Development of Sparkol Videoscribe-Based Animated Video Learning Media on the Subject of IPAS Material Changes in the Form of Substances
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v10i7.7423Published:
2024-07-25Issue:
Vol. 10 No. 7 (2024): JulyKeywords:
Learning Media, Learning Outcomes, Sparkol VideoscribeResearch Articles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
This research was conducted to develop learning media Sparkol Videoscribe-based animated video that is feasible and effective in improving the cognitive learning outcomes of students in the subject of Natural and Social Sciences (IPAS) material on changes in the form of substances in class IV SDN 1 Tambakrejo, Grobogan Regency. This study uses a quantitative approach with a development research method (R&D) based on the Borg and Gall development model. The data collection techniques used include tests (pretest and post test) and non-tests (observation, interview, documentation, and questionnaire) with research subjects 1 material expert, 1 media expert, teachers as practitioners and students totaling 9 on small-scale trials and 25 on large-scale trials. The results of validation by expert validators showed a high level of material feasibility and learning media design, namely 90.62% and 93.30%. This learning media is proven to be effective in improving student learning outcomes, indicated by the results of the t-test of the pretest and posttest values with sig (2-tailed) 0.000 < 0.005 and 0.004 < 0.005 while in the N-gain test there was an increase from 64.06 to 77.62 with a difference of 13.56 with a percentage of 0.39% including into the "medium" criteria. Thus, it can be concluded that it has been successfully developed Sparkol Videoscribe-based animated video learning media that is feasible and effective to use in learning to improve students' cognitive learning outcomes in IPAS subjects on material changes in the form of substances.
References
Abbas, J., Aman, J., Nurunnabi, M., & Bano, S. (2019). The Impact of Social Media on Learning Behavior for Sustainable Education: Evidence of Students from Selected Universities in Pakistan. Sustainability, 11(6), 1683. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061683
Andrade, C. (2021). The Inconvenient Truth About Convenience and Purposive Samples. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 43(1), 86–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0253717620977000
Anjelia, E., Arcana, I. N., & Kusumaningrum, B. (2022). Development of Learning Videos Using Videoscribe Tools in Statistics Learning at Junior High School of Muhammadiyah Koba. Union: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 10(3), 371–380. https://doi.org/10.30738/union.v10i3.13266
Baños, J. E., Blanco-Reina, E., Bellido-Estévez, I., Bosch, F., Cabello, M. R., Cambra-Badii, I., De La Cruz, J. P., D’Ocón, P., Ivorra, M. D., Ferrándiz, M., González-Correa, J. A., Martín-Montañez, E., Martos, F., Pavía, J., & Sanz, E. (2024). Beyond lectures and practical courses: Teaching pharmacology using imaginative pedagogical tools. Pharmacological Research, 202, 107130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2024.107130
Borgonovi, F., Pokropek, M., & Pokropek, A. (2023). Relations between academic boredom, academic achievement, ICT use, and teacher enthusiasm among adolescents. Computers & Education, 200, 104807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104807
Busetto, L., Wick, W., & Gumbinger, C. (2020). How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurological Research and Practice, 2(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z
Coman, C., Țîru, L. G., Meseșan-Schmitz, L., Stanciu, C., & Bularca, M. C. (2020). Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education during the Coronavirus Pandemic: Students’ Perspective. Sustainability, 12(24), 10367. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410367
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
Dejene, W. (2020). Conceptions of teaching & learning and teaching approach preference: Their change through preservice teacher education program. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1833812. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1833812
Dhawan, S. (2020). Online Learning: A Panacea in the Time of COVID-19 Crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., … Wright, R. (2023). Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Dziuban, C., Graham, C. R., Moskal, P. D., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. (2018). Blended learning: the new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0087-5
Eze, S. C., Chinedu-Eze, V. C. A., Okike, C. K., & Bello, A. O. (2020). Factors influencing the use of e-learning facilities by students in a private Higher Education Institution (HEI) in a developing economy. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), 133. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00624-6
Firdayati, U., Darwan, D., & Kusmanto, H. (2021). Android-Based Media Development in Mathematics Lessons. Eduma : Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v10i1.8138
González-Pérez, L. I., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2022). Components of Education 4.0 in 21st Century Skills Frameworks: Systematic Review. Sustainability, 14(3), 1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031493
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
Hillmayr, D., Ziernwald, L., Reinhold, F., Hofer, S. I., & Reiss, K. M. (2020). The potential of digital tools to enhance mathematics and science learning in secondary schools: A context-specific meta-analysis. Computers and Education, 153, 103897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103897
Keiler, L. S. (2018). Teachers’ roles and identities in student-centered classrooms. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0131-6
Landøy, A., Popa, D., & Repanovici, A. (2020). Teaching Learning Methods. In Collaboration in Designing a Pedagogical Approach in Information Literacy (pp. 137–161). Springer International Publishing.
Lange, C., & Costley, J. (2020). Improving online video lectures: learning challenges created by media. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00190-6
Lestari, N. A. P. (2023). Analysis of 2013 curriculum problems so it is changed into a merdeka curriculum. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Nusantara, 8(2), 263–274. https://doi.org/10.29407/jpdn.v8i2.19229
Licorish, S. A., Owen, H. E., Daniel, B., & George, J. L. (2018). Students’ perception of Kahoot!’s influence on teaching and learning. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 13(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-018-0078-8
Miranda, J., Navarrete, C., Noguez, J., Molina-Espinosa, J.-M., Ramírez-Montoya, M.-S., Navarro-Tuch, S. A., Bustamante-Bello, M.-R., Rosas-Fernández, J.-B., & Molina, A. (2021). The core components of education 4.0 in higher education: Three case studies in engineering education. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 93, 107278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107278
Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., Fernández-Batanero, J. M., & López-Meneses, E. (2023). Impact of the Implementation of ChatGPT in Education: A Systematic Review. Computers, 12(8), 153. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers12080153
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 160940691773384. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Patras, Y. E., Naibaho, M. M., Karmila, N., Marini, A., & Hidayat, R. (2023). Development of Video Learning Media based on Filmora in Technology Topics for Elementary Students. Pedagonal : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 7(2), 168–178. https://doi.org/10.55215/pedagonal.v7i2.8983
Pokhrel, S., & Chhetri, R. (2021). A Literature Review on Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Teaching and Learning. Higher Education for the Future, 8(1), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631120983481
Pozas, M., Letzel-Alt, V., & Schwab, S. (2023). The effects of differentiated instruction on teachers’ stress and job satisfaction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 122, 103962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103962
Putri, D. S., Pramswari, L. P., Suryana, S. I., & Widodo, A. (2021). Analysis of the Nature of Science in Elementary School Science Curriculum and Its Empowerment in Student Book. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(3), 488–495. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7i3.763
Ratnasari, D., & Haryanto, H. (2019). Analysis of Utilization of Gadgets as Effective Learning Media in Innovation Education to improve Student Learning Achievement. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i17.4671
Reike, D., Vermeulen, W. J. V., & Witjes, S. (2018). The circular economy: New or Refurbished as CE 3.0? —Exploring Controversies in the Conceptualization of the Circular Economy through a Focus on History and Resource Value Retention Options. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 135, 246–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.08.027
Sariningsih, R., Permana, I., & Fujirahayu, A. R. (2023). Development of Multimodal Mathematics and Indonesian Language Books for Elementary School Learning in Bandung Barat. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i3.2947
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Sugiyono. (2021). Metode Penelitian Luantitatif, Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Susilawati, W., & Yaniawati, P. (2024). Lateral Thinking Ability Through Challenge-based Learning with Sparkol Videoscribe. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i8.15623
Tarchi, C., Zaccoletti, S., & Mason, L. (2021). Learning from text, video, or subtitles: A comparative analysis. Computers & Education, 160, 104034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104034
Utaminingsih, S., Fathurrahman, I., & Zuliyanti, N. (2022). E-module With Discovery Learning Model Based on Educational Games. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i14.12006
Wahida, S., Tobing, M., & Sitompul, A. (2023). Development of media animated video to improve learning outcomes of Sunda siger bridal makeup. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 13(1), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v13i1.52322
Wahyudi, D., & Amir Mz, Z. (2022). Development of video learning media assisted by Sparkol Videoscribe to facilitate the ability to understand mathematical concepts of students. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 5(3), 306–314. https://doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v5i3.165
Widyasari, A., & Hermanto, H. (2023). The Effect of Cognitive Ability in Problem-Based Learning on Science Literacy Ability of Grade 4 Elementary School Students. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(1), 719–728. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i1.1612
Yilmaz, R., & Karaoglan Yilmaz, F. G. (2023). The effect of generative artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool use on students’ computational thinking skills, programming self-efficacy and motivation. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100147
Author Biographies
Elisa Ratna Dewi, Universitas Negeri Semarang
Dewi Nilam Tyas, Universitas Negeri Semarang
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Elisa Ratna Dewi, Dewi Nilam Tyas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
