Trends Research Problem Based Learning (PBL) Model to Improve Generic Science Skills in Students' Science Learning (2015-2024): A Systematic Review

Authors

Aris Doyan , Satutik Rahayu , Fitirana Lugi , Syarful Annam

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v10i9.8370

Published:

2024-09-25

Issue:

Vol. 10 No. 9 (2024): September

Keywords:

Generic science, Problem based learning, Review, Science learning

Review

Downloads

How to Cite

Doyan, A., Rahayu, S., Lugi, F., & Annam, S. (2024). Trends Research Problem Based Learning (PBL) Model to Improve Generic Science Skills in Students’ Science Learning (2015-2024): A Systematic Review. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(9), 621–630. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i9.8370
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

Generic science abilities are abilities that students must have so that the knowledge and skills obtained in the learning process can be applied in everyday life and answer the challenges of an increasingly developing era. Generic science skills can be facilitated through learning with a Problem Based Learning (PBL) model. This research aims to identify and analyze research trends of PBL model to improve generic science skill in science learning. This research method is descriptive and analytical. The data used in this research was obtained from documents indexed by Google Scholar from 2015-2024 using Publish or Perish and Dimension.ai. Research procedures use PRISMA guidelines. The data identified and analyzed are the type of publication, publication source, and the title of research on PBL model to improve generic science skill in science learning that is widely cited. The data analysis method uses bibliometric analysis assisted by VOS viewer software. The results of the analysis show that research trend on PBL model to improve generic science skill in science learning indexed by Google Scholar from 2015 to 2024 has experienced a fluctuating increase. Research trend with an increase in the number of publications from 2015 to 2018. However, in 2019 and 2022 the research trend on the generic science ability in learning has decreased from the previous year and the research trend increase again in 2023. There are many documents in the form of articles, proceedings, book chapters and edited books that discuss research about Problem Based Learning model to improve generic science skills in science learning. Key words that are often used in research of generic science are critical thinking, e module, science learning, PBL, etc.

References

Agustin, R. R. (2014). Pengembangan Keterampilan Generik Sains Melalui Penggunaan Multimedia Interaktif. Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 18(2), 253. https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v18i2.58

Anjalina, E., Khaeruman, K., & Mashami, R. A. (2019). Pengembangan Multimedia Interaktif Hidrolisis Garam Berbasis Problem Based Learning Untuk Penumbuhan Keterampilan Generik Sains Siswa. JPIn: Jurnal Pendidik Indonesia, 2(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.47165/jpin.v2i2.71

Astalini, Darmaji, Kurniawan, D. A., Jaya, H., & Husna, S. M. (2022). Analysis of Teacher Responses to the Use of Web-based Assessment to Assess Students’ Attitudes towards Science Subjects. Integrated Science Education Journal, 3(3), 66–71. https://doi.org/10.37251/isej.v3i3.282

Bahtiar, B., Yusuf, Y., Doyan, A., & Ibrahim, I. (2023). Trend of Technology Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Research in 2012-2022: Contribution to Science Learning of 21st Century. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(5), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i5.3685

Darmaji, D., Astalini, A., Kurniawan, D. A., & Putri, W. A. (2021). Rural Student Analysis: Correlation Science Process Skills and Critical Thinking at a State Senior High School in Jambi Province. Ta’dib, 24(2), 229. https://doi.org/10.31958/jt.v24i2.3645

Devi, V. M., Susilawati, S., & Gunada, I. W. (2021). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Fisika Model Berbasis Masalah Pada Materi Elastisitas Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Generik Sains Peserta Didik. ORBITA: Jurnal Kajian, Inovasi Dan Aplikasi Pendidikan Fisika, 7(1), 109. https://doi.org/10.31764/orbita.v7i1.3822

DiCerbo, K. (2014). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(4), 502–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2014.931836

Doyan, A., Susilawati, Mahardika, I. K., Rizaldi, D. R., & Fatimah, Z. (2022). Structure and optical properties of Titanium Dioxide thin film with mixed Fluorine and Indium doping for solar cell components. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2165(1), 012009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2165/1/012009

Fry, S., & Seely, S. (2011). Enhancing Preservice Elementary Teachers’ 21st-Century Information and Media Literacy Skills. Action in Teacher Education, 33(2), 206–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2011.569468

Geisinger, K. F. (2016). 21st Century Skills: What Are They and How Do We Assess Them? Applied Measurement in Education, 29(4), 245–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2016.1209207

González-Pérez, L. I., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2022). Components of Education 4.0 in 21st Century Skills Frameworks: Systematic Review. Sustainability, 14(3), 1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031493

Griffin, P. (2017). Assessing and Teaching 21st Century Skills: Collaborative Problem Solving as a Case Study. In Innovative Assessment of Collaboration (pp. 113–134). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33261-1_8

Hadzigeorgiou, Y., & Schulz, R. M. (2019). Engaging Students in Science: The Potential Role of “Narrative Thinking” and “Romantic Understanding.” Frontiers in Education, 4, 38. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00038

Hallinger, P., & Chatpinyakoop, C. (2019). A Bibliometric Review of Research on Higher Education for Sustainable Development, 1998–2018. Sustainability, 11(8), 2401. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082401

Hallinger, P., & Nguyen, V.-T. (2020). Mapping the Landscape and Structure of Research on Education for Sustainable Development: A Bibliometric Review. Sustainability, 12(5), 1947. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051947

Jang, H. (2016). Identifying 21st Century STEM Competencies Using Workplace Data. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(2), 284–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9593-1

Karpinski, R. I., Kinase Kolb, A. M., Tetreault, N. A., & Borowski, T. B. (2018). High intelligence: A risk factor for psychological and physiological overexcitabilities. Intelligence, 66, 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2017.09.001

Kaufman, K. J. (2013). 21 Ways to 21st Century Skills: Why Students Need Them and Ideas for Practical Implementation. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 49(2), 78–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2013.786594

Kaur, S., Kumar, R., Kaur, R., Singh, S., Rani, S., & Kaur, A. (2022). Piezoelectric materials in sensors: Bibliometric and visualization analysis. Materials Today: Proceedings, 65, 3780–3786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.06.484

Khabibah, E. N., Masykuri, M., & Maridi, M. (2017). The Effectiveness of Module Based on Discovery Learning to Increase Generic Science Skills. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 11(2), 146–153. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v11i2.6076

Kurniawan, D. A., Astalini, A., & Kurniawan, N. (2019). Analisis Sikap Siswa SMP Terhadap Mata Pelajaran IPA. Lentera Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah Dan Keguruan, 22(2), 323. https://doi.org/10.24252/lp.2019v22n2i14

Kurniawan, D. A., Darmaji, D., Astalini, A., & Muslimatul Husna, S. (2023). Study of Critical Thinking Skills, Science Process Skills and Digital Literacy: Reviewed Based on the Gender. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(4), 1741–1752. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i4.1644

Lambert, J., & Gong, Y. (2010). 21st Century Paradigms for Pre-Service Teacher Technology Preparation. Computers in the Schools, 27(1), 54–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380560903536272

Larson, L. C., & Miller, T. N. (2011). 21st Century Skills: Prepare Students for the Future. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 47(3), 121–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2011.10516575

Liao, H., Tang, M., Luo, L., Li, C., Chiclana, F., & Zeng, X.-J. (2018). A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Medical Big Data Research. Sustainability, 10(2), 166. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010166

Maison, M., Kurniawan, D. A., & Pratiwi, N. I. S. (2020). Pendidikan sains di sekolah menengah pertama perkotaan: Bagaimana sikap dan keaktifan belajar siswa terhadap sains? Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v6i2.32425

Meltzer, D. E. (2002). The relationship between mathematics preparation and conceptual learning gains in physics: A possible “hidden variable” in diagnostic pretest scores. American Journal of Physics, 70(12), 1259–1268. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1514215

Muliani, N. K. D., & Citra Wibawa, I. Md. (2019). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Berbantuan Video Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 3(1), 107. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v3i1.17664

Mynbayeva, A., Vishnevskaya, A., & Sadvakassova, Z. (2015). Diagnosis of Students Intellectual Potential on Pedagogical Specialties. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 171, 776–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.191

Nastiti, D., Rahardjo, S. B., & Van Hayus, E. S. (2019). Using module based on search, solve, create, and share effective to increase students’ science generic skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1175, 012145. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1175/1/012145

Nurlia, N. (2023). Analisis Sikap Peserta Didik Terhadap Pembelajaran IPA Secara Online dan Tatap Muka Terbatas. Jurnal Pendidikan, 11(1), 100–109. https://doi.org/10.36232/pendidikan.v11i1.2216

Oltarzhevskyi, D. O. (2019). Typology of contemporary corporate communication channels. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 24(4), 608–622. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-04-2019-0046

Parker, R., Thomsen, B. S., & Berry, A. (2022). Learning Through Play at School – A Framework for Policy and Practice. Frontiers in Education, 7, 751801. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.751801

Rahayu, S., Ahied, M., Hadi, W. P., & Wulandari, A. Y. R. (2021). Analisis Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa SMP pada materi getaran gelombang dan bunyi. Natural Science Education Research, 4(1), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.21107/nser.v4i1.8389

Razali, Halim, A., Haji, A. G., & Nurfadilla, E. (2020). Effect of inquiry learning methods on generic science skills based on creativity level. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1460(1), 012118. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1460/1/012118

Sakliressy, M. T., Sunarno, W., & Nurosyid, F. (2021). The Generic Science Skill Profile of High School on Theory Momentum And Impulse. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1842(1), 012058. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1842/1/012058

Sanjaya, F. (2019). Keefektifan Model Pembelajaran Murder (Mood, Understand, Recall, Detect, Elaborate, Review) Melalui Teknik Kie Untuk Meningkatkan Aspek Sebab Akibat Kemampuan Generik Sains Siswa. Indonesian Journal of Natural Science Education (IJNSE), 2(1), 134–140. https://doi.org/10.31002/nse.v2i1.451

Sibille, K., Greene, A., & Bush, J. P. (2010). Preparing Physicians for the 21st Century: Targeting Communication Skills and the Promotion of Health Behavior Change. Annals of Behavioral Science and Medical Education, 16(1), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03355111

Stehle, S. M., & Peters-Burton, E. E. (2019). Developing student 21st Century skills in selected exemplary inclusive STEM high schools. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0192-1

Sukarso, A. A., Syuzita, A., & Susilawati. (2023). Effectiveness of Science E-Module Using Argument-Driven Inquiry Models to Improve Students’ Generic Science, Critical Thinking and Scientific Argumentation Abilities. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(12), 11576–11581. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.6279

Suseno, B. A., & Fauziah, E. (2020). Improving Penginyongan Literacy in Digital Era Through E-Paper Magazine of Ancas Banyumasan. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3807680

Syugiyanto, A. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Keterampilan Generik Sains Pada Mahasiswa Calon Guru Pendidikan Biologi Fkip Uhamka. ACADEMIA: Jurnal Inovasi Riset Akademik, 1(2), 247–252. https://doi.org/10.51878/academia.v1i2.742

Syuzita, A., Susilawati, S., & Sukarso, A. (2023). Validation of E-Module Based on Argument-Driven Inquiry using 3D Page Flip Professional to Improve Students’ Generic Science, Critical Thinking and Scientific Argumentation Abilities. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(8), 6272–6277. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i8.4947

Tuononen, T., Hyytinen, H., Kleemola, K., Hailikari, T., Männikkö, I., & Toom, A. (2022). Systematic Review of Learning Generic Skills in Higher Education—Enhancing and Impeding Factors. Frontiers in Education, 7, 885917. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.885917

Van Laar, E., Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., Van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & De Haan, J. (2020). Determinants of 21st-Century Skills and 21st-Century Digital Skills for Workers: A Systematic Literature Review. SAGE Open, 10(1), 215824401990017. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900176

Wahyuni, A. S. (2022). Literature Review: Pendekatan Berdiferensiasi Dalam Pembelajaran IPA. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 12(2), 118–126. https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v12i2.562

Wulandari, F., & Sari, P. P. (2023). The effect of project-based learning integrated STEM toward science process skill of elementary school student. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 18(3), 362–368. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v18i3.4943

Yuberti, Kartika, I., Pratiwi, I., Riyadi, B., Latifah, S., & Pilia, Q. M. (2021). An analysis of generic science skills as 21 st -century skills for preservice physics teacher at UIN Raden Intan Lampung. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1796(1), 012043. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012043

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

Author Biographies

Aris Doyan, Universitas Mataram

Satutik Rahayu, Universitas Mataram

Fitirana Lugi, Universitas Mataram

Syarful Annam, Universitas Mataram

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Aris Doyan, Satutik Rahayu, Fitirana Lugi, Syarful Annam

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).