Trend of Creative Thinking Researches in Chemistry Education from Research Design to Data Analysis: A Literature Review
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v10i12.9504Published:
2024-12-26Issue:
Vol. 10 No. 12 (2024): DecemberKeywords:
Creative thinking, Chemistry education, Creative thinking skills, Literature reviewReview
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
Creative thinking is a skill needed to meet the demands of the 21st century. The complexity of learning chemistry requires students to have creative thinking skills to solve the problems they will face. This research aims to gather information about various studies that discuss creative thinking skills. The research method employed in this study involves a literature review with content analysis of several articles, focusing on the entirety of articles published from 2015 to 2024, all of which are indexed by Scopus. A total of 15 articles were reviewed after a screening process according to the inclusion criteria. The results showed that among these publications, the predominant research design was quantitative. The majority of the research subjects were undergraduate students, with biochemistry being the most frequently observed topic. The problem-based learning (PBL) method was the most commonly used, with tests, observation sheets, and interview sheets as the most common data collection instruments, along with t-tests for data analysis.
References
Acharya, Dr. S., & Bhattacharya, Dr. P. (2024). Universal Human Values In Educational Curriculum Of 21st Century. Educational Administration Theory and Practices, 30. https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i3.1785
Apriwanda, W., & Hanri, C. (2022). Level Of Creative Thinking Among Prospective Chemistry Teachers. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(2), 296–302. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i2.34572
Ariyatun, A. (2021). Analysis of Ethno-STEM Integrated Project Based Learning on Students’ Critical and Creative Thinking Skills. Journal of Educational Chemistry (JEC), 3. https://doi.org/10.21580/jec.2021.3.1.6574
Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
Bajpai, S., & Bajpai, R. (2014). Goodness of Measurement: Reliability and Validity. International Journal of Medical Science and Public Health, 3, 112. https://doi.org/10.5455/ijmsph.2013.191120133
Chusni, M., Saputro, S., Suranto, & Rahardjo, S. (2020). Review Of Critical Thinking Skill In Indonesia: Preparation Of The 21 St Century Learner. 7, 2020. https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.09.223
Coburn, C. E., & Penuel, W. R. (2016). Research–Practice Partnerships in Education: Outcomes, Dynamics, and Open Questions. Educational Researcher, 45(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16631750
Dewi, C. A., & Mashami, R. A. (2019). The Effect of Chemo-Entrepreneurship Oriented Inquiry Module on Improving Students’ Creative Thinking Ability. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(2), Article 2.
Dewi, C. A., Pahriah, P., & Purmadi, A. (2021). The Urgency of Digital Literacy for Generation Z Students in Chemistry Learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(11), 88–103. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i11.19871
Ernawati, M. D. W., Sudarmin, Asrial, Damris, M., Haryanto, Nevriansyah, E., Fitriani, R., & Putri, W. A. (2022). How Scaffolding Integrated With Problem Based Learning Can Improve Creative Thinking in Chemistry? European Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 1349–1361. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.3.1349
Ernawati, M. D. W., Yusnidar, Haryanto, Rini, E. F. S., Aldila, F. T., Haryati, T., & Perdana, R. (2023). Do creative thinking skills in problem-based learning benefit from scaffolding? Research Article. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 20(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2023.023
Ernawati, M., Muhammad, D., Asrial, A., & Muhaimin, M. (2019). Identifying creative thinking skills in subject matter bio-chemistry. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 8, 581. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i4.20257
Grimaldi, P. J., Mallick, D. B., Waters, A. E., & Baraniuk, R. G. (2019). Do open educational resources improve student learning? Implications of the access hypothesis. PLOS ONE, 14(3), e0212508. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212508
Herdiawan, H., Langitasari, I., & Solfarina, S. (2019). Penerapan PBL untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa pada Konsep Koloid. EduChemia (Jurnal Kimia dan Pendidikan), 4(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.30870/educhemia.v4i1.4867
Khoiri, N., Riyadi, S., Kaltsum, U., Hindarto, N., & Rusilawati, A. (2017). Teaching Creative Thinking Skills with Laboratory Work. International Journal of Science and Applied Science: Conference Series, 2(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijsascs.v2i1.16722
Kim, H., & Clasing-Manquian, P. (2023). Quasi-Experimental Methods: Principles and Application in Higher Education Research. In J. Huisman & M. Tight (Eds.), Theory and Method in Higher Education Research (Vol. 9, pp. 43–62). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2056-375220230000009003
Knapp, T. R. (2016). Why Is the One-Group Pretest–Posttest Design Still Used? Clinical Nursing Research, 25(5), 467–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1054773816666280
Kocatepe, A. (2017). Trends in Educational Research: A Content Analysis of the Studies Published in International Journal of Instruction. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Trends-in-Educational-Research-%3A-A-Content-Analysis-Kocatepe/e1fa614f71a3517857f64873b60c7e5974b6333c
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Mróz, A., & Ocetkiewicz, I. (2021). Creativity for Sustainability: How Do Polish Teachers Develop Students’ Creativity Competence? Analysis of Research Results. Sustainability, 13(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020571
Nuswowati, M., Susilaningsih, E., Ramlawati, R., & Kadarwati, S. (2017). Implementation of Problem-Based Learning with Green Chemistry Vision to Improve Creative Thinking Skill and Students’ Creative Actions. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i2.9467
Putri, Y. S., & Alberida, H. (2022). Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif Peserta Didik Kelas X Tahun Ajaran 2021/2022 di SMAN 1 Pariaman: (Creative Thinking Skills Class X Students for the 2021/2022 Academic Year at SMAN 1 Pariaman). BIODIK, 8(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.22437/bio.v8i2.17356
Rawung, W. H., Katuuk, D. A., Rotty, V. N. J., & Lengkong, J. S. J. (2021). Kurikulum dan Tantangannya pada Abad 21. Jurnal Bahana Manajemen Pendidikan, 10(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.24036/jbmp.v10i1
Robinson, S. K. (2012). Learning to be Creative. In Out of our Minds: Learning to be Creative (pp. 245–283). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780857086549.ch10
Santos, V., & Arroio, A. (2016). The representational levels: Influences and contributions to research in chemical education. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13, 3–18. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10153a
Sihaloho, M., Tungkagi, I. R., Ischak, N. I., Purwati, D. B., & Kilo, A. L. (2022). Students’ Creative Thinking Skills on Reaction Rate Topic through Contextual Teaching and Learning Model. JTK (Jurnal Tadris Kimiya), 7(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.15575/jtk.v7i1.18326
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Soh, M. T., Kamisah, O., & Arsad, N. M. (2010). The relationship of 21st-century skills on students’ attitude and perception towards physics. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7, 546-554. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.073
Sumarni, W., & Kadarwati, S. (2020). Ethno-Stem Project-Based Learning: Its Impact to Critical and Creative Thinking Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i1.21754
Sumarni, W., Rumpaka, D., Wardani, S., & Sumarti, S. (2021). STEM-PBL-Local Culture: Can It Improve Prospective Teachers’ Problem-solving and Creative Thinking Skills? Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 3, 70–79. https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v3i2.65
Suradika, A., Dewi, H. I., & Nasution, M. I. (2023). Project-Based Learning and Problem-Based Learning Models in Critical and Creative Students. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 12(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v12i1.39713
Susetyarini, E., & Fauzi, A. (2020). Trend of Critical Thinking Skill Researches in Biology Education Journals across Indonesia: From Research Design to Data Analysis. International Journal of Instruction, 13, 535–550. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13135a
Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21 st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.668938
Wiyarsi, A., Sutrisno, H., & Rohaeti, E. (2018). The effect of multiple representation approach on students’ creative thinking skills: A case of ‘Rate of Reaction’ topic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097, 012054. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012054
Author Biographies
Baiq Miftah Azumi, Yogyakarta State University
Siti Aisyah, Yogyakarta State University
Eli Rohaeti, Yogyakarta State University
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Baiq Miftah Azumi, Siti Aisyah, Eli Rohaeti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).