Students' Thinking Literacy Process in Mathematical Problem-Solving

Authors

Mukhlis , Cholis Sa’dijah , Sudirman , Santi Irawati

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v10i5.7676

Published:

2024-05-31

Issue:

Vol. 10 No. 5 (2024): May

Keywords:

Mathematical literacy, Mathematical problems, Mathematical thinking literacy

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Mukhlis, M., Sa’dijah, C., Sudirman, S., & Irawati, S. (2024). Students’ Thinking Literacy Process in Mathematical Problem-Solving. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(5), 2337–2345. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i5.7676

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

This study explores and investigates the process of students’ mathematical thinking literacy in solving mathematical problems. This qualitative descriptive research used a test sheet consisting of one item adapted from the PISA mathematical problem model and interview guidelines, as the instrument.  One male and two female participants were selected based on problem-solving characteristics. After that, task-based interviews were carried out to investigate the process of students’ mathematical thinking literacy. Data analysis was initiated by reviewing, reducing, and concluding all collected data to describe students’ mathematical thinking literacy in solving mathematical problems. The findings suggest that mathematical thinking literacy is initiated by understanding the problem (understanding), presenting the problem in a simpler form (specializing) to represent ideas, and creating patterns or relationships (generalizing).  Based on the relationship between the problem, the subject predicts a solution (conjecturing) or determines the solution to the problem, re-checks (justifying) the problem-solving process to find a logical final result, and communicates the reasons (convincing) to convince the truth of the results obtained. The results of this study help teachers understand the process of students’ mathematical thinking literacy in solving mathematical problems so that it can be used to determine the appropriate strategy in the learning process to improve students' mathematical problem-solving abilities

References

Al-Ghofiqi, M., Irawati, S., & Rahardi, R. (2019). Analisis Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Berkemampuan Matematika Rendah Dalam Menyelesaikan Ill-Structured Problem. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 4(10), 1386. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v4i10.12883

Almarashdi, H. S., & Jarrah, A. M. (2023). Assessing Tenth-Grade Students’ Mathematical Literacy Skills in Solving PISA Problems. Social Sciences, 12(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12010033

Bolstad, O. H. (2023). Lower secondary students’ encounters with mathematical literacy. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 35(1), 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-021-00386-7

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Carraher, D. W., Martinez, M. V., & Schliemann, A. D. (2008). Early algebra and mathematical generalization. ZDM, 40(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0067-7

Dewantara, A. H., Zulkardi, & Darmawijoyo. (2015). Assessing seventh graders’ mathematical literacy in solving pisa-like tasks. Journal on Mathematics Education, 6(2), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.6.2.2163.117-128

Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., … Wright, R. (2023). Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642

Firdaus, A. M., Juniati, D., & Wijayanti, P. (2019a). Generalization Pattern’s Strategy of Junior High School students based on Gender. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1417(1), 012045. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1417/1/012045

Firdaus, A. M., Juniati, D., & Wijayanti, P. (2019b). Generalization Pattern’s Strategy of Junior High School students based on Gender. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1417(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1417/1/012045

Firdaus, A. M., Juniati, D., & Wijayanti, P. (2020). Number pattern generalization process by provincial mathematics olympiad winner students. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(3), 991–1003. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.704984

Hardianti, S., & Zulkardi, Z. (2019). Students mathematical literacy abilities in solving PISA type math problem with LRT context. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1315(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1315/1/012016

Harvey, R., & Averill, R. (2012). A Lesson Based on the Use of Contexts: An Example of Effective Practice in Secondary School Mathematics. Mathematics teacher education and development, 14(1986), 41–59. Retrieved from https://rb.gy/h8vptk

Ikram, M., Purwanto, Parta, I. N., & Susanto, H. (2020). Exploring the Potential Role of Reversible Reasoning: Cognitive Research on Inverse Function Problems in Mathematics. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(5), 435–450. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.665836

Kohen, Z., & Orenstein, D. (2021). Mathematical modeling of tech-related real-world problems for secondary school-level mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107(1), 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-10020-1

Marjuwita, Johar, R., & Zubainur, C. M. (2020). Students’ critical mathematical thinking process based on their cognitive styles. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1460(1), 012015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1460/1/012015

Maryani, N., & Widjajanti, D. B. (2020). Mathematical literacy: How to improve it using contextual teaching and learning method? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1581(1), 012044. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1581/1/012044

Mason, Burton, & Stacey. (2013). Thinking mathematically. In Early Years Educator (Vol. 15, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.12968/eyed.2013.15.2.18

Mason, J. (2008). Making use of children’s power to produce algebraic thinking. In Algebra in the early grades (pp. 57-94). Routledge.

Misbah, Z., Gulikers, J., Dharma, S., & Mulder, M. (2020). Evaluating competence-based vocational education in Indonesia. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 72(4), 488–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2019.1635634

Novita, R., Zulkardi, & Hartono, Y. (2012). Exploring Primary Student’s Problem-Solving Ability by Doing Tasks Like PISA’s Question. Journal on Mathematics Education, 3(2), 133–150. Retrieved from https://rb.gy/7u4vq6

Ojose, B. (2011). Mathematics literacy: Are we able to put the mathematics we learn into everyday use? Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(1), 89–100. Retrieved from https://rb.gy/6yx5by

Oktiningrum, W., Zulkardi, & Hartono, Y. (2016). Developing PISA-like mathematics task with Indonesia natural and cultural heritage as context to assess students’ mathematical literacy. Journal on Mathematics Education, 7(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.7.1.2812.1-8

Pascucci, F., Savelli, E., & Gistri, G. (2023). How digital technologies reshape marketing: Evidence from a qualitative investigation. Italian Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43039-023-00063-6

Ramírez, R., Cañadas, M. C., & Damián, A. (2022). Structures and representations used by 6th graders when working with quadratic functions. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 54(6), 1393–1406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01423-w

Sa’dijah, C. (2013). Kepekaan Bilangan Siswa SMP Melalui Pembelajaran Matematika Kontekstual Yang Mengintegrasikan Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Universitas Negeri Malang, 20(2), 222–227. Retrieved from https://rb.gy/73jthf

Sa’Dijah, C., Handayani, U. F., Sisworo, Sudirman, Susiswo, Cahyowati, E. T. D., & Sa’Diyah, M. (2019). The Profile of Junior High School Students’ Mathematical Creative Thinking Skills in Solving Problem through Contextual Teaching. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1397(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1397/1/012081

Sa’dijah, C., Kholid, M. N., Hidayanto, E., & Permadi, H. (2021). Are there Differences in Reflective Thinking Between Male and Female Prospective Mathematics Teachers? In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Research, Implementation, and Education of Mathematics and Sciences (ICRIEMS 2020). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210305.050

Schukajlow, S., & Krug, A. (2014). Do Multiple Solutions Matter? Prompting Multiple Solutions, Interest, Competence, and Autonomy. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(4), 497–533. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.45.4.0497

Shafer, M. C., & Foster, S. (1997). The Changing Face of Assessmen. Principled Practice in Mathematics and Science, 1(2), 1–7.

Siregar, R., & Daut Siagian, M. (2019). Mathematical connection ability: Teacher’s perception and experience in learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1315(1), 012041. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1315/1/012041

Slamet, Purwanto, Sa’dijah, C., Irawati, S., & Prayekti, N. (2020). Critical Thinking Ability of High School Students in Solving a Quadratic Equation Problem. Journal of Criitical Reviews, 7(06), 2061–2069. Retrieved from https://rb.gy/bsbtqa

Spangenberg, E. D. (2012). Thinking styles of mathematics and mathematical literacy learners: Implications for subject choice. Pythagoras, 33(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v33i3.179

Stacey, K. (2011). The PISA view of mathematical literacy in Indonesia. Journal on Mathematics Education, 2(2), 95–126. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.2.2.746.95-126

Subanji, S., Sa’dijah, C., Syuhriyah, K., & Anwar, L. (2021). Students’ thinking process in solving two variables linear equation system problem based on systemic and intuitive cognitive style. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2330. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043732

Suh, J., Matson, K., Seshaiyer, P., Jamieson, S., & Tate, H. (2021). Mathematical Modeling as a Catalyst for Equitable Mathematics Instruction: Preparing Teachers and Young Learners with 21st Century Skills. Mathematics, 9(2), 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9020162

Sulisawati, D. N., Lutfiyah, L., Murtinasari, F., & Sukma, L. (2019). Differences of Visual, Auditorial, Kinesthetic Students in Understanding Mathematics Problems. Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning (MJML), 2(2), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.29103/mjml.v2i2.1385

Taufik, A. R., Pagiling, S. L., & Dadi, O. (2019). The process of formulating in mathematical literacy in solving Pisa-like problems viewed from cognitive style. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 343(1), 012217. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/343/1/012217

Uyangör, S. M. (2019). Investigation of the mathematical thinking processes of students in mathematics education supported with graph theory. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070101

Widjaja, W. (2013). The use of contextual problems to support mathematical learning. Journal on Mathematics Education, 4(2), 151–159. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.4.2.413.151-159

Zayyadi, M., Nusantara, T., Hidayanto, E., Sulandra, I. M., & Sa’Dijah, C. (2020). Content and pedagogical knowledge of prospective teachers in mathematics learning: Commognitive. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(1), 515–532. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.642131

Author Biographies

Mukhlis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar

Cholis Sa’dijah, Universitas Negeri Malang

Sudirman, Universitas Negeri Malang

Santi Irawati, Universitas Negeri Malang

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Mukhlis Mukhlis, Cholis Sa’dijah, Sudirman Sudirman, Santi Irawati

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).