Mind Map-Assisted STEM Integration to Enhance Students' Science Skills in the 21st Century: A Literature Review
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v10i12.9480Published:
2024-12-27Issue:
Vol. 10 No. 12 (2024): DecemberKeywords:
Mind map, Science, STEMReview
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
Creative thinking skills help students develop new ideas and concepts, imagine, find interrelated relationships, and have multiple perspectives on something. If their creative thinking skills are lacking, students will face difficulties in solving problems or learning questions. Mind Mapping helps organize numbers, letters, words, ideas, concepts, and other items so that they are not lost shortly. This helps students understand and develop creative thinking in science learning in the 21st century. Where the purpose of the study is to examine the Integration of Mind MAP in STEM to Improve Students' Science Skills in the 21st Century: Literature Review. This review was conducted based on state-of-the-art methods using the guidelines for preferred reporting items for reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA). The results of this study explain the Description of STEM Content (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics); Benefits of the STEM Learning Method, namely (Improving Skills, Motivating Children, Self-Evaluation, Fun Learning, Important Pillars); Advantages of the Mind Mapping Learning Model (Can express opinions freely; Notes are more concise and clear; Easier to find notes if needed; Notes are more focused on the core material; Easy to see the overall picture; Disadvantages of the Mind Mapping Learning Model (It takes longer to "see" the relationship between one idea and another. Often, material that is just a repetition of what was previously overlooked).
References
Astawan, I. G., Suarjana, I. M., Werang, B. R., Asaloei, S. I., Sianturi, M., & Elele, E. C. (2023). STEM-Based Scientific Learning and Its Impact on Students’ Critical and Creative Thinking Skills: An Empirical Study. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 12(3), 482–492. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v12i3.46882
Ayu Maharrany, A., Tukiran, & Kuntjoro, S. (2022). Profile of Mind Mapping Utilization in Learning During 2018-2022. IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 3(3), 288–300. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v3i3.212
Barak, M., Ginzburg, T., & Erduran, S. (2024). Nature of Engineering: A Cognitive and Epistemic Account with Implications for Engineering Education. Science & Education, 33(3), 679–697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00402-7
Bayanova, A. R., Orekhovskaya, N. A., Sokolova, N. L., Shaleeva, E. F., Knyazeva, S. A., & Budkevich, R. L. (2023). Exploring the role of motivation in STEM education: A systematic review. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(4), em2250. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13086
Busyairi, A., Zuhdi, M., & Makhrus, M. (2022). The Analysis of Concept Mastering and Creative Thinking Skills of Prospective Physics Teachers Post-Online Learning During the Covid-19 Pandemic. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 7(4b). https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v7i4b.958
Caspi, A., Gorsky, P., Nitzani-Hendel, R., & Shildhouse, B. (2023). STEM-oriented primary school children: Participation in informal STEM programs and career aspirations. International Journal of Science Education, 45(11), 923–945. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2177977
Chen, Y., So, W. W. M., Zhu, J., & Chiu, S. W. K. (2024). STEM learning opportunities and career aspirations: The interactive effect of students’ self-concept and perceptions of STEM professionals. International Journal of STEM Education, 11(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00466-7
Chiarello, F., Belingheri, P., & Fantoni, G. (2021). Data science for engineering design: State of the art and future directions. Computers in Industry, 129, 103447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2021.103447
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
Debora, R., & Pramono, R. (2021). Implementation of STEM Learning Method to Develop Children’s Critical Thinking and Problem-Solving Skills. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 6(3), 1221–1232. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v6i3.1722
Deeken, C., Neumann, I., & Heinze, A. (2020). Mathematical Prerequisites for STEM Programs: What Do University Instructors Expect from New STEM Undergraduates? International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 6(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-019-00098-1
Fadillah, R. (2019). Students’ Perception of the Use Of Mind Mapping Application Software In Learning Writing. Celtic: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching, Literature and Linguistics, 6(1), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.22219/celtic.v6i1.8755
Feng, R., Alsager, H. N., Azizi, Z., & Sarabani, L. (2023). Impact of mind-mapping technique on EFL learners’ vocabulary recall and retention, learning motivation, and willingness to communicate. Heliyon, 9(6), e16560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16560
Forte-Celaya, J., Ibarra, L., & Glasserman-Morales, L. D. (2021). Analysis of Creative Thinking Skills Development under Active Learning Strategies. Education Sciences, 11(10), 621. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100621
Gravemeijer, K., Stephan, M., Julie, C., Lin, F.-L., & Ohtani, M. (2017). What Mathematics Education May Prepare Students for the Society of the Future? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(S1), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9814-6
Hanggrasawani, F. T., Buana, T. Y., Swari, D. R. N., Nugrahaeni, D. A., & Faradisa, F. (2024). Students’ Perception of Using Mind Maps to Improve Students’ Writing Ability. JELITA: Journal of Education, Language Innovation, and Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.37058/jelita.v3i1.7649
Hsiao, P.-W., & Su, C.-H. (2021). A Study on the Impact of STEAM Education for Sustainable Development Courses and Its Effects on Student Motivation and Learning. Sustainability, 13(7), 3772. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073772
Hu, X., Fang, Y., & Liang, Y. (2024). Roles and Effect of Digital Technology on Young Children’s STEM Education: A Scoping Review of Empirical Studies. Education Sciences, 14(4), 357. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14040357
Ichsan, I., Suharyat, Y., Santosa, T. A., & Satria, E. (2023). Effectiveness of STEM-Based Learning in Teaching 21st Century Skills in Generation Z Student in Science Learning: A Meta-Analysis. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(1), 150–166. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i1.2517
Indriyani, N., Erita, Y., Undari, M., & Sanjaya, W. (2022). Comparison of Civics and Social Studies Learning Design Models in Various Countries at the Elementary School Level. Journal of Digital Learning and Distance Education, 1(7), 258-269. https://doi.org/10.56778/jdlde.v1i7.44
Istiana, R., Herawati, D., Herniningtyas, F., Ichsan, I. Z., & Ali, A. (2023). STEM Learning to Improve Problem-Solving Ability on the Topic of Environmental Education. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(3), 1202–1208. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i3.2979
Juliana, N. O., Hui, H. J., Clement, M., Solomon, E. N., & Elvis, O. K. (2021). The Impact of Creativity and Innovation on Entrepreneurship Development: Evidence from Nigeria. Open Journal of Business and Management, 09(04), 1743–1770. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2021.94095
Karakaya, F., & Yılmaz, M. (2022). Teachers view on assessment and evaluation methods in STEM education: A science course example. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 2. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202213526
Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
Khessina, O. M., Goncalo, J. A., & Krause, V. (2018). It’s time to sober up: The direct costs, side effects, and long-term consequences of creativity and innovation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 38, 107–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2018.11.003
Khoiri, A. (2019). Meta-Analysis Study: Effect of STEM (Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics) towards Achievement. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v9i1.2937
Kholid, M. N., Mahmudah, M. H., Ishartono, N., Putra, F. G., & Forthmann, B. (2024). Classification of students’ creative thinking for non-routine mathematical problems. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2394738. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2394738
Leung, W. M. V. (2023). STEM Education in Early Years: Challenges and Opportunities in Changing Teachers’ Pedagogical Strategies. Education Sciences, 13(5), 490. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13050490
Lin, K.-Y., Wu, Y.-T., Hsu, Y.-T., & Williams, P. J. (2021). Effects of infusing the engineering design process into STEM project-based learning to develop preservice technology teachers’ engineering design thinking. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00258-9
Lubna, L., & Kumala, F. Z. (2023). The Influence of Team Teaching Learning Model by Mind Mapping Method on the Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability. Journal of Education and Learning Mathematics Research (JELMaR), 4(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.37303/jelmar.v4i1.98
Luthfia, S. (2024). Enhancement of Creative Thinking skills using a Creative Problem-Solving Learning Model. International Journal of Education and Teaching Zone, 3(1), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.57092/ijetz.v3i1.197
Ma, X., Jia, Y., Jiang, X., & Nie, Z. (2022). Research on the Application of Mind Mapping in Promoting English Learning Efficiency of High School Art and Sports Specialty Students. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 10(06), 335–358. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2022.106025
Mashudi, M., & Pristine Adi, D. (2024). Implementation of Mind Mapping Learning Model in Improving Student Learning Outcomes at Pesantren Al-Falah Wuluhan Jember Elementary School. At-Ta’dib, 19(1), 155–175. https://doi.org/10.21111/attadib.v19i1.10066
Metekohy, L. M., Daliman, M., Metekohy, B., & Ming, D. (2022). The impact of teaching and learning quality process to school and university education for sustainable future. JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia), 8(1), 143. https://doi.org/10.29210/020221203
Montag-Smit, T., & Maertz, C. P. (2017). Searching outside the box in creative problem solving: The role of creative thinking skills and domain knowledge. Journal of Business Research, 81, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.07.021
Mou, T.-Y. (2024). The practice of visual storytelling in STEM: Influence of creative thinking training on design students’ creative self-efficacy and motivation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 51, 101459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101459
Naibaho, L. (2022). The integration of mind mapping strategy on students’ essay writing at universities Kristen Indonesia. JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia), 8(2), 320. https://doi.org/10.29210/020221678
Nursafitri, A. D., & Anriani, N. (2023). The Effect of Learning Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) on the Ability to Understand the Material Concepts of Lines and Angles. Journal of Medives : Journal of Mathematics Education IKIP Veteran Semarang, 7(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.31331/medivesveteran.v7i1.2240
Osborne, J., & Allchin, D. (2024). Science literacy in the twenty-first century: Informed trust and the competent outsider. International Journal of Science Education, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2331980
Oschepkov, A. A., Kidinov, A. V., Babieva, N. S., Vrublevskiy, A. S., Egorova, E. V., & Zhdanov, S. P. (2022). STEM technology-based model helps create an educational environment for developing students’ technical and creative thinking. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(5), em2110. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12033
Permanasari, A., Rubini, B., Pursitasari, I. D., Nurramadhani, A., Hadiana, D., Suwarma, I. R., & Kumano, Y. (2024). Fun Classroom: How Seven Graders and Science Teachers Respond to STEM Learning as the First Experience in Suburban Area? Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 13(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v13i1.47386
Polat, Ö., & Aydın, E. (2020). The effect of mind mapping on young children’s critical thinking skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38, 100743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100743
Razak, A., Santosa, T. A., Lufri, L., & Irdawati, I. (2024). The Influence of the Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics Approach with Mind Maps on the Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) of Students in Biology Learning Class X SMA N 4 Kerinci. International Journal of Education and Literature, 3(1), 75-82. https://doi.org/10.55606/ijel.v3i1.34
Safitri, E. (2023). A Comprehensive of the Guided Inquiry Learning Model in Education: A Review. Journal Of Digital Learning And Distance Education, 2(7). https://doi.org/10.56778/jdlde.v2i7.268
Sari, R. A., & Murdiono, M. (2021). The Effect of the Implementation of Mind Mapping Method on Critical Thinking Skills in Civic Education Learning. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 10(3), 505. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v10i3.30555
Sekarini, A. P., Wiyanto, W., & Ellianawati, E. (2020). Analysis of Problem-Based Learning Model with Mind Mapping to Increase 21st Century Skills. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 9(3), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.15294/jise.v9i1.36843
Sun, M., Wang, M., Wegerif, R., & Peng, J. (2022). How do students generate ideas together in scientific creativity tasks through computer-based mind mapping? Computers & Education, 176, 104359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104359
Tanta, Megawati, R., & Akobiarek, M. (2023). Analysis of Difficulties of Science Teachers in Jayapura City in Conducting Class Action Research. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(10), 8772–8783. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.5094
Ye, H., Liang, B., Ng, O.-L., & Chai, C. S. (2023). Integration of computational thinking in K-12 mathematics education: A systematic review on CT-based mathematics instruction and student learning. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00396-w
Zulirfan, Z., & Yennita, Y. (2022). Feasibility test of STEM at-home prototype kit as science project-based learning media for Junior High School students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i1.1122
Author Biographies
Pradicta Nurhuda, National Research and Innovation Agency
Ruth Megawati, Universitas Cenderawasih
Sudirman, Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin
Risnawati Agustin, Radinka Jaya Utama Institute
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Pradicta Nurhuda, Ruth Megawati, Sudirman, Risnawati Agustin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).