Competencies of Chemistry Teachers and Prospective Teachers: A Literature Review

Authors

Alessandro Jeremi Manarisip , Rabiatul Adawiyah , Sri Handayani

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9iSpecialIssue.6031

Published:

2023-12-25

Issue:

Vol. 9 No. SpecialIssue (2023): UNRAM journals and research based on science education, science applications towards a golden Indonesia 2045

Keywords:

Chemistry Teacher, Competence, Literature Review

Review

Downloads

How to Cite

Manarisip, A. J., Adawiyah, R., & Handayani, S. (2023). Competencies of Chemistry Teachers and Prospective Teachers: A Literature Review. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(SpecialIssue), 191–197. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9iSpecialIssue.6031

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

The role and function of teachers as professionals is to implement the national education system and realize national education goals, which is to develop the potential of students. Therefore, the competence and professional development of teachers must be in line with the way they carry out learning, especially in chemistry subjects. Where this subject is one of the subjects that most students are less interested in. The focus of this research is to collect information about the outcome of research that discusses the competence of chemistry teachers and prospective teachers, the research design uses a literature review with a qualitative descriptive approach. Reviewed 3 selected journals registered in Science and Technology Index (SINTA), and 17 SCOPUS indexed international journals. The collection of articles starts from 2016 to 2023. The most frequently used research type is qualitative with a case study research type, the most frequently used data collection instrument is observation with triangulation techniques.  Chemistry teacher competencies needed at this time are PCK, CK, AK, PCK_CCC, TPASK, topic-specific PCK (TSPCK), argumentation, laboratory skill competence, technological knowledge, professional competence, and competence in organizing lesson study

References

Akin, F.N., & Kondakci, E.Z. (2018). The nature of the interplay among components of pedagogical content knowledge in reaction rate and chemical equilibrium topics of novice and experienced chemistry teachers. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract, 19. 80—105. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00165G

Arslan, A. S., Faik Karatas, O., Unal, S., & Aslan, A. (2022). The effects of group mentoring on teachers’ classroom activities: an instrumental case study. Participatory Educational Research, 9 (5), 390-413. http://dx.doi.org/10.17275/per.22.120.9.5

Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in Teaching and Teacher Education over ten years. Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 10-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007

Boothe, J. R., Zotos, E. K., Shultz. G. V. (2023). Analysis of post-secondary instructors’ pedagogical content knowledge of organic acid–base chemistry using content representations. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 24, 577. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/D2RP00253A

British Council Teachers’ Federation (BCTF) & CUPE BC. (2009). Roles and responsibilities of teachers and teacher assistants/education assistants.

Chen, B., Chen, L. (2021). Examining the sources of high school chemistry teachers’ practical knowledge of teaching with practical work: from the teachers’ perspective. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 22, 476. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RP00246A

Chochran, S.M. (2006). Policy, practice and politics in teacher education. Editorial from the journal of teacher education. California: A joint publication of Crown Press. Sage Publication Company and Serving Leader Thousand Oaks. p. XIIV.

Cigdemoglu C,H. O. Arslanb & A. Cam. 2017. Argumentation to foster pre-service science teachers’ knowledge, competency, and attitude on the domains of chemical literacy of acids and bases. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract, 18, 288—303. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RP00167J

Copriady, J., Rery, R. U., Zulnaidi, H., Alimin, M. (2018). Contribution toward practical design to improve the planning, implementation, and assessment of the instruction of chemistry teachers. Journal of turkish science education, 15 (3), 41-50. Retrieved from https://www.tused.org/index.php/tused/article/view/245

Creswell John W. (2018). Research design pendekatan metode kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan campuran. Pustaka Belajar: Yoyakarta.

Gabby, S., Avargil, S., Herscovitza, O., & Dor, Y. J. (2017). The case of middle and high school chemistry teachers implementing technology: using the concerns-based adoption model to assess change processes. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract, 18, 214—232. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RP00193A

He, P., Zheng, C., & Li, T. (2021). Development and validation of an instrument for measuring Chinese chemistry teachers’ perceptions of pedagogical content knowledge for teaching chemistry core competencies. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract, 22, 513–531. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00286C

Hernández-Ramos, J., Rodríguez-Becerra, J., Cáceres-Jensen, L., & Aksela, M. (2023). Constructing a novel e-learning course, educational computational chemistry through instructional design approach in the tpask framework. Educ. Sci., 13, 648. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070648

Karatas F. O. (2016). Pre-service chemistry teachers’ competencies in the laboratory: a cross-grade study in solution preparation. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract, 17, 100—110. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RP00147A

Kiran B. Ekiz & Boz Yezdan. (2020). Interactions between the science teaching orientations and components of pedagogical content knowledge of in-service chemistry teachers. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract, 21. 95—112. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00092E

Mulyatun. (2017). Lesson study: strategi alternatif peningkatan kompetensi calon guru kimia. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 11 (1), 1816 – 1827. https://doi.org/10.15294/jipk.v11i1.9709

Oztay, E. S., Ekiz-Kiran, B., Boz, Y. (2023). Revealing the development of interaction among components of pedagogical content knowledge in teaching chemical equilibrium. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 24, 624. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2RP00159D

Peretz, R., Dori, D., & Dori, Y. J. (2023). Investigating chemistry teachers’ assessment knowledge via a rubric for self-developed tasks in a food and sustainability context. Educ. Sci. 13, 308. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13030308

Pongkendek, J. J., Marpaung, D. N. (2020). Analisis kompetensi pedagogik guru kimia sma di distrik Merauke dalam implementasi kurikulum 2013. QUANTUM: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Sains, 11 (1), 27-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/quantum.v11i1.7381

Pringgar R, F & Sujatmiko B. (2020). Penelitian kepustakaan (Library Research) Modul Pembelajaran Berbasis Augmented Reality Pada Pembelajaran Siswa. Jurnal IT-EDU, 05(01), 317-329. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/it-edu/article/view/37489/

Rusdiana, & Heryati, Y. (2015). Pendidkan Profesi Keguruan. Bandung: Pustaka Setia

Satori, D., & Komariah, A. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta

Sexton, S. (2015). Teaching the future teachers: a teacher educator’s self-study in making science relevant, useful and meaningful for New Zealand pre-service teachers. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 1(1), 10-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.94738

Siregar, R.A. (2012). Analisis kompetensi pedagogik guru kimia dan hubungannya dengan hasil belajar kimia siswa sma di kota Padangsidimpuan. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Edisi 8. 1(2). 5-12.

Sisdiknas. (2006). Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 14 Year 2005 About Teachers and Lecturers. Bandung: Citra Umbara.

Solikhin, F., & Rohiat, S. (2023). The tpack profile of chemistry prospective teachers in microteaching class, university of Bengkulu. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 7(1), 19-28. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpki.v7i1.49009

Subagia, I.W. (2014). Paradigma Baru Pembelajaran Kimia Sma. Seminar Nasional FMIPA UNDIKSHA IV

Tal, M., Herscovitz, O., & Dor, Y. J. (2021). Assessing teachers’ knowledge: incorporating context-based learning in chemistry. Chem. Educ. Res. Prac, 22, 1003–1019. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RP00359J

Uzuntiryaki-Kondakci, E., Demirdogen, B., Akin, F. N., Aysegul T., & Aydın-Gunbatar, S. (2017). Exploring the complexity of teaching: the interaction between teacher self-regulation and pedagogical content knowledge. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract, 18, 250—270. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RP00223D

Wei, B., & Liu, H. (2018). An experienced chemistry teacher’s practical knowledge of teaching with practical work: the PCK perspective. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 19, 452. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00254H

Widyatiningtyas. R. (2004). (Teachers’ role in doing assessment for processing skills) Peranan Guru Dalam Melakukan Penilaian Keterampilan Proses. Educare, Jurnal Pendidikan dan Budaya, 2 (2), 8-17

Author Biographies

Alessandro Jeremi Manarisip, Yogyakarta State University

Rabiatul Adawiyah, Yogyakarta State University

Sri Handayani, Yogyakarta State University

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Alessandro Jeremi Manarisip, Rabiatul Adawiyah, Sri Handayani

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).