ChatGPT for Teachers and Students in Science Learning: A Systematic Literature Review
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.5259Published:
2023-10-25Issue:
Vol. 9 No. 10 (2023): OctoberKeywords:
ChatGPT, Science learning, Student, TeacherReview
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
In Indonesia Science education has not reached a portion that is in accordance with the needs of science education. Science learning should not only focus on knowledge but must also be balanced with application in everyday life. With this application, students will know that what they learn in science is applied and useful for life. That way, students will continue to try to experiment because of their high curiosity so that students are able to produce scientific products. Science problems are not only experienced by students, but teachers who teach science at school also have science problems they face. For this reason, Chat GPT (Generative Pre-Trainer Transformer) is used as one of the Open AI (Artificial Intelligence) innovations, a research company engaged in the development of artificial intelligence. The purpose of this research is to explain GPT Chat for Teachers and Students in Science Learning. A review is conducted on the state-of-the-art methods using the preferred reporting items for reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The results of this research show that Chat GPT has main functions, Chat GPT also has many uses for teachers and students, and science learning has five domains of science education, which must be supported by appropriate technological sophistication.
References
Ajevski, M., Barker, K., Gilbert, A., Hardie, L., & Ryan, F. (2023). ChatGPT and the future of legal education and practice. The Law Teacher, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2023.2207426
Ariani, R. & Ratnawulan. (2020). Analysis of interactive media integrated natural science with energy themes in the life of using integrated types that integrate of learning for the 21 st century. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1481(1), 012048. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1481/1/012048
Awalin, N. A., & Ismono, I. (2021). The Implementation of Problem Based Learning Model with Stem (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) Approach to Train Students’ Science Process Skills of XI Graders on Chemical Equilibrium Topic. INSECTA: Integrative Science Education and Teaching Activity Journal, 2(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.21154/insecta.v1i2.2496
Bitzenbauer, P. (2023). ChatGPT in physics education: A pilot study on easy-to-implement activities. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(3), ep430. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13176
Cooper, G. (2023). Examining Science Education in ChatGPT: An Exploratory Study of Generative Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(3), 444–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10039-y
Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., … Wright, R. (2023). Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?†Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Essel, H. B., Vlachopoulos, D., Tachie-Menson, A., Johnson, E. E., & Baah, P. K. (2022). The impact of a virtual teaching assistant (chatbot) on students’ learning in Ghanaian higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00362-6
Fauzan, B. A., Kusnadi, D., & Sofyan, A. (2023). Changes in Students' Cognitive Abilities through STEM-Based Learning in Elementary Schools. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 89-100 https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v12i1.2122
Fuchs, K. (2023). Exploring the opportunities and challenges of NLP models in higher education: Is Chat GPT a blessing or a curse? Frontiers in Education, 8, 1166682. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1166682
Gao, C. A., Howard, F. M., Markov, N. S., Dyer, E. C., Ramesh, S., Luo, Y., & Pearson, A. T. (2023). Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers. Npj Digital Medicine, 6(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00819-6
Haggerty, D. A., Banks, M. J., Kamenar, E., Cao, A. B., Curtis, P. C., Mezić, I., & Hawkes, E. W. (2023). Control of soft robots with inertial dynamics. Science Robotics, 8(81), eadd6864. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.add6864
Haggerty, D., Banks, M., Kamenar, E., Cao, A., Curtis, P., Mezic, I., & Hawkes, E. (2023). Control of Soft Robots with Inertial Dynamics [Computer software]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.8184777
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., & Singh, R. P. (2022). An era of ChatGPT as a significant futuristic support tool: A study on features, abilities, and challenges. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations, 2(4), 100089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100089
Haryanto, P. C., & Arty, I. S. (2019). The Application of Contextual Teaching and Learning in Natural Science to Improve Student’s HOTS and Self-efficacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233(1), 012106. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012106
Hassani, H., & Silva, E. S. (2023). The Role of ChatGPT in Data Science: How AI-Assisted Conversational Interfaces Are Revolutionizing the Field. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 7(2), 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc7020062
He, M., & Garner, P. N. (2023). Can ChatGPT Detect Intent? Evaluating Large Language Models for Spoken Language Understanding. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2305.13512
Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., Khan, S., & Khan, I. H. (2023). Unlocking the opportunities through ChatGPT Tool towards ameliorating the education system. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations, 3(2), 100115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100115
Jiao, W., Wang, W., Huang, J., Wang, X., & Tu, Z. (2023). Is ChatGPT A Good Translator? Yes With GPT-4 As The Engine. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2301.08745
Johnston, A. C., Akarsu, M., Moore, T. J., & Guzey, S. S. (2019). Engineering as the integrator: A case study of one middle school science teacher’s talk. Journal of Engineering Education, 108(3), 418–440. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20286
Kung, T. H., Cheatham, M., Medenilla, A., Sillos, C., De Leon, L., Elepaño, C., Madriaga, M., Aggabao, R., Diaz-Candido, G., Maningo, J., & Tseng, V. (2023). Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models. PLOS Digital Health, 2(2), e0000198. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000198
Kurniawati, A. P., Prasetyo, Z. K., Wilujeng, I., & Suryadarma, I. G. P. (2017). The effectivenes of science domain-based science learning integrated with local potency. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1868, No. 1). AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995185
Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Smith, M. U. (2019). Teaching Nature of Scientific Knowledge to Kindergarten Through University Students. Science & Education, 28(3–5), 197–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00057-x
Lewis, D. W. (2023). Open Access: A Conversation with ChatGPT. The Journal of Electronic Publishing, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.3998/jep.3891
Lyu, Q., Tan, J., Zapadka, M. E., Ponnatapura, J., Niu, C., Myers, K. J., Wang, G., & Whitlow, C. T. (2023). Translating radiology reports into plain language using ChatGPT and GPT-4 with prompt learning: Results, limitations, and potential. Visual Computing for Industry, Biomedicine, and Art, 6(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42492-023-00136-5
Margolis, E., & Laurence, S. (2023). Making sense of domain specificity. Cognition, 240, 105583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105583
Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2
Moqbel, M. S. S., & Al-Kadi, A. M. T. (2023). Foreign Language Learning Assessment in the Age of ChatGPT: A Theoretical Account. Journal of English Studies in Arabia Felix, 2(1), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.56540/jesaf.v2i1.62
Pan, W., Chen, Q., Xu, X., Che, W., & Qin, L. (2023). A Preliminary Evaluation of ChatGPT for Zero-shot Dialogue Understanding. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2304.04256
Patel, S. B., & Lam, K. (2023). ChatGPT: The future of discharge summaries? The Lancet Digital Health, 5(3), e107–e108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00021-3
Rachmadtullah, R., Pramujiono, A., Setiawan, B., & Retnani Srinarwati, D. (2022). Teacher’s Perception of the Integration of Science Technology Society (STS) into Learning at Elementary School. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i19.12442
Ray, P. P. (2023). ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 3, 121–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003
Roumeliotis, K. I., & Tselikas, N. D. (2023). ChatGPT and Open-AI Models: A Preliminary Review. Future Internet, 15(6), 192. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15060192
Rubini, B., Permanasari, A., & Yuningsih, W. (2018). Learning Multimedia Based on Science Literacy on the Lightning Theme. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran IPA, 4(2), 89. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v4i2.3926
Sallam, M. (2023). ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns. Healthcare, 11(6), 887. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11060887
Schot, J., & Steinmueller, W. E. (2018). Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy, 47(9), 1554–1567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011
Shana, Z., & Abulibdeh, E. S. (2020). Science practical work and its impact on students’ science achievement. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 10(2), 199. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.888
Simorangkir, A., & Rohaeti, E. (2019). Exploring of Students’ Self-Efficacy: The Beliefs while Learning Process in Buffer Solution. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233(1), 012017. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012017
Singh, J., Steele, K., & Singh, L. (2021). Combining the Best of Online and Face-to-Face Learning: Hybrid and Blended Learning Approach for COVID-19, Post Vaccine, & Post-Pandemic World. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 50(2), 140–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395211047865
Siu, S. C. (2023). ChatGPT and GPT-4 for Professional Translators: Exploring the Potential of Large Language Models in Translation. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4448091
Sulaeman, I., Syuhadak, S., & Sulaeman, I. (2023). ChatGPT as a New Frontier in Arabic Education Technology. Al-Arabi: Jurnal Bahasa Arab dan Pengajarannya= Al-Arabi: Journal of Teaching Arabic as a Foreign Language, 7(1), 83-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um056v7i1p83-105
Thorp, H. H. (2023). ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science, 379(6630), 313–313. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adg7879
Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x
Wilujeng, I., Zuhdan, K. P., & Suryadarma, I. G. P. (2019, January). Integrating local wisdom in natural science learning. In 1st International Conference on Innovation in Education (ICoIE 2018) (pp. 182-186). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/icoie-18.2019.42
Wirzal, M. D. H., Halim, N. S. A., Md Nordin, N. A. H., & Bustam, M. A. (2022). Metacognition in Science Learning: Bibliometric Analysis of Last Two Decades. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: E-Saintika, 6(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.36312/esaintika.v6i1.665
Yannier, N., Hudson, S. E., & Koedinger, K. R. (2020). Active Learning is About More Than Hands-On: A Mixed-Reality AI System to Support STEM Education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 30(1), 74–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-020-00194-3
Zhang, Y., Pei, H., Zhen, S., Li, Q., & Liang, F. (2023). Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) usage in healthcare. Gastroenterology & Endoscopy, 1(3), 139–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gande.2023.07.002
Author Biographies
Iwan Purnama, Universitas Labuhanbatu
Firman Edi, Institut Teknologi Batam
Ruth Rize Paas Megahati S, Politeknik Kesehatan Kesuma Bangsa
Tiok Wijanarko, Universitas Negeri Padang
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Iwan Purnama, Firman Edi, Ruth Rize Paas Megahati S, Tiok Wijanarko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).