Development and Validation of a Test of Science Process Skills for Secondary Students on Cellular Living System Organization Matter: Rasch Model Analysis

Authors

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.5177

Published:

2023-10-25

Issue:

Vol. 9 No. 10 (2023): October

Keywords:

Cellular living system organization, Instrument test, Science process skills

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Subagja, S., Rubini, B. ., & Kurniasih, S. . (2023). Development and Validation of a Test of Science Process Skills for Secondary Students on Cellular Living System Organization Matter: Rasch Model Analysis. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(10), 9056–9062. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.5177

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

This study aims to develop and implement the instrument of science process skills tests on cellular living system organization matter, explicitly designed for secondary students. The indicators developed include formulating hypotheses, communicating, applying concepts, asking questions, observing, planning experiments, using laboratory tools, classifying, and interpreting data. The steps of this research are theoretical construction, determining the purpose of the assessment, constructing indicator items, compiling the items, expert judgment, instrument revision, field trials, and finalization of the instrument. The Science Process skills test consisted of 27 multiple-choice questions. The subject was 30 secondary school students. Data were analyzed using Rasch analysis. Evidence of the validity and reliability of the tests are presented. The conclusion is that the science process skills test instrument is theoretically and empirically valid and reliable

References

Alagumalai, S., Curtis, D. D., & Hungi, N. (2005). Applied Rasch Measurement: A Book of Exemplars. In Applied Rasch Measurement: A Book of Exemplars. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3076-2

Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences, 3rd ed. In Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences, 3rd ed. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Boone, W. J., Staver, J. R., & Yale, M. S. (2014). Item Measures BT - Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences (W. J. Boone, J. R. Staver, & M. S. Yale (eds.); pp. 93–110). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6857-4_5

Budiyono, A., & Madura, U. I. (2016). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains. Wacana Didaktika, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.31102/wacanadidaktika.4.2.141-149

Burns, J. C., Okey, J. R., & Wise, K. C. (1985). Development of an integrated process skill test: TIPS II. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(2), 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660220208

Cordier, R., Speyer, R., Schindler, A., Michou, E., Heijnen, B. J., Baijens, L., Karaduman, A., Swan, K., Clavé, P., & Joosten, A. V. (2018). Using Rasch Analysis to Evaluate the Reliability and Validity of the Swallowing Quality of Life Questionnaire: An Item Response Theory Approach. Dysphagia, 33(4), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-017-9873-4

Dillashaw, Gerald F., Okey, J. R. (1980). A Test of the Integrated Science Process Skills for. ERIC Processing and Referencing Facility, 14. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED184867.pdf

Gentile, M., Città , G., Perna, S., & Allegra, M. (2023). Do we still need teachers? Navigating the paradigm shift of the teacher’s role in the AI era. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1161777

Gerald Dillashaw, F., & Okey, J. R. (1980). Test of the integrated science process skills for secondary science students. Science Education, 64(5), 601–608. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730640506

Harlen, W. (1999). Purposes and Procedures for Assessing Science Process Skills. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 6(1), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695949993044

Hartono, H., Susanti, R., & Ariska, M. (2022). Science Process Skills Analysis of Junior High School Students in South Sumatera Using Test Basic of Process Skill (BAPS). Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(5), 2184–2190. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i5.2276

Hockings, C., Thomas, L., Ottaway, J., & Jones, R. (2018). Independent learning – what we do when you’re not there. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(2), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1332031

Hodosyová, M., Útla, J., MonikaVanyová, Vnuková, P., & Lapitková, V. (2015). The Development of Science Process Skills in Physics Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 982–989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.184

Hutahaean, R., Harahap, M. B., & Derlina, D. (2017). The Effect of Scientific Inquiry Learning Model Using Macromedia Flash on Student’s Concept Understanding and Science Process Skills in Senior High School. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSRJRME), 07(04), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0704012937

Jalil, S., Herman, Sidin Ali, M., & Haris, A. (2018). Development and validation of science process skills instrument in physics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1028(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/012203

Lemley, J. B., Schumacher, G., & Vesey, W. (2014). What Learning Environments Best Address 21st-Century Students’ Perceived Needs at the Secondary Level of Instruction? NASSP Bulletin, 98(2), 101–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192636514528748

Ludeman, R. R. (1975). Development of The Science Processes Test. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED108898.pdf

Manu, T. S. N., & Nomleni, F. T. (2018). Pengaruh Metode Pembelajaran Karya Kelompok Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains Dengan Kovariabel Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Biologi. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 8(2), 167–179. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.js.2018.v8.i2.p167-179

Marburger, J. H. (2011). Science, technology and innovation in a 21st century context. Policy Sciences, 44(3), 209–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-011-9137-3

Molitor, L. L., & George, K. D. (1976). Development of a test of science process skills. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 13(5), 405–412. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660130504

Ong, E. T., Mesmen, N., & Salleh, S. (2016). the Development and Validation of a Change. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational & Social Sciences (EPESS), 4(November), 342–351. Retrieved from http://www.epess.net/en/pub/issue/30322/334105

Ramaila, S., & Molwele, A. J. (2022). The Role of Technology Integration in the Development of 21st Century Skills and Competencies in Life Sciences Teaching and Learning. International Journal of Higher Education, 11(5), 9. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v11n5p9

Schwarz, P., Body, J. J., Cáp, J., Hofbauer, L. C., Farouk, M., Gessl, A., Kuhn, J. M., Marcocci, C., Mattin, C., Muñoz Torres, M., Payer, J., Van De Ven, A., Yavropoulou, M., Selby, P., & Ùاطمی, Ø­. (2014). The Positive Effects of Technology on Teaching and Student Learning. European Journal of Endocrinology, 171(6), 727–735. Retrieved from https://eje.bioscientifica.com/view/journals/eje/171/6/727.xml

Stehle, S. M., & Peters-Burton, E. E. (2019). Developing student 21st Century skills in selected exemplary inclusive STEM high schools. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0192-1

Sumintono, B. (2015). Aplikasi Pemodelan Rasch pada asesmen pendidikan. In Trim Komunikata (Issue March). Trim Komunikata. Retrieved from http://eprints.um.edu.my/15876/1/ITS_rasch_model_asesment_for_learning.pdf

Szymkowiak, A., Melović, B., Dabić, M., Jeganathan, K., & Kundi, G. S. (2021). Information technology and Gen Z: The role of teachers, the internet, and technology in the education of young people. Technology in Society, 65, 101565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101565

Tannenbaum, R. S. (1971). The development of the test of science processes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 8(2), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660080206

Turiman, P., Omar, J., Daud, A. M., & Osman, K. (2012). Fostering the 21st Century Skills through Scientific Literacy and Science Process Skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 110–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.253

Wan Husin, W. N. F., Mohamad Arsad, N., Othman, O., Halim, L., Rasul, M. S., Osman, K., & Iksan, Z. (2016). Fostering students’ 21st century skills through project oriented problem based learning (Popbl) in integrated stem education program. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 17(1). https://rb.gy/wpmhux

Winandika, G. (2020). Keefektifan Model Pembelajaran Keterampilan Proses Sains Bervisi Salingtemas (Sains, Lingkungan Teknologi dan Masyarakat) di SD Negeri Tinggarjaya. Jurnal Pancar, 4(1), 33–46. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unugha.ac.id/index.php/pancar/article/view/312

Author Biographies

Sigit Subagja, Universitas Pakuan

Bibin Rubini, Universitas Pakuan

Surti Kurniasih, Universitas Pakuan

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Sigit Subagja, Bibin Rubini, Surti Kurniasih

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).