The Effect of Using Inquiry Model on Science Process Skills and Student Learning Outcomes

Authors

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v10i12.8658

Published:

2024-12-24

Issue:

Vol. 10 No. 12 (2024): December

Keywords:

Inquiry, Learning outcomes, Science process skills

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Fahmi, Fajeriadi, H., Irhasyuarna, Y., Yulianti, Y. E., & Kusasi, M. (2024). The Effect of Using Inquiry Model on Science Process Skills and Student Learning Outcomes. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(12), 10426–10433. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i12.8658

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

Science learning must be changed by applying real and active science process skills which are shown by students being able to understand the use of tools, methods, and procedures and apply them in the discovery process and communicate them based on the evidence they get. The purpose of this study was to see the impact of the use of the inquiry model on science process skills and student learning outcomes. The research method used is a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods designed using a pre-test-post-test control group. The samples of this research were 7th-grade junior high school students. The length of the research process is 12 weeks. The results showed that there were significant differences between the two groups. This indicates that the inquiry model has a positive impact on students' science process skills. This was also accompanied by positive results on student learning outcomes in the group using the inquiry model. The conclusion is that quantitatively the fact that the inquiry learning model can improve science process skills and student learning outcomes is found. Optimizing the application of this model is needed to support progress in the education quality.

References

Abdi, A. (2014). The Effect of Inquiry-Based Learning Method on Students’ Academic Achievement in Science Course. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(1), 37-41. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2014.020104

Abungu, H. E., Okere, M. I., & Wachanga, S. W. (2014). Effect of Science Process Skills Teaching Strategy on Boys and Girls’ Achievement in Chemistry in Nyando District, Kenya. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(15), 42-48. https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2014.v4n6p359

Af’idayani, N., Setiadi, I., & Fahmi, F. (2018). The Effect of Inquiry Model on Science Process Skills and Learning Outcomes. European Journal of Education Studies. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1344846

Ahmed, M., Choudhary, F. R., & Sultan, S. (2023). A Comparative Study of Basic Science Process Skills of Science Students at Higher Secondary Level in District Rawalpindi, Pakistan. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 12(2), 276-285. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i3.37775

Arabacioglu, S., & Unver, A. O. (2016). Supporting Inquiry Based Laboratory Practices with Mobile Learning to Enhance Students’ Process Skills in Science Education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/16.15.216

Artayasa, I. P., Susilo, H., Lestari, U., & Indriwati, S. E. (2017). The Effectiveness of the Three Levels of Inquiry in Improving Teacher Training Students’ Science Process Skills. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(6), 908. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/17.16.908

Aydinli, E., Dokme, I., Ünlüa, Z. K., Öztürk, N. İ. H. A. N., Demir, R. A. M. A. Z. A. N., & Benli, E. (2011). Turkish Elementary School Students’ Performance on Integrated Science Process Skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3469-3475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.320

Aydogdu, B. (2015). The Investigation of Science Process Skills of Science Teachers in Terms of Some Variables. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(5), 582-594. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2015.2097

Batı, K., Ertürk, G., & Kaptan, F. (2010). The Awareness Levels of Pre-School Education Teachers Regarding Science Process Skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1993-1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.270

Bayram, Z., Oskay, O. O., Erdem, E., Ozgur, S. D., & Sen, S. (2013). Effect of Inquiry Based Learning Method on Students’ Motivation. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, 988-996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.112

Bekiroglu, F. O., & Arzu, A. (2013). Examination of the Effects of Model-Based Inquiry on Students’ Outcomes: Scientific Process Skills and Conceptual Knowledge. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 1187-1191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.202

Delen, İ., & Kesercioğlu, T. (2012). How Middle School Students’ Science Process Skills Affected by Turkey’s National Curriculum Change? Journal of Turkish Science Education, 9(4), 3-9. Retrieved from https://www.tused.org/index.php/tused/article/view/465

Dimyati, D., & Moedjiono, M. (2002). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Fahmi, F., & Irhasyuarna, Y. (2019). Pengantar Pendidikan: Manusia, Pendidikan, dan Perkembangan Zaman. Banjarmasin: Program Studi Magister Keguruan IPA PPs ULM.

Fahmi, F., & Irhasyuarna, Y. (2017). Misconceptions of Reaction Rates on High School Level in Banjarmasin. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 7(1), 54-61. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0701045461

Fahmi, F. (2018). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran untuk Melatihkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik SMP pada Materi Klasifikasi Benda (Thesis). S2 Keguruan IPA PPs ULM.

Fahmi, F., Chalisah, N., Istyadji, M., Irhasyuarna, Y., & Kusasi, M. (2022). Scientific Literacy on the Topic of Light and Optical Instruments in the Innovation of Science Teaching Materials. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v8i2.41343

Fahmi, F., Fajeriadi, H., & Irhasyuarna, Y. (2021). Feasibility of the Prototype of Teaching Materials on the Topic of Classification of Lifestyle Based on the Advantage of Local Wetland. BIO-INOVED: Jurnal Biologi-Inovasi Pendidikan, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.20527/bino.v3i2.10322

Fahmi, F., Setiadi, I., Elmawati, D., & Sunardi, S. (2019). Discovery Learning Method for Training Critical Thinking Skills of Students. European Journal of Education Studies. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3345924

Gibson, H. L., & Chase, C. (2002). Longitudinal Impact of an Inquiry-Based Science Program on Middle School Students' Attitudes Toward Science. Science Education, 86(5), 693-705. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10039

Harahap, M. B., Manurung, S. R., Marbun, M. A., & Mihardi, S. (2016). Effect Model Inquiry Training on Student’s Science Process Skill. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 3(11), 38-42. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.311.2288

Idiege, K., Nja, C. O., & Ugwu, A. N. (2017). Development of Science Process Skills Among Nigerian Secondary School Science Students and Pupils: An Opinion. International Journal of Chemistry Education, 1(2), 013-021. Retrieved from https://shorturl.at/rlLO3

Ilma, S., Al-Muhdhar, M. H. I., Rohman, F., & Saptasari, M. (2020). The Correlation between Science Process Skills and Biology Cognitive Learning Outcome of Senior High School Students. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 6(1), 55-64. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v6i1.10794

Inayah, A. D., Ristanto, R. H., Sigit, D. V., & Miarsyah, M. (2020). Analysis of Science Process Skills in Senior High School Students. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 15-22. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081803

Irhasyuarna, Y., Kusasi, M., Fahmi, F., Fajeriadi, H., Aulia, W. R., Nikmah, S., & Rahili, Z. (2022). Integrated Science Teaching Materials with Local Wisdom Insights to Improve Students' Critical Thinking Ability. BIO-INOVED: Jurnal Biologi-Inovasi Pendidikan, 4(3), 328-334. http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/bino.v4i3.14148

Irwanto, R., & Prodjosantoso, A. K. (2018). Undergraduate Students’ Science Process Skills in Terms of Some Variables: A Perspective from Indonesia. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(5), 751. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/18.17.751

Iswatun, I., Mosik, M., & Subali, B. (2017). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing untuk Meningkatkan KPS dan Hasil Belajar Siswa SMP Kelas VIII. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 3(2), 150-160. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v3i2.14871

Jack, G. U. (2018). Chemistry Students’ Science Process Skills Acquisition: Influence of Gender and Class Size. Global Research in Higher Education, 1(1), 80-97. https://doi.org/10.22158/grhe.v1n1p80

Koksal, E. A., & Berberoglu, G. (2012). The Effect of Guided-Inquiry Instruction on 6th Grade Turkish Students Achievement, Science Process Skill and Attitudes Toward Science. International Journal of Science Education, 36, 66-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.721942

Lati, W., Supasorn, S., & Promarak, V. (2012). Enhancement of Learning Achievement and Integrated Science Process Skills Using Science Inquiry Learning Activities of Chemical Reaction Rates. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 4471-4475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.279

Limatahu, I., Wasis, W., Sutoyo, S., & Prahani, B. K. (2018). Development of CCDSR Teaching Model to Improve Science Process Skills of Pre-Service Physics Teachers. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(5). https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/18.17.812

Lindquist, W. P. (2001). A Case Study of Online Collaborative Inquiry in an Elementary Classroom (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Minnesota.

Maison, M., Darmaji, D., Astalini, A., Kurniawan, D. D. A., & Indrawati, P. S. (2019). Science Process Skills and Motivation. Humanities & Social Science Reviews, 7(5), 47-56. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.756

Martin-Hansen, L. M. (2005). Crayfish Investigations: Inquiry in Action for Grades 4-8. Science Activities, 41(4), 3-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/00368120109603608

Molefe, L., & Aubin, J.-B. (2021). Pre-Service Teachers’ Views About Ecosystem-Based Fieldwork in Terms of the Nature of Environmental Education, Investigations, Skills, and Processes. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 20(4). https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/21.20.622

Molefe, L., & Aubin, J.-B. (2023). A Nexus of Scientific Investigations, Science Process Skills, and Sustainable Development Goals: Pre-Service Teachers’ Views Concerning Mangroves Fieldwork. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 22(4). https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/23.22.682

Mutlu, M., & Temiz, B. K. (2013). Science Process Skills of Students Having Field Dependent and Field Independent Cognitive Styles. Educational Research and Reviews, 8(11), 766. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2017.812132

Norhasanah, N., Yusuf, F. N., & Suherdi, D. (2022). EFL Learners’ Preferences and Perspectives on Learning Styles. Language Literacy: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Language Teaching, 6(2), 382-399. https://doi.org/10.30743/ll.v6i2.6172

Nuangchaleum, P., & Thammasena, B. (2009). Cognitive Development, Analytical Thinking and Learning Satisfaction of Second Grade Students Learning Though Inquiry-Based Learning. Asia Social Science, 5(10). https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v5n10p82

Ogan-Bekiroglu, F., & Arslan, A. (2014). Examination of the Effects of Model-Based Inquiry on Students’ Outcomes: Scientific Process Skills and Conceptual Knowledge. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 1187-1191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.202

Osman, K., & Vebrianto, R. (2013). Fostering Science Process Skills and Improving Achievement Through the Use of Multiple Media. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/13.12.191

Ozgelen, S. (2012). Students’ Science Process Skills Within a Cognitive Domain Framework. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 8(4), 283-292. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2012.846a

Ping, I. L. L., Halim, L., & Osman, K. (2020). Explicit Teaching of Scientific Argumentation as an Approach in Developing Argumentation Skills, Science Process Skills and Biology Understanding. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.276

Prayitno, B. A., Corebima, D., Susilo, H., Zubaidah, S., & Ramli, M. (2017). Closing the Science Process Skills Gap between Students with High and Low Level Academic Achievement. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/17.16.266

Putri, M. H., Fahmi, F., & Wahyuningsih, E. (2021). Efektivitas Perangkat Pembelajaran IPA untuk Melatihkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik SMP pada Materi Pokok Listrik Statis. Journal of Banua Science Education, 1(2), 79-84. https://doi.org/10.20527/jbse.v1i2.13

Qing, Z., Jing, G., & Yan, W. (2010). Promoting Preservice Teachers’ Critical Thinking Skills by Inquiry-Based Chemical Experiment. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4597-4603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.737

Rahayu, A. B., Hadi, S., Istyadji, M., Zaini, M., Sholahuddin, A., & Fahmi, F. (2018). Development of Guided Inquiry Based Learning Devices to Improve Student Learning Outcomes in Science Materials in Middle School. European Journal of Alternative Education Studies. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2261027

Saban, Y., Aydoğdu, B., & Elmas, R. (2019). Achievement and Gender Effects on 5th Grader's Acquisition of Science Process Skills in a Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Neighborhood. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/19.18.607

Sanjaya, W. (2011). Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media.

Schwartz, J. L. (2007). The Enactment of Tasks in a Fifth Grade Classroom (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Arizona.

Shahali, E. H. M., & Halim, L. (2010). Development and Validation of a Test of Integrated Science Process Skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 142-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.127

Simsek, P., & Kabapinar, F. (2010). The Effects of Inquiry-Based Learning on Elemantary Student Conceptual Understanding of Matter, Scientific Process Skills and Science Attitudes. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1190-1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.170

Stout, B. (2001). Tools for Scientific Inquiry in a Fifth-Grade Classroom. Primary Voices, 10(1), 23-27. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ630706

Sugiarti, S., & Ratnaningdyah, D. (2020). Improvement of Science Process Skills Through Discovery Learning Model in Physics Education Students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 5(2), 69-74. https://doi.org/10.26740/jppipa.v5n2.p69-74

Sullivan, F. R. (2008). Robotics and Science Literacy: Thinking Skills, Science Process Skills and Systems Understanding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(3), 373-394. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20238

Wu, H-K., & Hsieh, C. E. (2006). Developing Sixth Grader's Inquiry Skills to Construct Explanations in Inquiry-Based Learning Environments. International Journal of Science Education, 28(11), 1289-1313. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600621035

Zorluoğlu, S. L., Önder, E. Y., Timur, B., Timur, S., Güvenç, E., Özergun, I., & Özdemir, M. (2022). The Scope of Science Process Skills and the 5e Educational Model in Science Education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 21(6). https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/22.21.1101

Author Biographies

Fahmi, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

Hery Fajeriadi, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

Yudha Irhasyuarna, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

Yuyun Eka Yulianti, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

Muhammad Kusasi, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Fahmi, Hery Fajeriadi, Yudha Irhasyuarna, Yuyun Eka Yulianti, Muhammad Kusasi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).