Development of Test Instruments Based on Cognitive Processes and Knowledge Dimensions on Environmental Chemistry
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.4853Published:
2023-12-20Issue:
Vol. 9 No. 12 (2023): DecemberKeywords:
Anderson-Krathwohl, Cognitive domain, Bloom’s taxonomy, Test preparationResearch Articles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
This research aims to develop an instrument that can measure the achievement of student learning outcomes in chemistry education in Environmental Chemistry courses, which refers to Bloom's Taxonomy, which has been revised along with the dimensions of knowledge from Anderson & Krathwohl. The research method used in this research is research and development with 4 (four) stages of research 1) define; 2) design; 3) develop; and 4) dissemination. The validation of this instrument was carried out by two experts in the field of chemistry and tested on 20 students. The instrument used is in the form of a description that takes the cognitive domains C1 to C3. In addition, in the instrument there are also 4 (four) dimensions of knowledge tested, namely factual, conceptual, procedural, and metacognitive. Based on the results of expert validation, it was found that in content there were no problems only in the use of verbs in the instrument requiring more operational verbs and based on the test results it was found that all the questions given showed that 30.15% of the questions were categorized as easy, 44, 80% were categorized as moderate and 25.05% were categorized as difficult. This study shows that the knowledge dimension in Bloom's taxonomy needs to be applied by considering the knowledge dimension to develop thinking skills in students.
References
Ahmed, I., Lashari, A. A., & Golo, M. A. (2023). Evaluating Primary-Level English Textbooks of Single National Curriculum through the Lens of Bloom’s Taxonomy. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 7(III). https://doi.org/10.47205/plhr.2023(7-iii)31
Akturk, A. O., & Sahin, I. (2011). Literature review on metacognition and its measurement. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3731-3736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.364
Aninditya, A., Hasibuan, M. A., & Sutoyo, E. (2019). Text mining approach using TF-IDF and naive bayes for classification of exam questions based on cognitive level of bloom’s taxonomy. Proceedings - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things and Intelligence System, IoTaIS 2019, 112–117. https://doi.org/10.1109/IoTaIS47347.2019.8980428
Aryawan, M., Wayan, I., Gusti, I., & Gede, I. (2023). Bloom’s Taxonomy Revision-Oriented Learning Activities to Improve Procedural Capabilities and Learning Outcomes. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 9(1), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.9.1.261
Bibi, W., Butt, M. N., & Reba, A. (2020). Relating Teachers ’ Questioning Techniques with Students ’ Learning within the Context of Bloom ’ s Taxonomy. FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 14(1), 111–119.
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxomony of Educational Objective. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, 62–197.
Buckingham Shum, S., & Deakin Crick, R. (2016). Learning Analytics for 21st Century Competencies. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(2), 6–21. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2016.32.2
Chandio, M. T., Zafar, N., & Solangi, G. M. (2021). Bloom’s Taxonomy: Reforming Pedagogy Through Assessment. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 8(1), 109–140. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1308485.pdf
Crompton, H., Burke, D., & Lin, Y. C. (2019). Mobile learning and student cognition: A systematic review of PK-12 research using Bloom’s Taxonomy. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 684–701. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12674
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (2019). Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments. Psychological Assessment, 31(12), 1412–1427. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000626
Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.004
Gul, R., Kanwal, S., & Khan, S. S. (2020). Preferences of the Teachers in Employing Revised Blooms Taxonomy in their Instructions. Sir Syed Journal of Education & Social Research, 3(2), 258–266. https://doi.org/10.36902/sjesr-vol3-iss2-2020(258-266)
Herga, N. A. R., GlaŽar, S. A., & Dinevski, D. (2015). Dynamic visualization in the virtual laboratory enhances the fundam ental understanding of chemical concepts. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14(3), 351–365. Retrieved from https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=1022433
Knowlton, B. J., & Castel, A. D. (2022). Memory and reward-based learning: A value-directed remembering perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 73, 25-52. Retrieved from https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-psych-032921-050951
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104
Langdon, J., Botnaru, D. T., Wittenberg, M., Riggs, A. J., Mutchler, J., Syno, M., & Caciula, M. C. (2019). Examining the effects of different teaching strategies on metacognition and academic performance. Advances in physiology education, 43(3), 414-422. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00013.2018
Larsson, K. (2017). Understanding and teaching critical thinking—A new approach. International Journal of Educational Research, 84(May), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.05.004
Nascimento, J. da S. G., Siqueira, T. V., de Oliveira, J. L. G., Alves, M. G., Regino, D. da S. G., & Dalri, M. C. B. (2021). Development of clinical competence in nursing in simulation: the perspective of Bloom’s taxonomy. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 74(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2020-0135
Ntobuo, N. E., Arbie, A., & Amali, L. N. (2018). The development of gravity comic learning media based on gorontalo culture. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(2), 246–251. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i2.14344
Nuswowati, M. (2012). Pengembangan Perkuliahan Kimia Lingkungan Berbasis Masalah untuk Meningkatkan Nilai-Nilai Karakter Mahasiswa. Lembaran Ilmu Kependidikan, 41(2), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.15294/lik.v41i2.2346
Oktaviana, D., & Susiaty, U. D. (2020). Development of Test Instruments Based on Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy to Measure the Students' Higher Order Thinking Skills. JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika), 9(1), 21-29. http://doi.org/10.25273/jipm.v9i1.5638
Pikhart, M., & Klimova, B. (2019). Utilization of linguistic aspects of bloom’s taxonomy in blended learning. Education Sciences, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030235
Pujawan, I. G. N., Rediani, N. N., Antara, I. G. W. S., Putri, N. N. C. A., & Bayu, G. W. (2022). Revised Bloom Taxonomy-Oriented Learning Activities To Develop Scientific Literacy and Creative Thinking Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i1.34628
Qasrawi, R., & Beniabdelrahman, A. (2020). The Higher And Lower-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS and LOTS) In Unlock English Textbooks (1st And 2nd Editions) Based On Bloom’S Taxonomy: An Analysis Study. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET, 7(3), 744–758. Retrieved from https://iojet.org/index.php/IOJET/article/view/866
Rahbarnia, F., Hamedian, S., & Radmehr, F. (2014). A Study on the relationship between multiple Intelligences and mathematical problem solving based on Revised Bloom Taxonomy. Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics, 17(2), 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720502.2013.842044
Ridvan, E., Martin, R., Anssi, L., Pase, N., Koray, K., & Martin, B. (2014). The Intellectual Demands of The Intended Chemistry Curriculum in Czechia, Finland, and Turkey: A Comparative Analysis Based on The Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(2), 168–183. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RP00058B.Chemistry
Sivaraman, S. I., & Krishna, D. (2015). Blooms Taxonomy-Application in Exam Papers Assessment. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Engineering, 6(9), 5–8. Retrieved from https://www.ijmse.org/Volume6/Issue9/paper2.pdf
Stankov, L., & Lee, J. (2008). Confidence and cognitive test performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 961-976. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012546
Tuma, F., & Nassar, A. K. (2021). Applying Bloom’s taxonomy in clinical surgery: Practical examples. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 69(August), 102656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102656
Ullah, Z., Lajis, A., Jamjoom, M., Altalhi, A., & Saleem, F. (2020). Bloom’s taxonomy: A beneficial tool for learning and assessing students’ competency levels in computer programming using empirical analysis. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 28(6), 1628–1640. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22339
Widodo, A. (2006). Revisi Taksonomi Bloom dan Pengembangan Butir Soal. Buletin Puspendik, 3(2), 18–26. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/7497471/Revisi_Taksonomi_Bloom_dan_Pengembangan_Butir_Soal
Author Biographies
Sandra Sukmaning Adji, Universitas Terbuka
Rif’at Shafwatul Anam, Universitas Terbuka
Dodi Sukmayadi, Universitas Terbuka
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Sandra Sukmaning Adji, Rif’at Shafwatul Anam, Dodi Sukmayadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).