Optimizing the Science Literacy Abilities of Elementary School Teacher Education Students Through Electrical Material Practicum
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.5726Published:
2023-12-20Issue:
Vol. 9 No. 12 (2023): DecemberKeywords:
Optimization, Physics, Scientific literacyResearch Articles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
This research aims to determine the optimization of students' scientific literacy abilities through practical electricity material. The sample in this research was Elementary School Teacher Education students. This research uses a quantitative descriptive approach with a survey method. The research results show that students' scientific literacy is 64.49%, which is categorized as moderate. Based on the results of a review of research results, the competency that is classified as low is competency b with a score of 65.05 and the highest competency is competency c with a score of 73.45. In this research, the indicator that needs to be improved in scientific literacy is indicator 4 at 38.5%.
References
Adelia, M., Widowati, A., Jumadi, J., & Lafifa, F. (2023). Respons Peserta Didik Terhadap E-Modul Praktikum IPA pada Materi Konduktor dan Isolator. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(2), 465–470. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i2.1752
Aini, E., Evendi, E., Halim, A., Syukri, M., & Yusrizal, Y. (2023). Relationship between Misconceptions and Students’ Scientific Literacy Abilities on Global Warming Material. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(10), 8051–8058. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.5156
Altun-Yalçn, S., Açşli, S., & Turgut, Ü. (2011). Determining the levels of pre-service science teachers’ scientific literacy and investigating effectuality of the education faculties about developing scientific literacy. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 783–787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.185
Amin, M. (2017). Sadar Berprofesi Guru Sains, Sadar Literasi : Tantangan Guru di Abad 21. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional III Tahun 2017 “Biologi, Pembelajaran, Dan Lingkungan Hidup Perspektif Interdisiplinerâ€. Retrieved from http://biologi.fmipa.um.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/65.-967-3000-1-PB.pdf
Anjarsari, C., & Suyatna, A. (2023). Comparison of Cognitive Learning Outcomes and Students ’ Science Process Skills Between Hands on Practicum and Virtual Laboratory Based on PhET Simulation Viewed from Students’ Learning Style. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(11), 9524–9531. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.4065
Anshar, M. A., Rahayu, Y. S., Erman, E., Karimah, K., & Rofiq, A. (2023). Analysis of Umar Masud Junior High School Students’ Science Literacy Ability. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(2), 926–930. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i2.2667
Ardianto, D., & Rubini, B. (2016). Comparison of students’ scientific literacy in integrated science learning through model of guided discovery and problem based learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(1), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i1.5786
Asyhari, A. (2015). Profil Peningkatan Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Saintifik. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 4(2), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.24042/jpifalbiruni.v4i2.91
Daryanto, & Suryanto. (2022). Pembelajaran Abad 21. Gava Media.
Dhanil, M., & Mufit, F. (2023). Preliminary Analysis of Scientific Literacy in Fluids at SHS 6 Padang. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(11), 9257–9262. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.4320
Fadlika, R. H., Mulyani, R., & Dewi, T. N. S. (2020). Profil Kemampuan Literasi Sains Berdasarkan Gender di Kelas X. Quagga: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Biologi, 12(2), 104. https://doi.org/10.25134/quagga.v12i2.2326
Fuadi, H., Robbia, A. Z., Jamaluddin, J., & Jufri, A. W. (2020). Analisis Faktor Penyebab Rendahnya Kemampuan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 5(2), 108–116. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v5i2.122
Jamaluddin, J., Jufri, A. W., Ramdani, A., & Azizah, A. (2019). Profil Literasi Sains Dan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Pendidik IPA SMP. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v5i1.185
Lestari, T. A., & Handayani, B. S. (2021). Analysis of Practicum Skills for Private High School Alumni in Bandung City in Higher Education. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(3), 388–394. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7i3.723
Limiansih, K., & Susanti, M. M. I. (2021). Identifikasi Profil Literasi Sains Mahasiswa PGSD. DWIJA CENDEKIA: Jurnal Riset Pedagogik, 5(2), 313. https://doi.org/10.20961/jdc.v5i2.56281
Merta, I. W., Artayasa, I. P., Kusmiyati, K., Lestari, N., & Setiadi, D. (2020). Profil Literasi Sains dan Model Pembelajaran dapat Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Sains. Jurnal Pijar MIPA, 15(3), 223–228. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v15i3.1889
Mujahidin, G. R., Rahman, G. G. A., Wilujeng, I., & Nugroho, S. D. (2023). Profil Literasi Sains Aspek Kompetensi Peserta Didik Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Budaya Lokal Reyog Ponorogo. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(2), 965–970. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i2.2753
Munfaida, S., Mustadi, A., & Kurniawati, W. (2022). The Use of Practicum-Based LKM Can Improve Concept Understanding in Science Subject Energy Materials. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(6), 2859–2863. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i6.2173
Oliver, M. C., & Adkins, M. J. (2020). “Hot-headed†students? Scientific literacy, perceptions and awareness of climate change in 15-year olds across 54 countries. Energy Research and Social Science, 70(January), 101641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101641
Paristiowati, M., Hadinugrahaningsih, T., Purwanto, A., & Karyadi, P. A. (2019). Analysis of students’ scientific literacy in contextual-flipped classroom learning on acid-base topic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1156(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1156/1/012026
Rahmadani, S., J., & Zulkifli, L. (2017). Pengembangan Petunjuk Praktikum Biologi Dan Instrumen Penilaian Kinerja Praktikum Berbasis Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Dan Efektivitasnya Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Sma/Ma Kelas Xi. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 1(2), 0–12. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v1i2.13
Reiska, P., Soika, K., Möllits, A., Rannikmäe, M., & Soobard, R. (2015). Using Concept Mapping Method for Assessing Students’ Scientific Literacy. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 177(July 2014), 352–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.357
Seprianto, S., & Hasby, H. (2023). Analysis of Students’ Scientific Literacy Ability by the Implementation of Case Method Learning. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(3), 1143–1148. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i3.2250
Sudjana, & Ibrahim. (2015). Penelitian dan Penilaian Pendidikan. Sinar Baru Algensindo.
Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian. Alfabeta.
Sukmawati, W., Sari, P. M., & Yatri, I. (2022). Online Application of Science Practicum Video Based on Local Wisdom to Improve Student’s Science Literacy. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(4), 2238–2244. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i4.1940
Suparya, I. K., I Wayan Suastra, & Putu Arnyana, I. B. (2022). Rendahnya Literasi Sains: Faktor Penyebab Dan Alternatif Solusinya. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Citra Bakti, 9(1), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.38048/jipcb.v9i1.580
Techakosit, S., & Wannapiroon, P. (2015). Connectivism Learning Environment in Augmented Reality Science Laboratory to Enhance Scientific Literacy. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174(2), 2108–2115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.009
Turiman, P., Omar, J., Daud, A. M., & Osman, K. (2012). Fostering the 21st Century Skills through Scientific Literacy and Science Process Skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 110–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.253
Udompong, L., Traiwichitkhun, D., & Wongwanich, S. (2014). Causal Model of Research Competency Via Scientific Literacy of Teacher and Student. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116(2001), 1581–1586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.438
Udompong, L., & Wongwanich, S. (2014). Diagnosis of the Scientific Literacy Characteristics of Primary Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 5091–5096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1079
Zahro, I. F., Atika, A. R., & Westhisi, S. M. (2019). Strategi Pembelajaran Literasi Sains Untuk Anak Usia Dini. Jurnal Ilmiah Potensia, 4(2), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.33369/jip.4.2.121-130
Author Biographies
Gita Senja Sari, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Ali Mustadi, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Ikhlasul Ardi Nugroho, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Kintan Limiansih , Sanata Dharma University
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Gita Senja Sari, Ali Mustadi, Ikhlasul Ardi Nugroho, Kintan Limiansih
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).