Assessing the Effect of Socio-Scientific Inquiry-Based Learning on Socio-Scientific Decision-Making Skill among Senior High School Students

Authors

Maryam , Hadi Suwono

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.5067

Published:

2023-11-25

Issue:

Vol. 9 No. 11 (2023): November

Keywords:

Socio-scientific decision-making, Socio-scientific inquiry-based learning, SSI

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Maryam, & Suwono, H. . (2023). Assessing the Effect of Socio-Scientific Inquiry-Based Learning on Socio-Scientific Decision-Making Skill among Senior High School Students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(11), 10083–10090. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.5067
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Downloads

Metrics

PDF views
271
Nov 25 '23Nov 28 '23Dec 01 '23Dec 04 '23Dec 07 '23Dec 10 '23Dec 13 '23Dec 16 '23Dec 19 '23Dec 22 '235.0
|

Abstract

The use of socio-scientific issues as a context in education is very important because education needs to include interdisciplinary and holistic learning. When dealing with socio-scientific issues, students are expected to be able to make competent decisions. This study was aimed to determine the effect of the Socio-scientific Inquiry-Based Learning (SSIBL) on students' socio-scientific decision-making skill. SSIBL is an inquiry-based learning model that places socio-scientific issues as learning contexts that need to be debated and solved through a series of inquiry processes. This study was a quasi-experimental with a non-equivalent control group design, conducted at senior high school MAN 2 Kota Bima, Indonesia. The target population consisting of all students of grade XI with a total of 254 students. Students of XI IPA 3, 4, 5, and 7 classes were chosen as samples through random sampling. Data were collected through pre-test and post-test of socio-scientific decision-making test, then analyzed using ANCOVA. The results showed that there were significant differences of socio-scientific decision-making between students in the experimental group and students in the control group. The research indicated that the SSIBL model has an effect on increasing the socio-scientific decision-making of students in grade XI MAN 2 Kota Bima.

References

Adinda, I., Hasanah, U., & Banun, S. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Biologi Siswa Saat Pembelajaran Daring. Jurnal Biolokus, 2(2). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30821/biolokus.v4i2.1026

Alcaraz-Dominguez, S., & Barajas, M. (2021). Conceptualization of socioscientific issues in educational practice from a review of research in science education. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 11(6), 297–302. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2021.11.6.1526

Ariza, M. R., Christodoulou, A., van Harskamp, M., Knippels, M. C. P. J., Kyza, E. A., Levinson, R., & Agesilaou, A. (2021). Socioâ€Scientific Inquiryâ€Based Learning as a Means Toward Environmental Citizenship. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(20), 11509. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011509

Asmoro, S. P., Suciati, & Prayitno, B. A. (2020). Empowering Scientific Thinking Skills of Students with Different Scientific Activity Types through Guided Inquiry. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 947–962. https://doi.org/10.29333/IJI.2021.14156A

Capps, D. K., & Crawford, B. A. (2013). Inquiry-Based Instruction and Teaching About Nature of Science: Are They Happening? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(3), 497–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9314-z

Christenson, N., Rundgren, S.-N., & Zeidler, D. (2014). The Relationship of Discipline Background to Upper Secondary Students’ Argumentation on Socioscientific Issues. Research in Science Education, 44(4), 581–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9394-6

Cook, K. L., & Buck, G. A. (2017). Pre-service Teachers’ Understanding of the Nature of Science through Socio-scientific Inquiry. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 1–21. Retrieved from https://ejrsme.icrsme.com/article/view/11294

Dawson, V., & Carson, K. (2017). Using Climate Change Scenarios to Assess High School Students’ Argumentation Skills. Research in Science and Technological Education, 35(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2016.1174932

Eastwood, J., Sadler, T., Sherwood, R., & Schlegel, W. (2013). Students’ Participation in an Interdisciplinary, Socioscientific Issues Based Undergraduate Human Biology Major and Their Understanding of Scientific Inquiry. Research in Science Education, 43(3), 1051–1078. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9298-x

Eggert, S., & Bögeholz, S. (2010). Students’ use of decision-making strategies with regard to socioscientific Issues: An application of the rasch partial credit model. Science Education, 94(2), 230–258. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20358

Fang, S. C., Hsu, Y. S., & Lin, S. S. (2019). Conceptualizing Socioscientific Decision Making from a Review of Research in Science Education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(3), 427–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9890-2

Garrecht, C., Eckhardt, M., Höffler, T. N., & Harms, U. (2020). Fostering students’ socioscientific decision-making: exploring the effectiveness of an environmental science competition. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-020-00022-7

Genisa, M. U., Subali, B., Djukri, Agussalim, A., & Habibi, H. (2020). Socio-scientific issues implementation as science learning material. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(2), 311–317. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i2.20530

Grace, M. (2009). Developing high quality decision-making discussions about biological conservation in a normal classroom setting. International Journal of Science Education, 31(4), 551–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701744595

Gresch, H., Hasselhorn, M., & Bögeholz, S. (2013). Training in Decision-making Strategies: An approach to enhance students’ competence to deal with socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 35(15), 2587–2607. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.617789

Gutierez, S. B. (2015). Integrating Socio-Scientific Issues to Enhance The Bioethical Decision-Making Skills of High School Students. International Education Studies, 8(1), 142–151. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n1p142

Hake, R. (1999). Analyzing Change/Gain Score. Dept of Physics Indiana University.

Hancock, T., Friedrichsen, P., Kinslow, A., & Sadler, T. (2019). Selecting Socio-scientific Issues for Teaching: A Grounded Theory Study of How Science Teachers Collaboratively Design SSI-Based Curricula. Science and Education, 28(6–7), 639–667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00065-x

Handayani, G., Windyariani, S., & Pauzi, R. (2020). Profil Tingkat Penalaran Ilmiah Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas Pada Materi Ekosistem. Biodik, 6(2), 176–186. https://doi.org/10.22437/bio.v6i2.9411

Jeffery, E., Nomme, K., Deane, T., Pollock, C., & Birol, G. (2016). Investigating the role of an inquiry-based biology lab course on student attitudes and views toward science. CBE Life Sciences Education, 15(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-11-0203

Jho, H., Yoon, H. G., & Kim, M. (2014). The Relationship of Science Knowledge, Attitude and Decision Making on Socio-scientific Issues: The Case Study of Students’ Debates on a Nuclear Power Plant in Korea. Science and Education, 23(5), 1131–1151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9652-z

Kaya, G., & Avan, Ç. (2020). An Inquiry-Based Science Activity: Floating-Sinking-Staying Between the Surface and Bottom. Journal of Inquiry Based Activities (JIBA), 10(2), 112–126. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1273516.pdf

Khishfe, R. (2012). Nature of Science and Decision-Making. International Journal of Science Education, 34(1), 67–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.559490

Kinslow, A., Sadler, T., & Nguyen, H. (2019). Socio-scientific reasoning and environmental literacy in a field-based ecology class. Environmental Education Research, 25(3), 388–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2018.1442418

Knippels, M., & Harskamp, M. (2018). An Educational Sequence for Implementing Socio-scientific Inquiry-Based Learning (SSIBL). School Science Review, 100(371), 46–52. Retrieved from https://www.fi.uu.nl/publicaties/literatuur/2018_knippels_harskamp_ssi.pdf

Lee, E., & Brown, M. (2018). Connecting Inquiry and Values in Science Education: An Approach Based on John Dewey’s Philosophy. Science and Education, 27(1–2), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-017-9952-9

Levinson, R., Knippels, M. C., van Dam, F., Kyza, E., Christodoulou, A., Chang-Rundgren, S. ., Grace, M., Yarden, A., Abril, A., Amos, R., Ariza, M. R., Bächtold, M., van Baren-Nawrocka, J., Cohen, R., Dekker, S., Dias, C., Egyed, L., Fonseca, M., Georgiou, Y., … Zafrani, E. (2017). Science and Society in Education: Socio-scientific inquiry-based learning: Connecting formal and informal education with society. PARRISE. Retrieved from https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10157016/

Liu, S. Y., Lin, C. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). College Students’ Scientific Epistemological Views and Thinking Patterns in Socioscientific Decision Making. Science Education, 95(3), 497–517. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20422

Longford, N. (2010). Analysis of Covariance. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (Third, pp. 18–24). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.01304-X

Maulana, A., & Rochintaniawati, D. (2021). Analisis Keterampilan Pengambilan Keputusan Siswa Kelas XI SMAN 1 Cihaurbeuti. Indonesian Science Education Journal, 2(2). Retrieved from https://siducat.org/index.php/isej/article/view/265

Oktaviyanti, I., Sutarto, J., & Atmaja, H. T. (2016). Implementasi Nilai-Nilai Sosial Dalam Membentuk Perilaku Sosial Siswa SD. Journal of Primary Education, 5(2), 113–119. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpe.v5i2.12901

Papadouris, N., & Constantinou, C. (2010). Approaches Employed by Sixth-Graders to Compare Rival Solutions in Socio-scientific Decision-making Tasks. Science Education, 20(3), 225–238. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ872938

Putri, L., Siahaan, P., & Hernani. (2020). Students’ Scientific Reasoning and Argumentative Abilities through Levels of Inquiry Models Based on Socio-scientific Issue. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/4/042100

Romine, W., Sadler, T., Dauer, J., & Kinslow, A. (2020). Measurement of socio-scientific reasoning (SSR) and exploration of SSR as a progression of competencies. International Journal of Science Education, 42(18), 2981–3002. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1849853

Sadler, T. (2013). Socio-scientific Issues in the Classroom Teaching, Learning and Research :Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53 (9).

Sakamoto, M., Yamaguchi, E., Yamamoto, T., & Wakabayashi, K. (2021). An intervention study on students’ decision-making towards consensus building on socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 43(12), 1965–1983. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1947541

Sakschewski, M., Eggert, S., Schneider, S., & Bögeholz, S. (2014). Students’ Socioscientific Reasoning and Decision-making on Energy-related Issues-Development of a measurement instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 36(14), 2291–2313. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.920550

Sheira, S. (2023). A Program in the Issues Related to Gene Editing Applications Based on Socio-Scientific Inquiry-Based Learning (SSIBL) for Developing the Scientific Argumentation and Decision-Making Skills towards these Issues of Biology Section Students at the Faculty of. Egyptian Journal of Science Education, 26(3), 155–204. https://doi.org/10.21608/MKTM.2023.309173

Simon, S., & Amos, R. (2011). Decision Making and Use of Evidence in a Socio-scientific Problem on Air Quality. In T. Sadler (Ed.), Socio-scientific Issues in The Classroom (pp. 167–192). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1159-4_10

Siribunnam, S., Nuangchalerm, P., & Jansawang, N. (2014). Socio-Scientific Decision Making in the Science Classroom. International Journal for Cross-Diciplinary Subjects in Education (IJCDSE), 5(4), 1777–1782. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED556727

Suwono, H., Rofi’Ah, N. L., Saefi, M., & Fachrunnisa, R. (2021). Interactive Socio-Scientific Inquiry for Promoting Scientific Literacy, Enhancing Biological Knowledge, and Developing Critical Thinking. Journal of Biological Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2021.2006270

Walpuski, M., Tepner, O., Sumfleth, E., Dollny, S., Hostenbach, J., & Pollender, T. (2012). Multiple perspectives on students’ scientific communication & reasoning in chemistry education [VISIONS 2011: Teaching]. Acta Didactica Norge, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.5617/adno.1081

Zhang, W., & Hsu, Y. (2021). The interplay of students’ regulation learning and their collective decision-making performance in a SSI context. International Journal of Science Education, 43(11), 1746–1778. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1933250

Author Biographies

Maryam, Universitas Negeri Malang

Hadi Suwono, Universitas Negeri Malang

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Maryam, Hadi Suwono

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).