation Skills Test Instruments on Buffer Solutions in Daily Life

Authors

Lilla Pangestu Harwyandani , Suyono

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.4725

Published:

2023-12-20

Issue:

Vol. 9 No. 12 (2023): December

Keywords:

Argumentation Skills Test, Buffer Solution Instrument, Reliability, Validity

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Harwyandani, L. P., & Suyono. (2023). Development of Argumentation Skills Test Instruments on Buffer Solutions in Daily Life. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(12), 10705–10714. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.4725

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to develop a valid and reliable instrument for testing argumentation skills in buffer solutions in daily life. Argumentation skill test instruments are reviewed from theoretical validity (content and construct), empirical validity, and reliability. Development of argumentation skill test instruments using the ADDIE development model with stages: (1) analysis; (2) design; (3) development; (4) implementation; and (5) evaluation. This research was carried out until the initial implementation and then an evaluation was carried out. The argumentation skill test instrument that has been designed is then tested for theoretical validity through expert judgment involving three validators. The argumentation skill test instrument has criteria of theoretical validity if each statement has a mode ≥ 4 with valid categories. After being declared theoretically valid, argumentation skill test instruments are implemented to learners. The results of the argumentation skill test instrument are then analyzed to determine empirical validity and reliability. The results showed that the argumentation skill test instrument was declared theoretically valid where each statement had a mode of 5 with a very valid category. The test instrument is declared empirically valid where each question item has a consecutive calculated r value of 0.807; 0.879; 0.911; 0.911 is declared valid with r count > r table (0.468). The reliability of the argumentation skill test instrument of 0.876 is declared reliable with a r count > r table (0.468).

References

Afandi, A. A., & Rusmini. (2021). Kelayakan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik untuk Melatihkan Keterampilan Argumentasi Peserta Didik SMA Kelas XI. In UNESA Journal of Chemical Education, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.26740/ujced.v10n2.p172-184

Afni, A. N., & Suyono, S. (2021). Kelayakan Lembar Penugasan Terstruktur pada Materi Laju Reaksi untuk Melatihkan Literasi Sains. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 6(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.6.1.16-25

Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological Testing 7th ed (7th ed.). Prentice Hall/Pearson Education.

Arifin, Z. (2017). Kriteria Instrumen dalam suatu Penelitian. Jurnal THEOREMS (The Original Research of Mathematics), 2(1), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.31949/th.v2i1.571

Arikunto, S. (2005). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Bumi Aksara.

Arikunto, S. (2015). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Bumi Aksara.

Arnilawati, A., & Musdi, E. (2018). Students’ worksheet validity based on contextual teaching and learning in junior high school. In International Conferences on Educational, Social Sciences and Technology, 496–500. https://doi.org/10.29210/2018172

Azwar, S. (2011). Reliabilitas dan Validitas. Pustaka Belajar.

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. In Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6

Devi, N. D. C., Susanti VH, E., & Indriyanti, N. Y. (2018). Analysis of High School Students’ Argumentation Ability in the topic of Buffer Solution. JKPK (Jurnal Kimia Dan Pendidikan Kimia), 3(3), 152–159. https://doi.org/10.20961/jkpk.v3i3.23308

Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into Argumentation: Developments in the Application of Toulmin’s Argument Pattern for Studying Science Discourse. Science education, 88(6), 915-933. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20012

Ginanjar, W. S., Utari, S., & Muslim, Dr. (2015). Penerapan Model Argument-Driven Inquiry dalam Pembelajaran IPA untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa SMP. Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 20(1), 32–37. https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v20i1.559

Hamzah, A., & Muhlisrarini. (2016). Perencanaan dan Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika (3rd ed.). Rajagrafindo.

Jihad, A., & Haris, A. (2012). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Multi Pressindo.

Johnstone, A. H. (2009). Multiple Representations in Chemical Education. International Journal of Science Education, 31(16), 2271–2273. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903211393

Kastina, Z. V. K. (2017). Implementasi Sistem Penilaian dalam Kurikulum 2013 di SMA Negeri 2 Pekanbaru. In JOM FISIP, 4(1). Retrieved from https://jom.unri.ac.id/index.php/JOMFSIP/article/view/12720

Marsita, R. A., Priatmoko, S., & Kusuma, E. (2010). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Kimia Siwa SMA dalam Memahami Materi Larutan Penyangga dengan Menggunakan Two-Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Instrument. In Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/jipk.v4i1.1308

Matondang, Z. (2009). Validitas dan reliabilitas suatu instrumen penelitian. Jurnal tabularasa, 6(1), 87-97. Retrieved from http://digilib.unimed.ac.id/id/eprint/705

Muna, A. N., & Rusmini. (2021). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik untuk Melatihkan Keterampilan Argumentasi Ilmiah Peserta Didik pada Materi Laju Reaksi. In UNESA Journal of Chemical Education, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.26740/ujced.v10n2.p159-171

Newman, I., Lim, J., & Pineda, F. (2013). Content Validity Using a Mixed Methods Approach: Its Application and Development Through the Use of a Table of Specifications Methodology. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(3), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689813476922

Nizary, M. A., & Kholik, A. N. (2021). Validitas instrumen assesmen (Analisis validitas isi dan konstruk instrumen asesmen buku pelajaran Al Quran hadis kelas 6 madrasah ibtidaiyah materi surat Ad Dhuha Bab Vi). CONTEMPLATE: Jurnal Ilmiah Studi Keislaman, 2(1), 21–42. Retrieved from https://ejournal.iaiqi.ac.id/index.php/contemplate/article/view/49

Permendikbud. (2017). Penilaian Hasil Belajar Oleh Pemerintah dan Penilaian Hasil Belajar Oleh Satuan Pendidikan. Direktorat Utama Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Hukum Pemeriksaan Keuangan Negara Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan

Pritasari, A. C., Dwiastuti, S., & Probosari, R. M. (2016). Peningkatan kemampuan argumentasi melalui penerapan model problem based learning pada siswa kelas X MIA 1 SMA Batik 2 Surakarta Tahun Pelajaran 2014/2015. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 8(1), 1-7.

Putri, P. A. W., Rahayu, S., & Fajaroh, F. (2020). Efektivitas argument-driven inquiry untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berargumentasi ilmiah pada materi laju reaksi. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 5(1), 57-64. Retrieved from http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jptpp/article/view/13132

Riduwan, & Sunarto. (2017). Pengantar Statistika untuk Penelitian: Pendidikan, Sosial, Ekonomi, Komunikasi, dan Bisnis (8th ed.). Alfabeta.

Sudjana, N. (2009). Penilaian Hasil Belajar Proses Belajar Mengajar. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sudjono, A. (2003). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Suryabrata, S. (2005). Pengembangan Alat Ukur Psikologis. Andi.

Umah, U., Asari, A. R., & Sulandra, I. M. (2016). Struktur Argumentasi Penalaran Kovariasional Siswa Kelas Viiib Mtsn 1 Kediri. JMPM: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.26594/jmpm.v1i1.498

Westen, D., & Rosenthal, R. (2003). Quantifying Construct Validity: Two Simple Measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 608–618. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.608

Author Biographies

Lilla Pangestu Harwyandani, universitas Negeri Surabaya

Suyono, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Lilla Pangestu Harwyandani, Suyono

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).