The Influence of the Discovery Learning Learning Model and Interest in Learning on Students' Physics Learning Outcomes

Authors

Juniar Rasyid , Muhammad Sidin Ali , Pariabti Palloan

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v10i9.7816

Published:

2024-09-25

Issue:

Vol. 10 No. 9 (2024): September

Keywords:

Discovery Learning, Inquiry Based Learning Model, Learning Model, Interest in Learning Physics, Learning Outcomes

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Rasyid, J., Ali, M. S., & Palloan, P. (2024). The Influence of the Discovery Learning Learning Model and Interest in Learning on Students’ Physics Learning Outcomes. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(9), 7151–7159. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i9.7816

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

This research is a true experimental design using a 2x2 factorial design. The aim of the research is to: find out whether or not there is an influence of the application of the discovery learning learning model and interest in learning on physics learning outcomes for class XI MIPA, and diagram the interaction of the learning model and learning interest on physics learning outcomes. The independent variable in this research is the learning model, the moderator variable is interest in learning and the dependent variable is physics learning outcomes. The sample in this study was taken randomly using a simple random sampling technique which resulted in 60 people from class XI MIPA 2 and XI MIPA 3. Data from the research results were obtained by giving students interest in learning questionnaires before being taught using the learning model, and the learning outcomes tests were carried out after the students were taught using the learning model in the research. The data analysis technique used is analysis of variance (ANOVA). Based on the results of the inferential analysis, it was obtained: Fcount (9.60) > Ftable (1.30), it can be concluded that there is a significant difference between students who were taught the discovery learning learning model and students who were taught using the Inquiry Based learning model, Fcount (0. 10) < F table (1.30), it can be concluded that there is no interaction between the learning model and learning interest on physics learning outcomes.

References

Ahmar, A. S., Rahman, A., & Mulbar, U. (2018). The Analysis of Students’ Logical Thinking Ability and Adversity Quotient, and it is Reviewed from Cognitive Style. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1028, 012167. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/012167

Akhir, M., Siburian, J., & Effendi, M. H. (2023). A Study Comparison the Application of Discovery Learning and Problem Based Learning Models on the Critical Thinking Ability. Integrated Science Education Journal, 4(2), 84–89. https://doi.org/10.37251/isej.v4i2.390

Ananda, L. R., Rahmawati, Y., & Khairi, F. (2023). Critical thinking skills of Chemistry students by integrating design thinking with STEAM-PjBL. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 13(1), 352. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1938

Arafah, K. (2020). The Effect of Guided Discovery Method and Learning Interest on Students’ Understanding of Physics Concepts. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 8(2), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v8i2.3259

Bitzenbauer, P., & Hennig, F. (2023). Flipped classroom in physics teacher education: (How) can students’ expectations be met? Frontiers in Education, 8, 1194963. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1194963

Casinillo, L. F. (2023). Quantile Regression Analysis for Students’ Difficulty Level in Learning Statistics Online. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 12(4), 607–614. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpiundiksha.v12i4.66752

Darling-Hammond, L., Schachner, A. C. W., Wojcikiewicz, S. K., & Flook, L. (2024). Educating teachers to enact the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 28(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2022.2130506

Diani, R., Latifah, S., Jamaluddin, W., Pramesti, A., Susilowati, N. E., & Diansah, I. (2020). Improving Students’ Science Process Skills and Critical Thinking Skills in Physics Learning through FERA Learning Model with SAVIR Approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1467(1), 012045. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1467/1/012045

Erikson, M. G., & Erikson, M. (2019). Learning outcomes and critical thinking – good intentions in conflict. Studies in Higher Education, 44(12), 2293–2303. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1486813

Getie, A. S. (2020). Factors affecting the attitudes of students towards learning English as a foreign language. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1738184. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1738184

Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004

Han, J., Kelley, T., & Knowles, J. G. (2021). Factors Influencing Student STEM Learning: Self-Efficacy and Outcome Expectancy, 21st Century Skills, and Career Awareness. Journal for STEM Education Research, 4(2), 117–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-021-00053-3

Hidayatul, A., Nasution, N., & Nugroho, P. H. (2020). The Impact of Discovery Learning Models on The Critical Thinking Ability of Students at Middle-School. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v2i4.2275

Ingkavara, T., Panjaburee, P., Srisawasdi, N., & Sajjapanroj, S. (2022). The use of a personalized learning approach to implementing self-regulated online learning. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100086

Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., Khan, S., & Khan, I. H. (2023). Unlocking the opportunities through ChatGPT Tool towards ameliorating the education system. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations, 3(2), 100115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100115

Kasmiana, Yusrizal, & Syukri, M. (2020). The application of guided discovery learning model to improve students concepts understanding. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1460(1), 012122. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1460/1/012122

Khan, I., Ahmad, A. R., Jabeur, N., & Mahdi, M. N. (2021). An artificial intelligence approach to monitor student performance and devise preventive measures. Smart Learning Environments, 8(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00161-y

Kumpas-Lenk, K., Eisenschmidt, E., & Veispak, A. (2018). Does the design of learning outcomes matter from students’ perspective? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59, 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.07.008

Lo, K. W. K., Ngai, G., Chan, S. C. F., & Kwan, K. (2022). How Students’ Motivation and Learning Experience Affect Their Service-Learning Outcomes: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 825902. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.825902

Marpanaji, E., Mahali, M. I., & Putra, R. A. S. (2018). Survey on How to Select and Develop Learning Media Conducted by Teacher Professional Education Participants. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1140, 012014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1140/1/012014

Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., Fernández-Batanero, J. M., & López-Meneses, E. (2023). Impact of the Implementation of ChatGPT in Education: A Systematic Review. Computers, 12(8), 153. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers12080153

Murphy, D. H., Little, J. L., & Bjork, E. L. (2023). The Value of Using Tests in Education as Tools for Learning—Not Just for Assessment. Educational Psychology Review, 35(3), 89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09808-3

Murtonen, M., Gruber, H., & Lehtinen, E. (2017). The return of behaviourist epistemology: A review of learning outcomes studies. Educational Research Review, 22, 114–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.001

Nurkhojin, M., Odja, A. H., Buhungo, T. J., Mursalin, M., Uloli, R., & Payu, C. S. (2022). The Effectiveness of the Discovery Learning Model Assisted by Video Games to Improve Student Learning Outcomes on the Concept of Momentum and Impulse in High School. Physics Education Research Journal, 4(1), 57–62. https://doi.org/10.21580/perj.2022.4.2.12781

Paramitha, A. P., Istiqomah, N., & Mastura, S. (2023). The influence of problem-based learning and discovery learning models on learning outcomes. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/jpipfip.v16i1.52423

Pramita, C. & Tasa Ratna Putri. (2023). Effect of Learning Interest on Students’ Concept Understanding Ability Against Subject Pressure. International Journal of Education and Teaching Zone, 2(2), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.57092/ijetz.v2i2.59

Praweswari, D., & Nur’aeni, N. (2021). Self-Control and Self-Regulated Learning on Students. Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humanities, 2, 69–74. https://doi.org/10.30595/pssh.v2i.105

Ratnasari, D., & Haryanto, H. (2019). Analysis of Utilization of Gadgets as Effective Learning Media in Innovation Education to improve Student Learning Achievement. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i17.4671

Sari, L. D. K., Ambarsari, I. F., Putra, E. D., & Hasanah, N. (2023). THE INFLUENCE OF EXTERNAL FACTORS, SCHOOL SCOPE ON STUDENT’S LEARNING OUTCOMES IN MATHEMATICS CLASS X, DEPARTMENT OF SCIENCE AT SMAN 1 PANJI. Journal on Research and Review of Educational Innovation, 1(2), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.47668/jrrei.v1i2.773

Sari, Y., & Hidayatulloh, A. (2019). Antecedents of the Utilization of Social Media and its Impact on Micro and Small Enterprises Performances. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi Dan Bisnis (JPEB), 7(2), 120–128. https://doi.org/10.21009/JPEB.007.2.3

Sengul, O. (2024). Learning to Become a Physics Teacher: A Case Study of Experienced Teachers. Education Sciences, 14(2), 195. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020195

Shaqila, N. & Zetriuslita. (2023). Teaching Materials Using the Discovery Learning Learning Model to Facilitate the Mathematical Communication Skills of Junior High School Students. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 12(4), 762–769. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpiundiksha.v12i4.67132

Smiderle, R., Rigo, S. J., Marques, L. B., Peçanha De Miranda Coelho, J. A., & Jaques, P. A. (2020). The impact of gamification on students’ learning, engagement and behavior based on their personality traits. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-019-0098-x

Sofna, A., Sakinah, Y., Misbah, M., & Pentang, J. T. (2023). Analysis of Student Learning Interest In Physics In Subject Force Material. International Journal of Education and Teaching Zone, 2(1), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.57092/ijetz.v2i1.58

Tenenbaum, H. R., Winstone, N. E., Leman, P. J., & Avery, R. E. (2020). How effective is peer interaction in facilitating learning? A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(7), 1303–1319. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000436

Tong, D. H., Uyen, B. P., & Ngan, L. K. (2022). The effectiveness of blended learning on students’ academic achievement, self-study skills and learning attitudes: A quasi-experiment study in teaching the conventions for coordinates in the plane. Heliyon, 8(12), e12657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12657

Tullis, J. G., & Goldstone, R. L. (2020). Why does peer instruction benefit student learning? Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00218-5

Wartono, W., Hudha, M. N., & Batlolona, J. R. (2017). How Are The Physics Critical Thinking Skills of The Students Taught by Using Inquiry-Discovery Through Empirical and Theorethical Overview? EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80632

Xiao, M., Tian, Z., & Xu, W. (2023). Impact of teacher-student interaction on students’ classroom well-being under online education environment. Education and Information Technologies, 28(11), 14669–14691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11681-0

Zhao, T., Yang, G., Xi, J., Shen, Y., & Song, K. (2020). Factorial Experiment Study on the Mechanical Properties of Sandstone–Concrete Specimens Under Different Freeze–Thaw Conditions. Frontiers in Physics, 8, 322. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2020.00322

Author Biographies

Juniar Rasyid, Univeristas Negeri Makassar

Muhammad Sidin Ali, Univeristas Negeri Makassar

Pariabti Palloan, Univeristas Negeri Makassar

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Juniar Rasyid, Muhammad Sidin Ali, Pariabti Palloan

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).