The Trends Research of Conceptual Mastery in Students' Physics Learning (2015-2024): A Systematic Review

Authors

Aris Doyan , Susilawati Susilawati , Syarful Annam , Lalu Muliyadi , Ruth Rize Paas Megahati , Risnawati Agustin Hutabarat , Muhammad Ikhsan , Nuraini Rachma Ardianti

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v10i6.7827

Published:

2024-06-25

Issue:

Vol. 10 No. 6 (2024): June

Keywords:

Conceptual mastery, Physics learning, Review

Review

Downloads

How to Cite

Doyan, A., Susilawati, S., Annam, S., Muliyadi, L., Megahati, R. R. P., Hutabarat, R. A., … Ardianti, N. R. (2024). The Trends Research of Conceptual Mastery in Students’ Physics Learning (2015-2024): A Systematic Review. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(6), 323–332. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i6.7827

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

To support the improvement of 21st century skills, students must have good concept mastery first. This is in accordance with one of the goals of education is to master the concepts studied. Mastery of concepts is important for students to have because it can determine the level of success of students in participating in learning activities and whether the teacher is successful or not in fostering enthusiasm, encouragement, interest and student learning outcomes with classroom management. This research aims to identify and analyze research trends in the conceptual mastery in physics learning. This research method is descriptive and analytical. The data used in this research was obtained from documents indexed by Google Scholar from 2015-2024 using Publish or Perish and Dimension.ai. Research procedures use PRISMA guidelines. The data identified and analyzed are the type of publication, publication source, and the title of research on conceptual mastery in physics learning that is widely cited. The data analysis method uses bibliometric analysis assisted by VOS viewer software. The results of the analysis show that the trend of research on the conceptual mastery in physics learning indexed by Google Scholar from 2015 to 2024 experienced a fluctuating increase. However, in 2023 there will be a decline in the research trend on conceptual mastery in physics learning. There are many documents in the form of articles, proceedings, book, chapters, edited books and monograph that discuss research into the conceptual mastery in physics learning. Keywords that are often used in research of conceptual mastery are conflict cognitive approach, discovery model, STEM, effectiveness, etc.

References

Abdurrahman, A., Saregar, A., & Umam, R. (2018). The Effect of Feedback as Soft Scaffolding on Ongoing Assessment Toward The Quantum Physics Concept Mastery of The Prospective Physics Teachers. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(1), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i2.7239

Alfiyanti, I. F., & Jatmiko, B. (2020). The Effectiveness of Predict Observe Explain (POE) Model with PhET to Improve Critical Thinking Skills of Senior High School Students. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 1(2), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.46627/silet.v1i2.34

Badruzzaman, D. R., Utari, S., Karim, S., & Sirnawati, R. (2019). Upaya Meningkatkan Penguasaan Konsep Gerak Lurus melalui Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Levels of Inquiry pada Siswa Kelas X IPA 2 di SMA Negeri 2 Bandung. WaPFi (Wahana Pendidikan Fisika), 4(2), 187–193. https://doi.org/10.17509/wapfi.v4i2.20200

Bahtiar, B., Yusuf, Y., Doyan, A., & Ibrahim, I. (2023). Trend of Technology Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Research in 2012-2022: Contribution to Science Learning of 21st Century. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(5), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i5.3685

Boström, L., & Sjöström, M. (2022). MethodViz: designing and evaluating an interactive learning tool for scientific methods – visual learning support and visualization of research process structure. Education and Information Technologies, 27(9), 12793–12810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11139-9

Chou, C.-Y., & Zou, N.-B. (2020). An analysis of internal and external feedback in self-regulated learning activities mediated by self-regulated learning tools and open learner models. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00233-y

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Dewi, E. C., Suryadarma, I. G. P., & Wilujeng, I. (2018). Using Video Integrated with Local Potentiality to Improve Students’ Concept Mastery in Natural Science Learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097, 012001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012001

Dicerbo, K. (2014). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(4), 502–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2014.931836

Doyan, A., Susilawati, Purwoko, A. A., Ibrahim, Ahzan, S., Gummah, S., Bahtiar, & Ikhsan, M. (2023). Trend Synthesis Thin Film Research as Electronic Device (A Review). Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(11), 1155–1164. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.5764

Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., … Wright, R. (2023). Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642

Faraniza, Z. (2021). Blended learning best practice to answers 21 st century demands. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1940(1), 012122. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1940/1/012122

Fry, S., & Seely, S. (2011). Enhancing Preservice Elementary Teachers’ 21st-Century Information and Media Literacy Skills. Action in Teacher Education, 33(2), 206–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2011.569468

Geisinger, K. F. (2016). 21st Century Skills: What Are They and How Do We Assess Them? Applied Measurement in Education, 29(4), 245–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2016.1209207

Griffin, P. (2017). Assessing and Teaching 21st Century Skills: Collaborative Problem Solving as a Case Study. In Innovative assessment of collaboration (pp. 113–134). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33261-1_8

Gunawan, G., Kosim, K., Ibrahim, I., Susilawati, S., & Syukur, A. (2021). The effectiveness of physics learning tools based on discovery model with cognitive conflict approach toward student’s conceptual mastery. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1747(1), 012035. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1747/1/012035

Hallinger, P., & Chatpinyakoop, C. (2019). A Bibliometric Review of Research on Higher Education for Sustainable Development, 1998–2018. Sustainability, 11(8), 2401. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082401

Hallinger, P., & Nguyen, V.-T. (2020). Mapping the Landscape and Structure of Research on Education for Sustainable Development: A Bibliometric Review. Sustainability, 12(5), 1947. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051947

Harjono, A., Gunawan, G., Adawiyah, R., & Herayanti, L. (2020). An Interactive e-Book for Physics to Improve Students’ Conceptual Mastery. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(05), 40. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i05.10967

Hermansyah, H., Nurhairunnisah, N., Sentaya, I. M., Sulindra, I. G. M., Andriani, N., & Gunawan, G. (2021). The Effect of Physics Virtual Experiments on Mastery Concept Based on Students Learning Style. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1933(1), 012079. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1933/1/012079

Himmah, W. I., Nayazik, A., & Setyawan, F. (2019). Revised Bloom’s taxonomy to analyze the final mathematics examination problems in Junior High School. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1188, 012028. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012028

Jamilah, P. N., Mulyaningsih, N. N., & Bhakti, Y. B. (2020). The Effect of Learning Start Learning Strategy With A Question (LSQ) on the Mastery of Physics Concepts. Bulletin of Educational Science and Technology, 1(1), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.33292/best.v1i1.3

Jang, H. (2016). Identifying 21st Century STEM Competencies Using Workplace Data. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(2), 284–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9593-1

Kaufman, K. J. (2013). 21 Ways to 21st Century Skills: Why Students Need Them and Ideas for Practical Implementation. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 49(2), 78–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2013.786594

Kaur, S., Kumar, R., Kaur, R., Singh, S., Rani, S., & Kaur, A. (2022). Piezoelectric materials in sensors: Bibliometric and visualization analysis. Materials Today: Proceedings, 65, 3780–3786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.06.484

Kusumah, R. G. T., Walid, A., Sugiharta, I., Putra, E. P., Wicaksono, I., & Erfan, M. (2020). Construction of High School Chemistry Module, Based on Problem-based Learning (PBL) on Salt Hydrolysis Material for Gifted Students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1467(1), 012047. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1467/1/012047

Lambert, J., & Gong, Y. (2010). 21st Century Paradigms for Pre-Service Teacher Technology Preparation. Computers in the Schools, 27(1), 54–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380560903536272

Larson, L. C., & Miller, T. N. (2011). 21st Century Skills: Prepare Students for the Future. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 47(3), 121–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2011.10516575

Liao, H., Tang, M., Luo, L., Li, C., Chiclana, F., & Zeng, X.-J. (2018). A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Medical Big Data Research. Sustainability, 10(2), 166. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010166

Lindquist, M., Lange, E., & Kang, J. (2016). From 3D landscape visualization to environmental simulation: The contribution of sound to the perception of virtual environments. Landscape and Urban Planning, 148, 216–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.12.017

Lodge, J. M., Kennedy, G., Lockyer, L., Arguel, A., & Pachman, M. (2018). Understanding Difficulties and Resulting Confusion in Learning: An Integrative Review. Frontiers in Education, 3, 49. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00049

Mebert, L., Barnes, R., Dalley, J., Gawarecki, L., Ghazi-Nezami, F., Shafer, G., Slater, J., & Yezbick, E. (2020). Fostering student engagement through a real-world, collaborative project across disciplines and institutions. Higher Education Pedagogies, 5(1), 30–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2020.1750306

Nugraha, M. G., & Awalliyah, S. (2016). Analisis Gaya Kognitif Field Dependent Dan Field Independent Terhadap Penguasaan Konsep Fisika Siswa Kelas VII. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika (E-Journal) SNF2016 UNJ. https://doi.org/10.21009/0305010312

Oltarzhevskyi, D. O. (2019). Typology of contemporary corporate communication channels. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 24(4), 608–622. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-04-2019-0046

Parmini, N. P. (2023). 21st Century Skills and Information Literacy in Indonesian Language and Literature Education Study Program. Mimbar Ilmu, 28(1), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.23887/mi.v28i1.59441

Prayogo, J. A. (2022). English Language Teaching in Indonesia in the 21st Century: What Needs Reinforcing and Enhancing for the Teachers. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i7.10645

Ramdani, A., Jufri, A. W., Jamaluddin, J., & Setiadi, D. (2020). Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Penguasaan Konsep Dasar IPA Peserta Didik. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 6(1), 119–124. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v6i1.388

Roth, R. E. (2021). Cartographic Design as Visual Storytelling: Synthesis and Review of Map-Based Narratives, Genres, and Tropes. The Cartographic Journal, 58(1), 83–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087041.2019.1633103

Saprudin, S., Liliasari, L., & Prihatmanto, A. S. (2017). Pre-Service Physics Teachers’ Concept Mastery and the Challenges of Game Development on Physics Learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895, 012109. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012109

Serevina, V., & Luthfi, K. (2021). Development of discovery learning-based on online learning tools on momentum and impulse. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1876(1), 012076. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1876/1/012076

Siahaan, K. W. A., Lumbangaol, S. T. P., Marbun, J., Nainggolan, A. D., Ritonga, J. M., & Barus, D. P. (2020). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing dengan Multi Representasi terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Penguasaan Konsep IPA. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(1), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i1.614

Sibille, K., Greene, A., & Bush, J. P. (2010). Preparing Physicians for the 21st Century: Targeting Communication Skills and the Promotion of Health Behavior Change. Annals of Behavioral Science and Medical Education, 16(1), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03355111

Smiderle, R., Rigo, S. J., Marques, L. B., Peçanha de Miranda Coelho, J. A., & Jaques, P. A. (2020). The impact of gamification on students’ learning, engagement and behavior based on their personality traits. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-019-0098-x

Sulman, F., Yuliati, L., Kusairi, S., & Hidayat, A. (2022). Hybrid Learning Model: Its Impact on Mastery of Concepts and Self-Regulation in Newton’s Second Law Material. Kasuari: Physics Education Journal (KPEJ), 5(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.37891/kpej.v5i1.273

Suseno, B. A., & Fauziah, E. (2020). Improving Penginyongan Literacy in Digital Era Through E-Paper Magazine of Ancas Banyumasan. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3807680

Susilawati, S., Kusumayati, B. A., Sutrio, S., & Doyan, A. (2022). Practicality of Learning Devices Based on Conceptual Change Model to Improve Concept Mastery of Students in the Gas Kinetic Theory Material. AMPLITUDO : Journal of Science and Technology Inovation, 1(2), 54–57. https://doi.org/10.56566/amplitudo.v1i2.13

Thahir, A., Anwar, C., Saregar, A., Choiriah, L., Susanti, F., & Pricilia, A. (2020). The Effectiveness of STEM Learning: Scientific Attitudes and Students’ Conceptual Understanding. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1467(1), 012008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1467/1/012008

Winarto, W., Cahyono, E., Sumarni, W., Sulhadi, S., Wahyuni, S., & Sarwi, S. (2022). Science Teaching Approach Ethno-SETSaR to improve pre-service teachers’ creative thinking and problem solving skills. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 12(2), 327. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1367

Zulhelmi, Z., Syaflita, D., Amelia, N. C., & Sohibun, S. (2023). Predict-Observe-Explain Learning Model Assisted by “Educandy” Games to Improve Students’ Conceptual Understanding. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 9(1), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.09108

Zulkarnain, Z., Andayani, Y., & Hadisaputra, S. (2019). Peningkatan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik Pada Pembelajaran Kimia Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Preparing Dong Concluding. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 14(2), 96–100. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v14i2.1321

Author Biographies

Susilawati Susilawati, Master of Science Education, University of Mataram, Mataram, Indonesia

Syarful Annam, Master of Science Education, University of Mataram, Mataram, Indonesia

Lalu Muliyadi, Master of Science Education, University of Mataram, Mataram, Indonesia

Ruth Rize Paas Megahati, Radinka Jaya Utama Institute, Padang, Indonesia

Risnawati Agustin Hutabarat, Radinka Jaya Utama Institute, Padang, Indonesia

Muhammad Ikhsan, Department of Primary Information Systems, Universitas Diponorogo, Ponorogo, Indonesia

Nuraini Rachma Ardianti, Balai Publikasi Indonesia, Lombok, Indonesia

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Aris Doyan, Susilawati Susilawati, Syarful Annam, Lalu Muliyadi, Ruth Rize Paas Megahati, Risnawati Agustin Hutabarat, Muhammad Ikhsan, Nuraini Rachma Ardianti

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).