Development of Thematic Learning Using the Field-Trip Method Assisted by the Surrounding Environment to Improve Students' Scientific Literacy Abilities

Authors

Sri Luah , Parmin Parmin , Widiasih Widiasih

DOI:

10.29303/jppipa.v11i1.9355

Published:

2025-01-26

Issue:

Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025): In Progress

Keywords:

field trip, Scientific literacy abilities, Surrounding environment, Thematic learning

Research Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Luah, S., Parmin, P., & Widiasih, W. (2025). Development of Thematic Learning Using the Field-Trip Method Assisted by the Surrounding Environment to Improve Students’ Scientific Literacy Abilities. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(1), 432–445. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i1.9355

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to produce learning tools with a field-trip learning method assisted by the surrounding environment to improve students' scientific literacy skills. The learning tool developed in this class VI material has the theme of saving living things with the subtheme of plants, friends. Development device learning refers to the Borg & Gall model which consists of 7 steps. Thematic learning tools with the field-trip method assisted by the surrounding environment were validated by 3 expert validators in the fields of science, language and instructional design learning so that results that met the following valid success criteria were obtained: Syllabus 4.48 (very good category), RPP 3.95 (good category), student teaching materials 3.81 (good category), and LKS 4.35 (very good category). The results of the effectiveness test of the learning tool were carried out on grade VI students of SDN Dampyak 02, resulting in an increase in scientific literacy skills of 4.14 (good category). Effectiveness was also obtained when teachers managed learning by 4.56 (very good category). The level of practicality of the field trip method during learning was 4.14 (good category), 4.30 (very good category). Thus, the overall learning tools of the field trip method developed are valid, effective, and practical.

References

Abdullateef, S. T., Musa Alsheikh, R., & Khalifa Ibrahim Mohammed, B. (2023). Making Saudi vision 2030 a reality through educational transformation at the university level. Labour and Industry, 33(2), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/10301763.2023.2184166

Adnan, A., Mulbar, U., & Bahri, A. (2021). Scientific literacy skills of students: Problem of biology teaching in junior high school in south sulawesi, indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 847–860. Retrieved from https://eprints.unm.ac.id/24285/

Aikenhead, G. (2002). Renegotiating the culture of school science: scientific literacy for an informed public. Recuperado De. Retrieved from https://shorturl.asia/jU3Gi

Altun, A., & Kalkan, Ö. K. (2021). Cross-national study on students and school factors affecting science literacy. Educational Studies, 47(4), 403–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2019.1702511

Amala, I. A., Sutarto, S., Putra, P. D. A., & Indrawati, I. (2023). Analysis of Scientific Literacy Ability Junior High School Students in Science Learning on Environmental Pollution. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(3), 1001–1005. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i3.1816

Anggoro, S., Fitriati, A., Thoe, N. K., Talib, C. A., & Mareza, L. (2024). Differentiated instruction based on multiple intelligences as promising joyful and meaningful learning. Int J Eval & Res Educ ISSN, 2252(8822), 1195. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i2.24791

Anshar, M. A., Rahayu, Y. S., Erman, E., Karimah, K., & Rofiq, A. (2023). The Analysis of Umar Masud Junior High School Studentsâ€TM Science Literacy Ability. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(2), 926–930. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i2.2667

Apriliyani, P., Susantini, E., & Yuliani, Y. (2023). Validity of Science Literacy on the Respiratory System in Indonesia’s Merdeka Curriculum. IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 4(2), 163–175. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v4i2.297

Arsjad, R. H., Hulukati, W., Djafri, N., & Rahim, M. (2023). Management of Project-Based Learning and Case-Based Learning in Guidance and Counseling Lessons. International Journal of Professional Business Review: Int. J. Prof. Bus. Rev., 8(7), 103. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i7.2851

Aydin, H. (2019). The effect of multiple intelligence (s) on academic success: A systematic review and meta-analysis. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(12), em1777. Retrieved from https://www.ejmste.com/article/the-effect-of-multiple-intelligences-on-academic-success-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis-7736

Batdı, V. (2017). The effect of multiple intelligences on academic achievement: A meta-analytic and thematic study. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 17(6). Retrieved from https://jestp.com/menuscript/index.php/estp/article/view/415

Bórquez-Sánchez, E. (2024). Scientific literacy in biology and attitudes towards science in the Chilean education system. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2024.2320104

Buasuwan, P., Suebnusorn, W., Butkatunyoo, O., Manowaluilou, N., Kaewchinda, M., Lalitpasan, U., Srilapo, N., Sarnswang, S., Suksiri, W., & Wiboonuppatham, R. (2022). Re-envisioning a “skills framework” to meet 21st century demands: What do young people need? Frontiers in Education, 7, 1004748. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1004748

Cansız, M., & Cansız, N. (2019). Reconceptualizing and field testing the scientific literacy framework by exploring the aspect of scientific literacy in Turkish science curriculum. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 18(5), 681–691. Retrieved from https://openaccess.artvin.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/11494/2545

Çelik, M., & Doğru, M. (2024). Development of an attitude scale towards science literacy for secondary school pupils. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 21(2), 304–323. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2024.017

Costa, A. M., Ferreira, M. E., & da Silva Loureiro, M. J. (2021). Scientific literacy: The conceptual framework prevailing over the first decade of the twenty-first century. Revista Colombiana de Educación, 81, 195–228. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?pid=S0120-39162021000100195&script=sci_arttext

Dalaila, I., Widiyaningrum, P., & Saptono, S. (2022). Developing e-module based on socio-scientific issues to improve students scientific literacy. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 11(3), 285–294. https://doi.org/10.15294/jise.v10i1.54500

Dharin, A., Budiningsih, C. A., & Nurwangid, M. (2024). Developing of Multiple Intelligences-Based Elementary School Learning Kits To Improve Student Creativity. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 18(7), e05474–e05474. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n7-016

Fakhriyah, F., Masfuah, S., Roysa, M., Rusilowati, A., & Rahayu, E. S. (2017). Student’s science literacy in the aspect of content science? Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i1.7245

Fatmawati, B., & Khotimah, H. (2023). Assessing the scientific literacy of prospective biology teachers. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(5), 2701–2706. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i5.3526

Ferrero, M., Vadillo, M. A., & León, S. P. (2021). A valid evaluation of the theory of multiple intelligences is not yet possible: Problems of methodological quality for intervention studies. Intelligence, 88, 101566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2021.101566

Fitriani, R. (2023). Development of environmental pollution e-module containing socio scientific issue to train students’ scientific literacy. Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 3(1), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.15294/jese.v3i1.59915

Foo, S. C., & Foo, K. K. (2022). Purposeful field trip: Impact on experiential learning opportunities and critical thinking skills. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 30(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.30.1.01

Gope, D., & Gope, A. (2022). Students and academicians views on the engineering curriculum and industrial skills requirement for a successful job career. Open Education Studies, 4(1), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2022-0011

Guerrero, G. R., & Torres‐Olave, B. (2022). Scientific literacy and agency within the Chilean science curriculum: A critical discourse analysis. The Curriculum Journal, 33(3), 410–426. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.141

Hacıemınoglu, E. (2019). Student and School Level Variables related to Elementary School Students’ Attitudes towards Science. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 19(80), 59–88. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ejer/issue/43338/548894

Hadiprayitno, G., Kusmiyati, K., Lestari, A., Lukitasari, M., & Sukri, A. (2021). Blended Learning Station-Rotation Model: Does it Impact on Preservice Teachers’ Scientific Literacy? Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(3), 317–324. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7i3.676

Harishree, C., & Mekala, S. (2020). Need for 21st century skills education for teachers. Roots International Journal of Multidisciplinary Researches, 7(1), 45–52. Retrieved from https://shorturl.asia/Og94J

Ismail, I., Permanasari, A., & Setiawan, W. (2016). STEM virtual lab: An alternative practical media to enhance student’s scientific literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(2), 239–246. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i2.5492

Karataş, F. Ö., Orçan, F., Çelik, S., Uludüz, Ş. M., Bektaş, B. T., & Akaygün, S. (2022). Perception and Reality: Two Dimensions of Scientific Literacy Measures. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(1), 129–143. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2022.114

Lederman, N. G. (2018). The ever changing contextualization of nature of science: Recent science education reform documents in the US and its impact on the achievement of scientific literacy. Enseñanza De Las Ciencias, 36(2), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.2661

Luengvilai, C., Wongta, N., & Yodmongkol, P. (2021). Design and Application of a Legal Game to Promote Factual Investigation Knowledge for Undergraduate Law Students. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 29(1). Retrieved from http://journals-jd.upm.edu.my/resources/files/Pertanika PAPERS/JSSH Vol. 29 (1) Mar. 2021/39 JSSH-5404-2019.pdf

Ma, Y. (2023). The effect of inquiry-based practices on scientific literacy: The mediating role of science attitudes. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(7), 2045–2066. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10336-9

Mahmud, M. M., & Wong, S. F. (2022a). Digital age: The importance of 21st century skills among the undergraduates. Frontiers in Education, 7, 950553. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.950553

Mahmud, M. M., & Wong, S. F. (2022b). Stakeholder’s perspectives of the twenty-first century skills. Frontiers in Education, 7, 931488. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.931488

McGunagle, D., & Zizka, L. (2020). Employability skills for 21st-century STEM students: the employers’ perspective. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 10(3), 591–606. https://doi.org/10.1108/heswbl-10-2019-0148

Mudzar, B. M., Muzdalifah, N., & Chew, K. W. (2022). Change in Labour Force Skillset for the Fourth Industrial Revolution: A Literature Review. International Journal of Technology, 13(5). https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v13i5.5875

Norambuena-Meléndez, M., Guerrero, G. R., & González-Weil, C. (2023). What is meant by scientific literacy in the curriculum? A comparative analysis between Bolivia and Chile. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 18(3), 937–958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-023-10190-3

Nuryanti, T., Pursitasari, I. D., & Rubini, B. (2023). Science Literacy Profile of Junior High School Students on Climate Change Material. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(11), 9391–9396. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.5208

Nwedu, C. N. (2018). Taking Clinical Legal Education from Classrooms to Streets: A Practical Perspective to Solving Social Problems. Asian Journal of Legal Education, 5(2), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/2322005818768683

Octaviani, L., Ismail, I., & Akmalia, H. A. (2023). The Development of Biology E-Module Based on Unity of Sciences and Science Literacy as Teaching Materials for Students in Senior High School. Al Kawnu: Science and Local Wisdom Journal, 3(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.18592/ak.v3i1.10884

Omeodu, M. D., & Abara, J. F. (2018). Relevance of field trips in teaching and learning of physics in secondary schools in Port Harcourt Metropolis Rivers State. International Journal of Education and Evaluation, 4(4), 67–87. Retrieved from https://shorturl.asia/FmTO8

Pandya, B., Patterson, L., & Ruhi, U. (2022). The readiness of workforce for the world of work in 2030: perceptions of university students. International Journal of Business Performance Management, 23(1–2), 54–75. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBPM.2022.119555

Pérez-Rodríguez, F., Guerrero, G. R., & Donoso-Díaz, S. (2024). Scientific culture in the normative and curriculum documents of Initial Teacher Education in Chile. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-024-10226-2

Riyadi, R. A., Nur, M., & Ismayati, E. (2015). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Berbasis E-Learning Moodle dengan Model Pengajaran Langsung di SMKN 2 Tarakan [State University of Surabaya]. Retrieved from https://shorturl.asia/AYTqo

Roberts, F., Hobbs, H., Jessop, H., Bozzolini, C., Burman, J., Greco, R., Ismail, A., Kazmi, M., Kirgizov, K., & Mancardi, G. (2020). Rehabilitation before and after autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS): consensus guidelines and recommendations for best clinical practice on behalf of the Autoimmune Diseases Working Party. Frontiers in Neurology, 11, 556141. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.556141

Saari, A., Rasul, M. S., Yasin, R. M., Rauf, R. A. A., Ashari, Z. H. M., & Pranita, D. (2021). Skills sets for workforce in the 4th industrial revolution: Expectation from authorities and industrial players. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 13(2), 1–9. Retrieved from https://publisher.uthm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/JTET/article/view/7830

Samarawickrema, G., & Raponi, K. (2020). A field trip in the first week at university: perspectives from our LLB students. The Law Teacher, 54(1), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2018.1547030

Satpathy, S., Dash, K. K., & Mohapatra, M. (2020). A study on the new design thinking for industrial revolution 4.0, requirements and graduate readiness. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v12n4.09

Sinaga, P., Kaniawati, I., & Setiawan, A. (2017). Improving secondary school students’ scientific literacy ability through the design of better science textbooks. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(4), 92–107. https://doi.org/10.36681/

Srichaitung, P., Wuttisela, K., & Supasorn, S. (2024). Science Learning Management and Learning Skills Development for the 21st Century Learners. Journal of Science and Science Education Vol, 7(2). Retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JSSE/article/download/269282/183217/1105115

Stylos, G., Siarka, O., & Kotsis, K. T. (2023). Assessing Greek pre-service primary teachers’ scientific literacy. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(2), 271–282. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/12637

Tight, M. (2021). Twenty-first century skills: meaning, usage and value. European Journal of Higher Education, 11(2), 160–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2020.1835517

Turiman, P., Wook, T., & Osman, K. (2019). 21st Century skills mastery amongst science foundation programme students. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol, 9(1), 46. Retrieved from https://shorturl.asia/v7SyJ

Turner, J., Bone, A., & Ashton, J. (2018). Reasons why law students should have access to learning law through a skills-based approach. The Law Teacher, 52(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2016.1201739

Tushar, H., & Sooraksa, N. (2023). Global employability skills in the 21st century workplace: A semi-systematic literature review. Heliyon. Retrieved from https://www.cell.com/heliyon/fulltext/S2405-8440(23)08231-2

Yadav, N., Gupta, K., & Khetrapal, V. (2018). Next education: Technology transforming education. South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, 7(1), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/2277977918754443

Zeybekoğlu, Ş., & Koğar, H. (2022). Investigation of variables explaining science literacy in PISA 2015 Turkey sample. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 13(2), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.798106

Author Biographies

Sri Luah, Universitas Terbuka

Parmin Parmin, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Widiasih Widiasih, Universitas Terbuka

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Sri Luah, Parmin Parmin, Widiasih Widiasih

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).