The Influence of the PBL Model to Student Learning Outcomes on Heat and its Transfer Concepts

Authors

Sri Maulina Otoluwa , Ritin Uloli , Tirtawaty Abdjul , Mursalin , Abdul Haris Odja , Nova Elysia Ntobuo

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v10i7.8003

Published:

2024-07-25

Issue:

Vol. 10 No. 7 (2024): July: In Press

Keywords:

Heat, PBL model, Student learning outcomes

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Otoluwa, S. M., Uloli, R., Abdjul, T., Mursalin, Odja, A. H., & Ntobuo, N. E. (2024). The Influence of the PBL Model to Student Learning Outcomes on Heat and its Transfer Concepts. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(7), 4357–4363. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i7.8003

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

This research aims to determine the influence of the Problem-Based Learning (PBL) model to student learning outcomes on heat and transfer concepts by using experimental research, with the research design being One Group Pretest-Posttest Design. The population of this study was class VII students of SMP Negeri 5 Gorontalo. The sample consists of 3 classes, namely experimental class, replication 1, and replication 2, with the sampling technique being Cluster Random Sampling. The instrument of research used was a learning outcomes test in the form of a pretest-posttest to see student learning outcomes. Then, the data was analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, including normality tests, hypothesis tests, and n-gain analysis. The average score for class VII students is greater than the Criteria for Achieving Learning Goals, shown by an average score for the experimental class of 82.25, replication 1 of 79.94, and replication 2 of 79.04, compared to the Criteria for Achieving Learning Goals of 70. Based on the hypothesis testing criteria for the class, experimental Tcount 7.036 is greater than Ttable 2.035, replication 1 Tcount 6.684 is greater than Ttable 2.035, and replication 2 Tcount 5.824 is greater than Ttable 2.035 so it stated Tcount is more prominent than Ttable. This can be interpreted that the PBL model influences student learning outcomes.

References

Abdjul, T., Monoarfa, R., & Uloli, R. (2022). Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Ryleac Berbasis Mobile Learning Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa di SMA Negeri 2 Gorontalo. ORBITA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Fisika, 8(1), 123-127. https://doi.org/10.31764/orbita.v8i1.8073

Afnan, R., Munasir, M., Budiyanto, M., & Aulia, M. I. R. (2023). The Role of Scientific Literacy Instruments for Measuring Science Problem Solving Ability. IJORER: International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 4(1), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v4i1.271

Asrizal, A., Hikmah, N., Febriya, D., & Mawaddah, F. (2023). The Impact of Science Learning Materials Integrating Natural Disasters and Disaster Mitigation on Students' Learning Outcomes: A Meta Analysis. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(9), 586-595. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.2680

Ayunda, D., Kustiawan, A., & Erlin, E. (2022). Pengaruh Model Problem Based Learning Berbasis Tpack Terhadap Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Siswa. J-KIP (Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan), 3(3), 584-591. http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/j-kip.v3i3.8628

Bahtiar, B., Yusuf, Y., Doyan, A., & Ibrahim, I. (2023). The Trend of Technology Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Research in 2012-2022: Contribution to Science Learning of 21st Century. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(5), 39-47. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i5.3685

Bilyk, V., Banak, R., Bardadym, O., Sokal, M., & Anichkina, O. (2023). Introduction of Interactive Teaching Methods in Modern Schools. Revista Eduweb, 17(2), 199-209. https://doi.org/10.46502/issn.1856-7576/2023.17.02.17

Buhungo, T. J., Supartin, S., Arbie, A., Setiawan, D. G. E., Djou, A., & Yunus, M. (2023). Learning Tools Quality of Problem-Based Learning Model in Contextual Teaching and Learning Approach on Elasticity and Hooke’s Law Materials. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(3), 1092-1098. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i3.3127

Cahyani, R., Komarayanti, S., & Hidayah, L. (2023). Penerapan Problem Based Learning Berbasis Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi di SMAN 1 Jember untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar. ScienceEdu, 6(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.19184/se.v6i1.39643

Duan, M., Dong, F., & Wang, J. (2024). Student-Centered Assessment Research on Holographic Learning Paradigm Based on Intelligent Analytic Hierarchy Process in Teaching of Bridge Engineering Course. Sustainability, 16(6), 2430. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062430

Duong, N. T. T. (2023). Investigating Efl Teachers’ Perceptions of Implementing Active Learning Techniques in Teaching Speaking. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 7(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejfl.v7i2.4795

Fahrudin, D., & Saputro, S. (2023). Ethnoscience in Science Learning Research Trend: A Systematic Literature Review from 2013-2022. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(8), 458-467. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i8.3813

Ghazi, H. A., & Matansh, H. H. (2023). The Effect of the Constructive Technique (Active Learning Cycle) on Students' Development of Some Volleyball Skills and Cognitive Achievement. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.33687/jhssr.002.03.000169

Hikmah, N., Febriya, D., Asrizal, A., & Mufit, F. (2023). The Impact of the Project-Based Learning Model on Students' Critical and Creative Thinking Skills in Science and Physics Learning: A Meta-Analysis. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(10), 892-902. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.4384

Hung, W. (2019). Problem Design in PBL. In The Wiley Handbook of Problem‐Based Learning (pp. 249-272). Wiley Online Library. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119173243.ch11

Hurulean, R., Esomar, K., Kesaulya, N., & Nirahua, J. (2022). Analisa Kemampuan Analisis Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal-Soal Fisika Materi Kalor pada Siswa Kelas X SMA Angkasa Pattimura Ambon yang Diajarkan Menggunakan Model Contextual Teaching and Learning. Physikos Journal of Physics and Physics Education, 1(1), 46-53. https://doi.org/10.30598/physikos.1.1.6100

Irviana, I. (2020). Understanding the Learning Models Design for Indonesian Teacher. Online Submission, 1(2), 95-106. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED608335

Järvenoja, H., Järvelä, S., & Malmberg, J. (2015). Understanding Regulated Learning in Situative and Contextual Frameworks. Educational Psychologist, 50(3), 204-219. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1075400

Kwan, A. (2009). Problem-Based Learning. In The Routledge International Handbook of Higher Education (pp. 91-108). Routledge. Retrieved from http://taylorfrancis.com

Lagarusu, A., Odja, A. H., & Payu, C. S. (2023). Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Melalui Pendekatan Berdiferensiasi Menggunakan Blended Learning Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Konsep Fisika di SMA Negeri 6 Gorontalo Utara. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Undiksha, 13(2), 317-324. Retrieved from https://ejournal.

undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JJPF/article/view/60251

Matalka, M. A., Ayasrah, F. T. M., Jarrah, H. Y., Jawarneh, M., Alkhawaldeh, B. Y., Darawsheh, S. R., & Fadlallah, H. R. (2024). The Importance of Effective Learning Technology Utilization, Teacher Leadership, Student Engagement, and Curriculum in the Online Learning Environment. Retrieved from https://digitallibrary.aau.ac.ae/handle/123456789/1378

Muhali, M. (2019). Pembelajaran Inovatif Abad ke-21. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: E-Saintika, 3(2), 25-50. https://doi.org/10.36312/e-saintika.v3i2.126

Ng, D. T. K., Lee, M., Tan, R. J. Y., Hu, X., Downie, J. S., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023). A Review of AI Teaching and Learning from 2000 to 2020. Education and Information Technologies, 28(7), 8445-8501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11491-w

Niemi, H., Nevgi, A., & Aksit, F. (2016). Active Learning Promoting Student Teachers’ Professional Competences in Finland and Turkey. European Journal of Teacher Education, 39(4), 471-490. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2016.1212835

Imaculata, M., Syam, M., & Haryanto, Z. (2021). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing pada Materi Impuls dan Momentum di SMA Negeri 11 Samarinda. Jurnal Literasi Pendidikan Fisika (JLPF), 2(1), 63-72. https://doi.org/10.30872/jlpf.v2i1.355

Rahayu, A. B., Hadi, S., Istyadji, M., Zaini, M., Sholahuddin, A., & Fahmi, F. (2018). Development of Guided Inquiry Based Learning Devices to Improve Student Learning Outcomes in Science Materials in Middle School. European Journal of Alternative Education Studies. http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejae.v0i0.2149

Rasul, T., Nair, S., Kalendra, D., Robin, M., Santini, F. D. O., Ladeira, W. J., Sun, M., Day, I., Rather, R. A., & Heathcote, L. (2023). The Role of ChatGPT in Higher Education: Benefits, Challenges, and Future Research Directions. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 41-56. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.29

Rossi, I. V., de Lima, J. D., Sabatke, B., Nunes, M. A. F., Ramirez, G. E., & Ramirez, M. I. (2021). Active Learning Tools Improve the Learning Outcomes, Scientific Attitude, and Critical Thinking in Higher Education: Experiences in an Online Course During the COVID‐19 Pandemic. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 49(6), 888-903. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21574

Samosir, C. M., Muhammad, I., Marchy, F., & Elmawati, E. (2023). Research Trends in Problem Based Learning in Middle School (1998-2023): A Bibliometric Review. Sustainable Jurnal Kajian Mutu Pendidikan, 6(1), 46-58. https://doi.org/10.32923/kjmp.v6i1.3237

Shehata, B., Tlili, A., Huang, R., Adarkwah, M. A., Liu, M., & Chang, T. (2024). How Are We Doing with Student-Centered Learning Facilitated by Educational Technologies? A systematic Review of Literature Reviews. Education and Information Technologies, 29(7), 7813-7854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12112-w

Simanjuntak, M. P., Marpaung, N., & Siregar, N. (2020). Desain Pembelajaran IPA Berbasis Masalah dan Multirepresentasi Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep dan Pemecahan Masalah. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Fisika (INPAFI), 8(4), 20-25. Retrieved from https://digilib.unimed.ac.id/id/eprint/43284/

Sucilestari, R., Ramdani, A., Sukarso, A. A., Susilawati, S., & Rokhmat, J. (2023). Project-Based Learning Supports Students' Creative Thinking in Science Education. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(11), 1038-1044. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.5054

Suharyat, Y., Winiasri, L., Santosa, T. A., Rahman, A., & Marzuki, K. (2023). Meta-Analysis Study: Effect of Problem Solving Learning Model on Problem Solving Ability in Students' Science Learning SMP-SMA. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(9), 721-728. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.2791

Supartin, H. T., Mursalin, A. A., & Uloli, D. G. R. (2022). Pengaruh Penerapan Model Problem Based Learning dalam Pembelajaran Daring Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. Educatio, 17(1), 12-20. https://doi.org/10.29408/edc.v17i1.5283

Suyatmo, S., Yustitia, V., Santosa, T. A., Fajriana, F., & Oktiawati, U. Y. (2023). Effectiveness of the Inquiry Based Learning Model Based on Mobile Learning on Students' Creative Thinking Skills: A Meta-Analysis. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(9), 712-720. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.5184

Teater, B. A. (2011). Maximizing Student Learning: A Case Example of Applying Teaching and Learning Theory in Social Work Education. Social Work Education, 30(5), 571-585. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2010.505262

Timotheou, S., Miliou, O., Dimitriadis, Y., Sobrino, S. V., Giannoutsou, N., Cachia, R., & Ioannou, A. (2023). Impacts of Digital Technologies on Education and Factors Influencing Schools' Digital Capacity and Transformation: A Literature Review. Education and information technologies, 28(6), 6695-6726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11431-8

Tsui, E., Dragicevic, N., Fan, I., & Cheng, M. (2024). Co-Creating Curriculum with Students, Teachers, and Practitioners in a Technology-Enhanced Environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72(2), 869-893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10301-5

Wicaksono, A. G. (2020). Penyelenggaraan Pembelajaran IPA Berbasis Pendekatan STEM dalam Menyongsong Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. LENSA (Lentera Sains): Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 10(1), 54-62. https://doi.org/10.24929/lensa.v10i1.98

Zulyusri, Z., Elfira, I., Lufri, L., & Santosa, T. A. (2023). Literature Study: Utilization of the PjBL Model in Science Education to Improve Creativity and Critical Thinking Skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(1), 133-143. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i1.2555

Zunidar, Z. (2019). Peran Guru dalam Inovasi Pembelajaran. NIZHAMIYAH, 9(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.30821/niz.v9i2.550

Author Biographies

Sri Maulina Otoluwa, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Ritin Uloli, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Tirtawaty Abdjul, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Mursalin, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Abdul Haris Odja, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Nova Elysia Ntobuo, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Sri Maulina Otoluwa, Ritin Uloli, Tirtawaty Abdjul, Mursalin, Abdul Haris Odja, Nova Elysia Ntobuo

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).