Freedom to Learn and Freedom to Teach in Science Learning through ChatGPT: Systematic Literature Review

Authors

Paulus L Wairisal , Elijonnahdi , Nugroho Susanto , Ruth Rize Paas Megahati S

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.5089

Published:

2023-10-25

Issue:

Vol. 9 No. 10 (2023): October

Keywords:

ChatGPT, Freedom to teach, Learning, Science

Review

Downloads

How to Cite

Wairisal, P. L. ., Elijonnahdi, E., Susanto, N., & Megahati S, R. R. P. . (2023). Freedom to Learn and Freedom to Teach in Science Learning through ChatGPT: Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(10), 784–790. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.5089

Downloads

Metrics

PDF views
243
Oct 25 '23Oct 28 '23Oct 31 '23Nov 01 '23Nov 04 '23Nov 07 '23Nov 10 '23Nov 13 '23Nov 16 '23Nov 19 '23Nov 22 '239
|

Abstract

Education is very important in preparing people to be able to maintain and improve the quality of life as individuals with dignity. The severity of the challenges faced in all fields can be seen from various kinds of reports such as student learning outcomes, the inability of the community to keep their children successful in educational institutions up to the age of compulsory education. The evaluation system, education management and what is most often highlighted by the mass media today is the problem of the concept of Freedom to Learn and Freedom to Teach in Science Learning through ChatGPT. The purpose of this study is to examine Freedom to Learn and Freedom to Teach in Science Learning. A review is conducted on the state-of-the-art methods using the preferred reporting items for reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The results of this study can be seen from the aspects of affective learning and teaching models, learning methods, and self-learning methods sharing for information can facilitate the learning process in the independent curriculum, using the help of ChatGPT technology which functions to provide easiness in the process of achieving education. As part of modern technological innovation, ChatGPT has an impact on the world of education. Schools, teachers, and students can benefit from this artificial intelligence technology. ChatGPT can be a useful learning partner in implementing the Independent Curriculum.

References

Abbas, A. F., Jusoh, A., Mas’od, A., Alsharif, A. H., & Ali, J. (2022). Bibliometric analysis of information sharing in social media. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 2016556. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.2016556

Aljabreen, H. (2020). Montessori, Waldorf, and Reggio Emilia: A Comparative Analysis of Alternative Models of Early Childhood Education. International Journal of Early Childhood, 52(3), 337–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-020-00277-1

Almulla, M. A. (2020). The Effectiveness of the Project-Based Learning (PBL) Approach as a Way to Engage Students in Learning. SAGE Open, 10(3), 215824402093870. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020938702

Alonso-Vargas, J. M., Melguizo-Ibáñez, E., Puertas-Molero, P., Salvador-Pérez, F., & Ubago-Jiménez, J. L. (2022). Relationship between Learning and Psychomotor Skills in Early Childhood Education. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(24), 16835. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416835

Asih, T. (2019). Perkembangan Psikomotorik Peserta Didik di Kota Metro. Bioedukasi (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi), 10(1), 100. https://doi.org/10.24127/bioedukasi.v10i1.2046

Bamidis, P. D. (2017). Affective Learning: Principles, Technologies, Practice. In C. Frasson & G. Kostopoulos (Eds.), Brain Function Assessment in Learning (Vol. 10512, pp. 1–13). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67615-9_1

Casey, A., & Fernandez-Rio, J. (2019). Cooperative Learning and the Affective Domain. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 90(3), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2019.1559671

Chimentão Punhagui, G. (2019). Using Problem-Solving as a Method for the Development of Self-Regulation of Learning with Adolescents: An Experience Report. In N. Feza (Ed.), Metacognition in Learning. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88195

Cooper, G. (2023). Examining Science Education in ChatGPT: An Exploratory Study of Generative Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(3), 444–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10039-y

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Dejene, W. (2019). The practice of modularized curriculum in higher education institution: Active learning and continuous assessment in focus. Cogent Education, 6(1), Research Article. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1611052

Diem Le, C. T., Pakurár, M., Kun, I. A., & Oláh, J. (2021). The impact of factors on information sharing: An application of meta-analysis. PLOS ONE, 16(12), e0260653. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260653

Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., … Wright, R. (2023). Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?†Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges, and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice, and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642

Ellis, A. R., & Slade, E. (2023). A New Era of Learning: Considerations for ChatGPT as a Tool to Enhance Statistics and Data Science Education. Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education, 31(2), 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/26939169.2023.2223609

Engels, D., Haupt, C., Kugelmann, D., & Dethleffsen, K. (2021). The peer teachers’ perception of intrinsic motivation and rewards. Advances in Physiology Education, 45(4), 758–768. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00023.2021

Forman, N., Udvaros, J., & Avornicului, M. S. (2023). ChatGPT: A new study tool shaping the future for high school students. International Journal of Advanced Natural Sciences and Engineering Researches, 7(4), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.59287/ijanser.562

Gerrard, D. (2020). Enhancing Science Learning through Learning Experiences Outside School (LEOS): A review. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 20(3), 574–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-020-00104-8

Grassini, S. (2023). Shaping the Future of Education: Exploring the Potential and Consequences of AI and ChatGPT in Educational Settings. Education Sciences, 13(7), 692. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070692

Haleem, A., Javaid, M., & Singh, R. P. (2022). An era of ChatGPT as a significant futuristic support tool: A study on features, abilities, and challenges. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations, 2(4), 100089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100089

Hanson, R., Shapiro, S., Hutton-Thamm, E., Hagerty, M. R., & Sullivan, K. P. (2023). Learning to learn from positive experiences. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 18(1), 142–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2021.2006759

Hassani, H., & Silva, E. S. (2023). The Role of ChatGPT in Data Science: How AI-Assisted Conversational Interfaces Are Revolutionizing the Field. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 7(2), 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc7020062

Hirsh, Å., Nilholm, C., Roman, H., Forsberg, E., & Sundberg, D. (2022). Reviews of teaching methods–Which fundamental issues are identified? Education Inquiry, 13(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2020.1839232

Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., Khan, S., & Khan, I. H. (2023). Unlocking the opportunities through ChatGPT Tool towards ameliorating the education system. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations, 3(2), 100115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100115

Kandiko Howson, C., & Kingsbury, M. (2021). Curriculum change as transformational learning. Teaching in Higher Education, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1940923

Laato, S., Islam, A. K. M. N., Islam, M. N., & Whelan, E. (2020). What drives unverified information sharing and cyberchondria during the COVID-19 pandemic? European Journal of Information Systems, 29(3), 288–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1770632

Landøy, A., Popa, D., & Repanovici, A. (2020). Collaboration in Designing a Pedagogical Approach in Information Literacy. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34258-6

Levy, A. R., & Moore Mensah, F. (2020). Learning through the Experience of Water in Elementary School Science. Water, 13(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13010043

Li, Y., Schoenfeld, A. H., diSessa, A. A., Graesser, A. C., Benson, L. C., English, L. D., & Duschl, R. A. (2019). Design and Design Thinking in STEM Education. Journal for STEM Education Research, 2(2), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-019-00020-z

Liu, Y., Han, T., Ma, S., Zhang, J., Yang, Y., Tian, J., He, H., Li, A., He, M., Liu, Z., Wu, Z., Zhao, L., Zhu, D., Li, X., Qiang, N., Shen, D., Liu, T., & Ge, B. (2023). Summary of ChatGPT-Related Research and Perspective Towards the Future of Large Language Models. Meta-Radiology, 100017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metrad.2023.100017

Macfarlane, B. (2021). Why choice of teaching method is essential to academic freedom: A dialogue with Finn. Teaching in Higher Education, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.2007473

Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., Fernández-Batanero, J. M., & López-Meneses, E. (2023). Impact of the Implementation of ChatGPT in Education: A Systematic Review. Computers, 12(8), 153. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers12080153

Olulowo, T. G., Ige, O. A., & Ugwoke, E. O. (2020). Using Peer Tutoring to Improve Students’ Academic Achievement in Financial Accounting Concepts. Education Research International, 2020, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8871235

Plummer, L., Smith, L., Cornforth, E., & Gore, S. (2021). Teaching Psychomotor Skills in a Virtual Environment: An Educational Case Study. Education Sciences, 11(9), 537. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090537

Pokojová, R., & Bártlová, S. (2018). Effective communication and sharing information at clinical handovers. Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery, 9(4), 947–955. https://doi.org/10.15452/CEJNM.2018.09.0028

Ritala, P., Ruokonen, M., & Ramaul, L. (2023). Transforming boundaries: How does ChatGPT change knowledge work? Journal of Business Strategy. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-05-2023-0094

Ruiz-Martín, H., & Bybee, R. W. (2022). The cognitive principles of learning underlying the 5E Model of Instruction. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00337-z

Schneider, B., Krajcik, J., Lavonen, J., Salmela-Aro, K., Klager, C., Bradford, L., Chen, I.-C., Baker, Q., Touitou, I., Peek-Brown, D., Dezendorf, R. M., Maestrales, S., & Bartz, K. (2022). Improving Science Achievement—Is It Possible? Evaluating the Efficacy of a High School Chemistry and Physics Project-Based Learning Intervention. Educational Researcher, 51(2), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211067742

Shaker, D. (2018). Cognitivism and psychomotor skills in surgical training: From theory to practice. International Journal of Medical Education, 9, 253–254. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.5b9a.129b

Stern, E. (2017). Individual differences in the learning potential of human beings. npj Science of Learning, 2(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-016-0003-0

Stojanov, A. (2023). Learning with ChatGPT 3.5 as a more knowledgeable other: An autoethnographic study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00404-7

Tan, A.-L., Ong, Y. S., Ng, Y. S., & Tan, J. H. J. (2023). STEM Problem Solving: Inquiry, Concepts, and Reasoning. Science & Education, 32(2), 381–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00310-2

Ten Cate, O. (2017). Perspective Paper / Perspektive: Peer teaching: From method to philosophy. Zeitschrift Für Evidenz, Fortbildung Und Qualität Im Gesundheitswesen, 127–128, 85–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2017.10.005

Teraoka, E., Jancer Ferreira, H., Kirk, D., & Bardid, F. (2021). Affective Learning in Physical Education: A Systematic Review. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 40(3), 460–473. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2019-0164

Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT is a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x

Trinter, C. P., & Hughes, H. E. (2021). Teachers as Curriculum Designers: Inviting Teachers into the Productive Struggle. RMLE Online, 44(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404476.2021.1878417

Trullà s, J. C., Blay, C., Sarri, E., & Pujol, R. (2022). Effectiveness of problem-based learning methodology in undergraduate medical education: A scoping review. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), 104. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03154-8

Virk, A., Mahajan, R., & Singh, T. (2022). Conceptualizing problem-based learning: An overview. International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research, 12(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_827_21

Wang, C.-C. (2021). The process of implementing problem-based learning in a teacher education program: An exploratory case study. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1996870. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1996870

Weinstein, Y., Madan, C. R., & Sumeracki, M. A. (2018). Teaching the science of learning. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 3(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-017-0087-y

Wörner, S., Kuhn, J., & Scheiter, K. (2022). The Best of Two Worlds: A Systematic Review on Combining Real and Virtual Experiments in Science Education. Review of Educational Research, 92(6), 911–952. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543221079417

Wu, H., & Huwan, T. (2022). Analysis of Affective Factors and Optimization Strategies of Emotion in Online Teaching Based on Improved SVM Model. Security and Communication Networks, 2022, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2334544

Yang, C., Guo, Y., Hu, X., & Zhang, Y. (2023). A New Experimental Method for the Nonlinear Modal Parameter Identification of a Pressurized Water Reactor Fuel Assembly. Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, 2023, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8892196

Yuan, B., Peng, J., Wang, M., & Kuang, L. (2019). Facilitating Students’ Learning Through Problem-Solving in a Computer-Based Expert-Supported Learning Environment. In S. K. S. Cheung, J. Jiao, L.-K. Lee, X. Zhang, K. C. Li, & Z. Zhan (Eds.), Technology in Education: Pedagogical Innovations (Vol. 1048, pp. 3–14). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9895-7_1

Zhang, A., Olelewe, C. J., Orji, C. T., Ibezim, N. E., Sunday, N. H., Obichukwu, P. U., & Okanazu, O. O. (2020). Effects of Innovative and Traditional Teaching Methods on Technical College Students’ Achievement in Computer Craft Practices. SAGE Open, 10(4), 215824402098298. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020982986

Zhu, G., Raman, P., Xing, W., & Slotta, J. (2021). Curriculum design for social, cognitive, and emotional engagement in Knowledge Building. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00276-9

Author Biographies

Paulus L Wairisal, Universitas Pattimura

Elijonnahdi, STKIP Yayasan Abdi Pendidikan Payakumbuh

Nugroho Susanto, Universitas Negeri Padang

Ruth Rize Paas Megahati S, Politeknik Kesehatan Kesuma Bangsa

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Paulus L Wairisal, Elijonnahdi, Nugroho Susanto, Ruth Rize Paas Megahati S

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).