The Role of Technology in the Development of Critical Thinking: Systematic Literature Review
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v10i11.7855Published:
2024-11-25Downloads
Abstract
The role of technology in developing critical thinking skills in students. Technology helps create an interactive, collaborative learning environment and supports independent learning. This systematic study aims to investigate the influence of the use of technology, including mobile-based applications, educational games, and e-learning platforms, on the development of critical thinking skills in chemistry learning through the investigation process of articles published and indexed in Scopus. Systematic Review Method: (1) Formulate review questions, (2) Establish inclusion and exclusion criteria, (3) Develop search strategies for search strategies and find studies, (4) Select studies, (5) Extract data, (6) Assess the quality of studies, (7) Analyze and interpret the results. Articles found in the Google Scholar database, the Journal of Turkish Science Education and Scopus show that there are 15 articles that meet the inclusion criteria. The conclusion obtained is to affirm that the integration of technology in the educational process has great potential to develop critical thinking skills.
Keywords:
Critical Thinking, Systematic Reviews, TechnologyReferences
Abdurrahman, A., Setyaningsih, C. A., & Jalmo, T. (2019) Menerapkan lembar kerja berbasis multiple representasi untuk mengembangkan keterampilan berpikir kritis. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(1), 138–155. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10271a
Changwong, K., Sukkamart, A., & Sisan, B. (2018). Critical thinking skill development: analysis of a new learning management model for thai high schools. Journal of International Studies, 11(2), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2018/11-2/3
Cui, Y., Wise, A. F., & Allen, K. L. (2019). Developing reflection analytics for health professions education: A multi-dimensional framework to align critical concepts with data features. Computers in Human Behavior, 100, 305–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.02.019
Danczak, S. M., Thompson, C. D., & Overton, T. L. (2020). Development and validation of an instrument to measure undergraduate chemistry students’ critical thinking skills. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(1), 62–78. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RP00130H
DeWaelsche, S. A. (2015). Critical thinking, questioning and student engagement in Korean university English courses. Linguistics and Education, 32, 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2015.10.003
Drigas, A., & Karyotaki, M. (2016). Online and other ICT-based training tools for problem-solving skills. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 11(06), 35. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v11i06.5340
Gagnon, N. L., & Komor, A. J. (2017). Addressing an overlooked science outreach audience: development of a science mentorship program focusing on critical thinking skills for adults working toward a high school equivalency degree. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(10), 1435–1442. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b01002
Gupta, T., Burke, K. A., Mehta, A., & Greenbowe, T. J. (2015). Impact of guided-inquiry-based instruction with a writing and reflection emphasis on chemistry students’ critical thinking abilities. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(1), 32–38. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed500059r
Gürses, A., Cuya, Ş., Güneş, K., & Doğar, Ç. (2014). Determination of the relation between undergraduate students’ awareness levels regarding their scientific process skills and application potentials. American Journal of Educational Research, 2(5), 250–256. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-2-5-3
Hakim, A., Kadarohman, A., & Syah, Y. M. (2016). Peningkatan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa dengan bahan alam pembelajaran laboratorium proyek mini.
Ikhsan, J., Sugiyarto, K. H., & Astuti, T. N. (2020). Fostering student’s critical thinking through a virtual reality laboratory. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 14(08), 183. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i08.13069
Kriswantoro, K., Kartowagiran, B., & Rohaeti, E. (2021). A critical thinking assessment model integrated with science process skills on chemistry for senior high school. European Journal of Educational Research, volume–10–2021(volume–10–issue–1–january–2021), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.285
Lazem, S. (2019). On designing blended learning environments for resource-challenged communities. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 14(12), 182. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i12.10320
Lim, C. L., Ab Jalil, H., Ma’rof, A. M., & Saad, W. Z. (2020). Peer learning, self-regulated learning and academic achievement in blended learning courses: a structural equation modeling approach. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(03), 110. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i03.12031
Lindawati, L. (2019). Pengembangan bahan inkuiri berbasis representasi kimia untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa.
López-Fernández, M. D. M., González-García, F., & Franco-Mariscal, A. J. (2022). How can socio-scientific issues help develop critical thinking in chemistry education? a reflection on the problem of plastics. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(10), 3435–3442. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00223
Morales, D. X., Grineski, S. E., & Collins, T. W. (2018). Effects of gender concordance in mentoring relationships on summer research experience outcomes for undergraduate students. Science Education, 102(5), 1029–1050. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21455
Özgelen, S. (2012). Students’ science process skills withina cognitive domain framework. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2012.846a
Pratiwi, Y., Rahayu, S., & Fajaroh, F. (2016). Machine Translated by Google.
Pursitasari, I. D., Suhardi, E., Putra, A. P., & Rachman, I. (2020). Enhancement of student’s critical thinking skill through science context-based inquiry learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(1), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i1.21884
Quattrucci, J. G. (2018). Problem-based approach to teaching advanced chemistry laboratories and developing students’ critical thinking skills. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(2), 259–266. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00558
Reichert, M., & Mouza, C. (2018). Teacher practices during Y ear 4 of a one‐to‐one mobile learning initiative. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(6), 762–774. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12283
Retiyanto, H. F., Putri, S. E., As-Shidiq, M. H., & Suyanta, S. (2023). Systematic literature review: analysis of student’s critical thinking skills towards chemistry learning. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(SpecialIssue), 113–121. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9iSpecialIssue.6436
Sari, R. M., Sumarmi, S., Astina, I. K., Utomo, D. H., & Ridhwan, R. (2021). Increasing students critical thinking skills and learning motivation using inquiry Mind Map. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(03), 4. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i03.16515
Schmidt-McCormack, J. A., Fish, C., Falke, A., Lantz, J., & Cole, R. S. (2019). Assessment of process skills in analytical chemistry student responses to open-ended exam questions. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(8), 1578–1590. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00877
Stephenson, N. S., & Sadler-McKnight, N. P. (2016). Developing critical thinking skills using the Science writing heuristic in the chemistry laboratory. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(1), 72–79. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RP00102A
Susilawati, S., Doyan, A., Muliyadi, L., & Hakim, S. (2020). Growth of tin oxide thin film by aluminum and fluorine doping using spin coating sol-gel techniques. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 6(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v6i1.264
Van Brederode, M. E., Zoon, S. A., & Meeter, M. (2020). Examining the effect of lab instructions on students’ critical thinking during a chemical inquiry practical. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(4), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RP00020E
Wijaya, W. S., Feronika, T., & Fairusi, D. (2018). Penerapan problem based learning berpendekatan sets terhadap keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa. JTK (Jurnal Tadris Kimiya), 3(1), 94–103. https://doi.org/10.15575/jtk.v3i1.2338
Wulandari, T., Amin, M., Zubaidah, S., & Iam, M. (2017). Students’ critical thinking improvement through PDEODE and STAD combination in the nutrition and health lecture. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 6(2), 110. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v6i2.7589
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Rizka Fitriani, AK Prodjosantoso
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
