Systematic Literature Review: Analysis of Misconception Problems and Diagnostic Instruments for Learning Chemistry

Authors

Muhammad Habib Ash Shiddiqi , Vegha Dwi Arthamena , Mizzan Ayyubi , Alessandro Jeremi Manarisip , Nurfina Aznam

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v10i4.5189

Published:

2024-04-25

Issue:

Vol. 10 No. 4 (2024): April

Keywords:

Diagnostic instruments, Misconceptions in chemistry, Systematic literature review

Review

Downloads

How to Cite

Shiddiqi, M. H. A., Arthamena, V. D., Ayyubi, M., Manarisip, A. J., & Aznam, N. (2024). Systematic Literature Review: Analysis of Misconception Problems and Diagnostic Instruments for Learning Chemistry. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(4), 168–179. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i4.5189
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

This research aims to analyze research trends in Chemical misconceptions in chemistry learning and diagnostic instruments used. The research method used in this research is a systematic literature review (SLR). The database obtained was 16 articles selected from the Scopus and Google Scholar databases with Publish or Perish (PoP). The results of the research found were the majority of students experienced misconceptions in learning chemistry caused by errors in preconceptions and abstract thinking concepts in the material, the method used to analyze the misconceptions found was a two-level, three-level, four-level diagnostic instrument, multiple choice, and semi-open tests and The misconceptions found in chemistry materials are acid-base, reaction rate, chemical equilibrium, chemical bonding, salt hydrolysis, and buffer solution.

References

Aini, F., & Silfianah, I. (2022). Identification of Students’ Misconceptions on Acid-Base Using Four Tier Diagnostic Tests. J-PEK (Jurnal Pembelajaran Kimia), 7(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.17977/um026v7

i12022p033

Amry, U. W., Rahayu, S., & Yahmin, Y. (2017). Analisis Miskonsepsi Asam Basa pada Pembelajaran Konvensional dan Dual Situated Learning Model (DSLM). Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 2(3), 385–391. Retrieved from http://journal.um.ac.id/index.

php/jptpp/

Aulia, H., Saridewi, N., & Yunita, L. (2017). Penerapan Model POGIL (Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Learning) untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Siswa pada Materi Laju Reaksi. Edusains, 9(2), 174–181. http://dx.doi.org/10.15408/es.v9i2.

Damsi, M., & Suyanto, S. (2023). Systematic Literature Review: Multiple-Tier Diagnostic Instruments in Measuring Student Chemistry Misconceptions. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(5), 8–21 https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i5.2600

Dirman, H. M., Mufit, F., & Festiyed, F. (2022). Review and Comparison of Four-Tier Multiple Choice and Five-Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Tests to Identify Mastery of Physics Concepts. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i1.838

Djarwo, C. F. (2018). Analisis Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa Pendidikan Kimia pada Materi Hidrokarbon. Jurnal Ilmiah IKIP Mataram, 6(2), 90-97. Retrieved from https://ejournal.undikma.ac.id/index.php/

jiim/article/view/2788

Erman, E. (2017). Factors Contributing to Students’ Misconceptions in Learning Covalent Bonds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(4), 520–537. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21375

Fahmi, F., & Irhasyuarna, Y. (2017). The Misconceptions of Senior High School Students in Banjarmasin on Chemical Bonding. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(17), 32–39. Retrieved from http://eprints.ulm.ac.id/id/eprint/5382

Fajri, A. Y. R., Agung, S., & Saridewi, N. (2020). Penggunaan Instrumen Diagnostik Two-Tier untuk Menganalisis Miskonsepsi Asam Basa Siswa SMA dan MA. JINoP (Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran), 6(1), 101. https://doi.org/10.22219/

jinop.v6i1.8445

Fariyani, Q., Rusilowati, A., & Sugianto, S. (2017). Four-Tier Diagnostic Test to Identify Misconceptions in Geometrical Optics. Unnes Science Education Journal, 6(3), 1724-1729. Retrieved from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/usej/article/view/20396

Gurel, D. K., Eryılmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2015). A Review and Comparison of Diagnostic Instruments to Identify Students' Misconceptions in Science. (Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(5), 989-1008, https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1369a

Jannah, M., Ningsih, P., & Ratman, R. (2017). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Kelas XI SMA Negeri 1 Banawa Tengah pada Pembelajaran Larutan Penyangga dengan CRI (Certainty of Response Index). Jurnal Akademika Kimia, 5(2), 85. https://doi.org/10.22487/j24775185.2016.v5.i2.8019

Jusniar, J., & Syamsidah, S. (2021). Hubungan Konsep Diri dengan Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Konsep Kesetimbangan Kimia. Jurnal IPA Terpadu, 5(1), 96–102. Retrieved from http://eprints.unm.ac.id/id/eprint/30478

Karini, R. A., Fikroh, R. A., & Cahyani, V. P. (2022). Identification of Students’ Misconceptions on Hydrocarbon Material Using a Four-Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 6(2), 79–87. https://doi.org/10.23887/

jpki.v6i2.39022

Karpudewan, M., Treagust, D. F., Mocerino, M., Won, M., & Chandrasegaran, A. L. (2015). Investigating High School Students’ Understanding of Chemical Equilibrium Concepts. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 10(6), 845–863. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijese.2015.280a

Kartimi, K., Yunita, Y., Fuadi, F. N., & Addiin, I. (2021). A Four-Tier Diagnostic Instrument: An Analysis of Elementary Student Misconceptions in Science Topic. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(SpecialIssue), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.29303/

jppipa.v7iSpecialIssue.1022

Keshavarz, E., & Moshkbid, F. (2023). Identifying the Pattern of Correcting Chemistry Misconceptions and Promoting Scientific Culture. Popularization of Science, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.22034/POPSCI.

357801.1234

Khomaria, I. N., & Nasrudin, H. (2016). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran ECIRR untuk Mereduksi Miskonsepsi pada Materi Kesetimbangan Kimia Kelas XI MIA di SMA Negeri 1 Pacet. Unesa Journal of Chemical Education, 5(1), 98–106. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/

index.php/journal-of-chemical-education/article/view/14454

Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews. Keele: Software Engineering Group Department of Computer Science Keele University Keele.

Kurniawan, M. A., Rahayu, S., Fajaroh, F., & Almuntasheri, S. (2020). Effectiveness of Dual Situated Learning Model in Improving High School Students’ Conceptions of Chemistry Equilibrium and Preventing Their Misconceptions. Journal of Science Learning, 3(2), 99–105. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v3i2.22277

Kustiarini, F. T., Susanti, V. H. E., & Saputro, A. N. C. (2019). Penggunaan Tes Diagnostic Three-Tier Test Alasan Terbuka untuk Mengidentifikasi Miskonsepsi Larutan. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 8(2), 171. https://doi.org/10.20961/jpkim.v8i2.25236

Laksono, P. J. (2020). Pengembangan Three Tier Multiple Choice Test pada Materi Kesetimbangan Kimia Mata Kuliah Kimia Dasar Lanjut. Orbital: Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 4(1), 44–63. https://doi.

org/10.19109/ojpk.v4i1.5649

Maison, M., Lestari, N., & Widaningtyas, A. (2020). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Materi Usaha dan Energi. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 6(1), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v6i1.314

Manampiring, G., Santoso, I., & Kapahang, A. (2019). Penerapan Metode POGIL pada Materi Konsep Mol di Kelas X IPA SMA Negeri 2 Langowan. Journal of Chemistry Education, 1(2), 72–76. https://doi.org/10.37033/ojce.v1i2.112

Mapada, S., Wardhani, R. A. A. K., & Khairunnisa, Y. (2022). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Kelas XI IPA pada Materi Larutan Penyangga Menggunakan Two-Tier Diagnostic Instrument di SMA Sabilal Muhtadin Banjarmasin. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia dan Ilmu Kimia, 5(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.31602/dl.v5i1.7520

Maratusholihah, N. F., Rahayu, S., & Fajaroh, F. (2017). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa SMA pada Materi Hidrolisis Garam dan Larutan Penyangga. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 2(7), 919–926. Retrieved from http://journal.um.

ac.id/index.php/jptpp

Milenković, D. D., Hrin, T. N., Segedinac, M. D., & Horvat, S. (2016). Development of a Three-Tier Test as a Valid Diagnostic Tool for Identification of Misconceptions Related to Carbohydrates. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(9), 1514–1520. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00261

Monita, F. A., & Suharto, D. B. (2016). Identifikasi dan Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Menggunakan Three- Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Instrument pada Konsep Kesetimbangan Kimia. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Sains, 7(1), 27–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.

/quantum.v7i1.3538

Mubarokah, F. D., Mulyani, S., & Indriyanti, N. Y. (2018). Identifying Students’ Misconceptions of Acid-Base Concepts Using a Three-Tier Diagnostic Test: A Case of Indonesia and Thailand. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(Special Issue), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10256a

Mutlu, A., & Sesen, B. A. (2015). Development of a Two-Tier Diagnostic Test to Assess Undergraduates’ Understanding of Some Chemistry Concepts. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 629–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/

j.sbspro.2015.01.593

Ni’mah, M., Subandi, S., & Munzil, M. (2020). Keefektifan Pembelajaran POGIL dengan Strategi Konflik Kognitif untuk Mengurangi Miskonsepsi pada Materi Laju Reaksi Kelas XI SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 5(9), 1257. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i9.

Ningrum, L. S., Drastisianti, A., Setiowati, H., & Pratiwi, R. (2022). Effectiveness of Cognitive Conflict-Based Chemistry Learning in Reducing Students’ Misconceptions of Acid-Base Materials. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(4), 2425–2429. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i4.2092

Noprianti, E., & Utami, L. (2017). Penggunaan Two-Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test Disertai Ciri untuk Menganalisis Miskonsepsi Siswa. JTK (Jurnal Tadris Kimiya), 2(2), 124–129. https://doi.org/10.15575/jtk.v2i2.1876

Nurhidayatulah, N., & Prodjosantoso, A. K. (2018). Miskonsepsi Materi Larutan Penyangga. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 4(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v4i1.10029

Orgill, M., & Sutherland, S. (2008). Unergraduate Chemistry Students’ Perception of and Misconceptions about Buffers and Buffer Problems. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9, 131—141. https://doi.org/10.1039/

B806229N

Prodjosantoso, A. K., Hertina, A. M., & Irwanto, I. (2019). The Misconception Diagnosis on Ionic and Covalent Bonds Concepts with Three Tier Diagnostic Test. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 1477–1488. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.

12194a

Putri, V. W., & Gazali, F. (2021). Studi Literatur Model Pembelajaran POGIL untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik pada Pembelajaran Kimia. Ranah Research: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 3(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.

/rrj.v3i2.363

Ramdani, A. (2017). Pengembangan Instrumen Miskonsepsi Kimia pada Konsep Struktur Atom. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v3i2.87

Rokhim, D. A., Rahayu, S., & Dasna, I. W. (2023). Analisis Miskonsepsi Kimia dan Instrumen Diagnosisnya: Literatur Review. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 17(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.

/jipk.v17i1.34245

Rositasari, D., Saridewi, N., & Agung, S. (2015). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Two-Tier untuk Mendeteksi Miskonsepsi Siswa SMA pada Topik Asam-Basa. Edusains, 6(2), 169–176. https://doi.

org/10.15408/es.v6i2.1148

Sihaloho, M., Hadis, S. S., Kilo, A. K., & Kilo, A. La. (2021). Diagnosa Miskonsepsi Siswa SMA Negeri 1 Telaga Gorontalo pada Materi Termokimia. Jambura Journal of Educational Chemistry, 3(1). Retrieved from https://ejurnal.ung.ac.id/index.

php/jjec/article/view/7133

Soeharto, S., Csapó, B., Sarimanah, E., Dewi, F. I., & Sabri, T. (2019). A Review of Students’ Common Misconceptions in Science and Their Diagnostic Assessment Tools. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(2), 247–266. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i2.

Sulalah, A. S. (2014). Implementasi Strategi POGIL untuk Mereduksi Miskonsepsi pada Materi Stoikiometri Kelas X di SMAN 1 Kandangan. Unesa Journal of Chemical Education, 3(3), 187–192. https://doi.org/10.26740/ujced.v3n3.p%25p

Suprapto, N. (2020). Do We Experience Misconceptions?: An Ontological Review of Misconceptions in Science. Studies in Philosophy of Science and Education, 1(2), 50-55. https://doi.org/

46627/sipose.v1i2.24

Suyono, S. (2020). Miskonsepsi Kimia, Sebuah Misteri. J-PEK (Jurnal Pembelajaran Kimia), 5(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.17977/um026v5i12020p001

Treagust, D. F. (1988). Development and Use of Diagnostics Test to Evaluate Students’ Misconception in Science. International Journal of Science Education, 10(2), 159—169. https://doi.org

/10.1080/0950069880100204

Üce, M., & Ceyhan, İ. (2019). Misconception in Chemistry Education and Practices to Eliminate Them: Literature Analysis. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 7(3), 202. https://doi.org/10.

/jets.v7i3.3990

Vistara, M. F., Rochmad, R., & Wijayanti, K. (2022). Systematic Literature Review: STEM Approach through Engineering Design Process with Project Based Learning Model to Improve Mathematical Creative Thinking Skills. Mathematics Education Journal, 6(2), 140–156. https://doi.org/10.22219/

mej.v6i2.21150

Warsito, J., Subandi, S., & Parlan, P. (2021). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Topik Ikatan Kimia serta Perbaikannya dengan Pembelajaran Model ECIRR (Elicit, Confront, Identify, Resolve, Reinforce). Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 5(11), 1563. https://doi.org/10.

/jptpp.v5i11.14158

Yan, Y. K., & Subramaniam, R. (2018). Using a Multi-Tier Diagnostic Test to Explore The Nature of Students’ Alternative Conceptions on Reaction Kinetics. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(1), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP001

F

Author Biographies

Muhammad Habib Ash Shiddiqi, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Vegha Dwi Arthamena, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Mizzan Ayyubi, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Alessandro Jeremi Manarisip, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Nurfina Aznam, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Muhammad Habib Ash Shiddiqi, Vegha Dwi Arthamena, Mizzan Ayyubi, Alessandro Jeremi Manarisip, Nurfina Aznam

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).