Advantages and Disadvantages of Chatgpt in Science Learning: A Systematic Literature Review

Authors

Ahmad Maulid Asmiddin , Pradicta Nurhuda , Ruth Megawati

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.6576

Published:

2023-12-20

Issue:

Vol. 9 No. 12 (2023): December

Keywords:

Advantages and Disadvantages of gpt chat, Chatgpt, Science Learning

Review

Downloads

How to Cite

Asmiddin, A. M. ., Nurhuda, P. ., & Megawati, R. (2023). Advantages and Disadvantages of Chatgpt in Science Learning: A Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(12), 1335–1341. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.6576

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

Currently many forms of sophisticated technology are used by many people. This of course cannot be separated from the existence of artificial intelligence. One form of sophisticated technology is Chat GPT which was developed by Open AI. Science as a collection of knowledge is the result of human scientific creative activity. The results of scientific creative activities will produce knowledge in the form of facts, concepts, principles, laws, and theories. Science is a human activity characterized by thought processes that take place in the human mind. With developing technology, one of which is Chat GPT, it will make the current science learning process easier. The research aims to examine the advantages and disadvantages of Chatgpt in Science Learning: Systematic Literature Review. The review was conducted based on state-of-the-art methods using the preferred reporting items for reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The results of this research explain that. GPT chat has several uses, advantages, and disadvantages in science learning. For this reason, GPT chat must be used as wisely as possible, so that there are no mistakes in its application in science learning or other learning.

References

Adetayo, A. J. (2023). Artificial intelligence chatbots in academic libraries: The rise of ChatGPT. Library Hi Tech News, 40(3), 18–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-01-2023-0007

Adiguzel, T., Kaya, M. H., & Cansu, F. K. (2023). Revolutionizing education with AI: Exploring the transformative potential of ChatGPT. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(3), ep429. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13152

Agarwal, M., Goswami, A., & Sharma, P. (2023). Evaluating ChatGPT-3.5 and Claude-2 in Answering and Explaining Conceptual Medical Physiology Multiple-Choice Questions. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.46222

Alhashem, F., & Agha, N. (2020). Analysis Based on the Three Objective Educational Domains for Final Summative Secondary Examinations of Science Subject (Chemistry, Physics, and Biology). Education Research International, 2020, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8886126

AlZaabi, A., ALAmri, A., Albalushi, H., Aljabri, R., & AalAbdulsalam, A. (2023). ChatGPT applications in Academic Research: A Review of Benefits, Concerns, and Recommendations [Preprint]. Scientific Communication and Education. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.17.553688

Anagnostopoulos, C.-N. (2023). ChatGPT impacts in programming education: A recent literature overview that debates ChatGPT responses. F1000Research, 12, 1393. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.141958.1

Bašić, Ž., Banovac, A., Kružić, I., & Jerković, I. (2023). ChatGPT-3.5 as writing assistance in students’ essays. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 750. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02269-7

Baskara, Fx. R. (2023). The Promises and Pitfalls of Using Chat GPT for Self-Determined Learning in Higher Education: An Argumentative Review. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fakultas Tarbiyah Dan Ilmu Keguruan IAIM Sinjai, 2, 95–101. https://doi.org/10.47435/sentikjar.v2i0.1825

Bitzenbauer, P. (2023). ChatGPT in physics education: A pilot study on easy-to-implement activities. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(3), ep430. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13176

Cooper, G. (2023a). Examining Science Education in ChatGPT: An Exploratory Study of Generative Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(3), 444–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10039-y

Cooper, G. (2023b). Examining Science Education in ChatGPT: An Exploratory Study of Generative Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(3), 444–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10039-y

Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., … Wright, R. (2023a). Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?†Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642

Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., … Wright, R. (2023b). Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?†Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642

Ernst, J., & Burcak, F. (2019). Young Children’s Contributions to Sustainability: The Influence of Nature Play on Curiosity, Executive Function Skills, Creative Thinking, and Resilience. Sustainability, 11(15), 4212. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154212

Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2023a). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846

Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2023b). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846

Floridi, L., & Chiriatti, M. (2020). GPT-3: Its Nature, Scope, Limits, and Consequences. Minds and Machines, 30(4), 681–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09548-1

Florindo, F. (2023). ChatGPT: A Threat or an Opportunity for Scientists? Perspectives of Earth and Space Scientists, 4(1), e2023CN000212. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023CN000212

Fütterer, T., Fischer, C., Alekseeva, A., Chen, X., Tate, T., Warschauer, M., & Gerjets, P. (2023). ChatGPT in education: Global reactions to AI innovations. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 15310. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42227-6

Gill, S. S., & Kaur, R. (2023). ChatGPT: Vision and challenges. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 3, 262–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.05.004

Ginzburg, T., & Barak, M. (2023). Technology-Enhanced Learning and Its Association with Motivation to Learn Science from a Cross-Cultural Perspective. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(4), 597–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10048-x

Grassini, S. (2023). Shaping the Future of Education: Exploring the Potential and Consequences of AI and ChatGPT in Educational Settings. Education Sciences, 13(7), 692. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070692

Hadzigeorgiou, Y., & Schulz, R. M. (2019). Engaging Students in Science: The Potential Role of “Narrative Thinking†and “Romantic Understanding.†Frontiers in Education, 4, 38. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00038

Ivanov, S., & Soliman, M. (2023). Game of algorithms: ChatGPT implications for the future of tourism education and research. Journal of Tourism Futures, 9(2), 214–221. https://doi.org/10.1108/JTF-02-2023-0038

Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., Khan, S., & Khan, I. H. (2023a). Unlocking the opportunities through ChatGPT Tool towards ameliorating the education system. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations, 3(2), 100115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100115

Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., Khan, S., & Khan, I. H. (2023b). Unlocking the opportunities through ChatGPT Tool towards ameliorating the education system. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations, 3(2), 100115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100115

Kelly, S., Kaye, S.-A., & Oviedo-Trespalacios, O. (2023). What factors contribute to the acceptance of artificial intelligence? A systematic review. Telematics and Informatics, 77, 101925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2022.101925

Liang, Y., Zou, D., Xie, H., & Wang, F. L. (2023). Exploring the potential of using ChatGPT in physics education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00273-7

Loeng, S. (2020). Self-Directed Learning: A Core Concept in Adult Education. Education Research International, 2020, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3816132

Miedema, F. (2022). Images of Science: A Reality Check. In F. Miedema, Open Science: The Very Idea (pp. 15–65). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-2115-6_2

Mondal, H., Marndi, G., Behera, J. K., & Mondal, S. (2023). ChatGPT for Teachers: Practical Examples for Utilizing Artificial Intelligence for Educational Purposes. Indian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 10(3), 200–205. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijves.ijves_37_23

Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., Fernández-Batanero, J. M., & López-Meneses, E. (2023). Impact of the Implementation of ChatGPT in Education: A Systematic Review. Computers, 12(8), 153. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers12080153

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4

Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., De Jong, T., Van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003

Primastuti, M., & Atun, S. (2018). Science Technology Society (STS) learning approach: An effort to improve students’ learning outcomes. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097, 012062. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012062

Rahman, Md. M., & Watanobe, Y. (2023). ChatGPT for Education and Research: Opportunities, Threats, and Strategies. Applied Sciences, 13(9), 5783. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095783

Roumeliotis, K. I., & Tselikas, N. D. (2023). ChatGPT and Open-AI Models: A Preliminary Review. Future Internet, 15(6), 192. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15060192

Seo, K., Tang, J., Roll, I., Fels, S., & Yoon, D. (2021). The impact of artificial intelligence on learner–instructor interaction in online learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00292-9

Shana, Z., & Abulibdeh, E. S. (2020). Science practical work and its impact on students’ science achievement. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 10(2), 199. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.888

Su (è‹å˜‰çº¢), J., & Yang (æ¨ä¼Ÿé¹), W. (2023). Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT: A Framework for Applying Generative AI in Education. ECNU Review of Education, 6(3), 355–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311231168423

Suwono, H., Mahmudah, A., & Maulidiah, L. (2017). Scientific Literacy Of A Third Year Biology Student Teachers: Exploration Study. KnE Social Sciences, 1(3), 269. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v1i3.747

Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x

Wong, B., Chiu, Y.-L. T., Murray, Ó. M., Horsburgh, J., & Copsey-Blake, M. (2023). ‘Biology is easy, physics is hard’: Student perceptions of the ideal and the typical student across STEM higher education. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 32(1), 118–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2022.2122532

Xiao, Y., & Zhi, Y. (2023a). An Exploratory Study of EFL Learners’ Use of ChatGPT for Language Learning Tasks: Experience and Perceptions. Languages, 8(3), 212. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8030212

Xiao, Y., & Zhi, Y. (2023b). An Exploratory Study of EFL Learners’ Use of ChatGPT for Language Learning Tasks: Experience and Perceptions. Languages, 8(3), 212. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8030212

Yilmaz, R., & Karaoglan Yilmaz, F. G. (2023). Augmented intelligence in programming learning: Examining student views on the use of ChatGPT for programming learning. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 1(2), 100005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100005

Yu, H. (2023). Reflection on whether Chat GPT should be banned by academia from the perspective of education and teaching. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1181712. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1181712

Zheng, Y. (2023). ChatGPT for Teaching and Learning: An Experience from Data Science Education. The 24th Annual Conference on Information Technology Education, 66–72. https://doi.org/10.1145/3585059.3611431

Author Biographies

Ahmad Maulid Asmiddin, Universitas Dayanu Ikhsanuddin Baubau

Pradicta Nurhuda, Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional, Jakarta, Indonesia

Ruth Megawati, Universitas Cenderawasih

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Ahmad Maulid Asmiddin, Pradicta Nurhuda, Ruth Megawati

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).