Study of Science Learning Based on Scientific Literacy in Improving Critical Thinking: A Scoping Review

Authors

Bramastia , Satutik Rahayu

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9i8.5667

Published:

2023-08-25

Issue:

Vol. 9 No. 8 (2023): August

Keywords:

Critical Thinking, Natural Sciences, Scientific Literacy

Review

Downloads

How to Cite

Bramastia, B., & Rahayu, S. . (2023). Study of Science Learning Based on Scientific Literacy in Improving Critical Thinking: A Scoping Review. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(8), 499–510. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i8.5667

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

Facing and following increasingly sophisticated technological developments in science learning studies, both pupils and students must increase scientific literacy to improve critical thinking. Critical thinking skills will encourage students to understand problems and create alternative problem solutions with problem solving stages, namely clarification, assessment, inference and strategy. This research aims to explore the Study of Science Learning Based on Scientific Literacy in Improving Critical Thinking. The research was conducted using a scoping review approach. A scoping review is typically used to map the existing literature on a defined topic in terms of the volume, nature, and characteristics of key studies. The results of the scoping review analysis found several problems such as the low level of science learning regarding scientific literature so that pupils and students are unable to identify problematic issues and scientific evidence due to a lack of practicing skills in conducting scientific literature. The impact that occurs is that the ability to think critically decreases. Therefore, various efforts are being made, one of which is that pupils and students must have concepts to connect science, science learning websites, focus on specific knowledge, be able to design relevant indicators, have the ability to translate into critical, systematic and anticipatory actions, students' critical thinking skills , school location, and problem-based learning model

References

Ali, A. Z. A. R. (2010). The effect of critical thinking dispositions on students achievement in selection and placement exam for university in Turkey. Journal of Turkish science education, 7(1), 61-73.

Archer-Bradshaw, R. E. (2014). Demystifying scientific literacy: Charting the path for the 21st century. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 4(3), 165. doi:10.5901/jesr.2014.v4n3p165

Ardianto, D., & Rubini, B. (2016). Literasi sains dan aktivitas siswa pada pembelajaran IPA terpadu tipe shared. Unnes Science Education Journal, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/usej.v5i1.9650

Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International journal of social research methodology, 8(1), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616

Bellová, R., MelicherÄíková, D., & TomÄík, P. (2018). Possible reasons for low scientific literacy of Slovak students in some natural science subjects. Research in Science & Technological Education, 36(2), 226-242. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1367656

Brown, A., Franken, P., Bonner, S., Dolezal, N., & Moross, J. (2016). Safecast: successful citizen-science for radiation measurement and communication after Fukushima. Journal of Radiological Protection, 36(2), S82. DOI 10.1088/0952-4746/36/2/S82

Budiarti, I. S., & Tanta, T. (2021). Analysis on students’ scientific literacy of Newton’s law and motion system in living things. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Science Education), 9(1), 36-51. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v9i1.18470

Burford, G., Tamás, P., & Harder, M. K. (2016). Can we improve indicator design for complex sustainable development goals? A comparison of a values-based and conventional approach. Sustainability, 8(9), 861. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8090861

Carrascosa, J. M., Cuevas, R., Gonzalez, R., Azcorra, A., & Garcia, D. (2015). Quantifying the economic and cultural biases of social media through trending topics. PloS one, 10(7), e0134407. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134407

Che, F. S. (2002). Teaching critical thinking skills in a Hong Kong secondary school. Asia Pacific Education Review, 3, 83-91. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF03024923

Duron, R., Limbach, B., & Waugh, W. (2006). Critical thinking framework for any discipline. International Journal of teaching and learning in higher education, 17(2), 160-166. https://valenciacollege.edu/faculty/development/courses-resources/documents/ctframeworkarticle.pdf

Fakhriyah, F., Masfuah, S., Roysa, M., Rusilowati, A., & Rahayu, E. S. (2017). Student’s science literacy in the aspect of content science?. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i1.7245

Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International journal of qualitative methods, 5(1), 80-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107

Fives, H., Huebner, W., Birnbaum, A. S., & Nicolich, M. (2014). Developing a measure of scientific literacy for middle school students. Science Education, 98(4), 549-580. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21115

Friedel, C., Irani, T., Rudd, R., Gallo, M., Eckhardt, E., & Ricketts, J. (2008). Overtly teaching critical thinking and inquiry-based learning: A comparison of two undergraduate biotechnology classes. Journal of agricultural education, 49(1), 72-84. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ839873

Gotoh, Y. (2016). Development of Critical Thinking with Metacognitive Regulation. International Association for Development of the Information Society. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED571408

Hadisaputra, S., Gunawan, G., & Yustiqvar, M. (2019). Effects of Green Chemistry Based Interactive Multimedia on the Students' Learning Outcomes and Scientific Literacy. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems (JARDCS), 11(7), 664-674. http://eprints.unram.ac.id/24638/

Hariyati, N., & Tarma, M. (2018, February). The Effectiveness of Natural Science Learning Based on Contextual Teaching and Learning in Improving The Critical Thinking Skills of Elementary School Students. In 1st International Conference on Education Innovation (ICEI 2017) (pp. 254-257). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/icei-17.2018.66

Ilkorucu, S., Tapan Broutin, M. S., & Boyaci, M. (2022). The Effect of the Critical Thinking Based 4 MAT Instruction Applied in Science Education on Critical Thinking Dispositions. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(2), 641-659. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1360618

Impey, C. (2013). Science literacy of undergraduates in the united states. Orgazations People and Strategies in Astronomy 2 (OPSA 2).

Kähler, J., Hahn, I., & Köller, O. (2020). The development of early scientific literacy gaps in kindergarten children. International journal of science education, 42(12), 1988-2007. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1808908

Kurniawan, D. A., Perdana, R., & Ikhlas, M. (2020). Do a Science Process Skills Affect on Critical Thinking in Science? Differences in Urban and Rural. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(4), 874-880. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1274675

Larasati, L., Poerwanti, J. I. S., & Surya, A. (2018). Improved Critical Thinking Skills On Science Learning By Appllyng The Predict, Observe, Explain (POE) Model. In Social, Humanities, and Educational Studies (SHEs): Conference Series (Vol. 1, No. 1). https://doi.org/10.20961/shes.v1i1.23440

Lieung, K. W., & Rahayu, D. P. (2020, October). Scientific Approach to Improve the Critical Thinking Skills. In 3rd International Conference on Social Sciences (ICSS 2020) (pp. 480-483). Atlantis Press. https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/icss-20/125944966

Listiani, I., Susilo, H., & Sueb, S. (2022). Relationship between scientific literacy and critical thinking of prospective teachers. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(1), 721-730. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i1.1355

Mahardini, T., Khaerunisa, F., Wijayanti, I. W., & Salimi, M. (2018). Research based learning (RBL) to improve critical thinking skills. In Social, Humanities, and Educational Studies (SHEs): Conference Series (Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 466-473). https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/SHES/article/view/26816

Marjan, J., Arnyana, I. B. P., & Setiawan, I. G. A. N. (2014). Pengaruh pembelajaran pendekatan saintifik terhadap hasil belajar biologi dan keterampilan proses sains siswa MA. Mu allimat NW Pancor Selong Kabupaten Lombok Timur Nusa Tenggara Barat. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran IPA Indonesia, 4(1). https://ejournal-pasca.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/jurnal_ipa/article/view/1316

Mays, N., Roberts, E., & Popay, J. (2004). Synthesising research evidence. In Studying the organisation and delivery of health services (pp. 200-232). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780203481981-16/synthesising-research-evidence-nicholas-mays-emilie-roberts-jennie-popay

McQuail, D. (2012). Teori Komunikasi Massa 2, trans. by Putri Iva Izzati. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.

Nainggolan, V. A., Situmorang, R. P., & Hastuti, S. P. (2021). Learning Bryophyta: Improving Students' Scientific Literacy through Problem-Based Learning. Journal of Biological Education Indonesia (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 7(1), 71-82. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1298050

Napal Fraile, M., Mendioroz Lacambra, A., & Peñalva Vélez, A. (2020). Sustainability teaching tools in the digital age. Sustainability, 2020, 12 (8), 3366. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083366

Nasional, D. P. (2006). Kurikulum tingkat satuan pendidikan. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

OECD. (2006). Assessing Scientic, Reading and Mathematical Literacy: A framework for PISA 2006. Program Int Student Assess.

Okada, A. (2013). Scientific Literacy in the digital age: tools, environments and resources for co-inquiry. European Scientific Journal, 4, 263-274. https://oro.open.ac.uk/41729/

Özgelen, S. (2012). Students’ science process skills within a cognitive domain framework. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8(4), 283-292. https://www.ejmste.com/article/students-science-process-skills-withina-cognitive-domain-framework-4248

Parmin, P., & Fibriana, F. (2019). Prospective teachers’ scientific literacy through ethnoscience learning integrated with the indigenous knowledge of people in the frontier, outermost, and least developed regions. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran IPA, 5(2), 142-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v5i2.6257

Pham, M. T., Rajić, A., Greig, J. D., Sargeant, J. M., Papadopoulos, A., & McEwen, S. A. (2014). A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Research synthesis methods, 5(4), 371-385. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1123

Pisa, O. E. C. D. (2015). Draft science framework. 2014-07-17]. http://www. oecd. org/pisa/pisaproducts/Draft PISA 2015 Science Framework. pdf.

Ramdani, A., Jufri, A. W., Gunawan, G., Fahrurrozi, M., & Yustiqvar, M. (2021). Analysis of Students' Critical Thinking Skills in terms of Gender Using Science Teaching Materials Based on The 5E Learning Cycle Integrated with Local Wisdom. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(2), 187-199. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i2.29956

Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2009). Scientific literacy, PISA, and socioscientific discourse: Assessment for progressive aims of science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 909-921. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20327

Santhalia, P. W., & Yuliati, L. (2021). An Exploration of Scientific Literacy on Physics Subjects within Phenomenon-based Experiential Learning. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 11(1), 72-82. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v11n1.p72-82

Siregar, S., & Yuniasih, E. (2022). The Development of Scientific Literacy-Based English Teaching Materials For Biology Students. Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, 9(1), 175-183. https://doi.org/10.30605/25409190.355

Suhirman, S., & Khotimah, H. (2020). The Effects of Problem-Based Learning on Critical Thinking Skills and Student Science Literacy. Lensa: Jurnal Kependidikan Fisika, 8(1), 31-38. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-lkf.v8i1.2794

Sutiani, A. (2021). Implementation of an inquiry learning model with science literacy to improve student critical thinking skills. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 117-138. http://digilib.unimed.ac.id/42164/

Suwono, H., Pratiwi, H. E., Susanto, H., & Susilo, H. (2017). Enhancement of students’ biological literacy and critical thinking of biology through socio-biological case-based learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), 213-220. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i2.9622

Syamsuar, S., & Reflianto, R. (2019). Pendidikan dan tantangan pembelajaran berbasis teknologi informasi di era revolusi industri 4.0. E-Tech: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Pendidikan, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.24036/et.v2i2.101343

Turiman, P., Omar, J., Daud, A. M., & Osman, K. (2012). Fostering the 21st century skills through scientific literacy and science process skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 110-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.253

Udompong, L., & Wongwanich, S. (2014). Diagnosis of the scientific literacy characteristics of primary students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 5091-5096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1079

Utami, V. A. S. (2020, March). Improving students’ critical thinking skills through natural science learning website. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1511, No. 1, p. 012068). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1511/1/012068

Wardhani, S., & Rumiati, R. (2011). Modul matematika SMP program BERMUTU: instrumen penilaian hasil belajar matematika SMP belajar dari PISA dan TIMSS. https://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/15137/

White, B., Stains, M., Escriu-Sune, M., Medaglia, E., Rostamnjad, L., Chinn, C., & Sevian, H. (2011). A Novel Instrument for Assessing Students' Critical Thinking Abilities. Journal of College Science Teaching, 40(5). https://intro.bio.umb.edu/BW/papers/ACTAPaper.pdf

Widowati, A., Widodo, E., & Anjarsari, P. (2017, November). The Development of Scientific Literacy through Nature of Science (NoS) within Inquiry Based Learning Approach. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 909, No. 1, p. 012067). IOP Publishing. DOI 10.1088/1742-6596/909/1/012067

Yanti, H., Distrik, I. W., & Khasyyatillah, I. (2017). Profile Of Senior High School Metacognitive Ability In Solving Problems Of Abstract On Physics Material. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 6(2), 241-246. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e5df/6fe46de150571abe22d76d64460a75778306.pdf

Author Biographies

Bramastia, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Satutik Rahayu, Universitas Mataram

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Bramastia, Satutik Rahayu

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).