Implementation of Inquiry Learning Based on Creativity and Science Process Skills

Authors

Jurubahasa Sinuraya , Motlan , Satria Mihardi , Abd Hakim S

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v10i7.8008

Published:

2024-07-25

Issue:

Vol. 10 No. 7 (2024): July

Keywords:

Creativity, Indicator analysis, Inquiry learning, PPP

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Sinuraya, J., Motlan, Mihardi, S., & S, A. H. (2024). Implementation of Inquiry Learning Based on Creativity and Science Process Skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(7), 3650–3655. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i7.8008
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Downloads

Metrics

PDF views
133
Jul 25 '24Jul 28 '24Jul 31 '24Aug 01 '24Aug 04 '24Aug 07 '24Aug 10 '24Aug 13 '24Aug 16 '24Aug 19 '24Aug 22 '248
|

Abstract

After inquiry learning research is carried out, it is necessary to investigate problems and find problems based on clear concepts based on observations. Creativity is the ability to create something new. The proposed activities are based on physical phenomena through experiments. Prior knowledge of a problem may detract from an investigation, as it may prefer to retain known evidence rather than devise new alternatives. Creativity is the ability to think to come up with solutions, ideas, ways, products as solutions to existing problems. Innovative is the process of doing something in a new way. The process skills of discovering and developing concepts, theories, legal principles and facts are science process skills (KPS). Based on investigations and problem findings, creative inquiry learning with a process skills approach is used. The method in this research is analysis of indicators of inquiry learning syntax (problem formulation, hypothesis formulation, data collection, hypothesis testing and conclusions), creativity (KE experimental group and KK control group) and science process skills (KE and KK). The concepts developed mutually support inquiry, creativity and process skills. Students' ability to investigate and find problems can be realized.

References

Anam, R. S., Gumilar, S., & Handayani, M. (2023). The effects of teaching with real, virtual, and real-virtual experimentation modes on conceptual knowledge and science process skills among sixth-grade primary school students: a case study on concepts of electricity. Education, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2023.2192224

Aulia, I., Sumah, A. S. W., & Genisa, M. U. (2023). Increasing science process skills using inquiry learning model. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 18(3), 317–323. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v18i3.4850

Daniel, A., Gebeyhu, D., Assefa, S., & Abate, T. (2023). Modified guided-discovery methods in physics laboratories: Pre-service teachers’ conceptual and procedural knowledge, views of nature of science, and motivation. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2267937. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2267937

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

De Jong, T., Lazonder, A. W., Chinn, C. A., Fischer, F., Gobert, J., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Koedinger, K. R., Krajcik, J. S., Kyza, E. A., Linn, M. C., Pedaste, M., Scheiter, K., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2023). Let’s talk evidence – The case for combining inquiry-based and direct instruction. Educational Research Review, 39, 100536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100536

Dou, X., Li, H., & Jia, L. (2021). The linkage cultivation of creative thinking and innovative thinking in dance choreography. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 100896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100896

Ekici, M., & Erdem, M. (2020). Developing Science Process Skills through Mobile Scientific Inquiry. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36, 100658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100658

Eristya, A. M., & Aznam, N. (2019). Natural Science Learning with Modified Free Inquiry to Develop Students’ Creative Thinking Skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233, 012107. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012107

García-Carmona, A., Muñoz-Franco, G., Criado, A. M., & Cruz-Guzmán, M. (2023). Validation of an instrument for assessing basic science process skills in initial elementary teacher education. International Journal of Science Education, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2232936

Guy, M., Normand, J.-M., Jeunet-Kelway, C., & Moreau, G. (2023). The sense of embodiment in Virtual Reality and its assessment methods. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 4, 1141683. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2023.1141683

Harrell, P. E., Thompson, R., & Waid, J. (2023). Using inquiry-based learning to develop Earth science pedagogical content knowledge: impact of a long-term professional development program. Research in Science & Technological Education, 41(4), 1519–1538. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2022.2052037

Hetherington, L., Hardman, M., Noakes, J., & Wegerif, R. (2018). Making the case for a material-dialogic approach to science education. Studies in Science Education, 54(2), 141–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2019.1598036

Hikmah, N., Yamtinah, S., & Indriyanti, N. Y. (2018). Chemistry teachers’ understanding of science process skills in relation of science process skills assessment in chemistry learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1022, 012038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1022/1/012038

Ho, H.-C., Wang, C.-C., & Cheng, Y.-Y. (2013). Analysis of the Scientific Imagination Process. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.04.003

Hodosyová, M., Útla, J., Vnuková, P., & Lapitková, V. (2015). The Development of Science Process Skills in Physics Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 982–989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.184

Hunegnaw, T., & Melesse, S. (2023). An evaluative study of the experimental tasks of the Ethiopian grade 12 chemistry textbook considering developing “science process skills.” Cogent Education, 10(1), 2208944. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2208944

Idul, J. J. A., & Caro, V. B. (2022). Does process-oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL) improve students’ science academic performance and process skills? International Journal of Science Education, 44(12), 1994–2014. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2108553

Kauley, N., John, J., Barr, K., Wu, W. T., Grove, R., Masi, A., & Eapen, V. (2024). Predicting Communication Skills Outcomes for Preschool Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder Following Early Intervention. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, Volume 20, 35–48. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S435740

Khessina, O. M., Goncalo, J. A., & Krause, V. (2018). It’s time to sober up: The direct costs, side effects and long-term consequences of creativity and innovation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 38, 107–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2018.11.003

Kim, K. H. (2019). Demystifying Creativity: What Creativity Isn’t and Is? Roeper Review, 41(2), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2019.1585397

Kuang, X., Eysink, T. H. S., & De Jong, T. (2022). Effects of providing domain information on facilitating hypothesis generation in inquiry learning. The Journal of Educational Research, 115(5), 285–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2022.2124219

Kwangmuang, P., Jarutkamolpong, S., Sangboonraung, W., & Daungtod, S. (2021). The development of learning innovation to enhance higher order thinking skills for students in Thailand junior high schools. Heliyon, 7(6), e07309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07309

Larraz-Rábanos, N. (2021). Development of Creative Thinking Skills in the Teaching-Learning Process. In U. Kayapinar (Ed.), Teacher Education - New Perspectives. IntechOpen.

Mariegaard, S., Seidelin, L. D., & Bruun, J. (2022). Identification of positions in literature using thematic network analysis: the case of early childhood inquiry-based science education. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 45(5), 518–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2022.2035351

Marsh, B., & Deacon, M. (2024). Teacher practitioner enquiry: a process for developing teacher learning and practice? Educational Action Research, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2024.2313085

Navy, S. L., Maeng, J. L., Bell, R. L., & Kaya, F. (2021). Beginning secondary science teachers’ implementation of process skills, inquiry, and problem-based learning during the induction years: a randomised controlled trial. International Journal of Science Education, 43(9), 1483–1503. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1919334

Neto, J. C., Filipe, J. A., & Caleiro, A. B. (2019). Creativity and innovation: A contribution of behavioral economics. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 3(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2019.06.003

Nieminen, P., Hähkiöniemi, M., & Viiri, J. (2021). Forms and functions of on-the-fly formative assessment conversations in physics inquiry lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 43(3), 362–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1713417

Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003

Peguera-Carré, M. C., Aguilar Camaño, D., Ibáñez Plana, M., & Coiduras Rodríguez, J. L. (2024). The Effect of Video Analysis of Inquiry School Practices on Pre-Service Teachers’ Scientific Skills Knowledge. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 35(2), 198–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2023.2236377

Reith, M., & Nehring, A. (2020). Scientific reasoning and views on the nature of scientific inquiry: testing a new framework to understand and model epistemic cognition in science. International Journal of Science Education, 42(16), 2716–2741. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1834168

Romano, D., Maravita, A., & Perugini, M. (2021). Psychometric properties of the embodiment scale for the rubber hand illusion and its relation with individual differences. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 5029. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84595-x

Siantuba, J., Nkhata, L., & De Jong, T. (2023). The impact of an online inquiry-based learning environment addressing misconceptions on students’ performance. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00236-y

Solé-Llussà, A., Aguilar, D., & Ibáñez, M. (2020). Video-worked examples to support the development of elementary students’ science process skills: a case study in an inquiry activity on electrical circuits. Research in Science and Technological Education, 40(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2020.1786361

Syahgiah, L., Zan, A. M., & Asrizal, A. (2023). Effects of Inquiry Learning on Students’ Science Process Skills and Critical Thinking: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Innovative Physics Teaching, 1(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.24036/jipt/vol1-iss1/9

Tan, L. M., & Laswad, F. (2018). Professional skills required of accountants: what do job advertisements tell us? Accounting Education, 27(4), 403–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2018.1490189

Tornee, N., Bunterm, T., Lee, K., & Muchimapura, S. (2019). Examining the effectiveness of guided inquiry with problem-solving process and cognitive function training in a high school chemistry course. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 14(2), 126–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2019.1597722

Wale, B. D., & Bishaw, K. S. (2020). Effects of using inquiry-based learning on EFL students’ critical thinking skills. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 5(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-020-00090-2

Wiratman, A., Mustaji, M., & Widodo, W. (2019). The effect of activity sheet based on outdoor learning on student’s science process skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157, 022007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/2/022007

Zhou, J., Xu, X., Li, Y., & Liu, C. (2020). Creative Enough to Become an Entrepreneur: A Multi-Wave Study of Creative Personality, Education, Entrepreneurial Identity, and Innovation. Sustainability, 12(10), 4043. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104043

Author Biographies

Jurubahasa Sinuraya, Universitas Negeri Medan

Motlan, Universitas Negeri Medan

Satria Mihardi, Universitas Negeri Medan

Abd Hakim S, Universitas Negeri Medan

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Jurubahasa Sinuraya, Motlan, Satria Mihardi, Abd Hakim S

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).