Analysis of Science Process Skills of Junior High School Students

Authors

Apriani Herni Rophi , Ruth Megawati , Yaneta Tabita Aiboy , Mivtha Citraningrum , Edoward Krisson Raunsay

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v10i5.7194

Published:

2024-05-25

Issue:

Vol. 10 No. 5 (2024): May

Keywords:

Junior high school students, Science, Science process skills

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Rophi, A. H., Megawati, R., Aiboy, Y. T., Citraningrum, M., & Raunsay, E. K. (2024). Analysis of Science Process Skills of Junior High School Students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(5), 2294–2299. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i5.7194
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

Natural Sciences (IPA) emphasizes students' science process skills in every learning process. However, looking at the facts in the field when studying science, students still tend to memorize concepts, theories, and principles without understanding the discovery process. This has an impact on the ongoing learning process being uninteresting so that students become bored and ultimately causes students' understanding of science concepts to become low. This research aims to determine the quality of science process skills of class VII students at Kanda Middle School. The research method used is quantitative. The population is all class VII students at Kanda Middle School, totaling 46 people, while the sample in this study was 23 students taken by random sampling. The instruments used are performance that assesses practicum activities as well as interview guidelines used to gather information from science teachers. Data were analyzed using the percentage value formula. This research concludes that the science process skills of class VII Kanda State Middle School students have a percentage of 70.01% in the skilled category.

References

Baah, C., Govender, I., & Rontala Subramaniam, P. (2023). Exploring the role of gamification in motivating students to learn. Cogent Education, 10(1), 2210045. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2210045

Boonekamp, G. M., Dierx, J. A., & Jansen, E. (2021). Motivating students for physical activity: What can we learn from student perspectives? European Physical Education Review, 27(3), 512–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X20970215

Cannady, M. A., Vincent-Ruz, P., Chung, J. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2019). Scientific sensemaking supports science content learning across disciplines and instructional contexts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 59, 101802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101802

Coman, C., Țîru, L. G., Meseșan-Schmitz, L., Stanciu, C., & Bularca, M. C. (2020). Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education during the Coronavirus Pandemic: Students’ Perspective. Sustainability, 12(24), 10367. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410367

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Daskalovska, N., Gudeva, L. K., & Ivanovska, B. (2012). Learner Motivation and Interest. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1187–1191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.272

Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving Students’ Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266

Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., … Wright, R. (2023). Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642

Fauziah, A. N., & Kuswanto, H. (2020). Analysis of Junior High School students’ critical thinking ability on ecosystem materials. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1440(1), 012098. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1440/1/012098

Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004

Haryanto, P. C., & Arty, I. S. (2019). The Application of Contextual Teaching and Learning in Natural Science to Improve Student’s HOTS and Self-efficacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233(1), 012106. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012106

Hornstra, L., Stroet, K., Rubie-Davies, C., & Flint, A. (2023). Teacher Expectations and Self-Determination Theory: Considering Convergence and Divergence of Theories. Educational Psychology Review, 35(3), 76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09788-4

Hutapea, A., Bukit, N., & Manurung, S. R. (2021). Improvement science process skills of high school students through learning models scientific inquiry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1811(1), 012005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1811/1/012005

Jeronen, E., Palmberg, I., & Yli-Panula, E. (2016). Teaching Methods in Biology Education and Sustainability Education Including Outdoor Education for Promoting Sustainability—A Literature Review. Education Sciences, 7(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7010001

Manfaat, B., Nurazizah, A., & Misri, M. A. (2021). Analysis of mathematics test items quality for high school. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 25(1), 108–117. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v25i1.39174

Mappadang, A., Khusaini, K., Sinaga, M., & Elizabeth, E. (2022). Academic interest determines the academic performance of undergraduate accounting students: Multinomial logit evidence. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 2101326. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2101326

Markula, A., & Aksela, M. (2022). The key characteristics of project-based learning: How teachers implement projects in K-12 science education. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 4(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-021-00042-x

Masluha, S. (2021). Grammatical Errors in Literature and Philosophy Student Essays At Panca Marga University, Probolinggo. Journal of English Development, 29–44. https://doi.org/10.25217/jed.v1i01.1414

Munfaida, S., Mustadi, A., & Kurniawati, W. (2022). The Use of Practicum-Based LKM Can Improve Concept Understanding in Science Subject Energy Materials. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(6), 2859–2863. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i6.2173

Mushani, M. (2021). Science Process Skills in Science Education of Developed and Developing Countries: Literature Review. Unnes Science Education Journal, 10(1), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.15294/usej.v10i1.42153

Ndruru, N. S. (2020). The Efforts to Improve Students’ability to Write Exposition Text with Discovery Learning Method by Class X (Tenth) Students of SMA Negeri 1 Hilimegai. Al’Adzkiya International of Education and Sosial (AIoES) Journal, 1(2), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.55311/aioes.v1i2.60

Nilawati, N. K., Bayu, G. W., & Jayanta, I. N. L. (2023). Pengembangan Modul Praktikum Bahasa Inggris. Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 6(3), 369–378. https://doi.org/10.23887/jlls.v6i3.65194

Ningrum, A. W., Adi, B. S., & Nugroho, I. A. (2022). Profile of Science Processing Skill Primary Teacher Education Students in Simulation of Science Learning Media in Online Learning Period. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(4), 4815–4820. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i4.2361

Parmar, T. K., Rawtani, D., & Agrawal, Y. K. (2016). Bioindicators: The natural indicator of environmental pollution. Frontiers in Life Science, 9(2), 110–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/21553769.2016.1162753

Savitri, E. N., Wusqo, I. U., Ardhi, M. W., & Putra, P. D. (2017). Enhancement of Science Students’ Process Skills through Implementation of Green Learning Method (GeLem) with Conservation-Based Inquiry Approach. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), 237. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i2.11286

Senisum, M., Susilo, H., Suwono, H., & Ibrohim. (2022). GIReSiMCo: A Learning Model to Scaffold Students’ Science Process Skills and Biology Cognitive Learning Outcomes. Education Sciences, 12(4), 228. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12040228

Septiani, A., & Rustaman, N. Y. (2017). Implementation of Performance Assessment in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) Education to Detect Science Process Skill. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 812, 012052. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012052

Soykurt, M. (2010). Practicum students’ life in a nutshell. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 5313–5325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.866

Strat, T. T. S., Henriksen, E. K., & Jegstad, K. M. (2023). Inquiry-based science education in science teacher education: A systematic review. Studies in Science Education, 1–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2023.2207148

Stuart, N. J., & Barnett, A. L. (2023). The writing quality scale (WQS): A new tool to identify writing difficulties in students. British Journal of Special Education, 50(2), 258–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8578.12464

Sumanti, F., Khairil Anwar, & Nursina Sari. (2023). Improving Science Process Skills and Student Cooperation Skills Using the POGIL Model Assisted by Animated Media. Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 6(3), 469–478. https://doi.org/10.23887/jlls.v6i3.61997

Susilaningsih, E., Khotimah, K., & Nurhayati, S. (2018). Development of performance assessment instrument based contextual learning for measuring students laboratory skills. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 349, 012018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/349/1/012018

Tang, Y., & Hew, K. F. (2022). Effects of using mobile instant messaging on student behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement: A quasi-experimental study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00306-6

Väätäjä, J. O. (2023). A community of practice approach to the co-development of digital pedagogy: A case study of primary school teacher education practicum. European Journal of Teacher Education, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2023.2198102

Vincent‐Lancrin, S. (2023). Fostering and assessing student critical thinking: From theory to teaching practice. European Journal of Education, 58(3), 354–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12569

Wang, M.-T., & Eccles, J. S. (2013). School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 28, 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.002

Weinstein, Y., Madan, C. R., & Sumeracki, M. A. (2018). Teaching the science of learning. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 3(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-017-0087-y

Winarto, W., Cahyono, E., Sumarni, W., Sulhadi, S., Wahyuni, S., & Sarwi, S. (2022). Science Teaching Approach Ethno-SETSaR to improve pre-service teachers’ creative thinking and problem solving skills. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 12(2), 327. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1367

Wola, B. R., Rungkat, J. A., & Harindah, G. M. D. (2023). Science process skills of prospective science teachers’ in practicum activity at the laboratory. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 9(1), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v9i1.52974

Yenitha, M. S., & Miranda, Y. (2019). The Scientific Literacy Strategy in Efforts to Eliminate Student Misconceptions. Journal of Advances in Education and Philosophy, 03(10), 342–349. https://doi.org/10.36348/JAEP.2019.v03i10.001

Author Biographies

Apriani Herni Rophi, Universitas Cenderawasih

Ruth Megawati, Universitas Cenderawasih

Yaneta Tabita Aiboy, Senior High School Satu Atap Kanda

Mivtha Citraningrum, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Edoward Krisson Raunsay, Universitas Cenderawasih

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Apriani Herni Rophi, Ruth Megawati, Yaneta Tabita Aiboy, Mivtha Citraningrum, Edoward Krisson Raunsay

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).