Development of Science Learning Modules with Computer-Based Test (CBT) Assessments to Train Critical Thinking Skills of Students at SMP Negeri 7 Bontang

Authors

Hendita Dyah Ratnady , Makrina Tindangen , Elsje Theodora Maasawet , Abdul Hakim , Daniel , Herliani , Yusak Hudiyono , Aloysius Hardoko

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v10i9.8391

Published:

2024-09-25

Issue:

Vol. 10 No. 9 (2024): September

Keywords:

ADDIE model, Assessment, Computer-based test, Science module

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Ratnady, H. D., Tindangen, M., Maasawet, E. T., Hakim, A., Daniel, Herliani, … Hardoko, A. (2024). Development of Science Learning Modules with Computer-Based Test (CBT) Assessments to Train Critical Thinking Skills of Students at SMP Negeri 7 Bontang. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(9), 6564–6573. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i9.8391

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

This study aims to improve Modules for science subject with the Computer-Based Test Assessment in order to train students’ critical thinking on one of science topics which is human’s respiratory system using ADDIE model. This model of research is the development research level 3. The data were collected by involving expert’s validation, observation, test, and questionnaire. The results showed that: the module validity result in terms of module itself was 93.75% with a very valid category. The validity in terms of language and material were 88.77% and 99.54% respectively, while the results by the Computer-Based Test application were 97%. The module’s practical results assessed by questionnaires were 89.41% and it means this module is highly practical to be used. The results of the module’s efficacy in terms of normality, the n-gain of all classes in pre-test and post-test’s sig value > 0.05, therefore the data was distributed normally. The results of paired sample t-test indicate that there is a noticeable difference on the average of pre-test and post-test results in the experimental group. Hence, the science module with Computer-Based Test is effective to be utilized as learning materials that can increase students’ critical thinking skills at schools.

References

Achmad, W. (2021). Citizen and Netizen Society: The Meaning of Social Change From a Technology Point of View. Jurnal Mantik, 5(3), 1564–1570. Retrieved from https://iocscience.org/ejournal/index.php/mantik/article/view/1663

Ahmatika, D. (2017). Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Dengan Pendekatan Inquiry/Discovery. Euclid, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.33603/e.v3i1.324

Anwari, A. M., Kholik, N., I, S. P., I., M. S., Mainuddin, M. P. I., Umami, R., Putri, R., & Rahayu, R. (2021). Strategi Pembelajaran: Orientasi standar proses pendidikan. Edu publisher.

Ardiansyah, M. (2020). Pengembangan Ulangan Harian Matematika Berbasis Android Menggunakan Aplikasi Google Form. Lentera: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 13(2), 271–278. https://doi.org/10.52217/lentera.v13i2.674

Broadbent, J., Panadero, E., & Bouda, D. (2018). Implementing summative assessment with a formative flavour: A case study in a large class. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(2), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1343455

Chen, S., Fan, L., Chen, C., & Liu, Y. (2023). Automatically Distilling Storyboard With Rich Features for Android Apps. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 49(2), 667–683. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2022.3159548

Daka, H., Mulenga-hagane, L. M., Mukalula-kalumbi, M., & Lisulo, S. (2021). Making Summative Assessment Effective. European Modern Studies Journal, 5(4), 224–237. Retrieved from https://dspace.unza.zm/items/068409b4-9e80-4d51-9198-2d13d1a7c14d

de Vries, J. A., Dimosthenous, A., Schildkamp, K., & Visscher, A. J. (2023). The impact of an assessment for learning teacher professional development program on students’ metacognition. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 34(1), 109–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2022.2116461

Duron, R., Limbach, B., & Waugh, W. (2006). Critical Thinking Framework For Any Discipline. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17(2), 160–166. Retrieved from https://valenciacollege.edu/faculty/development/courses-resources/documents/CTFrameworkArticle.pdf

Ennis, R. (2011). Critical Thinking. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 26(2), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.5840/inquiryctnews201126215

Eviyanti, S. J., Ngabekti, S., & Sumarni, W. (2022). Effectiveness of Teaching Materials Based on Local Wisdom in the Takalar Region to Improve Literacy Capabilities of High School Students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(6), 3089–3094. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i6.1978

Haber, J. (2020). Critical thinking. MIT Press.

Hairida, H., Rasmawan, R., Sartika, R. P., & Masriani, M. (2023). Educators’ Perception of the Utilization of Information and Communication Tecnology (ICT) in Chemistry Learning. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(10), 9105–9024. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.4375

Herdiansyah, H., Soedrajad, M. R., Hawa, N. I., & Dyah Ayu Arintyas, A. P. R. (2023). Resetting the Relationship Between Human and Nature: Religion and the New Communication Technologies. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 22(66), 29–45. Retrieved from https://thenewjsri.ro/index.php/njsri/article/view/422

Ibarra-Sáiz, M. S., Rodríguez-Gómez, G., & Boud, D. (2020). Developing student competence through peer assessment: the role of feedback, self-regulation and evaluative judgement. Higher Education, 80(1), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00469-2

Ismail, S. M., Rahul, D. R., Patra, I., & Rezvani, E. (2022). Formative vs summative assessment: impacts on academic motivation, attitude toward learning, test anxiety, and self-regulation skill. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00191-4

Istaryaningtyas, I., L., S., & E., H. (2021). Management of the Independent Learning Curriculum during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 5(2), 176. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v5i2.32998

Kosasih, E. (2021). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar. Jakarta: PT BumiAksara.

Ma, L.-L., Wang, Y.-Y., Yang, Z.-H., Huang, D., Weng, H., & Zeng, X.-T. (2020). Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? Military Medical Research, 7(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40779-020-00238-8

Mamun, M. A. Al, Lawrie, G., & Wright, T. (2020). Instructional design of scaffolded online learning modules for self-directed and inquiry-based learning environments. Computers & Education, 144, 103695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103695

Mannion, J. (2022). Beyond the grade: the planning, formative and summative (PFS) model of self-assessment for higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(3), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1922874

Marshman, E., Devore, S., & Singh, C. (2020). Holistic framework to help students learn effectively from research-validated self-paced learning tools. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(2), 20108. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020108

Mayfield, M. (2011). Creating training and development programs: Using the ADDIE method. Development and Learning in Organisations, 25(3), 19–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777281111125363

Metre, K. (2013). Information and Communication Technologies for Development (ICT4D) in Indonesia: Opportunities and Challenges. In Nformation and Communication Technologies for Development in Indonesia (p. 74). Retrieved from https://shorturl.at/4x3DD

Miranda, J., Navarrete, C., Noguez, J., Molina-Espinosa, J.-M., Ramírez-Montoya, M.-S., Navarro-Tuch, S. A., Bustamante-Bello, M.-R., Rosas-Fernández, J.-B., & Molina, A. (2021). The core components of education 4.0 in higher education: Three case studies in engineering education. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 93, 107278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107278

Morris, R., Perry, T., & Wardle, L. (2021). Formative assessment and feedback for learning in higher education: A systematic review. Review of Education, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3292

Muchson, M. (2019). The Effectiveness of the Revolving Capital to Improve the Development of Cooperative and Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMS) in Kediri. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 10(18), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.7176/jesd/10-18-08

Prayitno, N., & Khoirunurrofik, K. (2020). The Effect of Internet Usage on Social Capital in Indonesia. Buletin Pos Dan Telekomunikasi, 18(2), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.17933/bpostel.2020.180202

Puig, B., Anaya, P. B., & Bargiela, I. M. (2020). A Systematic Review on E-learning Environments for Promoting Critical Thinking in Higher Education. In Handbook of Research in Educational Communications and Technology: Learning Design: Fifth Edition (pp. 345–362). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36119-8_15

Purnomo, E., Najib, A., & Nyura, Y. (2018). Penerapan Metode Trend Moment Untuk Forecast Penjualan Barang di Indomaret. Prosiding Seminar Ilmu Komputer Dan Teknologi Informasi, 100. Retrieved from https://shorturl.at/1BZxX

Rajabalee, Y. B., & Santally, M. I. (2021). Learner satisfaction, engagement and performances in an online module: Implications for institutional e-learning policy. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 2623–2656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10375-1

Ridha, S., Putri, E., Kamil, P. A., Utaya, S., Bachri, S., & Handoyo, B. (2020). The importance of designing GIS learning material based on spatial thinking. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 485(1), 12027. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/485/1/012027

Schildkamp, K., van der Kleij, F. M., Heitink, M. C., Kippers, W. B., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2020). Formative assessment: A systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice. International Journal of Educational Research, 103, 101602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101602

Septiani, D. R., Agung, S., & Bahriah, E. S. (2020). Pengembangan buku pengayaan kearifan lokal: Jakarta dalam kimia. JIPVA (Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Veteran), 4(2), 204–219. https://doi.org/10.31331/jipva.v4i2.1209

Szymkowiak, A., Melović, B., Dabić, M., Jeganathan, K., & Kundi, G. S. (2021). Information technology and Gen Z: The role of teachers, the internet, and technology in the education of young people. Technology in Society, 65, 101565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101565

Tomlinson, B. (2023). Developing materials for language teaching. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Wahyuni, S. (2015). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar IPA Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMP. PROSIDING : Seminar Nasional Fisika Dan Pendidikan Fisika, 6(6), 2015. Retrieved from https://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/prosfis1/article/view/7857

Winstone, N. E., & Boud, D. (2022). The need to disentangle assessment and feedback in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 47(3), 656–667. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1779687

Yahaya, N. I. S., Sapian, N. I. H., Abdul Razak, I. S., & Mohd Ishar, M. I. (2021). Impact of Technology Progress on Human Development in the Era of Industrial Revolution 4.0. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 6(2), 266–274. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v6i2.661

Yani, Y. P., Hardeli, H., Oktavia, B., & Kurniawati, D. (2020). Development of an Integrated E-Module of Scientific Literacy and Video Demonstration Using a Problem-Based Learning Model for High School Students on Acids and Bases. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(2), 452–462. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i2.1306

Yunaini, N., Rukiyati, R., Prabowo, M., Hassan, N. M., & Hermansyah, A. K. (2022). The Concept of the Independent Learning Curriculum (Merdeka Belajar) in Elementary Schools in View Progressivism Educational Philosophy. JIP Jurnal Ilmiah PGMI, 8(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.19109/jip.v8i2.14962

Zhang, C., Khan, I., Dagar, V., Saeed, A., & Zafar, M. W. (2022). Environmental impact of information and communication technology: Unveiling the role of education in developing countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 178, 121570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121570

Author Biographies

Hendita Dyah Ratnady, University of Mulawarman

Makrina Tindangen, University of Mulawarman

Elsje Theodora Maasawet, University of Mulawarman

Abdul Hakim, University of Mulawarman

Daniel, University of Mulawarman

Herliani, University of Mulawarman

Yusak Hudiyono, University of Mulawarman

Aloysius Hardoko, University of Mulawarman

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Hendita Dyah Ratnady, Makrina Tindangen, Elsje Theodora Maasawet, Abdul Hakim, Daniel, Herliani, Yusak Hudiyono, Aloysius Hardoko

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).