Learning Motivation and Computational Thinking Ability of Elementary School Students in Learning Science
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.4826Published:
2023-09-25Issue:
Vol. 9 No. 9 (2023): SeptemberKeywords:
Computation thinking skill, Learning motivation, ScienceResearch Articles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
This research is motivated by the low learning outcomes of students in elementary schools, especially in science learning content. This study aims to: (1) analyze learning motivation and students' computational thinking skills in science learning; (2) knowing the relationship between learning motivation and computational thinking ability. This research method is a mixed method, namely research methods that communicate or combine quantitative methods and qualitative methods to be used together in a research activity. This research was conducted in Cluster II Koto Salak, which consists of five elementary schools and one Islamic elementary school. The number of students in grade V at SDa is 25 students for class A, and 26 students for class B, SD B has 26 students, SD C has 15 students, SD D has 10 students, and MI A has 21 students. So that the total number of research subjects is 123 students, plus 5 school principals, and 6 class teachers. Data collection techniques used are questionnaires, observation, structured interviews, and documentation. The qualitative data analysis technique in this study is to use interactive data analysis, namely (1) data reduction; (2) Data presentation; (3) Drawing conclusions. Quantitative data analysis is the Pearson correlation test using SPSS. The results showed that the learning motivation and computational thinking abilities of students in cluster II Koto Salak were still low, on average, still below 30%. Pearson correlation test results Sig 0.00 <0.05 so that H1 is accepted, meaning that learning motivation and computational thinking ability have a correlation. The form of the correlation is positive with a value of 0.99 which is at the perfect relationship level.
References
Afrianti. (2019). Peranan Guru Dalam Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Siswa. DIDAKTIKA: Jurnal Kependidikan, 12(2), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.30863/didaktika.v12i2.181
Aminah, S., Puryati, L. K., Taqiyyah, F., Ardianti, S. D., & Fajrie, N. (2023). Hubungan Motivasi Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar dan Sosial Humaniora, 4(1), 88–100. https://doi.org/10.53625/jpdsh.v2i9.6049
Augie, K. T., & Priatna, N. (2021). Penggunaan Podcast Untuk Mengembangkan Keterampilan Berpikir Komputasi Siswa selama Gangguan Pandemi. Didactical Mathematics, 3(1), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.31949/dm.v3i1.1042
Bahri, D. S. (2011). Psikologi Belajar. PT Asdi Mahasty.
Boom, K. D., Bower, M., Siemon, J., & Arguel, A. (2022). Relationships between computational thinking and the quality of computer programs. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 8289–8310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10921-z
Disurya, R., & Ayu, I. R. (2022). Pengaruh Media Animasi terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas V SD. Journal on Teacher Education, 4(2), 731-744. https://doi.org/10.31004/jote.v4i3.12171
Fitria, Y. (2017). Efektivitas Capaian Kompetensi Belajar Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran Sains Di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Sekolah Dasar, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.24036/jippsd.v1i2.8605
Hanafiah, N., & Suhana. (2012). Konsep Strategi Pembelajaran. PT Refika Aditama.
Kurnia Sari, R., Chan, F., Kurnia Hayati, D., Syaferi, A., & Sa, H. (2020). Analisis Faktor Rendahnya Motivasi Belajar Siswa Dalam Proses Pembelajaran Ipa Di Sd Negeri 80/I Rengas Condong Kecamatan Muara Bulian Analysis of the Low Students Motivation in the Science Learning Process in Sd Negeri 08/I Rengas Condong Kecamatan Muara. Journal of Biology Education Research, 1(2), 63–79. Retrieved from http://e-journal.metrouniv.ac.id/index.php/Al-Jahiz
Lestari, A. C., & Annizar, A. M. (2020). Proses Berpikir Kritis Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah PISA Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Berpikir Komputasi. Jurnal Kiprah, 8(1), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.31629/kiprah.v8i1.2063
Maksum, K., Ni’mah, A., Ardiyaningrum, M., & Sukati. (2022). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Keterampilan Berpikir Komputasi Pada Pelajaran Matematika Sekolah Dasar (SD)/Madrasah Ibtida’iyah (MI). Modeling Jurnal Program Studi PGMI, 9(Mi), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.36835/modeling.v9i1.1038
Marta, H., Fitria, Y., Hadiyanto, H., & Zikri, A. (2020). Penerapan Pendekatan Contextual Teaching and Learning Pada Pembelajaran Ipa Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Dan Motivasi Belajar Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 4(1), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v4i1.334
Mulyanto, A., Rusyda, Y., & Niwanputri, G. S. (2020). Pembelajaran Computational Thinking Pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Institut Teknologi Bandung. Retrieved from https://rb.gy/qwlrt
Pratama, G. (2019). Metode Statistik Nonparametrik: Uji Korelasi. Retrieved from https://lms-paralel.esaunggul.ac.id/pluginfile.php?file=%2F202245%2Fmod_resource%2Fcontent%2F2%2F12_7450_esa155_062019_pdf.pdf
Rohman, A. A., & Karimah, S. (2018). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Rendahnya Motivasi Belajar Siswa Kelas XI. At-Taqaddum, 10, 95–108. Retrieved from http://journal.walisongo.ac.id/index.php/attaqaddum/article/download/2651/pdf
Sa’diyyah, F. N., Mania, S., & Suharti. (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Berpikir Komputasi Siswa. JPMI (jurnal pembelajaran matematika inovatif), 4(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v4i1.17-26
Sudaryono. (2021). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Mix Method (2nd ed.). PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan R and D. Bandung: Alfabeta
Sulistyono, N. Y. (2013). Ekonomi. Repository.Upi.Edu 19, 19–29.
Susilana, R. (2015). Modul Populasi dan Sampel. Modul Praktikum, 3–4. Retrieved from http://file.upi.edu/Direktori/DUAL-MODES/PENELITIAN_PENDIDIKAN/BBM_6.pdf
Taupik, R. P., Firman, & Desyandri. (2022). Analisis Kebutuhan Penggunaan Media Pembelajaran IPA Berbasis Teknologi di Era Merdeka Belajar. Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD FKIP Universitas Mandiri, 08(2), 2770–2780. https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v8i2.575
Yamin, M. (2011). Paradigma Baru Pembelajaran. Gaung Persada.
Yelena, Yakovleva, Natalya, & Goltsova. (2016). Information and communication technologies as a means of developing pupils’ learning motivation in elementary school. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 233, 428 – 432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.179
Author Biographies
Riska Putri Taupik, Universitas Negeri Padang
Yanti Fitria, Universitas Negeri Padang
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Riska Putri Taupik, Yanti Fitria
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
