Constructing Students Environmental Sensitivity Through Literacy

Authors

Zukya Rona Islami , Fadhil Sidiq , Rizkei Kurniawan

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.5146

Published:

2023-09-25

Issue:

Vol. 9 No. 9 (2023): September

Keywords:

21st learning, Conceptual model development, Geography textbook, SETS

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Islami, Z. R., Sidiq, F. ., & Kurniawan, R. . (2023). Constructing Students Environmental Sensitivity Through Literacy . Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(9), 7731–7739. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.5146
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

Sensitivity to the environment is an ability that must be possessed by students to be able to find alternative solutions that are right for solving environmental problems. Therefore, the study aims to develop a SETS-based environmental geography textbook using the ADDIE development model and environmental geography course students as respondents. Data was collected using validation sheets and FGD narratives by experts to maintain textbook quality and descriptive analysis. Using a geographical approach, environmental geography textbooks were developed on the basis of SETS. The textbook contains topic sub-chapters, illustrations in tables and graphs, assignments, and activity-based exercises. Based on SETS, practical steps are used to develop environmental geography textbooks, including presenting contextual science materials; presenting local, national, and international environmental issues; presenting examples of the use of technology in overcoming environmental problems;  describing the impact of technology use on the environment and society; and designing evaluations of problem-based textbooks with student activities including SETS elements and involving a geographic approach. This textbook is intended to be used by lecturers of Indonesian environmental geography and subsequent studies as reference material.

References

Aksa, F. I. & and Handoyo, B. (2019) "A conceptual model of the geography textbook 21 st century in enhancing the higher order thinking skill. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1321, 032109. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1321/3/0321.

Andriani, S. A., Masykuri, M., & Sukarmin, S. (2021). Pengembangan Elektronik Modul (E-Modul) Berbasis Guided Inquiry pada Materi Suhu dan Kalor untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains Siswa Kelas VII SMP/MTS. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(SpecialIssue), 281–287. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7ispecialissue.1234

Asakereh, A., Yousofi, N. & Weisi, H. (2019). Critical content analysis of English textbooks used in the Iranian education system: Focusing on ELF features. Issues in Educational Research, 29(4), 1016-1038

Ashari, A., Anwar, S., & Sumarna, O. (2023). Environmental Literacy of Students at SMA Negeri 6 Wajo, South Sulawesi Province. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(6), 4517–4522. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i6.3295

Barbas, T. A., Paraskevopoulos, S., & Stamou, A. G. (2009). The effect of nature documentaries on students’ environmental sensitivity: A case study. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(1), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880902759943

Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining TwentyFirst Century Skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st Century Skills (pp. 17-66). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands

Bratko, D., Butkovic, A., Vukasovic, T., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Von Stumm, S. (2012). Cognitive ability, self-assessed intelligence and personality: Common genetic but independent environmental aetiologies. Intelligence. 40(2), 91–99, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2012.02.001.

Christie B. A., Miller, K. K., Cooke R., & White J. G. (2015). Environmental sustainability in higher education: What do academics think?," Environmental Education Research, 21(5), 655–686. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.879697.

Claudino, S. (2011). 30 Teaching Geography In PORTUGAL: Going back to the future. 27, 10.

De Manzano O., & Ullén F. (2018). Genetic and environmental influences on the phenotypic associations between intelligence, personality, and creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Intelligence. 69, 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2018.05.004.

Fetiana, N., Permanasari, A., & Permana, I. (2022). Environmental Literacy Of Junior High School Students In Bogor: Contribution Of Knowledge To Environmental Attitudes And Behaviors. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(5), 2423–2429. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i5.1794

Ginting, F. W., Mellyzar, M., & Lukman, I. R. (2023). Analysis of Student Environmental Literacy: PjBL-Based Learning that is Integrated STEM. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(1), 242–248. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i1.2599

Imanda, R., Rahmi, A., Setiawaty, S., Dandina, A. D., & Humaira, N. (2022). Development of Chemistry Textbooks Based Scientific Approach in Efforts to Implement Prototype Curriculum at Schools. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(6), 3153–3158. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i6.2317

Jang, S. (2014). Study on Service Models of Digital Textbooks in Cloud Computing Environment for SMART Education," IJUNESST. 7(1). 73–82. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijunesst.2014.7.1.07.

Jitendra A. K., Victor Nolet, & Yan Ping. (2011). An analysis of middle school geography textbooks: implications for students with learning problems. Reading & Writing Quarterly. 17(2). 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/105735601300007606.

Jo I. & Bednarz S. W. (2009). Evaluating Geography Textbook Questions from a Spatial Perspective: Using Concepts of Space, Tools of Representation, and Cognitive Processes to Evaluate Spatiality. Journal of Geography. 108(1). 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221340902758401.

Kosugi T., Tokimatsu, K., Kurosawa, A., Itsubo N., Yagita H., & Sakagami M. (2009). Internalization of the external costs of global environmental damage in an integrated assessment model, Energy Policy, 37(7), 2664–2678, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.02.039.

Law, W.W. (2014). Understanding China's curriculum reform for the 21st century. Journal of Curriculum Studies. 46(3), 332–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2014.883431.

Lee, J & Catling S. (2017). What do geography textbook authors in England consider when they design content and select case studies?, International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 26(4). 342–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2016.1220125.

Liang yr, William, W. (2013) Analysis of A typical Chinese High School Biology Textbook Using the AAAS Textbook Standars Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 9 (4), 329-336

Lim, B. C. Y., Liu, L. W. L., & Choo, C. H. (2020). Investigating the Effects of Interactive E-Book towards Academic Achievement. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(3), 78–88. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i3.10272

Ministry of Education and Culture of Indonesia. (2013). Perkembangan Kurikulum di Indonesia, kelemahan dan kelebihannya [Curriculum development in Indonesia, the weaknesses and strenghts]. Retrieved July, 2020 Retrieved from http://www.kemdikbud.go.id/

Ministry of Education and Culture. (2020). Peta Jalan Pendidikan Indonesia 2020-2035 (Indonesian Education Road Map for 2020-2035). 2020.

Osborne, J. (2013). The 21st century challenge for science education: Assessing scientific reasoning. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.07.006.

Pedretti, E. (1996). Learning About Science, Technology, and Society (STS) Through an Action Research Project: Co-Constructing an Issues-Based Model for STS Education," School Science and Mathematics, 96(8), 432–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1996.tb15866.x.

Primastuti M. & Atun S. (2018). Science Technology Society (STS) learning approach: an effort to improve students' learning outcomes. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1097. 012062. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012062.

Rahman, N. A. (2016). Knowledge, Internal, And Environmental Factors On Environmental Care

Romig, K. (2017). Should Geography Educators Adopt Electronic Textbooks?, Journal of Geography, 116(4), 180–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2016.1215489.

Rubba P. A. & Wiesenmayer R. L. (1988). Goals and Competencies for Precollege STS Education: Recommendations Based upon Recent Literature in Environmental Education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 19(4), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1988.9942772.

S. O. Yager, R. E. Yager, and G. Lim. (2006). The Advantages of an STS Approach Over a Typical Textbook Dominated Approach in Middle School Science. School Science and Mathematics, 106 (5). 248–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2006.tb18083.x.

Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., Houang, R. T., Wang, H., Wiley, D. E., Cogan, L. S., & Wolfe, R. G. (2001). Why schools matter: A cross-national investigation of curriculum and learning. San Fransisco, CA: Jossie-Bass

Scholz M. A., Huynh N. T., Brysch C. P., & Scholz R. W. (2014). An Evaluation of University World Geography Textbook Questions for Components of Spatial Thinking. Journal of Geography. 113(5), 208–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2013.872692.

Schulz, C. et al. (2019). Physical, ecological and human dimensions of environmental change in Brazil's Pantanal wetland: Synthesis and research agenda. Science of The Total Environment. 687, 1011–1027 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.023.

Singh, P., Yusoff, N. M., & Hoon, T. S. (2020). Content analysis of primary school mathematics textbooks and its relationship with pupils achievement. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(2), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.24191/AJUE.V16I2.10286

Sivek, D. J. (2002). Environmental sensitivity among wisconsin high school students. Environmental Education Research, 8(2), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220128220

Sumarmi, S., Bachri, S., Irawan, L. Y., Aliman, M., & Wan Ahmad, W. I. (2021). Project-Based Research Learning (PBRL) Integrated With E-Learning in Projects Completion. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(07). 16–31. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i07.21193

Suwito, Budijanto, Handoyo, B., & Susilo, S. (2020). The effects of 5E learning cycle assisted with spatial based population geography textbook on students’ achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 315–324. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13121a

TucksanunKlahan & Yuenyong C. (2012). An Analysis of Grade 12 Students' Technological Capability in Learning About Electromagnetics Through Science Technology and Society Approach (STS Approach). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 46. 5085–5093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.390.

Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competencies: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.668938

Wahyuni, A. L. E. ., Arrohman, D. A. ., Wilujeng, I. ., Widowati, A. ., & Suyanta, S. (2022). Application of Integrated STEM-Based Student Worksheet Local Potential of Pagar Alam Tea Plantation to Improve Students’ Environmental Literacy. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(3), 1252–1257. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i3.1260

Wajdi, M., Jamaluddin, A. Bin, Nurdiyanti, N., & Magfirah, N. (2022). The effectiveness of problem-based learning with environmental-based comic in enhancing students environmental literacy. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 11(3), 1049–1057. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i3.22140

Wang, y., Lovonen, j., Tirri, K. (2018). Aims for Learning 21st Century Competencies in National Primary Science Curricula in China and Finland. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. 14 (6), 2081-2095. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/86363

Wilson, D. M., & Narasuman, S. (2020). Investigating teachers' implementation and strategies on higher order thinking skills in school based assessment instruments. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(1), 70–84. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i1.8991

Xin, Y. P. (2007). Word problem solving tasks in textbooks and their relation to student performance. Journal of Educational Research, 100(6), 347–359. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.100.6.347-360

Yager, S. O. Yager R. E., & Lim G. (2006). The Advantages of an STS Approach Over a Typical Textbook Dominated Approach in Middle School Science. School Science and Mathematics. 106(5). 248–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2006.tb18083.x.

Yang, Chin Der., Siantun, IA. (2017). An Analysis of Singaporean Versus Indonesian Textbooks Based on Trigonometry Content. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education. 13(7). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00760a

Author Biographies

Zukya Rona Islami, Universitas Samudra

Fadhil Sidiq, Universitas Samudra

Rizkei Kurniawan, Universitas Samudra

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Zukya Rona Islami, Fadhil Sidiq, Rizkei Kurniawan

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).