Development of Physics Teaching Materials Based on Sets (Science, Environment, Technology, and Society) to Improve Student Creativity
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v10i12.8774Published:
2024-12-20Issue:
Vol. 10 No. 12 (2024): In ProgressKeywords:
Increasing Creativity, Physics Teaching Materials, SETS-based, Teaching MaterialsResearch Articles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
This research is Research and Development (R&D). The development is carried out by referring to the 4D model. The 4D stages include the define, design, develop and disseminate stages. This development research aims to: produce SETS (science, environment, technology, and society-based physics teaching materials to improve students' creativity that meet valid criteria; produce SETS-based physics teaching materials to improve students' creativity that meet practical criteria; describe the effectiveness of using SETS-based physics teaching materials to improve students' creativity that has been developed. The instruments used in this study were SETS-based teaching material validation sheets, practitioner assessment questionnaires, namely physics subject teachers, and creativity test instruments. The criteria for the practicality of the physics teaching module are seen from the assessment of practitioners (physics teachers), and the criteria for increasing creativity after the application of SETS-based physics teaching materials are seen from the increase in students' creativity test results. Based on the analysis results, it was obtained that: SETS-based physics teaching materials developed based on expert assessment using the Aiken V index analysis were declared valid and feasible to use; SETS-based physics teaching materials reviewed from practitioner assessments were in the very practical category; the effectiveness of increasing student creativity after using SETS-based physics teaching materials analyzed with N-gain of 72% was in the effective criteria.
References
Abdulrahaman, M. D., Faruk, N., Oloyede, A. A., Surajudeen-Bakinde, N. T., Olawoyin, L. A., Mejabi, O. V., Imam-Fulani, Y. O., Fahm, A. O., & Azeez, A. L. (2020). Multimedia tools in the teaching and learning processes: A systematic review. Heliyon, 6(11), e05312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05312
Abubakar, A. M., Elrehail, H., Alatailat, M. A., & Elçi, A. (2019). Knowledge management, decision-making style and organizational performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4(2), 104–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2017.07.003
Arifani, L. I., Isnaeni*, W., Ellianawati, E., & Khulafa, F. N. (2024). Development of STREAM-Based Learning Media to Improve Students’ Science Literacy on The Matter Forms of Substances and Its Changes. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 12(3), 547–560. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v12i3.38024
Arisa, N. A., Hakim, L., & Lefudin, L. (2022). Development of Inquiry-Based Physics Learning Modules on Linear Motion Materials for Senior High School Students. Physics Education Research Journal, 4(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.21580/perj.2022.4.2.11188
Asmiliyah, A., Khaerudin, K., & Solihatin, E. (2021). Mobile Learning with STEM Approach in Physics Learning. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 5(4), 606. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v5i4.34275
Astutik, S., & Prahani, B. K. (2018). Developing Teaching Material for Physics Based on Collaborative Creativity Learning (CCL) Model to Improve Scientific Creativity of Junior High School Students. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika Dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 8(2), 91. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v8n2.p91-105
Banda, H. J., & Nzabahimana, J. (2023). The Impact of Physics Education Technology (PhET) Interactive Simulation-Based Learning on Motivation and Academic Achievement Among Malawian Physics Students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(1), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-10010-3
Bao, L., & Koenig, K. (2019). Physics education research for 21st century learning. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0007-8
Battiston, F., Cencetti, G., Iacopini, I., Latora, V., Lucas, M., Patania, A., Young, J.-G., & Petri, G. (2020). Networks beyond pairwise interactions: Structure and dynamics. Physics Reports, 874, 1–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2020.05.004
Berlian, M., Vebrianto, R., & Syafaren, A. (2021). Strengthening the Twenty-first Century Skills of University Students in Facing ASEAN Economic Community. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(3), 1633–1642. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i3.535
Cheung, G. W., Cooper-Thomas, H. D., Lau, R. S., & Wang, L. C. (2024). Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 41(2), 745–783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-023-09871-y
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
Dwikoranto, D. (2022). The Effectiveness of the Entrepreneurship MBKM Lecture Model: Alternatives to Improve Student Creativity Competencies during the Pandemic Covid-19. Prisma Sains : Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 10(2), 327. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v10i2.4993
Dwivedi, Y. K., Ismagilova, E., Hughes, D. L., Carlson, J., Filieri, R., Jacobson, J., Jain, V., Karjaluoto, H., Kefi, H., Krishen, A. S., Kumar, V., Rahman, M. M., Raman, R., Rauschnabel, P. A., Rowley, J., Salo, J., Tran, G. A., & Wang, Y. (2021). Setting the future of digital and social media marketing research: Perspectives and research propositions. International Journal of Information Management, 59, 102168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102168
Falcon, S., Admiraal, W., & Leon, J. (2023). Teachers’ engaging messages and the relationship with students’ performance and teachers’ enthusiasm. Learning and Instruction, 86, 101750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2023.101750
Farida, I., & Setiawan, D. (2022). Business Strategies and Competitive Advantage: The Role of Performance and Innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(3), 163. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8030163
Gitadewi, A. J., Prabowo, Supardi, Z. A. I., & Maryuni, W. (2022). Student’s Concept Understanding and Motivation to Learn Through Flipped Classroom Learning Integrated with Nested Model. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 3(1), 62–73. https://doi.org/10.46627/silet.v3i1.105
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
Herayanti, L., Habibi, H., & Sukroyanti, B. A. (2023). Development of Inquiry-Based Teaching Materials to Improve the Creativity of Prospective Physics Teachers. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(2), 971–976. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i2.3007
Hidayat, R. K., Novianti, B. A., & Subki, S. (2023). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Fisika Peserta Didik Berbasis Kurikulum Merdeka. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 8(2), 1143–1151. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v8i2.1412
I Nyoman Suparsa, Ida Bagus Nyoman Mantra, Ni Luh Sukanadi, I Nyoman Adi Susrawan, & I Nyoman Suwandi. (2023). A COMPREHENSIVE STUDY ON STUDENTS’ ESSAY WRITING SKILLS. International Journal of Social Science, 2(6), 2429–2434. https://doi.org/10.53625/ijss.v2i6.5542
Landberg, M., & Partsch, M. V. (2023). Perceptions on and attitudes towards lifelong learning in the educational system. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), 100534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100534
Li, Y., Kim, M., & Palkar, J. (2022). Using emerging technologies to promote creativity in education: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 3, 100177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100177
Made Astra, I., Henukh, A., & Uskenat, K. (2023). The effectiveness of STEM-Based Science Teaching Materials in Improving elementary School Students’ Science Literacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2582(1), 012047. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2582/1/012047
Marcinauskas, L., Iljinas, A., Čyvienė, J., & Stankus, V. (2024). Problem-Based Learning versus Traditional Learning in Physics Education for Engineering Program Students. Education Sciences, 14(2), 154. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020154
Ong, S. G. T., & Quek, G. C. L. (2023). Enhancing teacher–student interactions and student online engagement in an online learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 26(3), 681–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-022-09447-5
Parker, R., Thomsen, B. S., & Berry, A. (2022). Learning Through Play at School – A Framework for Policy and Practice. Frontiers in Education, 7, 751801. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.751801
Petropoulos, F., Apiletti, D., Assimakopoulos, V., Babai, M. Z., Barrow, D. K., Ben Taieb, S., Bergmeir, C., Bessa, R. J., Bijak, J., Boylan, J. E., Browell, J., Carnevale, C., Castle, J. L., Cirillo, P., Clements, M. P., Cordeiro, C., Cyrino Oliveira, F. L., De Baets, S., Dokumentov, A., … Ziel, F. (2022). Forecasting: Theory and practice. International Journal of Forecasting, 38(3), 705–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2021.11.001
Pursitasari, I. D., Alfitriyani, N., & Kurniasih, S. (2022). Enhancing Students’ Creative Thinking Skills through Biotechnology Module based Socio-Scientific Issues. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(2), 939–948. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i2.1438
Puyt, R. W., Lie, F. B., & Wilderom, C. P. M. (2023). The origins SWOT analysis. Long Range Planning, 56(3), 102304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2023.102304
Samani, J., & Pan, S. C. (2021). Interleaved practice enhances memory and problem-solving ability in undergraduate physics. Npj Science of Learning, 6(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-021-00110-x
Sarwi, S., Fauziah, N., & Astuti, B. (2018). The analysis of scientific communications and students’ character development through guided inquiry learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983, 012031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012031
Schildkamp, K., Van Der Kleij, F. M., Heitink, M. C., Kippers, W. B., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2020). Formative assessment: A systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice. International Journal of Educational Research, 103, 101602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101602
Seyedhamzeh, S., Nedjat, S., Shakibazadeh, E., Doustmohammadian, A., Hosseini, H., & Dorosty Motlagh, A. (2020). Nutrition labels’ strengths & weaknesses and strategies for improving their use in Iran: A qualitative study. PLOS ONE, 15(10), e0241395. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241395
Sunarti, T., Hariyono, E., Setyarsih, W., Prahani, B. K., & Suyidno, S. (2020). The Impact of Environmental Based Physics Learning on Students’ Concept Mastery and Ecopreneurship Management. Prisma Sains : Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 8(2), 91. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v8i2.3016
Sundari, P. D., Hidayati, Saputra, D., Sari, S. Y., & Anusba, E. B. (2024). Analysis of Teaching Materials Needs for Digital Module Development in Physics Learning: Teachers Perception. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(2), 674–680. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i2.6093
Szukits, Á., & Móricz, P. (2023). Towards data-driven decision making: The role of analytical culture and centralization efforts. Review of Managerial Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00694-1
Tod, D., Booth, A., & Smith, B. (2022). Critical appraisal. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 15(1), 52–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2021.1952471
Wati, W. W., & Syafriani*, S. (2023). Validity of Physics E-Modules Based on an Inquiry Model Integrated with the Science, Environment, Technology, and Society Approach to 21st Century Skills. Jurnal IPA & Pembelajaran IPA, 7(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.24815/jipi.v7i2.30002
Yuliani, H., Ulfah, R. Y., Agustina, E., Al-Huda, A. M., & Qamariah, Z. (2021). Application of generative learning in physics learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1760(1), 012018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1760/1/012018
Author Biographies
Zulfaniar, Universitas Negeri Makassar
Muhammad Arsyad, Universitas Negeri Makassar
Pariabti Palloan, Universitas Negeri Makassar
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Zulfaniar, Muhammad Arsyad, Pariabti Palloan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).