Development of E-LKPD Based on 7E Learning Cycle to Stimulus Students’ Complex Problem-Solving and Self-Efficacy
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v10i10.7506Published:
2024-10-25Downloads
Abstract
The research conducted aims to describe e-LKPD based on the 7E learning cycle that is valid, practical, and effective in stimulating complex problem-solving (CPS) and student self-efficacy (SE). The research method used is Design and Development Research (DDR) consisting of analysis, design, development, and evaluation. After the e-LKPD was designed based on the results of an analysis of teacher and student needs, a product feasibility test was carried out with three experts and obtained valid results in aspects of media and design, content, and construction. Furthermore, the e-LKPD was tested for practicality with aspects of learning implementation, readability tests, and student responses which obtained very practical results. Furthermore, the effectiveness test using the N-Gain test, difference test, and paired test showed that there was a significant difference in the increase in CPS and SE in the experimental class and the control class and there was a significant increase in CPS and SE in the experimental class which was categorized as quite effective. Therefore, the e-LKPD based on the 7E learning cycle that has been developed has obtained valid, practical, and effective results for stimulating students' CPS and SE.
Keywords:
Complex problem solving E-LKPD Learning cyle 7E Self efficacyReferences
Amalya, C. P., Artika, W., Safrida, S., Nurmaliah, C., Muhibbuddin, M., & Syukri, M. (2021). Implementation of the problem base learning model combined with e-stem based student worksheets on learning outcomes and self efficacy on environmental pollution materials. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(SpecialIssue), 37–38. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7iSpecialIssue.962.
Ardi, Y. M., Vauzia, V., Razak, A., & Syamsurizal. (2021). The Effect of using the student academic ability-problem solving and 5E cycle learning models on the student learning outcomes. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(4), 607–611. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7i4.77.
Asrizal, A., Ayu, D. F., Mardian, V., & Festiyed, F. (2022). Electronic learning material of newton’s laws with kvisoft flipbook maker to improve learning outcomes of students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(2), 489–498. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i2.1222.
Bada, & Olusegun, S. (2015). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. journal of research & method in education. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5(6), 66–70. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-05616670.
Chatri, M., Zalni, T. Y., Zalni, I., & Fajrina, S. (2023). Development of discovery learning based e-modules on animalia and ecosystem materials for class x high school students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(11), 9729–9737. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.4789
Diani, D. R., Nurhayati, N., & Suhendi, D. (2023). Pengembangan lembar kerja peserta didik (LKPD) menulis cerpen berbasis aplikasi android. Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 7(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.20961/basastra.v7i2.37800.
Eichmann, B., Goldhammer, F., Greiff, S., Pucite, L., & Naumann, J. (2019). The role of planning in complex problem solving. Computers & Education, 128, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.004.
Fatih, F. D., Suharini, E., & Sanjoto, T. B. (2020). Self-regulation and problem solving ability on geography basic knowledge materials using the 7e-learning cycle model. Proceedings of the International Conference on Science and Education and Technology (ISET 2019), 443. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200620.045.
Frisilla, S., & Hardeli, H. (2022). Validity and practicality of chemical equilibrium electronic student worksheets based on guided discovery learning to increase the critical thinking ability. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(3), 1191–1198. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i3.1481.
Fuadi, H., Melita, A. S., Siswadi, S., Jamaluddin, J., & Syukur, A. (2021). Inovasi LKPD dengan desains digital sebagai media pembelajaran ipa di smpn 7 mataram pada masa pandemi covid-19. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 6(2), 167–174. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v6i2.184.
Greiff, S., & Funke, J. (2017). Interactive problem solving: Exploring the potential of minimal complex systems. In The Nature of Problem Solving: Using Research to Inspire 21st Century Learning (pp.93-105). Paris: OECD Publishing.
Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., Ahonen, A., Näykki, P., & Valtonen, T. (2017). Preparing teacher-students for twenty-first-century learning practices (PREP 21): A framework for enhancing collaborative problem-solving and strategic learning skills. Teachers and Teaching, 23(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1203772.
Hasbie, M., Abdullah, A., Rusmansyah, R., Aufa, M. N., Fitri, M. A., Saputra, M. A., & Hairunnisa, H. (2023). Development of science module on the topic of interaction of living things and the environment using the scientific critical thinking (sct) model to improve critical thinking ability and self-efficacy. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(3), 1348–1351. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i3.2458.
Herde, C. N., Wüstenberg, S., & Greiff, S. (2016). Assessment of complex problem solving: What we know and what we don’t know. Applied Measurement in Education, 29(4), 265–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2016.1209208.
Hikmawati, H., Suastra, I. W., & Pujani, N. M. (2020). Ethnoscience-based science learning model to develop critical thinking ability and local cultural concern for junior high school students in lombok. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(1), 60–66. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7i1.530.
Jack, G. U. (2017). The effect of learning cycle constructivist-based approach on students’ academic achievement and attitude towards chemistry in secondary schools in north-eastern part of nigeria. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(7), 456–466. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2016.3095.
Jayanti, M. I., Jufri, A. W., & Ramdani, A. (2015). Pengembangan perangkat model pembelajaran kuantum berbasis masalah dengan pendekatan saintifik. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v1i2.15.
Jerusalem, M., & Schwarzer, R. (2014). Self-efficacy as a resource factor in stress appraisal processes. In Self-Efficacy (pp. 195-214). Taylor & Francis.
Lee, C.-D. (2014). Worksheet usage, reading achievement, classes’ lack of readiness, and science achievement: A cross-country comparison. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.38331.
Lestari, H., Rahmawati, I., Siskandar, R., & Dafenta, H. (2021). Implementation of blended learning with a stem approach to improve student scientific literacy skills during the covid-19 pandemic. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(2), 224–231. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7i2.654.
Marsim, F., Danial, M., & Syahrir, M. (2022). Pengembangan e-LKPD berbasis problem solving pada materi titrasi asam basa untuk meningkatkan motivasi dan hasil belajar peserta didik. Chemistry Education Review (CER), 5(2), 120. https://doi.org/10.26858/cer.v5i2.32718.
Masgumelar, N. K., & Mustafa, P. S. (2021). Teori belajar konstruktivisme dan implikasinya dalam pendidikan dan pembelajaran. Ghaitsa, 2(1), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.621 59/ghaitsa.v2i1.188.
Muslimah, N., Putra, R. W. Y., & Masykur, R. (2021). Pengaruh model pembelajaran student facilitator and explaining (SFAE) untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis dan self-confidence siswa. Maju: Jurnal Ilmiah Guruan Matematika, 8(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.30998/fjjk.v9i3.14504.
Nahdi, D. S. (2018). Eksperimentasi model problem based learning dan model duided discovery learning terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis ditinjau dari self efficacy siswa. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 4(1), 50–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.31949/jcp.v4i1.711.
Nurcahyo, A. W., Wartono, W., & Yuliati, L. (2017). Kemampuan pemecahan masalah hukum gerak newton mahasiswa melalui pembelajaran cooperative problem solving. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 2(7), 963–970. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v2i7.9686.
Nurhidayah, N., Jumaeri, J., & Susilaningsih, E. (2021). Development of video based on pop up questions integrated religious character human digestive system materials. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(SpecialIssue), 250–255. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7iSpecialIssue.1055.
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Result: What Students Know And Can Do. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Primanda, A., Distrik, I. W., & Abdurrahman, A. (2019). The impact of 7E learning cycle-based worksheets toward student’s conceptual understanding and problem-solving ability on newton’s Law of motion. Journal of Science Education, 19(2), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-8-6-1.
Puspita, W. R., & Fardillah, F. (2021). The effectiveness of the learning cycle model (5e and 7e) in learning to build flat side sides viewed from student self-eficacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1764(1), 012110. https://doi.org/10.1088/17426596/1764/1/012110.
Rahmat, A. D., Kuswanto, H., & Wilujeng, I. (2023). Integrating technology into science learning in junior high school: perspective of teachers. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(5), 2391–2396. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i5.2922.
Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2014). Design and development research. In Handbook of Research, Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 141-150). New York, NY: Springer.
Schefer-Wenzl, S., & Miladinovic, I. (2019). Developing Complex problem-solving skills: an engineering perspective. International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning (iJAC), 12(3), 82. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijac.v12i3.11067.
Setyani, N. D., Cari, C., Suparmi, S., & Handhika, J. (2017). Student’s concept ability of Newton’s law based on verbal and visual test. International Journal of Science and Applied Science: Conference Series, 1(2), 162. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijsascs.v1i2.5144.
Sritresna, T. (2018). Meningkatkan kemampuan komunikasi matematis dan self-confidence siswa melalui model pembelajaran Cycle 7E. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(3), 419–430. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v6i3.330.
Stadler, M., Becker, N., Gödker, M., Leutner, D., & Greiff, S. (2015). Complex problem solving and intelligence: A meta-analysis. Intelligence, 53, 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.09.005.
Suryaningsih, H., Medriati, R., & Purwanto, A. (2021). Pengembangan lembar kerja peserta didik (LKPD) berbasis scaffolding berorientasi berpikir kritis pada materi Hukum Newton di SMA Negeri kota Bengkulu. Amplitudo: Jurnal Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 1(1), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.33369/ajipf.1.1. 44-52.
Suryaningsih, S., & Nurlita, R. (2021). Pentingnya lembar kerja peserta didik elektronik (e-LKPD) inovatif dalam proses pembelajaran abad 21. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 2(7), 1256–1268. https://doi.org/10.59141/japendi.v2i07.233.
Syahrowardi, S., & Permana, A. H. (2016). Desain handout multimedia menggunakan 3d pageflip professional untuk media pembelajaran pada sistem android. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 2(1), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.02113.
Syamsudin, F. K., Sudirman, S., Lalang, A. C., & Lestarani, D. (2022). Pengembangan bahan ajar digital berbasis software flip pdf corporate professional pada materi pokok larutan elektrolit dan non elektrolit untuk SMA/MA Kelas X. Jurnal Beta Kimia, 2(1), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.201185/jbk.v2i1.7327.
Thomann, E., Trein, P., & Maggetti, M. (2019). What’s the problem? multilevel governance and problem‐solving. European Policy Analysis, 5(1), 37–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.1062.
Utami, N. P., Eliza, R., & Warahma, S. (2022). Kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis dan self-regulated learning dengan model pembelajaran learning cycle 7E. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 1025–1038. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v6i1.1330.
Utami, R. P. (2021). Desain dan uji coba lembar kerja peserta didik berbasis learning cycle 5e pada materi larutan penyangga. Journal of Education and Teaching, 2(1), 94. https://doi.org/10.24014/jete.v2i1.8231.
Weisdiyanti, N., Sahyar, S., & Juliani, R. (2023). Development of complex problem solving tests in Newton’s dynamic for high school. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 12(2), 178–183. https://doi.org/10.24114/jpf. 12i2.48639.
Yuliana, T., Sari, M., & Meria, A. (2020). Pengembangan modul berbasis learning cycle 7E berbantuan video pada materi teori kinetik gas dan termodinamika. Jurnal Penelitian Bidang IPA Dan Pendidikan IPA, 6(1), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.15548/nsc.v6i1.1552.
Zydney, J. M., & Warner, Z. (2016). Mobile apps for science learning: Review of research. Computers & Education, 94, 1–17. https://doi.org/10/1016/j.compedu.2015.11.001.
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Amelia Yuni Saputri, Agus Suyatna, Abdurrahman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
