How Does “Chemistry Challenge” E-book Affect the Chemical Literacy Profile? A Study to Test Learning Media Effectiveness

Authors

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v10i5.7018

Published:

2024-05-25

Issue:

Vol. 10 No. 5 (2024): May

Keywords:

CELQ, Chemistry challenge e-book, Chemical equilibrium, Chemical literacy

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Pratama, F. I., & Rohaeti, E. (2024). How Does “Chemistry Challenge” E-book Affect the Chemical Literacy Profile? A Study to Test Learning Media Effectiveness. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(5), 2253–2260. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i5.7018

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

The appropriate utilization of media can greatly impact one's chemical literacy. A prior study involved the development of an e-book called "Chemistry Challenge," which is specifically in chemical equilibrium. This research aims to evaluate the chemical literacy profile of students who have utilized the "Chemistry Challenge" e-book and determine if there are significant differences between those who have used it and those who have not. The Chemical Equilibrium Literacy Questionnaire (CELQ) was utilized as an instrument for data collection. The CELQ data was analyzed utilizing ideal criteria assessment to evaluate the chemical literacy profile, and the independent t-test was used to see significant differences. The results of the CELQ show that 82% of students have a chemistry literacy profile in the good and very good categories after using the "Chemistry Challenge" e-book, this result is superior to students who learn using student worksheets. Apart from that, statistically, there are significant differences between the two groups of students. Therefore, the use of the "Chemistry Challenge" e-book has a positive effect on students' chemical literacy profiles.

References

Adelia, D., Linda, R., & Erna, M. (2023). Development of E-module based on Multiple Representation to Improve the Competence of Chemical Literacy and Learning Independence of Students on the Material Reaction Rate. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(12), 11101–11110. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.5541

Arikunto, S. (2010). Metodologi penelitian. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.

Asikin, N., & Yulita, I. (2019). Scientific Literacy-Based Chemical Teaching Materials Design of Chemical Solution Materials on Sea Pollution Context. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 5(2), 204–211. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v5i2.249

Asrizal, A., & Sumarmin, R. (2018). The Development of Integrated Science Instructional Materials to Improve Students’ Digital Literacy in Scientific Approach. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(4), 442–450. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i4.13613

Asrizal, A., Amanda, F. D., & Aldilla, E. (2023). Meta-analysis of the Effect of STEM-Based Integrated Science E-books on Students’ Scientific Literacy. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 13(2), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v13i2.15654

Bruine de Bruin, W., Parker, A. M., & Fischhoff, B. (2007). Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(5), 938–956. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.5.938

Cigdemoglu, C., & Geban, O. (2015). Improving students’ chemical literacy levels on thermochemical and thermodynamics concepts through a context-based approach. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(2), 302–317. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RP00007F

Creswell, J. C. (2012). Education research, planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4 th). Pearson.

Crujeiras-Pérez, B., & Brocos, P. (2021). Pre-service teachers’ use of epistemic criteria in the assessment of scientific procedures for identifying microplastics in beach sand. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 22(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RP00176G

Eny, H. A., & Wiyarsi, A. (2019). Students’ Chemical Literacy on Context-Based Learning: A Case of Equilibrium Topic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1397(1), 012035. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1397/1/012035

Fadly, D., Rahayu, S., Dasna, I. W., & Yahmin, Y. (2022). The Effectiveness of a SOIE Strategy Using Socio-scientific Issues on Students’ Chemical Literacy. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 237–258. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15114a

Garner-O’Neale, L., Maughan, J., & Ogunkola, B. (2013). Scientific Literacy of Undergraduate Chemistry Students in the University of the West Indies, Barbados: Individual and Joint Contributions of Age, Sex and Level of Study. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies. https://doi.org/10.5901/ajis.2013.v2n10p55

Gay, L., Geoffrey, E., & Airasian, P. (2012). Educational research: competencies for analysis and application (10th ed.). Pearson.

Hewi, L., & Shaleh, M. (2020). Refleksi Hasil PISA (The Programme For International Student Assesment): Upaya Perbaikan Bertumpu Pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini). Jurnal Golden Age, 4(01), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.29408/jga.v4i01.2018

Jusniar, J., & Syamsidah, S. (2021). Hubungan Konsep Diri Dengan Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Konsep Kesetimbagan Kimia. Jurnal IPA Terpadu, 5(1), 96–102. https://doi.org/10.35580/ipaterpadu.v5i1.25499

Kousathana, M., & Tsaparlis, G. (2002). Students’ Errors in Solving Numerical Chemical-Equilibrium Problems. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 3(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1039/B0RP90030C

Lochmiller, C. R., & Lester, J. N. (2017). An introduction to educational research: connecting methods to practice. SAGE Publications, Inc.

Nisa’, A., Sudarmin, & Samini. (2015). Efektivitas Penggunaan Modul Terintegrasi Etnosains Dalam Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains Siswa. Unnes Science Education Journal, 4(3), 1049–1056. https://doi.org/10.15294/usej.v4i3.8860.

OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Results. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en

Prastiwi, M. N. B., & Laksono, E. W. (2018). The ability of analytical thinking and chemistry literacy in high school students learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097, 012061. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012061

Pratama, F. I. (2022). Pengembangan e-book “chemistry challenge” untuk membelajarkan literasi kimia peserta didik sma. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Pratama, F. I., Aznam, N., & Rohaeti, E. (2023). Study of Chemical Literacy Related to Chemical Ethics Based on Local Phenomena Day-to-day: A Case of Used Cooking Oil. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(9), 6810–6818. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.3224

Pratama, F. I., & Rohaeti, E. (2023). Students’ Chemical Literacy Ability on Hydrocarbon Material: A Case of Toxic Compounds in Fried Food. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(9), 6795–6802. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.4554

Pratomo, H., Priyambodo, E., & Wiyarsi, A. (2020). Vocational High School Students Chemical Literacy on Context-Based Learning: A Case of Petroleum Topic. Turkish Journal of Science Education, 17(1), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.18

Primadianningsih, C., Sumarni, W., & Sudarmin, S. (2023). Systematic Literature Review: Analysis of Ethno-STEM and Student’s Chemistry Literacy Profile in 21st Century. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(2), 650–659. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i2.2559

Rizki, A., Khaldun, I., & Pada, A. U. T. (2021). Development of Discovery Learning Student Worksheets to Improve Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Chemical Balance Materials. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(4), 707–711. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7i4.829

Sadhu, S., Ad’hiya, E., & Laksono, E. W. (2019). Exploring and comparing content validity and assumptions of modern theory of an integrated assessment: critical thinking-chemical literacy studies. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(4), 570–581. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i4.20967

Salmawati, A., S., & Priscylio, G. (2019). The use of chemistry e-book developed by 4s tmd: upper high school teachers and students’ views. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management and E-Learning - IC4E 2019. https://doi.org/10.1145/3306500.330656.

Shwartz, Y., Ben-Zvi, R., & Hofstein, A. (2006). The use of scientific literacy taxonomy for assessing the development of chemical literacy among high-school students. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 7(4), 203–225. https://doi.org/10.1039/B6RP90011A

Siami, F., Sumarni, W., Sudarmin, S., & Harjono, H. (2023). Pengembangan LKPD Terintegrasi Etnosains Batik Semarang untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Kimia Siswa. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(10), 7784–7792. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.3604

Suwahyu, F. A., & Rahayu, S. (2023). Development and utilization of instrument using PISA framework to improve chemistry literacy ability: A systematic review. AIP Conference Proceeding, 2569, 030016. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0113478

Tahmidaten, L., & Krismanto, W. (2020). Permasalahan Budaya Membaca di Indonesia (Studi Pustaka Tentang Problematika & Solusinya). Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 10(1), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.js.2020.v10.i1.p22-33

Thummathong, R., & Thathong, K. (2018). Chemical literacy levels of engineering students in Northeastern Thailand. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39(3), 478–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2018.06.009

Tyson, L., Treagust, D. F., & Bucat, R. B. (1999). The Complexity of Teaching and Learning Chemical Equilibrium. Journal of Chemical Education, 76(4), 554. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed076p554

Wei, B., & Chen, B. (2017). Examining the Senior Secondary School Chemistry Curriculum in China in View of Scientific Literacy. In Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education (Vol. 45, pp. 133–148). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9864-8_6

Wiyarsi, A., Prodjosantoso, A. K., & Nugraheni, A. R. E. (2020). Students’ chemical literacy level: A case on electrochemistry topic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1440(1), 012019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1440/1/012019

Wiyarsi, A., Prodjosantoso, A. K., & Nugraheni, A. R. E. (2021). Promoting Students’ Scientific Habits of Mind and Chemical Literacy Using the Context of Socio-Scientific Issues on the Inquiry Learning. Frontiers in Education, 6(May), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.660495

Yore, L. D., Pimm, D., & Tuan, H.-L. (2007). The Literacy Component of Mathematical and Scientific Literacy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(4), 559–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9089-4

Yulianti, R. N. E., Permanasari, A., & Heliawati, L. (2019). Pemanfaatan E-Book Konsep Asam Basa Dalam Pembelajaran Kimia Untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Kimia Siswa SMA Kelas XI. Journal of Science Education and Practice, 3(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.33751/jsep.v3i1.1378

Author Biographies

Faiz Ilham Pratama, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Pendidikan Kimia - UNY

Eli Rohaeti, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Faiz Ilham Pratama, Eli Rohaeti

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).