Epistemological Framework for Enhancing Higher-Order Cognition via Metaphorical Thinking Profiles
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v11i1.9405Published:
2025-01-31Issue:
Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025): JanuaryKeywords:
Epistemological construction, Epistemological framework, Higher-order thinking skill, Innovative learning strategy, Metaphorical thinkingReview
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
This study investigates the potential synergy between metaphorical thinking profiles and Higher-Order Thinking skills (HOTs) optimization in contemporary education. The research employs a qualitative methodology, utilizing literature review and content analysis to construct a comprehensive epistemological framework. The study's primary objective is to elucidate the relationship between symbolic thinking processes and the development of HOTs, specifically focusing on the dimensions of analysis, evaluation, and creation. The resultant conceptual framework demonstrates a strong correspondence between the stages of metaphorical thinking (including target concept identification, source domain exploration, structural mapping, elaboration, extension, evaluation, adjustment, and integration) and the core components of HOTs. These findings suggest that integrating symbolic thinking processes into educational strategies could significantly enhance HOTs development, potentially revolutionizing pedagogical approaches for the 21st century. This research contributes to the growing body of literature on cognitive skill development and offers practical implications for educators seeking innovative methods to prepare learners for the complexities of the global era.
References
Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Waddington, D. I., Wade, C. A., & Persson, T. (2015). Strategies for teaching students to think critically: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(2), 275–314.
Alhaddad, I. (2012). The application of Piaget’s mental development theory to the concept of long eternity. Infinity Journal, 1(1), 31–44.
Amin, T. G., Jeppsson, F., & Haglund, J. (2023a). Designing and evaluating instructional metaphors in physics education: A systematic approach. International Journal of Science Education, 45(5), 789–811. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2163157
Amin, T. G., Jeppsson, F., & Haglund, J. (2023b). Metaphors in science education: A systematic approach to metaphor development and evaluation. Science Education, 107(3), 456–485. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21745
Anderson, J. R., Smith, K. L., & Brown, T. H. (2021). Cognitive processing in metaphorical learning: A neuroscientific perspective. Neuroscience & Education, 15(2), 112–128.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
Bazzini, L. (2001). From grounding metaphors to technological devices: A call for legitimacy in school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47(3), 259–271.
Beaty, R. E., Silvia, P. J., & Benedek, M. (2017). Brain networks underlying novel metaphor production. Brain and Cognition, 111, 163–170.
Belova, N., Eilks, I., & Feierabend, T. (2021). The role of metaphors in science education: a systematic review. Studies in Science Education, 57(2), 127–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2020.1850510
Benedek, M., Jauk, E., Fink, A., Koschutnig, K., Reishofer, G., Ebner, F., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). To create or to recall? Neural mechanisms underlying the generation of creative new ideas. NeuroImage, 88, 125–133.
Boer, A. D. (2020). Architectural design thinking: A study of expert knowledge in the design process. Design Studies, 66, 54–77.
Boers, F. (2013). Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary: Assessment and integration. Language Teaching, 46(2), 208–224.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.
Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. ASCD.
Brown, L. M., Johnson, R. T., & Davis, S. A. (2021). Metaphorical approaches in mathematics education: Enhancing conceptual understanding. Journal of Mathematical Cognition, 7(3), 301–315.
Budsankom, P., Sawangboon, T., Damrongpanit, S., & Chuensirimongkol, J. (2015). Factors affecting higher order thinking skills of students: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling study. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(19), 2639–2652.
Burton, L. J. (2010). An interactive approach to writing essays and research reports in psychology (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Byram, M., Golubeva, I., Hui, H., & Wagner, M. (Eds.). (2017). From principles to practice in education for intercultural citizenship. Multilingual Matters.
Carreira, S. (2001). Where there’s a model, there’s a metaphor: Metaphorical thinking in students’ understanding of a mathematical model. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 3(4), 261–287.
Chen, Park, S., & Hand, B. (2021). Examining the use of juxtaposition and analogy in science teaching: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Science Education, 43(10), 1611–1634. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1918354
Chen, X., Xie, H., & Hwang, G. J. (2022). A systematic review of metaphor-based instruction in science education: Implications for conceptual understanding and problem-solving skills. Educational Research Review, 35, 100411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100411
Chen, Xie, & Hwang. (2022). The role of metaphorical thinking in science learning: A meta-analytic review. Educational Research Review, 36, 100441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100441
Chen, Y., Liu, X., & Wang, Z. (2022). Trends in cognitive science research: The role of symbolic thinking. Cognitive Science, 46(5), 1089–1105.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
Davis, E. M., Wilson, J. K., & Taylor, R. S. (2021). Creating engaging learning environments through symbolic thinking strategies. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(4), 2145–2162.
Davis, L., Wilson, J., & Taylor, S. (2021). Symbolic thinking and critical pedagogy in 21st-century education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(4), 456–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2021.1234567
Deardorff, D. K. (2015). Intercultural competence: Mapping the future research agenda. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 48, 3–5.
Dolunay, S. K., & Savas, Ö. (2016). The effect of active learning techniques on listening skills. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 8(2), 45–57.
Duit, R., Gropengießer, H., Kattmann, U., Komorek, M., & Parchmann, I. (2020). The model of educational reconstruction – A framework for improving teaching and learning science. In D. F. Treagust, R. Duit, & H. E. Fischer (Eds.), Multiple Representations in Physics Education (pp. 13–37). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28698-4_2
Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 43–52.
Erlingsson, C., & Brysiewicz, P. (2022). A hands-on guide to doing content analysis. African Journal of Emergency Medicine, 12(3), 422–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2022.04.004
Fauzi, A., Zainuddin, Z., & Atok, R. (2020). Enhancing students’ creativity through STEAM project-based learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(2), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i2.23209
Fernandez-Rio, J., Heras, E., González-Víllora, S., Trillo, A. V, & Hortigüela-Alcalá, D. (2022). Gamification and game-based learning to promote higher order thinking skills: A systematic review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 43, 100990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.100990
García-Martín, J., & García-Sánchez, J. N. (2020). The effectiveness of four instructional approaches used in a MOOC promoting personal skills for success in life. Computers & Education, 149, 103813.
García-Rodríguez, M., López-Martínez, A., & Sánchez-García, J. (2022). Symbolic thinking across disciplines: A comparative analysis. Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 11(2), 178–195.
Gelder, T. (2005). Teaching critical thinking: Some lessons from cognitive science. College Teaching, 53(1), 41–46.
Gentner, D., & Maravilla, F. (2018a). Analogical reasoning. In L. J. Ball & V. A. Thompson (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 186–203). Routledge.
Gentner, D., & Maravilla, R. (2018b). Metaphor, analogy, and reasoning with relational structure. Psychological Review, 125(4), 547–576. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000111
Gentner, D., & Smith, L. (2012). Analogical reasoning. In V. S. Ramachandran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Human Behavior (2nd ed., pp. 130–136). Elsevier.
Gibbs, R. W. (2017). Metaphor wars: Conceptual metaphors in human life. Cambridge University Press.
Glucksberg, S. (2017a). The psycholinguistics of metaphor. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(4), 285–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.01.005
Glucksberg, S. (2017b). Understanding figurative language: From metaphor to idioms. Oxford University Press.
Guarino, C. M., Levy, D. M., & Wang, C. (2023). Interdisciplinary perspectives on educational research: A systematic review of methodological trends. Review of Educational Research, 93(1), 136–172. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543221134475
Guo, L., Zhang, Y., & Li, H. (2021). Metaphor use in science education: A systematic review. International Journal of Science Education, 43(8), 1267–1285.
Hattie, J. (2015). The applicability of Visible Learning to higher education. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 1(1), 79–91.
Heijltjes, A., Gog, T., Leppink, J., & Paas, F. (2014). Improving critical thinking: Effects of dispositions and instructions on economics students’ reasoning skills. Learning and Instruction, 29, 31–42.
Heijltjes, A., Hooijdonk, C. M. J., & Paas, F. (2014). Designing argument mapping-based training to improve critical thinking. Learning and Instruction, 32, 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.01.005
Hendriana, H. (2012). Pembelajaran matematika humanis dengan metaphorical thinking untuk meningkatkan kepercayaan diri siswa. Infinity Journal, 1(1), 90–103.
Heong, Y. M., Othman, W. B., Md Yunos, J. B., Kiong, T. T., Hassan, R. B., & Mohamad, M. M. B. (2020). The Level of Marzano Higher Order Thinking Skills among Technical Education Students. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 11(6), 309–324.
Hernández-López, C., García-Sánchez, E., & Martínez-Gómez, R. (2022a). Integrating symbolic thinking in educational curricula: Challenges and opportunities. Curriculum Studies, 54(6), 815–832.
Hernández-López, García-Sánchez, J., & Martínez-Gómez, P. (2022b). Symbolic thinking and cognitive development in contemporary education. Educational Psychology, 42(5), 601–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2022.2056789
Hill, C. J., Bloom, H. S., Black, A. R., & Lipsey, M. W. (2008). Empirical benchmarks for interpreting effect sizes in research. Child Development Perspectives, 2(3), 172–177.
Holyoak, K. J., & Stamenković, D. (2018a). Metaphor comprehension: A computational perspective. Psychological Review, 125(2), 156–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000098
Holyoak, K. J., & Stamenković, D. (2018b). Metaphor comprehension: A critical review of theories and evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 144(6), 641–671.
Huang, K., Ge, X., & Eseryel, D. (2020). Metaconceptually-enhanced simulation-based inquiry learning: Effects on the 8th grade students’ conceptual change and science epistemological beliefs. Instructional Science, 48(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-019-09485-2
Huber, C. R., & Kuncel, N. R. (2016). Does college teach critical thinking? A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 431–468.
Jamrozik, A., McQuire, M., Cardillo, E. R., & Chatterjee, A. (2016). Metaphor: Bridging embodiment to abstraction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 1080–1089.
Jeppsson, F., Haglund, J., & Amin, T. G. (2022). Metaphor and analogy in physics education: A meta-analysis of their effects on conceptual understanding and transfer. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 18(1), 13101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.013101
Johnson, A. R., & Lee, S. Y. (2021). Rethinking Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Assessment in the Digital Age. Computers & Education, 168, 104212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104212
Johnson, R. M., Williams, S. T., & Brown, A. L. (2021). The impact of metaphorical instruction on problem-solving skills: A quantitative analysis. Educational Psychology, 41(7), 889–904.
Kamarudin, M. F., Sidik, S. M., Majid, F. A., Zain, N. M., & Abdullah, N. (2019). Developing higher order thinking skills (HOTS) assessment instrument for Malaysian technical universities. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 11(1), 73–81.
Kim, S. J., & Park, J. H. (2022). Cognitive flexibility and metaphorical thinking: Implications for educational practice. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 6(3), 275–289.
Kovalenko, N., & Ivanov, S. (2023). Symbolic thinking strategies in the digital age: Adapting educational approaches. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 32(2), 215–231.
Kövecses, Z. (2020). Extended conceptual metaphor theory. Cambridge University Press.
Krulik, S., & Rudnick, J. A. (1993). Reasoning and problem solving: A handbook for elementary school teachers. Allyn and Bacon.
Kusuma, M. D., Rosidin, U., Abdurrahman, A., & Suyatna, A. (2021). The Development of Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) Instrument Assessment in Physics Study. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 145–162.
Kuswana, W. S. (2012). Taksonomi kognitif: Perkembangan ragam berpikir. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Lai, E. R. (2011). Critical thinking: A literature review. Pearson’s Research Reports, 6, 40–41.
Lai, E. R. (2013). Metacognition: A literature review. Always Learning: Pearson Research Report, 24(1), 1–40.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2020). Metaphors we live by (Updated). University of Chicago Press.
Landau, M. J., Zhong, C. B., & Swanson, T. J. (2018). Conceptual metaphors shape consumer psychology. Consumer Psychology Review, 1(1), 54–71.
Lee, S. H., Kim, J. Y., & Park, C. S. (2021). The role of symbolic thinking in developing higher-order cognitive skills: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 33, 100385.
Leung, A. K. Y., Lee, S. L., & Chiu, C. Y. (2014). Meta-knowledge of culture promotes cultural competence. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(10), 1397–1414.
Li, X., & Wang, Y. (2022). Metaphorical approaches in mathematics education: A review of empirical studies. ZDM Mathematics Education, 54(3), 539–553.
Lipsey, M. W., Puzio, K., Yun, C., Hebert, M. A., Steinka-Fry, K., Cole, M. W., Roberts, M., Anthony, K. S., & Busick, M. D. (2012). Translating the statistical representation of the effects of education interventions into more readily interpretable forms. National Center for Special Education Research.
Littlemore, J., Chen, P. T., Koester, A., & Barnden, J. (2014). Difficulties in metaphor comprehension faced by international students whose first language is not English. Applied Linguistics, 35(4), 416–444.
Liu, O. L., Frankel, L., & Roohr, K. C. (2014). Assessing critical thinking in higher education: Current state and directions for next‐generation assessment. ETS Research Report Series, 2014(1), 1–23.
López-González, M. A., Rodríguez-Sánchez, P., & Fernández-Martínez, C. (2023a). Cognitive science and educational psychology: Emerging trends in symbolic thinking research. Educational Psychology Review, 35(1), 15–32.
López-González, Rodríguez-Sánchez, M., & Fernández-Martínez, A. (2023b). Cognitive development through symbolic thinking. Cognitive Science, 47(4), 567–590. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13245
Lyn, D., Cowie, B., & Otrel-Cass, K. (2013). Developing an understanding of higher order thinking skills: Lessons from the classroom. Teaching Science, 59(3), 39–45.
Marzano, R. J. (1994). A different kind of classroom: Teaching with dimensions of learning. ASCD.
Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., & Stewart, L. A. (2020). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 9(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
Moreno, R., García, A., & López, M. (2022). Enhancing higher-order thinking skills through symbolic learning: A longitudinal study. Learning and Instruction, 78, 101542.
Müller, K., Schmidt, H., & Weber, G. (2022). Leveraging metaphor and symbolism in educational settings: Best practices and challenges. Teaching and Teacher Education, 111, 103621.
Nacey, S. (2020). Metaphors in learner English. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Nakamura, K., Tanaka, S., & Ito, H. (2023). The influence of metaphorical thinking on cognitive development: A neurodevelopmental perspective. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 59, 101155.
Narayanan, S., & Adithan, M. (2015). Analysis of question papers in engineering courses with respect to HOTS (Higher Order Thinking Skills. American Journal of Engineering Education, 6(1), 1–10.
Nguyen, T. H., & Tran, L. T. (2023). Symbolic thinking in interdisciplinary contexts: Implications for higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 48(5), 989–1004.
Oktaviani, L., Irawan, B., & Murtono, M. (2021). Metaphorical Thinking Approach to Improve Students’ Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1), 12101.
Olsen-Rong, E., Kim, J., & Park, H. (2022). Metaphorical thinking in higher education: Critical thinking development. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(4), 678–695. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1987654
Olsen-Rong, T., Smith, J., & Brown, K. (2022). Integrating metaphorical thinking in higher education curricula: Impact on critical thinking skills. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(3), 742–756.
Pappas, E., Pierrakos, O., & Nagel, R. (2013). Using Bloom’s Taxonomy to teach sustainability in multiple contexts. Journal of Cleaner Production, 48, 54–64.
Patel, R., & Singh, A. (2022). Metaphorical instruction in science classrooms: Impact on conceptual understanding. Research in Science Education, 52(4), 1105–1121.
Podolefsky, N. S., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2019). Use of analogy in learning physics: The role of representations. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(2), 20148. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020148
Porto, M., & Byram, M. (2015). A curriculum for action in the community and intercultural citizenship in higher education. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(3), 226–242.
Prayitno, B. A., Suciati, S., & Titikusumawati, E. (2022). Empowering Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills through Guided Inquiry-Based Learning. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 21(3), 405–418.
Ramirez, G., Chen, X., & Geva, E. (2023). Cross-linguistic influence in metaphor comprehension: Implications for science education. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 26(1), 147–160.
Ramos, J. L. S., Dolipas, B. B., & Villamor, B. B. (2013). Higher order thinking skills and academic performance in physics of college students: A regression analysis. International Journal of Innovative Interdisciplinary Research, 4(1), 48–60.
Resnick, L. B. (1987). Education and learning to think. National Academy Press.
Richland, L. E., & Simms, N. (2015). Analogy, higher order thinking, and education. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 6(2), 177–192.
Rodriguez-Moreno, D., Hirsch, P., & Bock, K. (2021). Analogical reasoning and metaphorical thinking in childhood: A longitudinal study of their relationship to higher-order cognition. Cognitive Development, 57, 100968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2020.100968
Salbiah, M. S., Puteh, M., & Adnan, M. (2015). A review of higher order thinking skills (HOTS) in mathematics teaching and learning. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1660(1), 50037.
Sanchez-Ruiz, M. J., Pérez-González, J. C., & Petrides, K. V. (2013). Trait emotional intelligence and creativity: The mediating role of optimism. Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(1), 27–35.
Saputri, A. C., Sajidan, S., & Rinanto, Y. (2019). The implementation of problem-based learning to improve students’ critical thinking skills and conceptual understanding of the nature of science. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1227(1), 12037. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1227/1/012037
Sato, Y., Tanaka, K., & Watanabe, M. (2023). Enhancing mathematical problem-solving through metaphorical thinking: A Japanese perspective. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 54(5), 815–831.
Schneider, M., Fischer, F., & Kaplan, J. (2024). Symbolic thinking in digital learning environments: Opportunities and challenges. Computers & Education, 180, 104432.
Scott, C. L. (2015). The futures of learning 2: What kind of learning for the 21st century? UNESCO Education Research and Foresight Working Papers.
Shirazi, M. G., & Talebinezhad, M. R. (2013). Developing intermediate EFL learners’ metaphorical competence through exposure. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(1), 135–141.
Smith, J., Johnson, A., & Williams, R. (2023). The impact of higher-order thinking skills on industrial innovation and productivity: A cross-sector analysis. Journal of Applied Cognitive Psychology, 37(2), 145–160.
Smith, J., & Jones, K. (2024). Cognitive development through metaphorical learning. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 47(2), 201–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2024.1234567
Smith, J. L., & Jones, R. K. (2024). Cultivating higher-order thinking skills through symbolic learning strategies: A comprehensive review. Review of Educational Research, 94(1), 3–35.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Spitzberg, B. H., & Changnon, G. (2009). Conceptualizing intercultural competence. In D. K. Deardorff (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of intercultural competence (pp. 2–52). Sage Publications.
Sunito, I. (2013). Metaphorming: Some Creative Thinking Strategies. Indeks.
Takahashi, R., & Yamamoto, K. (2022). The role of metaphor in facilitating abstract thinking: Evidence from cognitive psychology. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 43, 100968.
Tan, S. Y., Zou, L., Wijaya, T. T., Suci, N., & Dewi, S. (2021). Improving student’s creative thinking ability through higher order thinking skills-oriented learning. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(1), 121–132.
Thibodeau, Matlock, & Flusberg. (2019). Looking through metaphorical glasses: The impact of metaphor usage on cognitive processes. Cognitive Science, 43(7), 12766. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12766
Thibodeau, P. H., & Boroditsky, L. (2011). Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PLoS ONE, 6(2), 16782.
Thibodeau, P. H., Hendricks, R. K., & Boroditsky, L. (2019). How Linguistic Metaphor Scaffolds Reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(5), 384–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.03.004
Ting-Toomey, S., & Dorjee, T. (2019). Communicating across cultures. Guilford Publications.
Tiruneh, D. T., Cock, M., Weldeslassie, A. G., Elen, J., & Janssen, R. (2018). Measuring critical thinking in physics: Development and validation of a critical thinking test in electricity and magnetism. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(7), 1349–1368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9842-2
Tiruneh, D. T., Verburgh, A., & Elen, J. (2014). Effectiveness of critical thinking instruction in higher education: A systematic review of intervention studies. Higher Education Studies, 4(1), 1–17.
Vui, T. (2001). Practice trends and issues in the teaching and learning of mathematics in the countries. SEAMEO-RECSAM.
Wan, & Chiu, C. Y. (2023a). Metaphorical thinking profiles in educational design: A critical review. Educational Research Review, 39, 100472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100472
Wan, Z. H., & Chiu, M. H. (2023b). Metaphor and analogy in science education: A critical review and research agenda. International Journal of Science Education, 45(3), 349–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2163156
Weinberg, A., Wiesner, E., & Fukawa-Connelly, T. (2021). Students’ sensemaking in learning linear algebra: Conceptual metaphor theory as an analytical lens. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 62, 100850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2021.100850
Wilson, A. D., Thompson, R. L., & Anderson, S. J. (2023). Bridging concrete and abstract thinking: The power of metaphor in education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 17(1), 78–91.
Winarti, W., Rahmini, Y., & Almakadevi, A. (2020). The effectiveness of inquiry-based learning to train students’ higher-order thinking skills in science learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1567(4), 42057. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/4/042057
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2021). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
Xu, F., & Gong, T. (2021). The cognitive science of metaphor: A review and synthesis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(11), 981–995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.08.004
Xu, Z., Chen, X., & Liu, J. (2020). Metaphor-based instruction in science education: A study on conceptual understanding and problem-solving skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 100687.
Xu, Zhang, X., & Duan, H. (2020). The role of metaphorical thinking in the creativity of scientific hypotheses. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 100676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100676
Yao, L., & Li, W. (2024). Cognitive science perspectives on symbolic thinking: Implications for educational theory and practice. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 28(2), 140–155.
Zhang, L., & Chen, H. (2023). Symbolic thinking and its role in fostering creativity: A cross-cultural study. Creativity Research Journal, 35(1), 78–92.
Zhang, L., Wang, S., & Zhou, W. (2020). Towards Effective Assessment of Higher Order Thinking Skills: A Comprehensive Review and Development of Assessment Framework. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(4), 466–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1662389
Zhang, Sternberg, R. J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2023). Creative metaphorical thinking and problem solving in science. Journal of Creative Behavior, 57(1), 86–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.519
Zhang, Y., Liu, J., & Wang, Z. (2023). The impact of metaphor-based instruction on critical thinking skills: A quasi-experimental study. Instructional Science, 51(2), 259–277.
Zhu, Y., & Wang, X. (2021). The influence of cognitive styles on the effectiveness of metaphorical instruction in physics: A longitudinal study. Learning and Individual Differences, 85, 101957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101957
Zohar, A., & Agmon, V. A. (2018). Raising test scores vs. teaching higher order thinking (HOT): Senior science teachers’ views on how several concurrent policies affect classroom practices. Research in Science & Technological Education, 36(2), 243–260. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1395332
Author Biographies
Luvia Ranggi Nastiti, IAIN Palangka Raya
Hadma Yuliani, State Islamic Institute of Palangkaraya
Yokhebed, Tanjung Pura University
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Luvia Ranggi Nastiti, Hadma Yuliani, Yokhebed

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).