Vol. 9 No. 11 (2023): November
Open Access
Peer Reviewed

Engineering Design Process (EDP)-Based Learning to Enhance High School Students' Creativity in Alternative Energy Topics

Authors

Ujang Sudrajat , Didit Ardianto , Anna Permanasari

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.5248

Published:

2023-11-25

Downloads

Abstract

The energy issue is one of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which is a global development agenda that all countries, including Indonesia, must follow. The curriculum plays a crucial role in enhancing students' energy literacy. It is expected that with the energy literacy possessed by students, they will have a good understanding of energy, which will encourage them to use energy wisely. Additionally, it is hoped that creative ideas from students will emerge to address energy-related problems. Based on this background, this research aims to enhance students' creativity in addressing energy issues. The research method employed is a quantitative research method with a Pretest-Posttest Nonequivalent Control Group Design, which is a form of Quasi Experimental Design. The subjects in this study are twelfth-grade science students (XII MIPA) selected through purposive sampling and divided into two groups, namely the control group and the experimental group. The control group uses a project-based learning model, while the experimental group uses project-based learning based on the engineering design process. The number of samples for the experimental group is 33 students, and for the control group, it is 34 students, making a total of 67 research subjects. The creative thinking skills of students are measured using a descriptive test that includes indicators of creative thinking skills, while student creativity in their products is measured using an assessment sheet for creative products based on presentations and testing of creative products carried out at the end of the learning process. The data analysis results show that there is an improvement in students' creative thinking skills, as indicated by the average N-Gain achievement of 53.3%, falling into the moderate category. Additionally, the creativity of student products in all creative product indicators is rated as highly creative, with an average score of 89. The Mann Whitney U Test results indicate a significant difference in the improvement of creative thinking skills and student creativity in their products

Keywords:

Creative thinking skills Engineering design process Student’s creativity

References

Aini, M., & Aini, M. (2023). Enhancing Creative Thinking And Communication Skills Through Engineering Design Process (EDP) Learning Model: A Case Study. Bioedukasi, 21(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.19184/bioedu.v21i1.38022

Anshori, I. Al, Rokhmat, J., & Gunada, I. W. (2019). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kausalitik Dalam Meningkatkan Kreativitas Peserta Didik. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 5(2), 205–212. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v5i2.1215

Ayaz, E., & Sarıkaya, R. (2019). The Effect of Engineering Design-Based Science Teaching on The Perceptions of Classroom Teacher Candidates Towards STEM Disciplines. International Journal of Progressive Education, 15(3), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2019.193.2

Besemer, S. P., & Treffinger, D. J. (1981). Analysis of Creative Products: Review and Synthesis. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 15(3), 158–178. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1981.tb00287.x

BNSP. (2010). Paradigma Pendidikan Nasional Abad XXI (V. 1.0 (ed.)).

Creswell, J. (2003). Research Mthods_Qual_Quant Mixed Methods Approaches.

Dinantika, H. K., Suyanto, E., & Nyeneng, I. D. P. (2019). Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Project Based Learning Terhadap Kreativitas Siswa Pada Materi Energi Terbarukan. Titian Ilmu: Jurnal Ilmiah Multi Sciences, 11(2), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.30599/jti.v11i2.473

Han, H. J., & Shim, K. C. (2019). Development of an engineering design process-based teaching and learning model for scientifically gifted students at the Science Education Institute for the Gifted in South Korea. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-019-0047-6

Hoque, F., Yasin, R. M., & Sopian, K. (2022). Revisiting Education for Sustainable Development: Methods to Inspire Secondary School Students toward Renewable Energy. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(14), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148296

Indarta, Y., Jalinus, N., Abdullah, R., & Samala, A. D. (2021). 21st Century Skills: TVET dan Tantangan Abad 21. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(6), 4340–4348. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v3i6.1458

Jolly, A. (2016). STEM by design: Strategies and activities for grades 4-8. STEM by Design: Strategies and Activities for Grades 4-8, 1–168. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315679976

Langngan, V. B., Tulandi, D. A., & Mandang, T. (2021). Efektivitas Laboratorium Virtual Sebagai Media Pembelajaran Pada Eksperimen Viskositas. Charm Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 2(2), 88–93. https://doi.org/10.53682/charmsains.v2i2.112

Mayasari, T., Kadarohman, R. A., & Rusdiana, D. (2014). Eksplorasi Dimensi Kreativitas Untuk Pengembangan Produk Kreatif Energi Baru Dan Terbarukan. Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 18(2), 221. https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v18i2.54

Maysyaroh, S., & Dwikoranto, D. (2021). Kajian Pengaruh Model Project Based Learning Terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif Peserta Didik Pada Pembelajaran Fisika. ORBITA: Jurnal Kajian, Inovasi Dan Aplikasi Pendidikan Fisika, 7(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.31764/orbita.v7i1.4433

Nurkhoerudin, D., Edie, S. S., & Hartono, H. (2019). Unnes Physics Education Journal Kreativitas Mahasiswa Fisika dalam Mendesain Produk Materi Medan dan Gaya. Unnes Physics Education Journal, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.15294/upej.v8i3.35628

Sekretariat Jenderal Dewan Energi Nasional. (2022). Laporan Analisis Nerasa Energi Nasional. Sekretariat Jenderal Dewan Energi Nasional.

Siew, N. M., Goh, H., & Sulaiman, F. (2016). Integrating stem in an engineering design process: The learning experience of rural secondary school students in an outreach challenge program. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(4), 477–493. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/16.15.477

Soegiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D (19th ed.). Alfabeta.

Syukri, M., Halim, L., & Mohtar, L. E. (2017). Engineering Design Process: Cultivating Creativity Skills through Development of Science Technical Product Muhammad. Jurnal Fizik Malaysia, 38(1), 10055–10065. Retrieved from https://rb.gy/t4cmld

Triwibowo, S., Parno, P., & Latifah, E. (2021). Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa SMA Topik Usaha dan Energi. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 6(11), 1787. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v6i11.15146

Winarno, N., Rusdiana, D., Samsudin, A., Susilowati, E., Ahmad, N. J., & Afifah, R. M. A. (2020). The Steps of the Engineering Design Process (EDP) in Science Education: A Meta-Analysis. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(4), 1345–1360. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.766201

Yusup, M. (2017). Analisis Kurikulum Fisika Sma Dalam Perspektif Literasi Energi. Jurnal Inovasi Dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 48–53. Retrieved from http://fkip.unsri.ac.id/index.php/menu/104

Author Biographies

Ujang Sudrajat, Universitas Pakuan

Author Origin : Indonesia

Didit Ardianto, Pakuan University

Author Origin : Indonesia

Anna Permanasari, Pakuan University

Author Origin : Indonesia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Sudrajat, U. ., Ardianto, D. ., & Permanasari, A. . (2023). Engineering Design Process (EDP)-Based Learning to Enhance High School Students’ Creativity in Alternative Energy Topics. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(11), 9547–9553. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.5248