Testing the Construct Validity and Reliability of the Student Learning Interest Scale Using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA)

Authors

Adetia Swarni , Herwin , Sujati

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v10i9.8794

Published:

2024-09-25

Issue:

Vol. 10 No. 9 (2024): September

Keywords:

Confirmatory factor analysis, Construct reliability, Convergent validity, Discriminant validity, Learning interest scale

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Swarni, A., Herwin, & Sujati. (2024). Testing the Construct Validity and Reliability of the Student Learning Interest Scale Using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(9), 6322–6330. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i9.8794
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

Learning interest is one of the determining factors of student learning success. The low interest of students in learning process is caused by several problems that occur. Thus, learning interest is very important in learning progress, namely to bring out students' interest and activeness in learning. To support learning and increase students' interest in learning, teachers should not only master the material but also create interesting learning to help arouse curiosity, enjoyment and interest in learning in them. This study aims to test the validity and reliability of the construct of the developed learning interest scale. A researcher needs 250 to 500 respondents. This study involved 300 random samples of fifth grade elementary school students in Berbah District, Sleman, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Data were analyzed with second-order confirmatory factors assisted by IBM SPSS version 26 software. This study measures the validity and reliability of elementary school students' interest in learning science. So the data analysis in this study measures validity and reliability. So this study uses second order confirmatory factor analysis (nd order CFA). The results showed that the developed learning interest scale had met the criteria of suitability, convergent validity, discriminant validity, construct reliability. Therefore, the developed scale is feasible to use.

References

Ab Hamid, M. R., Sami, W., & Mohmad Sidek, M. H. (2017). Discriminant Validity Assessment: Use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT Criterion. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 890, 012163. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/890/1/012163

Agarwal, V. (2013). Investigating the convergent validity of organizational trust. Journal of Communication Management, 17(1), 24–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/13632541311300133

Andayani, S. A. (2022). Meningkatkan Minat dan Hasil Belajar Bahasa Indonesia melaui Penerapan Belajar Kelompok Siswa Kelas IX.A SMP Negeri 17 Mataram. Junal Pendidikan Dan Sosial Budaya YASIN, 2(6), 871–879. https://doi.org/10.58578/yasin.v2i6.1213

Andira, P. A., Utami, A., Astriana, M., & Walid, A. (2022). Analisis Minat Siswa Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran IPA. Pionir: Jurnal Pendidikan, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.22373/pjp.v11i1.13087

Anggraeni, P., Dadang Sunendar, Bunyamin Maftuh, Wahyu Sopandi, & Ryan Dwi Puspita. (2023). What do Elementary School Teachers Think About 6Cs? Mimbar Ilmu, 28(1), 96–105. https://doi.org/10.23887/mi.v28i1.55857

Bandhu, D., Mohan, M. M., Nittala, N. A. P., Jadhav, P., Bhadauria, A., & Saxena, K. K. (2024). Theories of motivation: A comprehensive analysis of human behavior drivers. Acta Psychologica, 244, 104177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104177

Cheung, G. W., Cooper-Thomas, H. D., Lau, R. S., & Wang, L. C. (2024). Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 41(2), 745–783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-023-09871-y

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Dash, G., & Paul, J. (2021). CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121092

Esmaily, M., Svensson, J. E., Fajardo, S., Birbilis, N., Frankel, G. S., Virtanen, S., Arrabal, R., Thomas, S., & Johansson, L. G. (2017). Fundamentals and advances in magnesium alloy corrosion. Progress in Materials Science, 89, 92–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.04.011

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312

Forsell, J., Forslund Frykedal, K., & Hammar Chiriac, E. (2020). Group Work Assessment: Assessing Social Skills at Group Level. Small Group Research, 51(1), 87–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496419878269

Franke, G., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: A comparison of four procedures. Internet Research, 29(3), 430–447. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-12-2017-0515

Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M.-C. (2000). Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.00407

Hidayat, P. W., & Widjajanti, D. B. (2018). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kreatif dan minat belajar siswa dalam mengerjakan soal open ended dengan pendekatan CTL. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 13(1), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v13i1.21167

Hidi, S. (2006). Interest: A unique motivational variable. Educational Research Review, 1(2), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2006.09.001

Hill, C. R., & Hughes, J. N. (2007). An examination of the convergent and discriminant validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. School Psychology Quarterly, 22(3), 380–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/1045-3830.22.3.380

Hu, Y., & Wansbeek, T. (2017). Measurement error models: Editors’ introduction. Journal of Econometrics, 200(2), 151–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2017.06.001

Igbaria, M., Zinatelli, N., Cragg, P., & Cavaye, A. L. M. (1997). Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model. MIS Quarterly, 21(3), 279. https://doi.org/10.2307/249498

Lee, Y., Cho, Y. H., Park, T., & Choi, J. (2023). Situational interest during individual reading and peer reading activities using PALS: its relationship to students’ reading skills and reading motivations. Educational Studies, 49(5), 842–860. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2021.1898341

Linnenbrink‐Garcia, L., Patall, E. A., & Messersmith, E. E. (2013). Antecedents and consequences of situational interest. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 591–614. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02080.x

Liu, M., Zhao, G., Zhong, Z., Ma, J., & Wang, W. (2024). Theoretical Foundations for Blended Learning. In M. Li, X. Han, & J. Cheng (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Reform Through Blended Learning (pp. 1–44). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6269-3_1

Lusidawaty, V., Fitria, Y., Miaz, Y., & Zikri, A. (2020). Pembelajaran IPA Dengan Strategi Pembelajaran Inkuiri Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains Dan Motivasi Belajar Siswa Di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 4(1), 168–174. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v4i1.333

Mariqueo-Russell, A. (2023). Desire and motivation in desire theories of well-being. Philosophical Studies, 180(7), 1975–1994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-023-01966-y

Nurlia, N., Hala, Y., Muchtar, R., Jumadi, O., & Taiyeb, M. (2017). Hubungan Antara Gaya Belajar, Kemandirian Belajar, dan Minat Belajar dengan Hasil Belajar Biologi Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.24114/jpb.v6i2.6552

Permatasari, B. D., Gunarhadi, & Riyadi. (2019). The influence of problem based learning towards social science learning outcomes viewed from learning interest. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i1.15594

Purnami. (2022). Upaya Mengembangkan Minat Menulis Siswa Melalui Gawai Menuju New Normal. Jurnal Ilmiah WUNY, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/jwuny.v3i2.42634

Roemer, E., Schuberth, F., & Henseler, J. (2021). HTMT2–an improved criterion for assessing discriminant validity in structural equation modeling. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 121(12), 2637–2650. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-02-2021-0082

Rogers, P. (2024). Best practices for your confirmatory factor analysis: A JASP and lavaan tutorial. Behavior Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-024-02375-7

Rönkkö, M., & Cho, E. (2022). An Updated Guideline for Assessing Discriminant Validity. Organizational Research Methods, 25(1), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120968614

Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2017). Interest development: Arousing situational interest affects the growth trajectory of individual interest. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.02.003

Schildkamp, K., Van Der Kleij, F. M., Heitink, M. C., Kippers, W. B., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2020). Formative assessment: A systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice. International Journal of Educational Research, 103, 101602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101602

Setiadi, H. (2016). Pelaksanaan penilaian pada Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2), 166–178. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i2.7173

Smiderle, R., Rigo, S. J., Marques, L. B., Peçanha De Miranda Coelho, J. A., & Jaques, P. A. (2020). The impact of gamification on students’ learning, engagement and behavior based on their personality traits. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-019-0098-x

Suwanto, E. (2022). Membangkitkan Minat Belajar Matematika dengan Media Pembelajaran Interatif. SCIENCE : Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika Dan IPA, 2(1), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.51878/science.v2i1.918

Tashie-Lewis, B. C., & Nnabuife, S. G. (2021). Hydrogen Production, Distribution, Storage and Power Conversion in a Hydrogen Economy—A Technology Review. Chemical Engineering Journal Advances, 8, 100172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceja.2021.100172

Yunitasari, R., & Hanifah, U. (2020). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Daring terhadap Minat Belajar Siswa pada Masa Covid 19. Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 2(3), 232–243. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v2i3.142

Yuwanita, I., Dewi, H. I., & Wicaksono, D. (2020). Pengaruh Metode Pembelajaran Dan Gaya Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA. Instruksional, 1(2), 152. https://doi.org/10.24853/instruksional.1.2.152-158

Zekarias, A. P. (2023). Contributions and controversies of self-assessment to the development of writing skill. Journal of Research in Instructional, 3(1), 13–30. https://doi.org/10.30862/jri.v3i1.94

Zhang, H. M., Peh, L. S., & Wang, Y. H. (2014). Servo Motor Control System and Method of Auto-Detection of Types of Servo Motors. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 496–500, 1510–1515. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.496-500.1510

Author Biographies

Adetia Swarni, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Herwin, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Sujati, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Adetia Swarni, Herwin, Sujati

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).