SMART-Problem Solving Strategy to Improve Students Scientific Argumentation Skills on "Rain and Malin Kundang Stone Issue" as Local Socio-Scientific Issues (LSSI)

Authors

Vella Aulia Illahi , Sri Rahayu , Hayuni Retno Widarti , Yahmin

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v10i6.7300

Published:

2024-06-30

Issue:

Vol. 10 No. 6 (2024): June

Keywords:

Local socio-scientific issues (LSSI), Problem solving, Scientific argumentation skills

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Illahi, V. A., Rahayu, S., Widarti, H. R., & Yahmin, Y. (2024). SMART-Problem Solving Strategy to Improve Students Scientific Argumentation Skills on "Rain and Malin Kundang Stone Issue" as Local Socio-Scientific Issues (LSSI). Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(6), 3423–3432. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i6.7300
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

Argumentation skills are needed to prepare the generation to face the industrial era 5.0. This research aims to find out whether the SMART-Problem Solving strategy can improve students' scientific argumentation skills in the context of LSSI "Batu Malin Kundang" which is integrated in chemistry learning to encourage students to make good scientific arguments. This research is a quasi-experimental research with Pretest Posttest Control Group design, involving 101 class XI students at one of the State High Schools in Padang City. The research sample was selected using a convenience sampling technique, namely sampling based on availability in the field or samples that have easy access to researchers. Scientific argumentation skills were measured through pretest and posttest using scientific argumentation skills test instrument in the form of an essay (N=4). The data analysis used in this research is parametric (one way ANOVA). The results of the study showed that there was a significant difference in the average students' scientific argumentation abilities between the SMART-Problem Solving class (average score of 74.09), ADI (average score of 62.94) and the control class (average score of 43. 35), where learning SMART-Problem Solving with the LSSI context can improve argumentation skills effectively

References

Acar, O., Turkmen, L., & Roychoudhury, A. (2010). Student Difficulties in Socio‐scientific Argumentation and Decision‐making Research Findings: Crossing the borders of two research lines. International Journal of Science Education, 32(9), 1191–1206. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902991805

Amirahma, S., & Setyasto, N. (2024). Development of Augmented Reality-Assisted Teaching Materials in Science Subjects: Solar System Topic. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(5), 2346–2355. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i5.7027

Anisa, Widodo, A., Riandi, & Muslim. (2023). Students’ Argumentation in Science Lessons. Science & Education, 32(3), 669–687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00320-8

Asniar, A. (2016). Profil Penalaran Ilmiah Dan Kemampuan Berargumentasi Mahasiswa Sains Dan Non-Sains. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran IPA, 2(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v2i1.428

Atabey, N., & Topcu, M. S. (2017). The Development of a Socioscientific Issues-Based Curriculum Unit for Middle School Students: Global Warming Issue. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5(3), 153–153. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.296027

Ayunda, A. D., Hasanah, H., & Ariyanti, N. A. (2024). Analysis of Student Problem-Solving Skills in XI Class Biology Learning at State Senior High Schools Sleman Regency. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(5), 2465–2472. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i5.5466

Aziz, A. A., & Johari, M. (2023). The Effect of Argumentation about Socio-Scientific Issues on Secondary Students’ Reasoning Pattern and Quality. Research in Science Education, 53(4), 771–789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-023-10099-5

Choi, K., Lee, H., Shin, N., Kim, S., & Krajcik, J. (2011). Re‐conceptualization of scientific literacy in South Korea for the 21st century. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 670–697. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20424

Christenson, N., Rundgren, S.-N., & Zeidler, D. (2014). The Relationship of Discipline Background to Upper Secondary Students’ Argumentation on Socioscientific Issues. Research in Science Education, 44(4), 581–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9394-6

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education (8th ed.). New York: Routledge.

Dewi, C. A., Habiddin, H., Dasna, I. W., & Rahayu, S. (2022). Case-Based Learning (CBL) in Chemistry Learning: A Systematic Review. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(4), 2219–2230. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i4.1971

Dewi, C. A., & Rahayu, S. (2023). Implementation of case-based learning in science education: A systematic review. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 20(4), 729–749. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2023.041

Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-237x(200005)84:3<287::aid-sce1>3.0.co;2-a

Evagorou, M., Sadler, T. D., & Tal, T. (2011). Metalogue: Assessment, Audience, and Authenticity for Teaching SSI and Argumentation. In Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education (Vol. 39, pp. 161–166). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1159-4_9

Fadly, D., Rahayu, S., Dasna, I. W., & Yahmin, Y. (2022). The Effectiveness of a SOIE Strategy Using Socio-scientific Issues on Students’ Chemical Literacy. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 237–258. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15114a

Ge, X., & Land, S. M. (2003). Scaffolding students’ problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504515

Gräber, W., Nentwig, P., Becker, H.-J., Sumfleth, E., Pitton, A., Wollweber, K., & Jorde, D. (2001). Scientific Literacy: From Theory to Practice. In Research in Science Education - Past, Present, and Future (pp. 61–70). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47639-8_6

Grooms, J., Sampson, V., & Golden, B. (2014). Comparing the Effectiveness of Verification and Inquiry Laboratories in Supporting Undergraduate Science Students in Constructing Arguments Around Socioscientific Issues. International Journal of Science Education, 36(9), 1412–1433. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.891160

Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Erduran, S. (2007). Argumentation in Science Education: An Overview. In Science & Technology Education Library (Vol. 35, pp. 3–27). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6670-2_1

Kilinc, A., Demiral, U., & Kartal, T. (2017). Resistance to dialogic discourse in SSI teaching: The effects of an argumentation‐based workshop, teaching practicum, and induction on a preservice science teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(6), 764–789. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21385

Komalasari, B. S., Jufri, A. W., & Santoso, D. (2019). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar IPA Berbasis Inkuiri Terbimbing untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 5(2), 219–227. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v5i2.279

Lee, W. W. S., & Chan, V. C. W. (2017). Cross-Sectional Study on Chinese Secondary School Students’ Epistemic Beliefs and Fallacy Identification. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 26(1-2), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-016-0322-1

Lin, Y.-R., & Hung, J.-F. (2016). The analysis and reconciliation of students’ rebuttals in argumentation activities. International Journal of Science Education, 38(1), 130–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1134848

Listiyani, N., Hidayat, S., & Nulhakim, L. (2021). Development of Augmented Reality Flashcard Media to Improve the Ability of Grade IV Elementary School Students in Reading Understanding of Alternative Energy Source Materials. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(4), 782–787. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7i4.861

Lubben, F., Sadeck, M., Scholtz, Z., & Braund, M. (2010). Gauging Students’ Untutored Ability in Argumentation about Experimental Data: A South African case study. International Journal of Science Education, 32(16), 2143–2166. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903331886

Mahdi, Raharjo, T. J., & Widiasih. (2023). Analysis of Problem Solving Ability in Natural Sciences and Life Skills through Guided Discovery Learning in the View of Student Learning Independence in the Subject Matter of Changes in Energy Forms. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(12), 11093–11100. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.5289

Mason, L., & Scirica, F. (2006). Prediction of students’ argumentation skills about controversial topics by epistemological understanding. Learning and Instruction, 16(5), 492–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.09.007

Muntari, M., Rahmayanti, B. F., & Andayani, Y. (2024). Effectiveness of Socio-Scientific Issue (SSI) Based Science E-Modules to Increase Students’ Scientific Literacy. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(4), 1901–1906. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i4.5257

Ningsih, P. W., Putri, D. H., & Purwanto, A. (2024). Development of Student Worksheets based on Problem-Solving of Temperature and Heat to Improve the Students Problem-Solving Ability. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(2), 940–950. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i2.6524

Nussbaum, E. M. (2002). Scaffolding Argumentation in the Social Studies Classroom. The Social Studies, 93(2), 79–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377990209599887

Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994–1020. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20035

Peine, A., Kabino, K., & Spreckelsen, C. (2016). Self-directed learning can outperform direct instruction in the course of a modern German medical curriculum - results of a mixed methods trial. BMC Medical Education, 16(1), 158. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0679-0

Putri, P. A. W., Rahayu, S., & Fajaroh, F. (2020). Efektivitas Argument-Driven Inquiry untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berargumentasi Ilmiah pada Materi Laju Reaksi. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 5(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i1.13132

Putri, P. A. W., Rahayu, S., Widarti, H. R., & Yahmin, Y. (2022). Chemistry students’ digital literacy skills on thermochemistry context “hydrogen fuel issue.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(12), em2198. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12699

Rahayu, S. (2016). Mengembangkan Literasi Sains Anak Indonesia melalui Pembelajaran Berorientasi Nature of Science (NOS). In Makalah disampaiakan dalam Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar dalam Bidang Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam. Universitas Negeri Malang.

Rosyid, Y. R. R., & Setyasto, N. (2024). Development of Android-Based Augmented Reality Learning Media on the Human Respiratory System to Improve Student Learning Outcomes. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(5), 2503–2510. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i5.7024

Rundgren, C. S. N., & Rundgren, C.-J. (2010). SEP-SEP: Form a Separate to a Holistic View of Socioscientific Issues. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 2. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/45459012

Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009

Sadler, T. D., & Donnelly, L. A. (2006). Socioscientific Argumentation: The effects of content knowledge and morality. International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1463–1488. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600708717

Saenab, S., Asriani, S., Muhiddin, N. H., & Saleh, A. R. (2024). Elevating Problem-Solving Prowess: The Impact of ICT-Assisted ReCODE Learning Model on Class VIII Students’ Problem-Solving Skills at SMPN 18 Makassar. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(5), 2371–2378. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i5.4872

Safarati, N., & Zuhra, F. (2023). Use of Problem-Solving Based Physics Comic Media on Global Warming Material in Increasing Learning Motivation and Students’ Understanding Concept. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(11), 9193–9199. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.4828

Saija, M., Rahayu, S., Fajaroh, F., & Sumari, S. (2022). Enhancement of High School Students’ Scientific Literacy Using Local-Socioscientific Issues in OE3C Instructional Strategies. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i1.33341

Sampson, V., & Clark, D. (2009). The impact of collaboration on the outcomes of scientific argumentation. Science Education, 93(3), 448–484. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20306

Setyaningsih, A., Rahayu, S., Fajaroh, F., & Parmin, P. (2019). Pengaruh pembelajaran process oriented-guided inquiry learning berkonteks isu-isu sosiosaintifik dalam pembelajaran asam basa terhadap keterampilan berargumentasi siswa SMA kelas XI. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 5(2), 168–179. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v5i2.20693

Suryadi, A., Alatas, F., & Hanifa, N. A. (2023). Supporting Students’ Problem Solving Skills Using Science, Technology, Religion, Art, and Mathematics (STREAM) Approach on Sound Wave Concept. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(11), 9106–9112. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.5385

Syerliana, L., Muslim, & Setiawan, W. (2018). Argumentation skill profile using “toulmin Argumentation Pattern” analysis of high school student at Subang on topic hydrostatic pressure. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012031

Telenius, M., Yli-Panula, E., Vesterinen, V.-M., & Vauras, M. (2020). Argumentation within Upper Secondary School Student Groups during Virtual Science Learning: Quality and Quantity of Spoken Argumentation. Education Sciences, 10(12), 393. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10120393

Walker, J. P., Sampson, V., Southerland, S., & Enderle, P. J. (2016). Using the laboratory to engage all students in science practices. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(4), 1098–1113. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RP00093B

Walker, J. P., Sampson, V., & Zimmerman, C. O. (2011). Argument-Driven Inquiry: An Introduction to a New Instructional Model for Use in Undergraduate Chemistry Labs. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(8), 1048–1056. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed100622h

Zeidler, D. L., & Nichols, B. H. (2009). Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173684

Author Biographies

Vella Aulia Illahi, Universitas Negeri Malang

Sri Rahayu, Universitas Negeri Malang

Hayuni Retno Widarti, Universitas Negeri Malang

Yahmin, Universitas Negeri Malang

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Vella Aulia Illahi, Sri Rahayu, Hayuni Retno Widarti, Yahmin

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).