Chemistry Teachers’ Self-efficacy for Using Information and Communication Technology: A Survey Cross Sectional
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v10i9.7419Published:
2024-09-25Issue:
Vol. 10 No. 9 (2024): September : In ProgressKeywords:
Chemistry teacher, ICT self-efficacy, school status, teaching experienceResearch Articles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
The utilization of ICT in education could be further optimized due to the low self-efficacy of teachers. Teachers' years of teaching experience and the status of their schools have an influence on their ICT self-efficacy. This study aims to describe the differences in ICT self-efficacy among chemistry teachers based on their teaching experience and school status. This study used a quantitative approach with a cross-sectional survey method. The research was conducted in 31 high schools in Pekanbaru City and included a randomly selected sample of 50 chemistry teachers. The research instruments consisted of ICT self-efficacy questionnaires 14 items. ICT self-efficacy instrument declared valid and reliable using the Rasch model test. Additionally, interview data were employed to reinforce the findings from the questionnaire. The research questionnaire data underwent processing using analysis descriptive statistics and a two-way ANOVA test with SPSS. The results of the research show that there is a significant difference in the ICT self-efficacy of chemistry teachers based on the teacher's teaching experience with significance level of 0.005 and there is no difference the ICT self-efficacy of chemistry teachers based on school status with significance level of 0.783. The effect size test shows that the partial eta square value for the effect of teaching experience belongs to the high category while school status belongs to the low category.
References
Adisel, A., & Prananosa, A. G. (2020). Penggunaan teknologi informasi dan komunikasi dalam sistem manajemen pembelajaran pada masa pandemi Covid 19. Journal Of Administration and Educational Management, 3(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.31539/alignment.v3i1.1291
Afshari, M., Kamariah, A. B., Luan, W. S., Samah, B. A., & Fooi, F. S. (2009). Factors affecting teachers’ use of information and communication technology. International Journal of Instruction, 2(1), 1694–609. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED524156.pdf
Andriani, A. E., Sulistyorini, S., Kiptiyah, S. M., & Widagdo, A. (2023). Peningkatan kompetensi TIK guru melalui pemanfaatan evaluasi online berbasis project based learning bagi guru sekolah dasar. BERNAS: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 4(3), 2437–2446. https://doi.org/10.31949/jb.v4i3.5672
Atabek, O. (2020). Associations between emotional states, self-efficacy for and attitude towards using educational technology. International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(2), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.241.12
Azhari, B., & Fajri, I. (2022). Distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: School closure in Indonesia. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(7), 1934–1954. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1875072
Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2015). ICT usage in Ghanaian secondary schools: Teachers’ perspectives. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 32(5), 300–312. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-09-2015-0022
BPK. (2005). Undang-Undang RI Nomor 14, tahun 2005, tentang Guru dan Dosen. Republik Indonesia.
Creswell, John. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed). Pearson.
Dewi, R. K., Wardani, S., Wijayati, N., & Sumarni, W. (2019). Demand of ICT-based chemistry learning media in the disruptive era. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(2), 265–270. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i2.17107
Durak, H. Y. (2021). Modeling of relations between K-12 teachers’ TPACK levels and their technology integration self-efficacy, technology literacy levels, attitudes toward technology and usage objectives of social networks. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(7), 1136–1162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1619591
Dursun, O. O. (2019). Pre-service information technology teachers’ self-efficacy, self-esteem and attitudes towards teaching: A four-year longitudinal study. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(2), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.554478
Farida, F., & Nurhaliza, S. (2022). Analisis layanan kualitas jaringan 4G di Kota Pekanbaru dengan G-Net track. Electrops: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Elektro, 1(1), 30–36. Retrieved from https://e-journals.unmul.ac.id/index.php/TE/article/view/9375E
Fuady, M. J. (2016). Pengembangan aplikasi evaluasi pembelajaran online untuk pendidikan jarak jauh. Jurnal Tekno, 16, 148–154. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/292562157.pdf
Gbemu, L. A., Sarfo, F. K., Adentwi, K. I., & Aklassu-Ganan, E. K. K. (2020). Teacher educators’ self-efficacy beliefs and actual use of ICTS in teaching in the Kumasi Metropolis. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 19(2), 13–23. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1251121.pdf
Ghavifekr, S., & Rosdy, W. A. W. (2015). Teaching and learning with technology: Effectiveness of ICT integration in schools. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 1(2), 175–191. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1105224.pdf
Gilakjani, A. P. (2013). Factors contributing to teachers’ use of computer technology in the classroom. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(3), 262–267. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2013.010317
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis. Pearson.
Hatlevik, I. K. R., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2018). Examining the relationship between teachers’ ICT self-efficacy for educational purposes, collegial collaboration, lack of facilitation and the use of ICT in teaching practice. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00935
Hidayat, W. N., Muladi, & Mizar, A. M. (2016). Studi integarsi TIK dalam pembelajaran di Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 1(12), 2281–2291.
Hoai, V. T. T., Son, P. N., Em, V. V. D., & Duc, N. M. (2023). Using 3D molecular structure simulation to develop chemistry competence for Vietnamese students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(7). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13345
Hong, K. S., Chai, M. L., Tan, K. W., Hasbee, U., & Ting, L. N. (2014). ESL teachers’ computer self-efficacy, attitudes toward computer and classroom computer use the findings of the study. Sosial Science & Humanities, 22(2), 369–385.
Hori, R., & Fujii, M. (2021). Impact of using ICT for learning purposes on self-efficacy and persistence: Evidence from pisa 2018. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116463
Joshi, D. R., Chitrakar, R., Belbase, S., & Khanal, B. (2021). ICT Competency of Mathematics Teachers at Secondary Schools of Nepal. European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education, 2(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejimed/10847
Kemendikbud. (2018). 40 persen guru yang siap dengan Teknologi. Republik Indonesia.
Kemendikbud. (2023). Data SMA di Kota Pekanbaru. Republik Indonesia. https://dapo.kemdikbud.go.id/sp/3/096002
Kim, C. M., Kim, M. K., Lee, C. J., Spector, J. M., & DeMeester, K. (2013). Teacher beliefs and technology integration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29(1), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.08.005
Kosar, C., & Besen, D. B. (2019). Adaptation of a patient activation measure (PAM) into Turkish: Reliability and validity test. African Health Sciences, 19(1), 1811–1820. https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v19i1.58
Krause, M., Pietzner, V., Dori, Y. J., & Eilks, I. (2017). Differences and developments in attitudes and self-efficacy of prospective chemistry teachers concerning the use of ICT in education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 4405–4417. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00935a
Kwon, K., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sari, A. R., Khlaif, Z., Zhu, M., Nadir, H., & Gok, F. (2019). Teachers’ self-efficacy matters: Exploring the integration of mobile computing device in middle schools. TechTrends, 63(6), 682–692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00402-5
Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
Latiafah, R., & Hidayati, F. H. (2021). Problematika guru dalam pembelajaran matematika pada masa pandemi Covid-19 di SMA Yogyakarta. Journal in Mathematics Education, 1(1), 36–43. Retrieved from https://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/tarbiyah/Polynom/article/download/4225/2160
Liesa-Orús, M., Latorre-Cosculluela, C., Vázquez-Toledo, S., & Sierra-Sánchez, V. (2020). The technological challenge facing higher education professors: Perceptions of ICT tools for developing 21st Century skills. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135339
Maatuk, A. M., Elberkawi, E. K., Aljawarneh, S., Rashaideh, H., & Alharbi, H. (2022). The Covid-19 pandemic and E-learning: challenges and opportunities from the perspective of students and instructors. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 34(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-021-09274-2
Mashami, R. A., & Khaeruman. (2020). Pengembangan multimedia interaktif kimia berbasis PBL (Problem Based Learning) untuk meningkatkan keterampilan generik sains siswa. Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia, 8(2), 85–96. Retrieved from https://e-journal.undikma.ac.id/index.php/hydrogen/article/view/3138
Mlambo, S., Rambe, P., & Schlebusch, L. (2020). Effects of Gauteng province’s educators’ ICT self-efficacy on their pedagogical use of ICTS in classrooms. Heliyon, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03730
Morelock, J. S., Peterson, D., Mukhopadhyay, S., Thieman, G., & Everett, M. (2015). Effective technology implementation in schools: Differing perceptions of teachers, administrators, and technology staff. ProQuest LLC.
Nasution, S. H. (2018). Pentingnya literasi teknologi bagi mahasiswa calon guru matematika. Jurnal Kajian Pembelajaran Matematika, 2(1), 14–18. Retrieved from https://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jkpm/article/view/3168
Okas, A., van der Schaaf, M., & Krull, E. (2014). Novice and experienced teachers’ views on professionalism. Trames, 18(4), 327–344. https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2014.4.02
Oktavian, R., & Aldya, R. A. (2020). Efektivitas pembelajaran daring terintegrasi di era pendidikan 4.0. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan, 20(2), 129–135. Retrieved from http://repository.uki.ac.id/6030/
Pernantah, P. S., Nova, N., & Ramadhani, A. S. (2021). Penggunaan aplikasi google meet dalam menunjang keefektifan belajar daring masa pandemi Covid-19 di SMA Negeri 3 Pekanbaru. Pedagogi: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 21(1), 45–50. https://doi.org/10.24036/pedagogi.v21i1.991
Purnasari, P. D., & Sadewo, Y. D. (2021). Strategi pembelajaran pendidikan dasar di perbatasan pada era digital. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(5), 3089–3100. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i5.1218
Raman, K., & Yamat, H. (2013). Barriers teachers face in integrating ICT during english lessons: A case study. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2(3), 11–19. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1086402
Rogers, Evverat. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovation. Free Press.
Šabić, J., Baranović, B., & Rogošić, S. (2022). Teachers’ self-efficacy for using information and communication technology: The interaction effect of gender and age. Informatics in Education, 21(2), 353–373. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2022.11
Syahid, A. A., Hernawan, A. H., & Dewi, L. (2022). Analisis kompetensi digital guru sekolah dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(3), 4600–4611. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i3.2909
Author Biographies
Insani Efrili Yanti, Yogyakarta State University
Hari Sutrisno, Yogyakarta State University
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Insani Efrili Yanti, Hari Sutrisno
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
