Development of E-Learning Based PBL-STEM Learning Tools on Students' Science Process Skills and Critical Thinking Ability

Authors

Kusumawati Dwiningsih , Sukarmin , Achmad Lutfi , Rusly Hidayah , Suyono , Utiya Azizah , Aiza Alya

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v10i9.7106

Published:

2024-09-30

Issue:

Vol. 10 No. 9 (2024): September

Keywords:

Critical Thinking, Learning Tools, PBL-STEM, Process Skills Science

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Dwiningsih, K., Sukarmin, S., Lutfi, A., Hidayah, R., Suyono, S., Azizah, U., & Alya, A. (2024). Development of E-Learning Based PBL-STEM Learning Tools on Students’ Science Process Skills and Critical Thinking Ability. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(9), 7171–7178. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i9.7106

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

Education in the 21st century must be in harmony with technological developments where students are expected to be able to master useful skills to be responsive to changes and developments over time and to have in-depth knowledge and understanding to become lifelong learners. Based on these problems, the researcher aims to produce e-learning based PBL-STEM learning tools that are valid, practical and effective. This research procedure follows the Borg and Gall research and development method. Where the research method is pre-experimental, researchers use the One Group Pretest - Posttest Design approach. The results of this research are: the teaching tools were declared valid in terms of validation results of 95%, the practicality of the teaching tools seen from the student response questionnaire obtained a score of 95% and the student activity observation sheet as supporting data obtained a value of 98%, and the effectiveness of interactive e-modules can be seen from the average N-Gain value of the science process skills test obtained an average N-Gain value of 0.73 and in the critical thinking ability test obtained an average N-Gain score of 0.70 so it can be concluded that the teaching tools developed are suitable use in learning.

References

Aidoo, B. (2023). Teacher Educators Experience Adopting Problem-Based Learning in Science Education. Education Sciences, 13(11), 1113. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111113

Aka, K. A. (2019). Integration Borg & Gall (1983) and Lee & Owen (2004) models as an alternative model of design-based research of interactive multimedia in elementary school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1318(1), 012022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1318/1/012022

Albay, E. M. (2019). Analyzing the effects of the problem solving approach to the performance and attitude of first year university students. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 1(1), 100006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2019.100006

Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is Qualitative in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7

Cavalcanti, A. P., Barbosa, A., Carvalho, R., Freitas, F., Tsai, Y.-S., Gašević, D., & Mello, R. F. (2021). Automatic feedback in online learning environments: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100027

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., … Wright, R. (2023). Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642

Fitriani, H., Imanda, R., Rahmi, A., & Nurmalinda, S. (2021). The development of flashcard learning media based on make a match on colloid. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 3(5), 373. https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v3i5.6069

González-Pérez, L. I., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2022). Components of Education 4.0 in 21st Century Skills Frameworks: Systematic Review. Sustainability, 14(3), 1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031493

Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L. S., & Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, 101586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586

Irnidayanti, Y., & Fadhilah, N. (2023). Teaching Quality in Indonesia: What Needs to Be Improved? In R. Maulana, M. Helms-Lorenz, & R. M. Klassen (Eds.), Effective Teaching Around the World (pp. 225–244). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31678-4_10

Ješková, Z., Lukáč, S., Šnajder, Ľ., Guniš, J., Klein, D., & Kireš, M. (2022). Active Learning in STEM Education with Regard to the Development of Inquiry Skills. Education Sciences, 12(10), 686. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100686

Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z

Lavee, E., & Itzchakov, G. (2023). Good listening: A key element in establishing quality in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 23(3), 614–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941211039402

Li, L. (2022). Reskilling and Upskilling the Future-ready Workforce for Industry 4.0 and Beyond. Information Systems Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10308-y

Maison, M., Darmaji, D., Kurniawan, D. A., Astalini, A., Kuswanto, K., & Ningsi, A. P. (2021). Correlation Of Science Process Skills On Critical Thinking Skills In Junior High School In Jambi City. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika Dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 11(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v11n1.p29-38

Markula, A., & Aksela, M. (2022). The key characteristics of project-based learning: How teachers implement projects in K-12 science education. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 4(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-021-00042-x

Meng, N., Dong, Y., Roehrs, D., & Luan, L. (2023). Tackle implementation challenges in project-based learning: A survey study of PBL e-learning platforms. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(3), 1179–1207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10202-7

Mlambo, M., Silén, C., & McGrath, C. (2021). Lifelong learning and nurses’ continuing professional development, a metasynthesis of the literature. BMC Nursing, 20(1), 62. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00579-2

Nguyen, T. P. L., Nguyen, T. H., & Tran, T. K. (2020). STEM Education in Secondary Schools: Teachers’ Perspective towards Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 12(21), 8865. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218865

Nursalam, L. O., Syarifuddin, Sailan, Z., Saifullah, Hakim, A. R., Rosadi, A., Suhardi, M., Asyş_ari, M., Prayogi, S., & Bilad, M. R. (2022). Exploring pre-service teacher’ views of science process skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2165(1), 012012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2165/1/012012

Park, W., Wu, J.-Y., & Erduran, S. (2020). The Nature of STEM Disciplines in the Science Education Standards Documents from the USA, Korea and Taiwan: Focusing on Disciplinary Aims, Values and Practices. Science & Education, 29(4), 899–927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00139-1

Poláková, M., Suleimanová, J. H., Madzík, P., Copuš, L., Molnárová, I., & Polednová, J. (2023). Soft skills and their importance in the labour market under the conditions of Industry 5.0. Heliyon, 9(8), e18670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18670

Priya, A. (2021). Case Study Methodology of Qualitative Research: Key Attributes and Navigating the Conundrums in Its Application. Sociological Bulletin, 70(1), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038022920970318

Putri, P. A. W., Rahayu, S., Widarti, H. R., & Yahmin, Y. (2022). Chemistry students’ digital literacy skills on thermochemistry context “hydrogen fuel issue.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(12), em2198. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12699

Rusmansyah, Hayati, N., Winarti, A., & Rahmi. (2021). Train students’ science process skills and self-efficacy in online learning using the Scientific Critical Thinking (SCT) model assisted by google classroom and google meet. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1760(1), 012034. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1760/1/012034

Sari*, R. P., Hasibuan, M. P., Oktaviani, C., Yakob, M., & Nazar, M. (2023). Development of Electronic Learning Chemistry Assessment Applications Through Project-Based Learning for Increasing Student Scientific Performance. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 11(1), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v11i1.27984

Sari, V. A. (2019). Educational Assistance and Education Quality in Indonesia: The Role of Decentralization. Population and Development Review, 45(S1), 123–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12272

Stevani, F., & Sucahyo, I. (2022). Development of Android-Based Learning Media Using Microsoft Powerpoint Integrated Ispring Suite on Class X’s Work and Energy Materials. Prisma Sains : Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 10(3), 688. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v10i3.5422

Strat, T. T. S., Henriksen, E. K., & Jegstad, K. M. (2023). Inquiry-based science education in science teacher education: A systematic review. Studies in Science Education, 1–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2023.2207148

Suryani, D. I., Berlian, L., Rachmawati, D., & Laraswati, M. D. (2020). Development of Learning Tools based on Food Security to Build Scientific Attitude of Undergraduate Students. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran IPA, 6(1), 87. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v6i1.7103

Tan, A.-L., Ong, Y. S., Ng, Y. S., & Tan, J. H. J. (2023). STEM Problem Solving: Inquiry, Concepts, and Reasoning. Science & Education, 32(2), 381–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00310-2

Triyanto, A., Istiqomah, I., & Arigiyati, T. A. (2022). The Learning Process with Contextual Approach to Improve Students’ Motivation and Mathematics Learning Achievement. Journal of Instructional Mathematics, 3(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.37640/jim.v3i1.1043

Tyas, B. W., & Novita, D. (2023). POGIL (Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning) e-Worksheet to Improve Critical Thinking Skills on Reaction Rate Material. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 7(2), 224–231. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.7.2.224-231

Van Laar, E., Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., Van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & De Haan, J. (2020). Determinants of 21st-Century Skills and 21st-Century Digital Skills for Workers: A Systematic Literature Review. SAGE Open, 10(1), 215824401990017. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900176

Wale, B. D., & Bishaw, K. S. (2020). Effects of using inquiry-based learning on EFL students’ critical thinking skills. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 5(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-020-00090-2

Walter, Y. (2024). Embracing the future of Artificial Intelligence in the classroom: The relevance of AI literacy, prompt engineering, and critical thinking in modern education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00448-3

Wang, A. I., & Tahir, R. (2020). The effect of using Kahoot! For learning – A literature review. Computers & Education, 149, 103818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103818

Xu, W., & Ouyang, F. (2022). The application of AI technologies in STEM education: A systematic review from 2011 to 2021. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00377-5

Yeager, D. S., Hanselman, P., Walton, G. M., Murray, J. S., Crosnoe, R., Muller, C., Tipton, E., Schneider, B., Hulleman, C. S., Hinojosa, C. P., Paunesku, D., Romero, C., Flint, K., Roberts, A., Trott, J., Iachan, R., Buontempo, J., Yang, S. M., Carvalho, C. M., … Dweck, C. S. (2019). A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement. Nature, 573(7774), 364–369. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1466-y

Author Biographies

Kusumawati Dwiningsih, State University of Surabaya

Sukarmin, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Achmad Lutfi, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Rusly Hidayah, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Suyono, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Utiya Azizah, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Aiza Alya, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Kusumawati Dwiningsih, Sukarmin, Achmad Lutfi, Rusly Hidayah, Suyono, Utiya Azizah, Aiza Alya

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).