Constructing Assessment for Evaluating Critical Thinking and Creative Problem-Solving Skills in the Lesson on Soundwave
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v10i8.8332Published:
2024-08-25Downloads
Abstract
The objective of this article is to develop an instrument that can be used to assess the ability to solve creative problems (CPS) and critical thinking (CT) in the context of sound waves. This work is a component of our research on developing a teaching material that includes assessment as a component of the final product. The objective of this instrument is to evaluate students' critical thinking (CT) and critical problem-solving (CPS) abilities both before and after implementing the recently developed mobile learning teaching resources. To construct the instrument, we adhere to the Facione and Osborn-Parness frameworks for CTs and CPSs. Validity testing and reliability testing comprise this instrument development process. We utilize Cronbach's Alpha to assess reliability and the content validity index to assess validity. According to the content validity index results, four of the six items in the CT instrument were determined to be valid. Conversely, the empirical validation test of the creative problem-solving skills instrument demonstrated that the results were valid and suitable for use. The Cronbach's Alpha results also indicated that both tools accurately evaluated students' creative problem-solving and critical reasoning abilities.
Keywords:
Assessment, Creative problem-solving, Critical thinkingReferences
Adom, D., Mensah, J. A., & Dake, D. A. (2020). Test, Measurement, and Evaluation: Understanding and Use of the Concepts in Education. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(1), 109-119. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i1.20457
Almanasreh, E., Moles, R., & Chen, T. F. (2019). Evaluation of Methods Used for Estimating Content Validity. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 15(2), 214-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.03.066
Azmi, N., & Festiyed, F. (2023). Development of Physics Learning Assessment Instrument in Project-Based Learning Model to Improve 4C Skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(4), 1798–1804. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i4.3174
Chappuis, J., & Stiggins, R. J. (2019). Classroom Assessment for Student Learning: Pearson New International Edition: Doing It Right - Using It Well (3rd Edition). London: Pearson.
Dasilva, B. E., Ardiyati, T. K., Suparno, S., Sukardiyono, S., Eveline, E., Utami, T., & Ferty, Z. N. (2019). Development of Android-Based Interactive Physics Mobile Learning Media (IPMLM) with Scaffolding Learning Approach to Improve HOTS of High School Students. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(3), 659-681. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.610377
Deming, D. J. (2017). The Value of Soft Skills in The Labor Market. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), 4, 7–11. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10419/178757
Depdiknas. (2008). Panduan Pengembangan Bahan Ajar. Retrieved from https://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id
/7169/1/Model%20Parenting%202015-Model%20
Bahan%20Ajar%20Program%20Pendidikan%20Keluarga-w.pdf
Desnita, D. (2022). Validity and Reliability of Critical Thinking Instruments to Measure the Effectiveness of Context-Based Physics E-Module on Wave Materials. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 8(1), 57-64. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.08106
Dirman, H. M., & Mufit, F. (2022). Design and Validity of Five Tier-Multiple Choice Test E-Instruments Using I-Spring Quiz Maker as an Assessment of Student Science Literacy in 21st Century Learning. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(6), 3170–3179. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i6.2300
Evans, J. R. (1997). Creativity in OR/MS: The Creative Problem-Solving Process, Part 1. Interfaces, 27(5), 78-83. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.27.5.78
Facione, P. A. (2020). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts 2020 Update. In Insight Assessment: Vol. XXVIII (Issue 1). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251303244
Fan, C. W., Lin, J., & Reynolds, B. L. (2023). A Bibliometric Analysis of Trending Mobile Teaching and Learning Research from the Social Sciences. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(7), 6143. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076143
Fatmawati, B., Djalilah, S. R., & Wafiah, N. (2023). Developing Worksheet Based on Creative Problem-Solving Models. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(11), 10364–10370. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.5138
Fatmawati, B., Jannah, B. M., & Sasmita, M. (2022). Students’ Creative Thinking Ability Through Creative Problem Solving Based Learning. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(4), 2090–2094. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i4.1846
Feng, Y. S., Kohlmann, T., Janssen, M. F., & Buchholz, I. (2021). Psychometric Properties of the EQ-5D-5L: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Quality of Life Research, 30(3), 647–673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02688-y
Fitri, M. A., Hadi, S., Sholahuddin, A., Rusmansyah, R., Aufa, M. N., Hasbie, M., & Saputra, M. A. (2023). Module Development with Creative Problem Solving Model to Improve Creative Thinking Skills and Self-Efficacy of Junior High School Students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(1), 422-426. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i1.2569
Fleaca, E., & Stanciu, R. D. (2019). Digital-Age Learning and Business Engineering Education-a Pilot Study on Students’ E-skills. Procedia Manufacturing, 32, 1051-1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.320
Husna, M., & Kuswanto, H. (2018). Development of Physics Mobile Learning Based on Local Wisdom to Improve Vector and Diagram Representation Abilities. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 12(6), 85-100. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v12i6.8746
Hyytinen, H., Holma, K., Toom, A., Shavelson, R. J., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2014). The Complex Relationship between Students’ Critical Thinking and Epistemological Beliefs in the Context of Problem Solving. Frontline Learning Research, 2(5), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v2i4.124
Isaksen, S. G. (2023). Developing Creative Potential: The Power of Process, People, and Place. Journal of Advanced Academics, 34(2), 111-144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X231156389
Ismail, N. S., Salleh, S. M., Zakaria, M. A. Z. M., & Harun, J. (2017). Cultivating Higher Order Thinking Skills in a Science Classroom Through Mobile-Problem Based Science Dictionary Application. Advanced Science Letters, 23(9), 8290-8297. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.9879
Kharisma, I., Ulfa, A., Pada, T., & Huda, I. (2024). Content Validity of the Critical Thinking Skill Test Instrument on Computer Based Test ( CBT ) Ecology Lesson for High School Education. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(6), 3533–3540. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i6.6914
Korpershoek, H., Canrinus, E. T., Fokkens-Bruinsma, M., & de Boer, H. (2020). The Relationships between School Belonging and Students’ Motivational, Social-Emotional, Behavioural, and Academic Outcomes in Secondary Education: A Meta-Analytic Review. Research Papers in Education, 35(6), 641-680. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2019.1615116
Manik, A. C., Sutrisno, H., & Rivaldo, I. (2022). Pengujian Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Konsepsi Pembelajaran Kimia pada Masa Pandemi COVID-19 Menggunakan Pemodelan Rasch. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(3), 1561–1568. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i3.1486
Mardis, M. A., Ma, J., Jones, F. R., Ambavarapu, C. R., Kelleher, H. M., Spears, L. I., & McClure, C. R. (2018). Assessing Alignment between Information Technology Educational Opportunities, Professional Requirements, and Industry Demands. Education and Information Technologies, 23(4), 1547-1584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9678-y
Muharini, R., & Rasmawan, R. (2024). Analysis of Understanding the Concept of Alkenes through the Three-tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test Instrument. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(6), 3463–3472. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i6.6510
Mulyana, V., & Desnita, D. (2023). Empirical Validity and Reliability of the Scientific Literacy Assessment Instrument Based on the Tornado Physics Enrichment Book. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(5), 3961–3967. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i5.3290
Noris, M., Jannah, M., Suyitno, M., & Rizal, S. U. (2024). Analysis of Students’ Critical Thinking Ability Profile Using HOTS-Based Questions. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(2), 530-538. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i2.5435
OECD. (2014a). 2012 PISA Results. 98. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-overview.pdf
OECD. (2014b). PISA 2012 Results: Creative Problem Solving (Volume V). Programme for International Student Assessment.
Parnes, S. J. (1988). Visionizing: State-of-the-Art Processes for Encouraging Innovative Excellence. New York: D.O.K. Publishers.
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The Content Validity Index: Are You Sure You Know What’s Being Reported? Critique and Recommendations. Research in Nursing and Health, 29(5), 489-497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147
Prastowo, A. (2013). Panduan Kreatif Membuat Bahan Ajar Inovatif Menciptakan Metode Pembelajaran yang Menarik dan Menyenangkan. Yogyakarta: Diva Press.
Rajalahti, T., & Kvalheim, O. M. (2011). Multivariate Data Analysis in Pharmaceutics: A Tutorial Review. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 417(1–2) 280-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.02.019
Revelle, W., & Condon, D. M. (2019). Reliability from α to ω: A Tutorial. Psychological Assessment, 31(12), 1395–1411. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000754
Rizki, A., Khaldun, I., & Pada, A. U. T. (2021). Development of Discovery Learning Student Worksheets to Improve Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Chemical Balance Materials. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(4), 707-711. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7i4.829
Ruseffendi, H. E. T. (2005). Fundamentals of Research & Other Non-Exact Areas. Bandung: Tarsito.
Sa’adah, S. I., & Ikhsan, J. (2023). Validity and Reliability Test of the Learning Independence Questionnaire Instrument in Using Electronic Modules. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(12), 11173–11180. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.4466
Setiadi, H. (2016). Pelaksanaan Penilaian pada Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2), 166-178. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i2.7173
Shi, J., Mo, X., & Sun, Z. (2012). Content Validity Index in Scale Development. Journal of Central South University (Medical Sciences), 37(2), 152-155. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-7347.2012.02.007
Sireci, S., & Faulkner-Bond, M. (2014). Validity Evidence Based on Test Content. Psicothema, 26(1), 100-107. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.256
Sukma, I. M., Marianti, A., & Ellianawati, E. (2023). Development of an E-Book Based on STEM-Integrated Creative Problem Solving on Environmental Change Material to Improve Students’ Critical Thinking and Creative Thinking. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(8), 6111-6121. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i8.4356
Sulistiani, S., Suyatna, A., & Rosidin, U. (2024). Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi Berbantuan LKPD Bermuatan STEM pada Materi Energi Alternatif untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Creative Problem Solving. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(1), 385–395. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i1.5253
Sürücü, L., & Maslakçi, A. (2020). Validity and Reliability in Quantitative Research. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(3), 2694–2726. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v8i3.1540
Tiruneh, D. T., De Cock, M., Weldeslassie, A. G., Elen, J., & Janssen, R. (2017). Measuring Critical Thinking in Physics: Development and Validation of a Critical Thinking Test in Electricity and Magnetism. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(4), 663-682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9723-0
Treffinger, D. J., Selby, E. C., & Isaksen, S. G. (2008). Understanding Individual Problem-Solving Style: A Key to Learning and Applying Creative Problem Solving. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(4), 390-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2007.11.007
van Hooijdonk, M., Mainhard, T., Kroesbergen, E. H., & van Tartwijk, J. (2020). Creative Problem Solving in Primary Education: Exploring the Role of Fact Finding, Problem Finding, and Solution Finding across Tasks. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 100665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100665
Widya, W., Ginting, F. W., Iqbal, M., & Andriani, R. (2023). Validity of a Physics E-Module Based on Creative Problem Solving Model Integrated With Renewable Energy. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(12), 11544–11550. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.5959
Wongwatkit, C., Panjaburee, P., & Srisawasdi, N. (2017). A Proposal to Develop a Guided-Inquiry Mobile Learning with a Mastery Learning Mechanism for Improving Students’ Learning Performance and Attitudes in Physics. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 11(1), 63–86. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2017.080898
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sri Zakiyah, Irma Rahma Suwarma, Dadi Rusdiana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
