Student Learning Styles in The Industrial Revolution 4.0
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v7iSpecialIssue.972Published:
2021-12-06Issue:
Vol. 7 No. SpecialIssue (2021): DecemberKeywords:
learning style, visual, auditory, Kinesthetic, Industrial revolution 4.0Review
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
The industrial revolution 4.0 in the field of education provides convenience in learning methods and processes. Internet-based technology makes it easier for students to learn independently, quickly in providing feedback, and freely choose material from library sources from anywhere. As a result, student learning styles change along with the development of internet-based technology. In the coursework, students can read and combine various writings from several sources, and in-class when students present assignments of learning materials that have been read so that they are easily understood by other students. Likewise, in completing paper assignments from lecturers, students can read various papers given by many lecturers. This happens because of the students' understanding of the assignments given by the lecturer. The purpose of this study was to identify the learning styles of students of the Biology Education Study Program, STKIP PGRI Sumatera Barat on the development of internet-based technology in the industrial revolution 4.0. This type of research is descriptive and the approach used is quantitative. The results of this study indicate that the learning style of students of the Biology Education Study Program STKIP PGRI Sumatera Barat, Padang, West Sumatra tends to be visual, namely 60.3%. The presence of internet technology and its use in an educational institution is a medium or source of learning that can be utilized by students
References
Akram Awla, H. (2014). Learning Styles and Their Relation to Teaching Styles. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(3), 241. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20140203.23
Aoun, J.E. (2018). Robot-proof: higher education in the age of artificial intelligence. US: MIT Press.
Biabani, M., & Izadpanah, S. (2019). The Study of The Relationship between Kolb’s Learning Styles, Gender, and Learning American Slang by Iranian EFL Students. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 517–538. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12233
Boström, L., & Hallin, K. (2012). Learning Style Differences between Nursing and Teaching Students in Sweden: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Higher Education, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v2n1p22
Cloete, A. (2018). Technology and Education : Challenges and Opportunities. October 2017. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v73i3.4589
De Poter, B. & Hernacki, M. (2000). Quantum learning. Yogyakarta: Kaifa.
Engels, P. T., & De Gara, C. (2010). Learning Styles of Medical Students, General Surgery Residents, and General Surgeons: Implications for Surgical Education. BMC Medical Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-10-51
Fleming, N. D., & Mills, C. (1992). Not Another Inventory, Rather A Catalyst for Reflection. To Improve The Academy, 11(1), 137-155. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/J.2334-4822.1992.Tb00213.X
Gantasala, P. V., & Gantasala, S. B. (2009). Influence of Learning Styles. International Journal of Learning, 16(9), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/cgp/v16i09/46612
Gholami, S., & Bagheri, M. S. (2013). Relationship between VAK Learning Styles and Problem-Solving Styles Regarding Gender and Students' Fields of Study. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(4), 700-706. doi: https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.4.4
Hamzah, (2008). Orientasi Baru dalam psikologi pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara [Indonesian]
Hardika, Aisyah, E. N., Raharjo, K. M., & Soraya, D. U. (2020). Transformation of the Meaning of Learning for The Millennial Generation in The Digital Era. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 14(12), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.3991/IJIM.V14I12.15579
Harvey, D., Ling, C., & Shehab, R. (2010). Comparison of student’s learning style in STEM disciplines. IIE Annual Conference and Expo 2010 Proceedings, 2010.
Jamulia, J. (2018). Identifying Students Learning Style Preferences At IAIN Ternate. International Journal of Education, 10(2), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v10i2.1631
James, W.B. & Gardner, D.L. (1995). Learning Styles: Implications for Distance Learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 67, 19-31. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.36719956705
Kaliky, P. I. (2013). Pemanfaatan Internet dalam Pembelajaran Mahasiswa di Universitas Pattimura, Ambon. Jurnal Komunika KAREBA, 2(1), 110–120. https://doi.org/10.31947/kjik.v2i1.354 [Indonesian]
Kaminski, D. A., Théroux, P. J., Lister, B. C., & Gabriele, G. A. (2005). Exploring the Link between Student Learning Styles & Grades in an Introductory Thermal-Fluids Course. In Proceedings of The 2005 American Society For Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (Pp. 10.508.1-10.508.16). American Society for Engineering Education
Kamuche, F. U. (2011). Do Learning & Teaching Styles Affect Students Performance? An Empirical Study. Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER),3(9). Doi: https://doi.org/10.19030/Jber.V3i9.2806
Lujan, H. L., & DiCarlo, S. E. (2006). First-year medical students prefer multiple learning styles. Advances in physiology education, 30(1), 13–16. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00045.2005
Nasution, S. (2008). Berbagai pendekatan dalam proses belajar dan mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara [Indonesian]
Oxford, R. (2001) Language Learning Styles and Strategies. In. M. Celce-Murcia, Ed. Teaching English As A Second Or Foreign Language (3 Rd Ed.). US A: Heinle & Heinle. Retrieved from: http://www.sciepub.com/reference/78657
Orlich, D., Harder, R., Callahan, R., Trevisan, M., & Brown, A. (2012). Teaching strategies: A guide to effective instruction. Cengage Learning.
Papilaya, J. O., & Huliselan, N. (2016). Identifikasi Gaya Belajar Mahasiswa (Identify Student Learning Styles). Jurnal Psikologi Undip, 15(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.14710/jpu.15.1.56-63
Puriwat, W., & Tripopsakul, S. (2020). Preparing for Industry 4.0-will Youths have Enough Essential Skills?: an evidence from Thailand. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1337a
Rahmatih, A., & Fauzi, A. (2020, September 30). Persepsi Mahasiswa Calon Guru Sekolah Dasar dalam Menanggapi Perkuliahan secara Daring Selama Masa Covid-19. MODELING: Jurnal Program Studi PGMI, 7(2), 143-153. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36835/modeling.v7i2.618 [Indonesian]
Sasikirani, V & Herlambang, Y.T. (2020). Urgensi Merdeka Belajar Di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0 dan Tantangan Society 5.0 E-Tech, 8(2): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.24036/et.v8i2.110765 [Indonesian]
Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution. Geneva: World Economic Forum
Schmidt, G. M., & Druehl, C. T. (2008). When Is A Disruptive Innovation Disruptive? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(4), 347–369. https://Doi.Org/10.1111/J.1540-5885.2008.00306.X
Sudria, I. B. N., Redhana, I. W., Kirna, I. M., & Aini, D. (2018). Effect of Kolb’s Learning Styles under Inductive Guided-Inquiry Learning on Learning Outcomes. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1117a
Susilo, M. Joko. (2006). Gaya belajar menjadikan makin pintar. Yogyakarta : Pinus. [Indonesian]
Widharyanto, B., & Binawan, H. (2020). Learning Style and Language Learning Strategies of Students from Various Ethnicities in Indonesia. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 39(2), 480–492. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i2.28173
Wilkinson, T., Boohan, M., & Stevenson, M. (2013). Does Learning Style Influence Academic Performance in Different Forms of Assessment? Journal Of Anatomy, 224(3), 304-308. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/Joa.12126
Yahya, M. (2018). Era Industri 4.0: Tantangan dan Peluang Perkembangan Pendidikan Kejuruan Indonesia. Orasi Ilmiah Professor bidang Ilmu Pendidikan Kejuruan Universitas Negeri Makassar Tanggal 14 Maret 2018. [Indonesian]
Yazici, H. (2005). A study of collaborative learning style and team learning performance. Education & Training, 47, 216–229. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910510592257
Author Biographies
Febri Yanti, Doctoral Program Student, Postgraduate Program, Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, West Sumatra, IndonesiaBiology Education Program, STKIP PGRI Sumatera Barat, Padang, West Sumatra, Indonesia
Biology Education Program
Lufri Lufri, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, West Sumatra, Indonesia
Biology Education Study Program
Yuni Ahda, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, West Sumatra, Indonesia
Biology Education Study Program
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Febri Yanti, Lufri Lufri, Yuni Ahda
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
