Analysis of Students' Metacognition Skills in Solving Static Fluid Problems

Authors

Seska Malawau

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.5148

Published:

2023-09-25

Issue:

Vol. 9 No. 9 (2023): September

Keywords:

Metacognition Skills, Physics StudentS, Static Fluids

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Malawau, S. (2023). Analysis of Students’ Metacognition Skills in Solving Static Fluid Problems. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(9), 7749–7756. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.5148
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

Students' errors in solving problems are caused by a lack of accuracy and calculation as well as the use of strategies in problem solving. So, to improve academic achievement, students need metacognitive skills so they can manage their cognition and find weaknesses so they can be corrected. This research aims to describe students' metacognitive skills in solving static fluid physics problems. The type of research used is quantitative descriptive research. Participants in this research were class XI science students at SMA Negeri 12 Ambon, a total of 26 students. The sample was selected using a purposive sampling technique. The instruments used are tests and non-tests in the form of essay test questions and the MAI metacognitive skills questionnaire. Based on the research results, it can be concluded that with a total of 26 students with metacognitive skills in planning and monitoring indicators in solving test questions, it can be seen that 21 students (80.8%) and 18 students (69.2%) have very good qualifications. Meanwhile, in the evaluation category, only 9 students (34.6%) qualified as very good. In this way, MAI can be used by teachers in solving students' physics problems. Therefore, students are expected to be more active and study hard, especially practicing solving physics problems with different problems in order to achieve good metacognitive skills

References

Ayal, C. S., Kesuma, Y. S., Sabandar, J., & Dahlan, J. A. (2016). The enhancement of mathematical reasoning ability of junior high school students by applying mind mapping strategy. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(25), 50–58.

Baran, M., Maskan, A., & Yasar, S. (2018). Learning physics through project-based learning game techniques. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11215a

Batlolona, J. R., Diantoro, M., Wartono, & Latifah, E. (2019). Creative thinking skills students in physics on solid material elasticity. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(1), 48–61. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10265a

Batlolona, J. R., Diantoro, M., Wartono, & Leasa, M. (2020). Students’ mental models of solid elasticity: Mixed method study. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(2), 200–210. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.21

Batlolona, J. R., Leasa, M., Papilaya, P. M., Jamaludin, J., & Taihuttu, J. (2022). Exploration of students’ conceptual understanding and ethnophysics: a case study of Tifa In The Tanimbar Islands, Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(6), 2717–2727. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i6.2154

Bryce, D., & Whitebread, D. (2012). The development of metacognitive skills: Evidence from observational analysis of young children’s behavior during problem-solving. Metacognition and Learning, 7(3), 197–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-012-9091-2

Changwong, K., Sukkamart, A., & Sisan, B. (2018). Critical thinking skill development: Analysis of a new learning management model for Thai high schools. Journal of International Studies, 11(2), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2018/11-2/3

Çini, A., Malmberg, J., & Järvelä, S. (2023). How individual metacognitive awareness relates to situation-specific metacognitive interpretations of collaborative learning tasks. Educational Studies, 49(1), 54–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1834359

Demirel, M., Aşkın, İ., & Yağcı, E. (2015). An Investigation of teacher candidates’ metacognitive skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 1521–1528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.783

Dulger, Z., & Feral, O.-B. (2018). Examination of students ’ metacognitive awareness and their physical problem solving strategies. The Eurasia Proceeding of Educational & Social Sciences, 9, 59–63.

Erhan, A. (2016). Examining the relation between metacognitive understanding of what is listened to and metacognitive awareness levels of secondary school students. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(7), 390–401. https://doi.org/10.5897/err2015.2616

Estianinur. (2020). Identifikasi kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa materi fluida statis. Jurnal Riset Dan Konseptual, 5(3), 477–487.

Garzón, D. F. M., Bustos, A. P. H., & Lizarazo, J. O. U. (2020). Relationship between metacognitive skills, gender, and level of schooling in high school students. Suma Psicologica, 27(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.14349/sumapsi.2020.v27.n1.2

Gok, T. (2010). The general assessment of problem solving processes and metacognition in physics education. International Journal of Physics & Chemistry Education, 2(2), 110–122. https://doi.org/10.51724/ijpce.v2i2.186

Güner, P., & Erbay, H. N. (2021). Metacognitive skills and problem-solving. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 7(3), 715–734. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.1594

Haavold, P. Ø., & Sriraman, B. (2022). Creativity in problem solving: integrating two different views of insight. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 54(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01304-8

Halmo, S. M., Bremers, E. K., Fuller, S., & Stanton, J. D. (2022). “Oh, that makes senseâ€: Social Metacognition in Small-Group Problem Solving. CBE Life Sciences Education, 21(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.22-01-0009

Hindun, I., Nurwidodo, N., & Wicaksono, A. G. C. (2020). Metacognitive awareness components of high-academic ability students in biology hybrid learning: Profile and correlation. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 6(1), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v6i1.11097

Irma, Z. U., Kusairi, S., & Yuliati, L. (2023). Strem PBL with e-authentic assessment: its impact to students’ scientific creativity on static fluid. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 12(1), 80–95. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v12i1.40214

Jamaludin, J., & Batlolona, J. R. (2021). Analysis of students’ conceptual understanding of physics on the topic of static fluids. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(SpecialIssue), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7ispecialissue.845

Jamaludin, J., Hendrik Wenno, I., & Rafafy Batlolona, J. (2022). The effect of problem-based learning and students’ understanding of physics concepts on the topic of the doppler effect. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika, 7(2), 192–202.

Järvelä, S., Kirschner, P. A., Panadero, E., Malmberg, J., Phielix, C., Jaspers, J., Koivuniemi, M., & Järvenoja, H. (2015). Enhancing socially shared regulation in collaborative learning groups: designing for CSCL regulation tools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(1), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9358-1

Kallio, H., Kallio, M., Virta, K., Iiskala, T., & Hotulainen, R. (2021). Teachers’ support for learners’ metacognitive awareness. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 65(5), 802–818. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2020.1755358

Koriat, A., Ma’ayan, H., & Nussinson, R. (2006). The intricate relationships between monitoring and control in metacognition: Lessons for the cause-and-effect relation between subjective experience and behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(1), 36–69. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.135.1.36

Leasa, M., Fenanlampir, A., Pelamonia, J., Talakua, M., & Education, P. (2023). Contribution of metacognition awareness to critical thinking skills with pbl model and hpc strategy: A food digestion system study. Biosfer : Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 16(2), 467–480.

Lebuda, I., & Benedek, M. (2023). A systematic framework of creative metacognition. Physics of Life Reviews, 46, 161–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2023.07.002

McDowell, L. D. (2019). The roles of motivation and metacognition in producing self-regulated learners of college physical science: a review of empirical studies. International Journal of Science Education, 41(17), 2524–2541. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1689584

Perry, J., Lundie, D., & Golder, G. (2019). Metacognition in schools: what does the literature suggest about the effectiveness of teaching metacognition in schools? Educational Review, 71(4), 483–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2018.1441127

Pimvichai, J., Yuenyong, C., Thomas, G. P., & Art-In, S. (2015). Comparison of metacognitive orientation between Thai Urban and rural physics classrooms. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(3), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n3s1p193

Rozencwajg, P. (2003). Metacognitive factors in scientific problem-solving strategies. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 18(3), 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173249

Safari, Y., & Meskini, H. (2016). The Effect of Metacognitive instruction on problem solving skills in iranian students of health sciences. Global Journal of Health Science, 8(1), 150–156. https://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v8n1p150

Schleicher, D. J., Baumann, H. M., Sullivan, D. W., & Yim, J. (2019). Evaluating the effectiveness of performance management : a 30-year integrative conceptual review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(7), 851–887.

Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. In Contemporary Educational Psychology (Vol. 19, Issue 4, pp. 460–475). https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033

Stanton, J. D., Sebesta, A. J., & Dunlosky, J. (2021). Fostering metacognition to support student learning and performance. CBE Life Sciences Education, 20(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-12-0289

Sutopo. (2016). Student S ’ Understanding of Fundamental Concepts of Mechanical Wave Pemahaman Mahasiswa Tentang Konsep-Konsep. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia 12, 12(5), 41–53.

Taasoobshirazi, G., Bailey, M. L., & Farley, J. (2015). Physics Metacognition Inventory Part II: Confirmatory factor analysis and Rasch analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 37(17), 2769–2786. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1104425

Versteeg, M., Bressers, G., Wijnen-Meijer, M., Ommering, B. W. C., de Beaufort, A. J., & Steendijk, P. (2021). What were you thinking? medical students’ metacognition and perceptions of self-regulated learning. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 33(5), 473–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2021.1889559

Winarti, Ambaryani, S. E., & Putranta, H. (2022). Improving learners’ metacognitive skills with self-regulated learning based problem-solving. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 139–154. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.1528a

Zepeda, C. D., Elizabeth Richey, J., Ronevich, P., & Nokes-Malach, T. J. (2015). Direct instruction of metacognition benefits adolescent science learning, transfer, and motivation: An in vivo study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(4), 954–970. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000022

Author Biography

Seska Malawau, Pattimura University

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Seska Malawau

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).