Learning Challenge: Solar Cell Technology in PjBL- STEM Learning Using Jigsaw Strategy to Enhance the 21st Century Skills of 9th Graders
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.5126Published:
2023-10-25Downloads
Abstract
Project-based innovative, creative, and integrative learning is currently an option in preparing 21st-century skills for students and accommodating the implementation of the Merdeka Belajar Curriculum. Research has been conducted through the application of PjBL-STEM learning with a Jigsaw strategy through the theme of environmentally friendly technology with the utilization of solar cells in grade 9 to improve critical thinking skills and communication skills. This research was conducted using a pseudo-experimental method with a pre-posttest control group design using inferential analysis methods to test critical thinking skills while testing communication skills using descriptive analysis. The research subjects were junior high school students totaling 62 people. The results showed that PjBL-STEM learning with the Jigsaw strategy can train students to argue, draw conclusions, deduce, and build basic skills, tactics, and strategies better than the control class. The Jigsaw strategy causes students to become more confident and trained to discuss more intensely with both the initial group and the expert group. This led to an increase in students' communication skills much better than the control class students whose learning was guided by the inquiry method
Keywords:
Jigsaw strategy PjBL-STEM 21st Century skillsReferences
Afriana, J., Permanasari, A., & Fitriani, A. (2016). Penerapan project based learning terintegrasi STEM untuk meningkatkan literasi sains siswa ditinjau dari gender. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 2(2), 202. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v2i2.8561
Ambarwati, R., Dwijanto, & Hendikawati, P. (2015). Keefektifan Model ProjectBased Learning Berbasis GQM Terhadap Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Dan Percaya Diri Siswa Kelas VII. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education. 4(2), 180–186. https://doi.org/10.15294/ujme.v4i2.7601
Bell, A. K., Chiappe, L. M., Erickson, G. M., Suzuki, S., Erickson, G. M., Suzuki, S., et al. (2010). Description and Ecologic Analysis of Hollanda Luceria, a Late Cretaceous Bird from the Gobi Desert (Mongolia). Cretaceous Res. 31 (1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2009.09.001.
Buck Institute of Education. (2016). Why Project Based Learning (PBL)?, (Online), (http://www.bie.org/about/why_pbl), diakses 18 Agustus 2016.
Boss, S. & Krauss, J. (2013). Thinking Through Project-Based Learning Guiding Deeper Inquiry. United States of America: SAGE Publications
Christensen, R., Knezek, G., & Tyler-Wood, T. (2015). Alignment of hands-on STEM engagement activities with positive STEM dispositions in secondary school students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(6), 898–909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9572-6
Ernawati MDW, Muhammad D, Asrial A, Muhaimin M, Info A. Identifying creative thinking skills in subject matter 2019;8:581–9. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i4.20257.
Frankel, J. A. (2012). Choosing an Exchange Rate Regime. Handbook of Exchange Rates, 767–784. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118445785.ch
Griffin, P., McGaw, B., & Care, E. (2012). Assessment and teaching of 21st-century skills. In Assessment and teaching of 21st-century skills (Vol. 9789400723). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007- 2324-5
Hasanah SS, Permanasari A, Riandi. The Effectiveness of the Teacher Professional Development Program in Implementing Curriculum 2013 in the Framework of STEM Education. Proc 5th Asian Educ Symp 2020 (AES 2020) 2021; 566:38 5–8. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210715.081.Fis2020;8:8–15.
Hake RR. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. Am J Phys. 66: 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809.
Hanif S, Wijaya AFC, Winarno N. (2019). Enhancing Students’ Creativity through STEM Project-Based Learning. J Sci Learn. 2:50. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v2i2.13271.
Henriksen, D. (2014). Full STEAM Ahead: Creativity in Excellent STEM Teaching Practices. The STEAM Journal, 1. DOI:10.5642/STEAM.20140102.15
Holm, M. (2011). J575-Project-Based-Instruction-Holm. InSight: Rivier Academic Journal, 7(2), 1–13.
Ismail, I., Permanasari, A., & Setiawan, W. (2016). Stem virtual lab: An alternative practical media to enhance student’s scientific literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(2), 239–246. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i2.5492
Kumalaretna, W. N. D., Mulyono. 2017. Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Ditinjau dari Karakter Kolaborasi dalam Pembelajaran Project Based Learning. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 6(2): 195-205.
Luthvitasari, N., Made D. P., N., & Linuwih, S. (2012). Implementasi Pembelajaran Fisika Berbasis Proyek Terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis, Berpikir Kreatif Dan Kemahiran Generik Sains. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 1(2), 93–97.
Mahanal, S. (2019). Asesmen Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: E-Saintika, 3(2), 51. https://doi.org/10.36312/e-saintika.v3i2.128
Munandar, U. (1999). M. B. dan K. A. S. P. bagi G. dan O. T. J. G. (2019). Instrumen Penilaian Berpikir Kreatif Pada Pendidikan Abad 21. JCP. 5(2), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.31949/jcp.v5i2.1350
Mayasari, T., Kadarohman, A., Rusdiana, D., & Kaniawati, I. (2016). Apakah Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Dan Project Based Learning Mampu Melatihkan Keterampilan Abad 21? Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Keilmuan (JPFK), 2(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.25273/jpfk.v2i1.24
Nugraha, T. S. (2022). Kurikulum Merdeka untuk Pemulihan Krisis Pembelajaran. Inovasi Kurikulum, Inovasi Kurikulum. 2, 160. Retrieved from https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/JIK
OECD. (2017a). PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematic, Financial Literacy and Collaborative Problem Solving, revised edition. In OECD Publishing
Permanasari, A. (2016). STEM Education : Inovasi dalam Pembelajaran Sains. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan sains “Peningkatan Kualitas Pembelajaran Sains Dan Kompetensi Guru Melalui Penelitian & Pengembangan Dalam Menghadapi Tantangan Abad-21†Surakarta, 22 Oktober 2016, 23–34.
Richardson, C., Henriksen, D., Mishra, P. & The Deep-Play Research Group (2017). The Courage to be Creative: An interview with Dr. Yong Zhao. TechTrends, 61(5).
Siew, N. M., Amir, N., & Chong, C. L. (2015). The Perceptions Of Pre-Service And In-Service Teachers Regarding A Project-Based STEM Approach To Teaching Science. Springer Plus, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-4-8.
Seel, N. M. (Ed.). (2012). Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning. Boston: Springer
Shiroishi, Y., Uchiyama, K., & Suzuki, N. (2018). Society 5.0: For Human Security and Well-Being. Computer, 51(7), 91–95. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2018.3011041
Shriki, O., Alstott, J., Carver, F., Holroyd, T., Henson, R. N. A., Smith, M. L., Coppola, R., Bullmore, E., & Plenz, D. (2013). Neuronal avalanches in the resting MEG of the human brain. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(16), 7079–7090. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4286-12.2013
Stylianidou, F., Glauert, E., Rossis, D., Compton, A., Cremin, T., Craft, A., & Havu-Nuutinen, S. (2018). Fostering Inquiry and Creativity in Early Years STEM Education: Policy Recommendations from the Creative Little Scientists Project. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/3875
Zhou, J. and Y. Su (2010), “A missing piece of the puzzle: The organizational context in cultural patterns of creativityâ€, Management and Organization Review, Vol. 6/3, pp. 391-413, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2010.00192.x.
Zubaidah, S., Fuad, N. M., Mahanal, S., & Suarsini, E. (2017). Improving creative thinking skills of students through Differentiated Science Inquiry integrated with mind map. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(4), 77–91. https://doi.org/ 10.12973/tused.10214a
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Rida Widiawati, Anna Permanasari, Didit Ardianto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
