Analysis of Understanding the Concept of Alkenes through the Three-tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test Instrument

Authors

Selina , Rini Muharini , Ira Lestari , Masriani , Rahmat Rasmawan

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v10i6.6510

Published:

2024-06-30

Issue:

Vol. 10 No. 6 (2024): June

Keywords:

Alkenes, Concept understanding, Diagnostic test, Three-tier multiple choice

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Selina, S., Muharini, R., Lestari, I., Masriani, M., & Rasmawan, R. (2024). Analysis of Understanding the Concept of Alkenes through the Three-tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test Instrument. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(6), 3463–3472. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i6.6510
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

The ability of prospective teacher students to master chemistry material will influence the achievement of learning objectives. Alkenes are an important sub material in organic chemistry courses because alkenes are often used as basic ingredients in chemical reactions. This research aims to analyze Untan chemistry education students' understanding of alkene sub materials. The research method used is quantitative descriptive. The research sample consisted of 50 students. The instrument used was Three-Tier Multiple Choice with a total of 10 questions and a semi-structured interview. Before using the instrument, a validity and reliability test was carried out first. The analysis results of students who understand the concept well are only 28.06%, and 6.06% of students understand but are not sure, while the percentage of students who do not understand the concept is 40.21%, and 29.95% of students experience misconceptions.

References

A’yun, Q., & Nuswowati, D. M. (2018). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Menggunakan Tes Diagnostic Multiple Choice Berbantuan Cri (Certainty of Response Index). Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 12(1), 2108–2117. https://doi.org/10.15294/jipk.v12i1.13302

Akkuzu, N., & Uyulgan, M. A. (2016). An epistemological inquiry into organic chemistry education: exploration of undergraduate students’ conceptual understanding of functional groups. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(1), 36–57. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RP00128E

Alfiah N, A. H., & Iwan S, H. (2020). Analysis of Understanding Concept in Solving Mathematics Story problems Using CRI in Terms of Personality Types. Daya Matematis: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika, 8(3), 229–236. https://doi.org/10.26858/jdm.v8i3.15342

Alighiri, D., Drastisianti, A., & Susilaningsih, E. (2018). Pemahaman Konsep Siswa Materi Larutan Penyangga dalam Pembelajaran Multiple Representasi. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 12(2), 2192–2200. https://doi.org/10.15294/jipk.v12i2.15735

Amir, L. R., Tanti, I., Maharani, D. A., Wimardhani, Y. S., Julia, V., Sulijaya, B., & Puspitawati, R. (2020). Student perspective of classroom and distance learning during COVID-19 pandemic in the undergraduate dental study program Universitas Indonesia. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 392. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02312-0

Anintia, R., Sadhu, S., & Annisa, D. (2017). Identify Students’ Concept Understanding Using Three-Tier Multiple Choice Questions (TTMCs) on Stoichiometry. International Journal of Science and Applied Science: Conference Series, 2(1), 308. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijsascs.v2i1.16734

Argaheni, N. B. (2020). Sistematik Review: Dampak Perkuliahan Daring Saat Pandemi COVID-19 Terhadap Mahasiswa Indonesia. PLACENTUM: Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan Dan Aplikasinya, 8(2), 99. https://doi.org/10.20961/placentum.v8i2.43008

Athiyyaturrahmah, G., Huri, A. D., & Jaelani, S. R. (2023). Exploring The Factors Behind Students’ Disinterest In Learning English. Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa Dan Budaya, 2(3), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.55606/jpbb.v2i3.2013

Atwa, H., Shehata, M. H., Al-Ansari, A., Kumar, A., Jaradat, A., Ahmed, J., & Deifalla, A. (2022). Online, Face-to-Face, or Blended Learning? Faculty and Medical Students’ Perceptions During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Method Study. Frontiers in Medicine, 9, 791352. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.791352

Bali, S., & Liu, M. C. (2018). Students’ perceptions toward online learning and face-to-face learning courses. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1108, 012094. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1108/1/012094

Belachew, W. (2020). Optimizing Pre-service Chemistry Teachers Understanding in Reaction Related Concepts of Alipahtic Hydrocarbons. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(9), em1875. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8359

Busetto, L., Wick, W., & Gumbinger, C. (2020). How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurological Research and Practice, 2(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z

Coman, C., Țîru, L. G., Meseșan-Schmitz, L., Stanciu, C., & Bularca, M. C. (2020). Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education during the Coronavirus Pandemic: Students’ Perspective. Sustainability, 12(24), 10367. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410367

Djarwo, C. F., & Kafiar, F. P. (2023). Analyzing Misconceptions of Acid-Base Topic among Chemistry Education Students in Online Learning Settings: A Case Study. Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia, 11(2), 202. https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v11i2.7147

Dzalila, L., Ananda, A., & Zuhri, S. (2020). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Daring pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Terhadap Tingkat Pemahaman Belajar Mahasiswa. Jurnal Signal, 8(2), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.33603/signal.v8i2.3518

Elvinawati, E., Rohiat, S., & Solikhin, F. (2022). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa Dalam Mata Kuliah Kimia Sekolah II Pada Materi Asam Basa. Alotrop, Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Kimia, 6(1), 10–14. https://doi.org/10.33369/atp.v6i1.20303

Gherheș, V., Stoian, C. E., Fărcașiu, M. A., & Stanici, M. (2021). E-Learning vs. Face-To-Face Learning: Analyzing Students’ Preferences and Behaviors. Sustainability, 13(8), 4381. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084381

Godwin, A., Benedict, B., Rohde, J., Thielmeyer, A., Perkins, H., Major, J., Clements, H., & Chen, Z. (2021). New Epistemological Perspectives on Quantitative Methods: An Example Using Topological Data Analysis. Studies in Engineering Education, 2(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.21061/see.18

Hendryadi, H. (2017). Validitas Isi: Tahap Awal Pengembangan Kuesioner. Jurnal Riset Manajemen Dan Bisnis (JRMB) Fakultas Ekonomi UNIAT, 2(2), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.36226/jrmb.v2i2.47

Karini, R. A., Fikroh, R. A., & Cahyani, V. P. (2022). Identification of Students’ Misconceptions on Hydrocarbon Material Using a Four-Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 6(2), 79–87. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpki.v6i2.39022

Laila, F., & Rahmat, A. (2018). Meningkatkan pemahaman konsep siswa melalui teams games tournament. Social Science Education Journal, 5(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.15408/sd.v1i1.9518

Lange, C., & Costley, J. (2020). Improving online video lectures: learning challenges created by media. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00190-6

Lestari, I. (2021). Identifikasi Pemahaman Mahasiswa Pendidikan Kimia pada Materi Stereokimia Hidrokarbon. Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(6), 4810–4817. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v3i6.1555

Lewohl, J. M. (2023). Exploring student perceptions and use of face-to-face classes, technology-enhanced active learning, and online resources. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00416-3

Lodge, J. M., Kennedy, G., Lockyer, L., Arguel, A., & Pachman, M. (2018). Understanding Difficulties and Resulting Confusion in Learning: An Integrative Review. Frontiers in Education, 3, 49. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00049

Maatuk, A. M., Elberkawi, E. K., Aljawarneh, S., Rashaideh, H., & Alharbi, H. (2022). The COVID-19 pandemic and E-learning: challenges and opportunities from the perspective of students and instructors. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 34(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-021-09274-2

Mentari, L., Suardana, I. N., & Subagia, I. W. (2014). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa SMA pada Pembelajaran Kimia Untuk Materi larutan Penyangga. E-Jurnal Kimia Visvitalis, 2, 76–87. https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpk.v1i1.3975

Nainggolan, J., Silaban, B., Sinaga, D., & Zendrato, F. (2023). Analysis of Physics Misconceptions of Students in Mechanic Materials Using the Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i3.3023

Nasution, A. K. P., Surbakti, A. H., Zakaria, R., Wahyuningsih, S. K., & Daulay, L. A. (2021). Face to Face Learning vs Blended Learning vs Online Learning (Student Perception of Learning). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1783(1), 012112. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1783/1/012112

Nasution, S. L., Windari, F., Harahap, S. Z., & Elvina, E. (2021). Pengaruh Media Pembelajaran Online Dalam Pemahaman Dan Minat Belajar Mahasiswa Pada Bidang Studi Akutansi Di Feb Universitas Labuhanbatu. Ecobisma (Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis Dan Manajemen), 8(1), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.36987/ecobi.v8i1.2068

Nurhayati, Wahyudi, & Alsagaf, S. L. H. (2019). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Three-Tier Multiple Choice Untuk Mengukur Konsepsi Fisika Siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan, 4(2), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.26740/jp.v4n2.p47-54

Ong, S. G. T., & Quek, G. C. L. (2023). Enhancing teacher–student interactions and student online engagement in an online learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 26(3), 681–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-022-09447-5

Paul, J., & Jefferson, F. (2019). A Comparative Analysis of Student Performance in an Online vs. Face-to-Face Environmental Science Course From 2009 to 2016. Frontiers in Computer Science, 1, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2019.00007

Perdana, G. P. (2017). Pengetahuan Awal dan Tingkat Keyakinan Siswa Tentang Konsep listrik Dinamis. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 143–152. https://doi.org/10.23887/jipp.v1i2.11972

Purwanto, K. K. (2021a). Analysis On Students’ Understanding Of Hydrocarbon Compounds In Organic Chemistry II Course. Jurnal Kimia Dan Pendidikan, 6(2), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.30870/educhemia.v6i1.10727

Purwanto, K. K. (2021b). Analysis on Students’ Understanding of Hydrocarbon Compounds in Organic Chemistry II Course. EduChemia (Jurnal Kimia Dan Pendidikan), 6(2), 219. https://doi.org/10.30870/educhemia.v6i2.10727

Rahayu, S., Rahmadani, E., Syafitri, E., Prasetyoningsih, L. S. A., Ubaidillah, M. F., & Tavakoli, M. (2022). Teaching with Technology during COVID-19 Pandemic: An Interview Study with Teachers in Indonesia. Education Research International, 2022, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7853310

Saha, S. M., Pranty, S. A., Rana, M. J., Islam, M. J., & Hossain, M. E. (2022). Teaching during a pandemic: do university teachers prefer online teaching? Heliyon, 8(1), e08663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08663

Sitinjak, D. S. (2021). Analisis Kompetensi Pedagogi Dan Penguasaan Konsep Kimia Mahasiswa Calon Guru Kimia Yang Profesional. Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(2), 603–610. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v3i2.379

Utomo, B. (2019). Analisis Validitas Isi Butir Soal Sebagai Salah Satu Upaya Peningkatan Kualitas Pembelajaran Di Madrasah Berbasis Nilai Nilai Islam. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(No 2), 146–159. https://doi.org/10.21043/jpm.v1i2.4883

Author Biographies

Selina, Universitas Tanjungpura

Rini Muharini, Universitas Tanjungpura

Ira Lestari, Universitas Tanjungpura

Masriani, Universitas Tanjungpura

Rahmat Rasmawan, Universitas Tanjungpura

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Selina, Rini Muharini, Ira Lestari, Masriani, Rahmat Rasmawan

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).