Validity and Practicality of the Ethnoscience-Based Design Thinking E-book

Authors

Diah Kartika Sari , Yenny Anwar , Eka Ad'hiya , Sofia , Rodi Edi

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.6115

Published:

2023-12-20

Issue:

Vol. 9 No. 12 (2023): December

Keywords:

Design Thinking, Ethnoscience

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Sari, D. K. ., Anwar, Y., Ad'hiya, E., Sofia, & Edi, R. (2023). Validity and Practicality of the Ethnoscience-Based Design Thinking E-book. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(12), 11831–11836. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.6115
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

Design thinking is an innovation methodology that combines skills, processes and mindset. Design thinking is becoming increasingly popular in education as a way to encourage students to think critically, collaborate effectively, and develop innovative solutions to complex problems. Teachers and students can solve wicked problems creatively using design thinking. This research aims to determine the validity and practicality of an ethnoscience-based design thinking e-book. This research was conducted using walkthroughs and questionnaires. Validation data was analyzed using Cohen's Kappa while practicality data was analyzed using percentages. The results show that the ethnoscience-based design thinking textbook that was developed was said to be valid in aspects of design, systematics, substance and writing style. The textbooks being developed are also said to be very practical in terms of design, language, material and interest aspects.

References

Agustiana, E., Putra, F. G., & Farida, F. (2018). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Auditory, Intellectually, Repetition (AIR) dengan Pendekatan Lesson Study terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Peserta Didik. Desimal: Jurnal Matematika, 1(1), 1-6.

Amir, M. F. (2015). Proses Berpikir Kritis Siswa Sekolah Dasar dalam Memecahkan Masalah Berbentuk Soal Cerita Matematika Berdasarkan Gaya Belajar. Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara: Wahana Publikasi Karya Tulis Ilmiah di Bidang Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2). Retrieved from https://ojs.unpkediri.ac.id/index.php/matematika/article/view/235

Baskoro, M. L., & Haq, B. N. (2020). Penerapan Metode Design Thinking pada Mata Kuliah Desain Pengembangan Produk Pangan. IKRAITH-HUMANIORA: Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora, 4(2), 83-93. Retrieved from https://journals.upi-yai.ac.id/index.php/ikraith-humaniora/article/view/560

Carroll, M. (2015). Stretch, Dream, and Do-A 21st Century Design Thinking & STEM Journey. Journal of Research in STEM Education, 1(1), 59-70. Retrieved from https://j-stem.net/index.php/jstem/article/view/9/6

Gibbons, S. (2019). Design Thinking 101. Retrieved from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/design-thinking/

Husein, A. S. (2018). Metode Design Thinking untuk Inovasi. Malang: UB Press.

Irsalina, A., & Dwiningsih, K. (2018). Analisis Kepraktisan Pengembangan Lembar Kegiatan Peserta Didik (LKPD) Berorientasi Blended Learning pada Materi Asam Basa. JKPK (Jurnal Kimia dan Pendidikan Kimia), 3(3), 171-182. Retrieved from https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/jkpk/article/view/25648/18494

Karma, I. G. M. (2021). Feasibility Test and Practicality of Blended Learning Design of Applied Mathematics for Vocational Education. Logic: Jurnal Rancang Bangun dan Teknologi, 21(2), 101-110. https://www.academia.edu/78089546/

Kasri, M. A., Novan, Y., & Ramadhani, I. A. (2021). Penerapan Model Design Thinking pada Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Macro Media Flash. JURNAL PETISI (Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi), 2(2), 60-71. https://doi.org/10.36232/jurnalpetisi.v2i2.1531

Kurniati, D., Harimukti, R., & Jamil, N. A. (2016). Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Siswa SMP di Kabupaten Jember dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Berstandar PISA. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2), 142–155. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i2.8058

Luthfi, M. I., & Septiyanti, N. D. (2023). Design Thinking untuk Analisis Masalah Pembelajaran Daring pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 di Indonesia. Decode: Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi, 3(2), 193–204. https://doi.org/10.51454/decode.v3i2.146

Mintrom, M., & Luetjens, J. (2016). Design Thinking in Policymaking Processes: Opportunities and Challenges. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 75(3), 391-402. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12211

Mukti, H., Suastra, I. W., & Aryana, I. B. P. (2022). Integrasi Etnosains dalam Pembelajaran IPA. Jurnal Penelitian Guru Indonesia, 7(4), 356–362. https://doi.org/10.29210/022525jpgi0005

Mustofa, Z., Susilo, H., & Al Muhdhar, M. H. I. (2016). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning melalui Pendekatan Kontekstual Berbasis Lesson Study untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Memecahkan Masalah dan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 1(5), 885-889. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jp.v1i5.6298

Nurhayati, E. (2020). Meningkatkan Keaktifan Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Daring melalui Media Game Edukasi Quiziz pada Masa Pencegahan Penyebaran Covid-19. Jurnal Paedagogy, 7(3), 145-150. https://doi.org/10.33394/jp.v7i3.2645

Nurmanita, M. (2021). Perwujudan Nilai Budaya dalam Tradisi Bedendang Melalui Aplikasi TikTok sebagai Bentuk Kearifan Lokal Bengkulu Selatan. Al Ma’arief: Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial dan Budaya, 3(2), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.35905/almaarief.v3i2.2104

Ponidi, P., & Kristina, M. (2018). Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Direct Learning pada Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Materi Menulis Cerita Guna Meningkatkan Minat Belajar Siswa Kelas II SDN 3 Karangraja. INVENTA: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 2(2), 46-54. https://jurnal.unipasby.ac.id/index.php/jurnal_inventa/article/view/1648/1466

Rachmantika, A. R., & Wardono, W. (2019). Peran Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa pada Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Pemecahan Masalah. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 2, 439–443. Retrieved from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/

Rahardhian, A. (2022). Kajian Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis (Critical Thinking Skill) dari Sudut Pandang Filsafat. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 5(2), 87-94. https://www.academia.edu/104718020/

Sastria, E., Setiawan, M. E., Ningsih, H. N., & Purnawati, W. (2020). Buku Pintar “Daunâ€: Uji Validitas dan Praktikalitas Bahan Ajar Mahasiswa Jurusan Tadris Biologi IAIN Kerinci. Bioedusiana: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 5(2), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.37058/bioed.v5i2.2196

Satria, A. B. A., & Muntaha, A. A. (2021). Inovasi Pendidikan Abad 21: Penerapan Design Thinking dan Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek dalam Pendidikan Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.20961/jpd.v9i2.59940

Setiawan, A., Mujianto, G., & Fauzan, F. (2020). Meningkatkan Keaktifan Siswa dalam Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia dengan Menggunakan Pendekatan Saintifik dalam Kegiatan Lesson Study. JINoP (Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran), 6(2), 164-180. Retrieved from https://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/jinop/article/download/7177/8667/42570

Sofiana, Y. (2014). Pemahaman Critical Thinking, Design Thinking dan Problem Solving dalam Proses Desain. Humaniora, 5(2), 649-654. https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v5i2.3120

Suciono, W., Rasto, R., & Ahman, E. (2020). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Ekonomi Era Revolusi 4.0. Socia: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 17(1), 48-56 https://doi.org/10.21831/socia.v17i1.32254

Sugiyono, S. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mix Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sumarto, S. (2019). Budaya, Pemahaman dan Penerapannya “Aspek Sistem Religi, Bahasa, Pengetahuan, Sosial, Keseninan dan Teknologi.†Jurnal Literasiologi, 1(2), 144–159. https://doi.org/10.47783/literasiologi.v1i2.49

Syifa, R., Hapizah, H., Susanti, E., Mulyono, B., & Hadi, C. A. (2022). Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Melalui Implementasi Blended Learning Materi Program Linear. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 6(3), 417. https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v6i3.6137

Wiguna, B., & Kurniawan, D. (2022). Analisis Penerapan Design Thinking untuk Menampilakan Brand Image Instagram grocie.id. Retrieved from https://www.injazat.com

Winarni, E. W. (2018). Teori dan Praktik Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, PTK, R&D. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Yustitia, V., Rusminati, S. H., & Sulistyawati, I. (2018). Implementasi Lesson Study Menggunakan Model Think Pair Share dan Pendekatan Saintifik. Premiere Educandum: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar dan Pembelajaran, 8(1), 88-97. http://doi.org/10.25273/pe.v8i1.2621

Author Biographies

Diah Kartika Sari, universitas sriwijaya

Yenny Anwar, Universitas Sriwijaya

Eka Ad'hiya, Universitas Sriwijaya

Sofia, Universitas Sriwijaya

Rodi Edi, Universitas Sriwijaya

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Diah Kartika Sari, Yenny Anwar, Eka Ad'hiya, Sofia, Rodi Edi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).