Identification of Science Process Skills of Group B Students at Kreativa Gebang Kindergarten
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v10i2.5981Published:
2024-02-28Issue:
Vol. 10 No. 2 (2024): FebruaryKeywords:
Kindergarten, PAUD, Science Process skillResearch Articles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
The newest Curriculum stipulates a scientific approach as a characteristic of the national PAUD curriculum. In reality, kindergartens still have not optimized this. Therefore, it is necessary to identify the science process skills of early childhood students so that improvements can be made immediately. This research aims to identify and analyze the science process skills of Group B Students at Kreativa Gebang Kindergarten. This is descriptive research. The research instruments used were video recordings of learning activities, observation sheets for learning activities, and student development assessment reports (LPPA). The data obtained in this research was analyzed using a combination of analysis (quantitative – and qualitative). The results showed: 1) The identified science process skills of Group B students were observing, classifying, and communicating skills; 2) The percentage of achievements in observing skills that were categorized into developing very well (BSB) categories were 41.4%, Classification skills were at 32.8%, and communication skills were at 14%. Based on the data, it can be concluded that the science process skills of group B students at PAUD Kreativa Gebang were still relatively low because the percentage of achievements in the three science process skills that were categorized into developing very well (BSB) categories was below 50%.
References
Asy’ari, M., Fitriani, H., & Proses, K. (2017). Literatur Reviu Keterampilan Proses Sains sebagai Dasar Pengembangan Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi. Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Matematika dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 5(1), 1–7.
Bubikova-Moan, J., Næss Hjetland, H., & Wollscheid, S. (2019). ECE teachers’ views on play-based learning: a systematic review. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 27(6), 776–800. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2019.1678717
Bundu, P. (2006). Penilaian Keterampilan Proses dan Sikap Ilmiah : Dalam Pembelajaran Sains Sekolah Dasar. Depdiknas.
Bunterm, T., Lee, K., Ng Lan Kong, J., Srikoon, S., Vangpoomyai, P., Rattanavongsa, J., & Rachahoon, G. (2014). Do Different Levels of Inquiry Lead to Different Learning Outcomes? A comparison between guided and structured inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 36(12), 1937–1959. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.886347
Fatimah, F. (2020). Identifikasi Keterampilan Proses Sains Pada Siswa Paud Usia 4-5 Tahun Di Kecamatan Rambipuji Kabupaten Jember. GENIUS: Indonesian Journal of Early Childhood Education, 1(1), 72–86. http://genius.iain-jember.ac.id
Forman, G., & Hall, E. (2005). Wondering with Children: The Importance of Observation in Early Education. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 7(2).
Gooden, C., & Kearrns, J. (2013). The Importance of Communication Skills in Young Children. Dalam Science (Vol. 283, Nomor 5398). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.283.5398.40
Hamlin, M., & Wisneski, D. B. (2012). Supporting the Scientific Thinking and Inquiry of Toddlers and Preschoolers through Play. Young Children, 67(3), 82–88.
Handayani, G., Adisyahputra, A., & Indrayanti, R. (2018). Correlation between integrated science process skills, and ability to read comprehension to scientific literacy in biology teachers students. Biosfer, 11(1), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.11-1.3
Izzuddin, A. (2019). Sains dan Pembelajarannya pada Anak Usia Dini. BINTANG, 1(3), 353–365.
Kermani, H., & Aldemir, J. (2015). Preparing children for success: integrating science, math, and technology in early childhood classroom. Early Child Development and Care, 185(9), 1504–1527. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2015.1007371
Majoko, T. (2017). Education Teacher Preparation for Inclusion. International Journal Of Special Education, 32(4).
Markawi, N. (2013). Pengaruh Keterampilan Proses Sains, Penalaran, dan Pemecahan Masalah terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika. Jurnal Formatif, 3(11), 11–25. https://journal.lppmunindra.ac.id/index.php/Formatif/article/view/109/0
Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction—what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20347
Munastiwi, E. (2015). Implementasi Pendekatan Saintifik Pada Pembelajaran Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini (PAUD). Jurnal Pendidikan Anak, 1(2), 43–50.
Nugraha, J., Arief Suyitno, H., & Susilaningsih, E. (2017). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Ditinjau dari Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Motivasi Belajar melalui Model PBL. Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Matematika dan IPA , 6(1). http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jpe
Özgelen, S. (2012). Students’ science process skills within a cognitive domain framework. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8(4), 283–292. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2012.846a
Rusmini, Suyono, & Agustini, R. (2021). Analysis of science process skills of chemical education students through self-project based learning (sjbl) in the covid-19 pandemic era. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 11(2), 371–387. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1288
Sadiqin, I. K., Santoso, U. T., & Sholahuddin, A. (2017). Pemahaman konsep IPA siswa SMP melalui pembelajaran problem solving pada topik perubahan benda-benda di sekitar kita. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 3(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v3i1.12554
Samarapungavan, A., Mantzicopoulos, P., & Patrick, H. (2008). Learning science through inquiry in kindergarten. Science Education, 92(5), 868–908. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20275
Samarapungavan, A., Patrick, H., & Mantzicopoulos, P. (2011). What Kindergarten Students Learn in Inquiry-Based Science Classrooms. Cognition and Instruction, 29(4), 416–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2011.608027
Siahaan, P., Suryani, A., Kaniawati, I., Suhendi, E., & Samsudin, A. (2017). Improving Students’ Science Process Skills through Simple Computer Simulations on Linear Motion Conceptions. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 812(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012017
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D (2 ed.). Alfabeta.
Velentzas, J., & Broni, G. (2014). Communication cycle: Definition, process, models and examples. Recent Advances in Financial Planning and Product Development, 117–131.
Author Biographies
Ni Luh Putu Nina Sriwarthini, University of Mataram
Nurhasanah, University of Mataram
I Made Suwasa Astawa, University of Mataram
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Nina Sriwarthini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).