Development of Three-Dimensional Light Wave Test Based on Three-Dimensional Learning Framework
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v10i7.8119Published:
2024-07-31Issue:
Vol. 10 No. 7 (2024): July: In PressKeywords:
Three-dimensional test, Light waves, Three-dimensional learning frameworkResearch Articles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
The three-dimensional learning framework as a current science learning standard to facilitate the development of students' knowledge that is coherent and interconnected so that it can be used in various situations of daily life, is only possible if the assessment is oriented towards the science learning standards in question. The focus of this research is to develop a Three-Dimensional light wave test based on the Three-Dimensional Learning Framework. Development was carried out through quantitative research methods with construction design and validation, involving physics lecturers, physics teachers and high school students. Construction and validation were carried out using document analysis sheets, cognitive questionnaires, content validation sheets and student responses. Analysis was carried out through descriptive analysis, V-Aiken content validation, and Item Response Theory (IRT) using eIRT software. The construction and validation results show that the Three-Dimentional light wave test based on the Three-Dimentional Learning Framework has differentiating power in the good category, five items are very high, three items are high, eight items are medium and five items are low; the level of difficulty is in the medium category, two questions are very difficult, seven questions are difficult, eight questions are medium and four questions are easy; the pseudo guessing factor overall functions well; and reliable for measuring the level of ability of students with low to very high abilities. The Three-Dimensional test of light waves based on the Three-Dimentional Learning Framework can be used by educational practitioners as an assessment tool to explore students' coherent understanding of disciplinary core ideas (DCI), scientific practices (SP), and crosscutting concepts (CC) in wave material light.
References
Aiken Lewis R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Allyn & Bacon. Boston, MA (Pearson Education Group).
Bain, K., Bender, L., Bergeron, P., Caballero, M. D., Carmel, J. H., Duffy, E. M., Ebert-May, D., Fata-Hartley, C. L., Herrington, D. G., Laverty, J. T., Matz, R. L., Nelson, P. C., Posey, L. A., Stoltzfus, J. R., Stowe, R. L., Sweeder, R. D., Tessmer, S. H., Underwood, S. M., Urban-Lurain, M., & Cooper, M. M. (2020). Characterizing college science instruction: The Three-Dimensional Learning Observation Protocol. PLoS ONE, 15(6), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234640
Baker Frank B. (2001). The basics of item response theory (2nd ed.). ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation.
Cooper, M. M., Posey, L. A., & Underwood, S. M. (2017). Core Ideas and Topics: Building Up or Drilling Down? Journal of Chemical Education, 94(5), 541–548. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00900
Cooper, M. M., & Stowe, R. L. (2018). Chemistry Education Research - From Personal Empiricism to Evidence, Theory, and Informed Practice. Chemical Reviews, 118(12), 6053–6087. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00020
Cresqwll John W., & Cresqwll J. David. (2018). Research Design Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods research (Fifth Edit). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (2008). Introduction to classical and modern test theory- Procedures for Estimating Reliability. In Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College.
Fraenkel, R. J., & Wallen, E. N. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education (7th ed.). San Francisco: McGraw-Hill.
Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of Item Respons. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Lee, O., Quinn, H., & Valdés, G. (2013). Science and Language for English Language Learners in Relation to Next Generation Science Standards and with Implications for Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and Mathematics. Educational Researcher, 42(4), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X13480524
National Research Council. (1996). The national academies press. https://doi.org/10.17226/2266
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. In A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165
National Research Council. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. In Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States (Vols. 1–2). https://doi.org/10.17226/18290
Pellien T., & Rothenburger L. (2014). Addressing next generation science standards: A method for supporting classroom teachers. Journal of Extension, 52(4). https://doi.org/10.34068/joe.52.04.29
Retnawati, H. (2014). Teori Respons Butir dan Penerapannya untuk Peneliti, Praktisi Pengukuran dan Pengujian, Mahasiswa Pascasarjana (Pertama). Yogyakarta: Nuha Medika.
Singer, S.R., Nielsen, N.R., and Schweingruber, H. A. (2012). Discipline-Based Education Research. In Discipline-Based Education Research. https://doi.org/10.17226/13362
Uzun, S., Alev, N., & Karal, I. S. (2013). A cross-age study of an understanding of light and sight concepts in physics. Science Education International, 24(2), 129–149.
Wyner, Y., & Doherty, J. H. (2017). Developing a learning progression for three-dimensional learning of the patterns of evolution. Science Education, 101(5), 787–817. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21289
Author Biographies
Ridwan Efendi, Departement of Physics, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Winny Liliawati, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Muslim, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Raden Giovanni Ariantara, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ridwan Efendi, Winny Liliawati, Muslim, Raden Giovanni Ariantara
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
