Teacher’s and Student’s Perceptions of Green Chemistry and its Principles in Chemistry Learning in High Schools

Authors

Jusniar , Syamsidah , Army Auliah

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.4756

Published:

2023-10-25

Issue:

Vol. 9 No. 10 (2023): October

Keywords:

Chemistry learning, Green chemistry, Student’s perception, Teacher’s perception

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Jusniar, J., Syamsidah, & Auliah, A. . (2023). Teacher’s and Student’s Perceptions of Green Chemistry and its Principles in Chemistry Learning in High Schools. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(10), 7924–7934. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.4756

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

Green Chemistry (GC) is an issue that is very relevant to chemistry subjects in senior high schools. Chemistry subject is closely related to the environment as one of the pillars of sustainable development. This certainly contributes to the possibility integration of green chemistry principles into chemistry learning. This exploratory research aims to describe the principles of GC that allow it to be integrated into chemistry learning in grades X and XI; describes the high school teacher's and students' perceptions and understanding of GC and its principles in chemistry  learning. The subjects in this study were 230 students who were selected purposively from five Senior high schools. Totally 40 chemistry teachers were purposively used as research subjects from a number of high schools throughout South Sulawesi. The instrument used was ten items of teacher's perception questionnaires, while the students' perception questionnaire consisted of twelve items. Guidelines for interviewing teachers and students were used to describe more deeply about their understanding of GC. All instruments have been validated by two experts. The results of the exploration of material elements for phases E and F show that five GC principles can be integrated into learning chemistry. In general, the teacher's perception of GC is good, which assumes that GC is an environmentally friendly concept. Understanding of the five principles of GC for students and teachers is in the moderate and poor categories. This shows the importance of integrating GC principles in the form of positive habits in chemistry learning.

References

Alamer, A. (2022). Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM) and Bifactor ESEM for Construct Validation Purposes: Guidelines and Applied Example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 100005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100005

Anastas, P. T., & Warner, J. C. (1998). Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice. New York: Oxford University Press.

Anastas, P. T., & Zimmerman, J. B. (2018). The United Nations Sustainability Goals: How Can Sustainable Chemistry Contribute? Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 13, 150-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2018.04.017

Anderson, K., Ryan, B., Sonntag, W., Kavvada, A., & Friedl, L. (2017). Earth Observation in Service of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Geo-spatial Information Science, 20(2), 77-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2017.1333230.

Aubrecht, K. B., Bourgeois, M., Brush, E. J., Mackellar, J., & Wissinger, J. E. (2019). Integrating Green Chemistry in the Curriculum: Building Student Skills in Systems Thinking, Safety, and Sustainability. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(12), 2872-2880. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00354

Borich, G. D. (2003). Observation Skill for Effective Teaching (3th Edition). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Braun, B., Charney, R., Clorens, A., Farrugia, J., Kitchen C., Lisowski C., Naistat, D., & O’Neil A. (2006). Completing Our Education; Green Chemistry in the Curriculum. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(8), 1126-1129. Retrieved from www.JCE.DivCHED.org

Colás-Bravo, P., Magnoler, P., & Conde-Jiménez, J. (2018). Identification of Levels of Sustainable Consciousness of Teachers in Training through an E-Portfolio. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(10), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103700

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

Didham, R. J., & Ofei-Manu, P. (2020). Adaptive Capacity as an Educational Goal to Advance Policy for Integrating DRR into Quality Education for Sustainable Development. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 47(May 2019), 101631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101631

Evans, N. S., Stevenson, R. B., Lasen, M., Ferreira, J. A., & Davis, J. (2017). Approaches to Embedding Sustainability in Teacher Education: A Synthesis of the Literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 405-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.01.013

Gama, F., Sjödin, D., Parida, V., Frishammar, J., & Wincent, J. (2022). Exploratory and Exploitative Capability Paths for Innovation: A Contingency Framework for Harnessing Fuzziness in the Front End. Technovation, 113, 102416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102416

Government Sierra Leone. (2016). United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Advanced Draft Report on Adaptation of the Goals in Sierra Leone. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/10720sierraleone.pdf

Guo, H., Liang, D., Sun, Z., Chen, F., Wang, X., Li, J., Zhu, L., Bian, J., Wei, Y., Huang, L., Chen, Y., Peng, D., Li, X., Lu, S., Liu, J., & Shirazi, Z. (2022). Measuring and Evaluating SDG Indicators with Big Earth Data. Science Bulletin, 67(17), 1792-1801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2022.07.015

Kioupi, V., & Voulvoulis, N. (2019). Education for Sustainable Development: A Systemic Framework for Connecting the SDGs to Educational Outcomes. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216104

Kusumastuti, Y. S., Parlina, N., Anugrahsari, S., & Sihombing, A. (2021). Merdeka Belajar in an Online Learning during the Covid-19 Outbreak: Concept and Implementation. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(4), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v17i4.16207

Manahan, S. E. (2005). Green Chemistry and the Ten Commandments of Sustainability. Columbia: ChemChar Research, Inc. Retrieved from https://www.asdlib.org/onlineArticles/ecourseware/Manahan/GreenChem-2.pdf

Manahan, S. E. (2006). Green Chemistry and the Ten Commandments of Sustainability (2nd edition). Columbia: ChemChar Research, Inc. Retrieved from https://www.asdlib.org/onlineArticles/ecourseware/Manahan/GreenChem-2.pdf

Mitarlis, M., Azizah, U., & Yonata, B. (2018). Learning Design to Integrate Scientific Character Values with Green Chemistry Insight in Basic Chemistry Course. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Education Innovation (ICEI 2017), 222-225. https://doi.org/10.2991/icei-17.2018.58

Mitarlis, M., Azizah, U., & Yonata, B. (2023). The Integration of Green Chemistry Principle in Basic Chemsitry Learning to Support Achievement of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through Education. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 13(1), 233-254. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1892

Purnomo, A. R., Yulianto, B., Mahdiannur, M. A., & Subekti, H. (2023). Embedding Sistainable Development Goals to Support Curriculum Merdeka Using Project in Biotechnology. International Journal of Learning, Teaching, and Educational Research, 2(1), 406-433. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.1.23

Purvis, B., Mao, Y., & Robinson, D. (2019). Three Pillars of Sustainability: in Search of Conceptual Origins. Sustainability Science, 14(3), 681-695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5

Purwananto, A. T. (2022). Perencanakan Pembelajaran Bermakna dan Asesmen Kurikulum Merdeka. Journal Pedagogy, 15(1), 75-94. Retrieved from http://www.jurnal.staimuhblora.ac.id/index.php/pedagogy/article/view/116

Rahmawati, Y., Zulhipri, Z., Hartanto, O., Falani, I., & Iriyadi, D. (2022). Students’ Conceptual Understanding in Chemistry Learning Using PhET Interactive Simulations. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 12(2), 303-326. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1597

Sánchez, M. A., González-Gómez, D., & Jeong, J. S. (2022). Service Learning as an Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) Teaching Strategy: Design, Implementation, and Evaluation in a STEM University Course. Sustainability, 14(12), 6965. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14126965

Segara, N. B. (2015). Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) Sebuah Upaya Mewujudkan Kelestarian Lingkungan. Sosio Didaktika: Social Science Education Journal, 2(1), 22-30. https://doi.org/10.15408/sd.v2i1.1349

Telaumbanua, Y., Yalmiadi, Y., & Ritmi, T. (2022). The MECRI Nadiem Makarim’s “Freedom of Learningâ€: A Critical Study of John Dewey’s Pragmatic Philosophy. Modality Journal: International Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 2(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.30983/mj.v2i1.5392

Tjaija, A. (2022). Implementation of ‘Freedom to Learn, Independent Campus’ (MBKM) Policy. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(1), 319-328. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i1.2115

Wardencki, W., Curyło, J., & Namieśnik, J. (2005). Green Chemistry-Current and Future Issues. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 14(4), 389-395. Retrieved from http://www.pjoes.com/Green-Chemistry-Current-and-Future-Issues,87771,0,2.html

Yulianto, H. (2022). Implementation of Learning Assessment Model on the Curriculum of Merdeka Belajar. Technical and Vocational Education International Journal (TAVEIJ), 2(2), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.556442/taveij.v2i2

Zakiyyah, Z., Cahyani, M. D., & Fatnah, N. (2021). Readiness of the Science Education Study Program in the Implementation of the ‘Merdeka Belajar—Kampus Merdeka’ (MBKM) Curriculum. Scientiae Educatia, 10(2), 160-168. https://doi.org/10.24235/sc.educatia.v10i2.9243

Zguir, M. F., Dubis, S., & Koç, M. (2021). Embedding Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) and SDGs Values in Curriculum: A Comparative Review on Qatar, Singapore, and New Zealand. Journal of Cleaner Production, 319(August), 128534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128534

Zulkipli, N. H. N., & Wills, G. B. (2021). An Exploratory Study on Readiness Framework in IoT Forensics. Procedia Computer Science, 179, 966-973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.086

Author Biographies

Jusniar, Universitas Negeri Makassar

Syamsidah, Universitas Negeri Makassar

Army Auliah, Universitas Negeri Makassar

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Jusniar, Syamsidah, Army Auliah

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).