Formative Assessment on Science Learning to Improve the Quality of Learning in Curriculum Merdeka
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v10i10.9029Published:
2024-10-25Issue:
Vol. 10 No. 10 (2024): October : In ProgressKeywords:
Curriculum merdeka, Elementary school, Formative assessment, Learning assessment, Learning modulesResearch Articles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
Formative assessment is a learning assessment whose target is formative and aims to evaluate the learning process. In reality, there are still many teachers who have not implemented formative assessment optimally in science learning. Formative assessments conducted in the middle, end, or throughout learning aim to determine student progress while providing quick feedback to teachers, for example regarding student understanding of the material. This study aims to find out the things that educators need to prepare and how they carry it out. The research method used a descriptive method with a qualitative approach, through distributing questionnaires and interviews. The target respondents were elementary school teachers who teach grade VI students. The data that has been collected is then processed using a Likert scale. The results showed that what needs to be prepared by teachers to conduct formative assessment in science subjects is a clear understanding of concepts, and prepare the three stages of formative assessment carefully. Based on the results of the questionnaire, teachers are still not optimal in the information-gathering and action-taking stages. Ways that can be done to implement formative assessment in improving the quality of learning, can be started from the preparation of the right learning module.
References
Adinda, A. H., Siahaan, H. E., Raihani, I. F., Aprida, N., Fitri, N., & Suryanda, A. (2021). Summative Assessment and Formative Assessment of Online Learning. Report of Biological Education, 2(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.37150/rebion.v2i1.1024
Alic, S., Demszky, D., Mancenido, Z., Liu, J., Hill, H., & Jurafsky, D. (2022). Computationally Identifying Funneling and Focusing Questions in Classroom Discourse (Version 1). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2208.04715
Amaliyah, A., Ramadhan, G., Mustafa, L., & Nur Cahyani, T. (2022). Student Learning Activity Analysis on Building Space Materials. Progres Pendidikan, 3(2), 98–107. https://doi.org/10.29303/prospek.v3i2.247
Andersson, C., & Palm, T. (2017). Characteristics of improved formative assessment practice. Education Inquiry, 8(2), 104–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2016.1275185
Anharuddin, M. `Izza M., & Fatonah, S. (2023). Analysis of The Nature of Science in Class IV Thematic Curriculum 2013 Books. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(4), 2075–2081. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i4.3443
Astiantih, S., & Akfan, S. S. (2023). Utilizing Concept Maps to Enhance Students’ Writing Skills. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 11(3), 433. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v11i3.7993
Barr, M. (2018). Student attitudes to games-based skills development: Learning from video games in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.030
Brinia, V., Selimi, P., Dimos, A., & Kondea, A. (2022). The Impact of Communication on the Effectiveness of Educational Organizations. Education Sciences, 12(3), 170. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030170
Broadbent, J., Panadero, E., & Boud, D. (2018). Implementing summative assessment with a formative flavor: A case study in a large class. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(2), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1343455
Chen, P. P., & Bonner, S. M. (2020). A framework for classroom assessment, learning, and self-regulation. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(4), 373–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2019.1619515
Chirumalla, K. (2021). Building digitally-enabled process innovation in the process industries: A dynamic capabilities approach. Technovation, 105, 102256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102256
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
Dominguez, S., & Svihla, V. (2023). A review of teacher-implemented scaffolding in K-12. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), 100613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100613
Erlinawati, E., & Muslimah, M. (2021). Test Validity and Reliability in Learning Evaluation. Bulletin of Community Engagement, 1(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.51278/bce.v1i1.96
Fischer, J., Bearman, M., Boud, D., & Tai, J. (2024). How does assessment drive learning? A focus on student’s development of evaluative judgment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(2), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2206986
Hansen, G., & Ringdal, R. (2018). Formative assessment as a future step in maintaining the mastery approach and performance-avoidance goal stability. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 56, 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.11.005
Harris, R., & Clayton, B. (2019). The current emphasis is on learning outcomes. International Journal of Training Research, 17(2), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/14480220.2019.1644777
Ismail, S. M., Rahul, D. R., Patra, I., & Rezvani, E. (2022). Formative vs. summative assessment: Impacts on academic motivation, attitude toward learning, test anxiety, and self-regulation skill. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00191-4
Khong, T. D. H., Saito, E., Hardy, I., & Gillies, R. (2023). Teachers learn through dialogue with colleagues, self, and students. Educational Research, 65(2), 170–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2023.2192226
Kuo, Y.-C., Lin, H.-C. K., Lin, Y.-H., Wang, T.-H., & Chuang, B.-Y. (2023). The Influence of Distance Education and Peer Self-Regulated Learning Mechanism on Learning Effectiveness, Motivation, Self-Efficacy, Reflective Ability, and Cognitive Load. Sustainability, 15(5), 4501. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054501
Leite, L. O., Go, W., & Havu-Nuutinen, S. (2022). Exploring the Learning Process of Experienced Teachers Focused on Building Positive Interactions with Pupils. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 66(1), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2020.1833237
Mahdi, K. (2024). Class XI Students’ Science Literacy Ability Profile on Biology Material In MAN 1 Kolaka. Journal of Digital Learning and Distance Education, 3(2), 975–980. https://doi.org/10.56778/jdlde.v3i2.277
Maker, C. J., & Zimmerman, R. H. (2020). Concept Maps as Assessments of Expertise: Understanding of the Complexity and Interrelationships of Concepts in Science. Journal of Advanced Academics, 31(3), 254–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X20921770
Monteiro, V., Mata, L., & Santos, N. N. (2021). Assessment Conceptions and Practices: Perspectives of Primary School Teachers and Students. Frontiers in Education, 6, 631185. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.631185
Mundelsee, L., & Jurkowski, S. (2021). Think and pair before share: Effects of collaboration on students’ in-class participation. Learning and Individual Differences, 88, 102015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102015
Murphy, D. H., Little, J. L., & Bjork, E. L. (2023). The Value of Using Tests in Education as Tools for Learning—Not Just for Assessment. Educational Psychology Review, 35(3), 89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09808-3
Muslim, M., Rustaman, N. Y., Siahaan, P., Liliawati, W., & Efendi, R. (2023). Implementation of Participatory Training Model to Develop Teachers’ Ability to Design Formative Assessment Instruments in Science Learning. Jurnal IPA & Pembelajaran IPA, 7(1), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.24815/jipi.v7i1.29657
Näsström, G., Andersson, C., Granberg, C., Palm, T., & Palmberg, B. (2021). Changes in Student Motivation and Teacher Decision Making When Implementing a Formative Assessment Practice. Frontiers in Education, 6, 616216. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.616216
Pals, F. F. B., Tolboom, J. L. J., & Suhre, C. J. M. (2023). Formative Assessment Strategies by Monitoring Science Students’ Problem-Solving Skill Development. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 23(4), 644–663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-023-00296-9
Petropoulos, F., Apiletti, D., Assimakopoulos, V., Babai, M. Z., Barrow, D. K., Ben Taieb, S., Bergmeir, C., Bessa, R. J., Bijak, J., Boylan, J. E., Browell, J., Carnevale, C., Castle, J. L., Cirillo, P., Clements, M. P., Cordeiro, C., Cyrino Oliveira, F. L., De Baets, S., Dokumentov, A., … Ziel, F. (2022). Forecasting: Theory and practice. International Journal of Forecasting, 38(3), 705–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2021.11.001
Power, J. R., & Tanner, D. (2023). Peer assessment, self-assessment, and resultant feedback: An examination of feasibility and reliability. European Journal of Engineering Education, 48(4), 615–628. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2023.2185769
Reynders, G., Lantz, J., Ruder, S. M., Stanford, C. L., & Cole, R. S. (2020). Rubrics to assess critical thinking and information processing in undergraduate STEM courses. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00208-5
Schildkamp, K., Van Der Kleij, F. M., Heitink, M. C., Kippers, W. B., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2020). Formative assessment: A systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice. International Journal of Educational Research, 103, 101602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101602
Swiecki, Z., Khosravi, H., Chen, G., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Lodge, J. M., Milligan, S., Selwyn, N., & Gašević, D. (2022). Assessment in the age of artificial intelligence. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100075
Van Der Steen, J., Van Schilt-Mol, T., Van Der Vleuten, C., & Joosten-ten Brinke, D. (2023). Designing Formative Assessment That Improves Teaching and Learning: What Can Be Learned from the Design Stories of Experienced Teachers? Journal of Formative Design in Learning, 7(2), 182–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-023-00080-w
Wang, B. (2023). Exploring information processing as a new research orientation beyond cognitive operations and their management in interpreting studies: Taking stock and looking forward. Perspectives, 31(6), 996–1013. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2023.2200955
Xu, X., Shen, W., Islam, A. Y. M. A., & Zhou, Y. (2023). A whole learning process-oriented formative assessment framework to cultivate complex skills. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 653. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02200-0
Yan, Z., & Carless, D. (2022). Self-assessment is about more than self: The enabling role of feedback literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(7), 1116–1128. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.2001431
Yan, Z., Wang, X., Boud, D., & Lao, H. (2023). The effect of self-assessment on academic performance and the role of explicitness: A meta-analysis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.2012644
Yusop, S. R. M., Rasul, M. S., Mohamad Yasin, R., Hashim, H. U., & Jalaludin, N. A. (2022). An Assessment Approaches and Learning Outcomes in Technical and Vocational Education: A Systematic Review Using PRISMA. Sustainability, 14(9), 5225. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095225
Author Biographies
Jenny I S Poerwanti, Universitas Sebelas Maret
Sri Marmoah, Universitas Sebelas Maret
Supianto, Universitas Sebelas Maret
Sukarno, Universitas Sebelas Maret
Hasan Mahfud, Universitas Sebelas Maret
Siti Istiyati, Universitas Sebelas Maret
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jenny I S Poerwanti, Sri Marmoah, Supianto, Sukarno, Hasan Mahfud, Siti Istiyati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
